USE OF UNCERTAINTY OF MEASUREMENT IN TESTING ROHAN PERERA MSc ( UK ), ISO/IEC 17025 Technical Assessor, Metrology Consultant.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 10: The t Test For Two Independent Samples
Advertisements

The ISA for Physics What you need to revise.
Key Concepts in Evaluating Overall System Uncertainty Carroll S. Brickenkamp NVLAP Program Manager Panasonic Users Meeting June 2001.
MGT-491 QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS AND RESEARCH FOR MANAGEMENT
Enhancing Data Quality of Distributive Trade Statistics Workshop for African countries on the Implementation of International Recommendations for Distributive.
1 SSS II Lecture 1: Correlation and Regression Graduate School 2008/2009 Social Science Statistics II Gwilym Pryce
MARLAP Measurement Uncertainty
EPIDEMIOLOGY AND BIOSTATISTICS DEPT Esimating Population Value with Hypothesis Testing.
Laboratory Quality Control
1 Seventh Lecture Error Analysis Instrumentation and Product Testing.
Chapter 9: Introduction to the t statistic
Measurement System Analysis Kevin B. Craner Boise State University October 6, 2003.
Introduction to the design (and analysis) of experiments James M. Curran Department of Statistics, University of Auckland
AUDIT PROCEDURES. Commonly used Audit Procedures Analytical Procedures Analytical Procedures Basic Audit Approaches - Basic Audit Approaches - System.
Chemometrics Method comparison
V. Rouillard  Introduction to measurement and statistical analysis ASSESSING EXPERIMENTAL DATA : ERRORS Remember: no measurement is perfect – errors.
Copyright 2008 © Silliker, All Rights Reserved Interpretation of Lab Results What am I buying? What does it mean? What do I do with it?
Respected Professor Kihyeon Cho
Communication Key Skills INSET. Outline of INSET training 1. A review of the standards for all levels of communication key skill 2. Examples of portfolios.
SAMPLING DALAM PENGUJIAN PENGENDALIAN. AU defines audit sampling as the application of an audit procedure to less than 100% of the items within.
Development of An ERROR ESTIMATE P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department A Tolerance to Error Generates New Information….
The following minimum specified ranges should be considered: Drug substance or a finished (drug) product 80 to 120 % of the test concentration Content.
Unanswered Questions in Typical Literature Review 1. Thoroughness – How thorough was the literature search? – Did it include a computer search and a hand.
LECTURE 06B BEGINS HERE THIS IS WHERE MATERIAL FOR EXAM 3 BEGINS.
Standardization and Test Development Nisrin Alqatarneh MSc. Occupational therapy.
Automotive Test & Measurement Case Studies SAAMF Roadshow Durban CSIR NML Eddie Tarnow Metrologist: Torque & Automotive 14 June 2006.
American Association for Laboratory Accreditation Practical Solutions to Traceability and Uncertainty in Accreditation Presented to CITAC-NCSLI Joint Workshop.
Fundamentals of Data Analysis Lecture 10 Management of data sets and improving the precision of measurement pt. 2.
Metrology Adapted from Introduction to Metrology from the Madison Area Technical College, Biotechnology Project (Lisa Seidman)
Measurement Uncertainty Information in
Lecture 4 Basic Statistics Dr. A.K.M. Shafiqul Islam School of Bioprocess Engineering University Malaysia Perlis
Quality Control Lecture 5
S14: Analytical Review and Audit Approaches. Session Objectives To define analytical review To define analytical review To explain commonly used analytical.
Laboratory QA/QC An Overview.
CHAPTER 11 SECTION 2 Inference for Relationships.
Uncertainty of measurement & Technical Specifications SAAMF Roadshow Durban CSIR NML Eddie Tarnow Metrologist: Torque & Automotive 14 June 2006.
Williams, A.: Measurement Uncertainty© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003 In: Wenclawiak, Koch, Hadjicostas (eds.) Quality Assurance in Analytical.
Lecture 16 Section 8.1 Objectives: Testing Statistical Hypotheses − Stating hypotheses statements − Type I and II errors − Conducting a hypothesis test.
5. Quality Assurance and Calibration Quality assurance is We do to get the right answer for our purpose. Have Sufficient accuracy and precision to support.
SAAMF Roadshow Durban CSIR NML Eddie Tarnow Metrologist: Torque & Automotive 14 June 2006 ISO/TS 16949:2002 certification – Meeting the requirements of.
1 The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: Collecting and Reporting Quality Performance Data.
Validation Defination Establishing documentary evidence which provides a high degree of assurance that specification process will consistently produce.
Metrology for Chemical Analysis
Criteria for selection of a data collection instrument. 1.Practicality of the instrument: -Concerns its cost and appropriateness for the study population.
Analytical Review and Audit Approaches
Wenclawiak, B.: Fit for Purpose – A Customers View© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003 In: Wenclawiak, Koch, Hadjicostas (eds.) Quality Assurance in.
Industrial Technology Institute Test Method Validation & Verification H.P.P.S.Somasiri Principal Research Scientist / SDD-QAD /QM Industrial Technology.
LECTURE 13 QUALITY ASSURANCE METHOD VALIDATION
UNCERTAINTY OF MEASUREMENT Andrew Pascall Technical Director Integral Laboratories (Pty) Ltd
Building Valid, Credible & Appropriately Detailed Simulation Models
Recommended Guide for Determining and Reporting Uncertainties for Balances and Scales Val Miller NIST Office of Weights and Measures.
EQUIPMENT and METHOD VALIDATION
1 CURRENT PRACTICES AND FUTURE CHALLENGES IN METHODS VALIDATION – NEW AREAS OF APPLICATION THE POINT OF VIEW OF AN ACCREDITATION BODY EURACHEM Workshop.
Establishing by the laboratory of the functional requirements for uncertainty of measurements of each examination procedure Ioannis Sitaras.
Descriptive and Inferential Statistics
Chapter 16: Sample Size “See what kind of love the Father has given to us, that we should be called children of God; and so we are. The reason why the.
MSA / Gage Capability (GR&R)
26134 Business Statistics Week 5 Tutorial
Calibration of Weighing Instruments
Laboratory Quality Control
Quality Assurance: Pay Factors and Dispute Resolution
This teaching material has been made freely available by the KEMRI-Wellcome Trust (Kilifi, Kenya). You can freely download,
METHOD VALIDATION: AN ESSENTIAL COMPONENT OF THE MEASUREMENT PROCESS
Statistical Analysis Error Bars
Uncertainty of Measurement
Inter-Laboratory Comparison Exercise CPC CALIBRATION
The Quality Control Function
CHAPTER – 1.1 UNCERTAINTIES IN MEASUREMENTS.
Introduction to the design (and analysis) of experiments
A New Concept for Laboratory Quality Management Systems
Presentation transcript:

USE OF UNCERTAINTY OF MEASUREMENT IN TESTING ROHAN PERERA MSc ( UK ), ISO/IEC Technical Assessor, Metrology Consultant

REASON FOR ESTIMATING UNCERTAINTY The estimation of the uncertainty of measurement allows meaningful comparison of similar results from different laboratories or within the same laboratory comparison of results with reference values given in specifications or standards the equivalence of results to be judged by the user and avoid unnecessary and expensive repetition of test if differences are not significant UNCERTAINTY OF MEASUREMENT IS THE UNIFYING PRINCIPLE IN DATA QUALITY

REASON FOR ESTIMATING UNCERTAINTY Comparison of measurements from different batches of material will not indicate real differences in properties of performance if the observed differences could simply be within the range of the inherent variation in the test procedure. A deviation from a specified value for the properties or performance of a product may not be significant if the difference between the specified value and the test result is within the range of uncertainty. THE UNCERTAINTY OF THE RESULTS OF A TEST NEEDS TO BE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT WHEN INTERPRETING THOSE RESULTS

REASON FOR ESTIMATING UNCERTAINTY In some cases the uncertainty of measurement or test result may be quite small or insignificant. However, without a formal estimate, one might not be able to give a convincing response if the results are challenged. EVEN IF THE UNCERTAINTIES ARE CONSIDERED TO BE TOO SMALL, THEY NEED TO BE EVALUATED

REASON FOR ESTIMATING UNCERTAINTY The results of some types of test are subjected to large uncertainty where tests are carried out on samples that are themselves inconsistent in their properties. In such cases it might be asserted that even a relatively large uncertainty to be associated with the measurement may be ignored in comparison with the uncertainty due to sample variation. However, unless an estimate of the measurement uncertainty is made, the validity of such an assertions cannot be supported. THERE CAN BE INSTANCES WHERE EVEN LARGE UNCERTAINTIES MAY BE IGNORED

REASON FOR ESTIMATING UNCERTAINTY An estimation of the components contributing to the overall uncertainty of measurement or test result provides a means of establishing that the measurements made and the results obtained are valid. It may also help to confirm the tolerances included within a performance specification have been met or that the item under test is fit for the intended purpose. Results A & C may need further investigation and perhaps retesting Result B can be considered as acceptable A PROPERLY EVALUATED UNCERTAINTY HELPS TO DECIDE WHETHER THE ITEM UNDER TEST IS FIT FOR THE INTENDED PURPOSE. IT FACILITATES DECISION MAKING

REASON FOR ESTIMATING UNCERTAINTY A THOROUGH ASSESSMENT OF THE COMPONENTS CONTRIBUTING TO THE OVERALL UNCERTAINTY HELPS TO IMPROVE THE PROCEDURES AND ACCURACY OF MEASUREMENT OR TEST RESULTS. An assessment of the components contributing to the measurement uncertainty may indicate aspects of a test method to which attention should be directed in order to improve the procedure and accuracy of the measurement result and to improve the understanding of the principles of the test method. It plays a key part in method validation...\LCS\TEST METHODS\CALIBRATION OF BALANCE LCS_TM_09\LCS_WS_09_REV0.XLSX Source of uncertainty Variability interval Standard uncertainty Sensitivity coefficient Contribution to uncertainty Balance resolution mg mg 1 Balance repeatability mg mg 1 Calibration of standards mg mg 1 Drift of standards 0.02 mg mg 1 Temperature fluctuation 1 ⁰C ⁰C 0.01 mg/ ⁰C mg Off-centre loading 5 mm1.44 mm mg/mm mg Expanded uncertainty (k=2)0.016 mg

REASON FOR ESTIMATING UNCERTAINTY There is a general requirement that all accredited laboratories shall have a procedure in place to evaluate the measurement uncertainty of measurement or test results for which the laboratory holds accreditation. The degree of rigour needed in an estimation of uncertainty may differ between testing and calibration laboratories. In some cases the nature of the test method may preclude rigorous and metrologically and statistically valid calculation of measurement uncertainty. However, the laboratory is required to attempt to identify all possible sources of uncertainty and make a reasonable estimate. THANK YOU ISO/IEC THE STANDARD REQUIRES THAT ALL ACCREDITED LABORATORIES “ shall have and shall apply a procedure to estimate the uncertainty of measurement”