Compliance and Investigations Division (CID). Proposed Rules  Official establishments, and retail stores that grind raw beef products, will keep records.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Selling Eggs, Poultry and Organic Products at Farmers Markets Deanna Baldwin, Program Manager Food Quality Assurance.
Advertisements

Selling Agricultural Products at Farmer’s Markets Deanna Baldwin, Program Manager Food Quality Assurance.
FDA’s Proposed Rule under FSMA for Preventive Controls
California Department of Public Health Food and Drug Branch San Joaquin County All Hazards Workshop August 2008.
Lessons from the Food Safety Front: What if you had used peanut butter in your products? Wendy Campbell, Food Defense Coordinator Food & Drug Protection.
Country of Origin Labeling, Final Rule 2013: Labeling Provisions for Muscle Cut Covered Commodities National Chicken Council Webinar Wednesday, June 12,
ALERT: The Basics Food and Drug Administration Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition.
Controlling Listeria monocytogenes (Lm) in Retail Delicatessens
Control and response measures Dr. Christina Rundi Ministry of Health, Malaysia Foodborne Outbreak Investigation, Hanoi, 1-5 June 2009.
Food Safety and Inspection Service Pathogen Reduction/HACCP.
John Wigglesworth Total Quality May 10, 2011 John Wigglesworth Total Quality May 10, 2011 State of the Shrimp Union: “Commercial Perspective and New Traceability.
Protecting Food Safety From naturally occurring sources –Cholesterol From intentional contamination –Food terrorism 25 Chapters 10 and 11 Knutson, Penn.
Proposed Rules under the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Role of Economics in Pathogen Control Regulations Daniel Engeljohn, Ph.D. Office.
UAE Food Safety Crosses Borders Ernest Julian, Ph.D., Chief Office of Food Protection RI Department of Health February 24, 2014.
Food Safety Is Risky Business Food Safety Is Risky Business Nancy Flores, Ph.D., Extension Food Technology Specialist Various.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety Inspection Service Office of Outreach, Employee Education and Training Outreach and Partnership Division.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service National Advisory Committee on Meat and Poultry Inspection (NACMPI) Public Meeting.
Proposed Rule for Sanitary Transportation of Human and Animal Food
Proposed Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food 1.
Foodborne Outbreak and Recalls Mansour Samadpour IEH Laboratories and consulting Group Seattle, Washington Mansour Samadpour IEH Laboratories and consulting.
April 11, 2008 “Who’s Minding the Store? The Current State of Food Safety and How It Can Be Improved” Conference sponsored by Marler Clark and Stoel Rives.
Good Hygiene Practices Module 2, Module 11 Recall and Traceability.
Chapter 3 Network and System Design. Objectives After reading the chapter and reviewing the materials presented the students will be able to: Understand.
NC Food Safety and Defense Task Force Food Protection Evolution Adapting to Changing Times Terry Levee, RS, REHS Director of Food Safety Programs Food.
Prevention of Salmonella Enteritidis in Shell Eggs During Production, Storage, and Transportation FDA 2000-N-0190.
NS 440 LEGAL AND REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT IN FOOD PRODUCTION SPRING YOUNTS DAHL, MS PHD INSTRUCTOR Unit 5: Policy Considerations in Food Regulation.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service The Role of USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service to Ensure Foodborne Disease.
Food Safety …From Farm to Table By: Allison Weis
Guilt by Association: The Impact of Secondary Recalls Erin Woodom Food Compliance Officer Rapid Response Team Microbiologist Food and Drug Protection Division.
1 FSIS Notice Notice of Reassesment for E. Coli O157:H7 Control And Completion of Checklist for all beef operations.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 New FSA Tools EIAO Methodology Industry Walkthrough December 18, 2008 Washington,
Lessons Learned from the Hydrolyzed Vegetable Protein Incident Jenny Scott FDA CFSAN Office of Food Safety.
Public Meeting – Product Tracing Systems for Food Washington, D.C. December 9-10, Product Tracing Challenges: FDA Perspective Ellen F. Morrison.
Final Rule for Preventive Controls for Human Food September 16, THE FUTURE IS NOW 1.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 11 Recordkeeping: A Public Health Vulnerability.
Framing the Issue: FDA Perspective Product Tracing Sherri A. McGarry Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition Food and Drug Administration.
Proposed Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food.
Proposed Rule: 21 CFR 507 Proposed Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food 1.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Stage 1: Epidemiology and Identify the Food.
Lessons Learned from Salmonella in Eggs Outbreaks Don L. Zink, Ph.D. Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition U.S. Food & Drug Administration 1.
Daniel Engeljohn USDA, FSIS May 9, 2001
Pathogen Reduction Dialogue Panel 4 May 7, 2002 The Costs and Benefits of Adopting Food Safety Interventions. Michael Ollinger.
1 1 Poultry Slaughter Exemptions Under the Federal Poultry Products Inspection Act and the SC Poultry Products Inspection Law SC Poultry Products Inspection.
Who’s Minding the Store? The Current State of Food Safety
Final Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food 1 THE FUTURE IS NOW.
1 Daniel Engeljohn USDA, FSIS May 9, 2001 Processed Meat and Poultry Proposed Rule _________________ Listeria monocytogenes and Listeria spp.
Country of Origin Labeling National Fisheries Institute September 29, 2015.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Industry Briefing December 18, 2008 Advanced EIAO Methodology.
 This notice provides new instructions to Enforcement Investigations and Analysis Officers (EIAOs) and Public Health Veterinarians who were trained in.
Leveraging & Harnessing Existing Systems and Enabling Technology Deborah White SVP & CLO Food Marketing Institute December 9-10, 2009
Explaining the FSIS Sampling Program for Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Raw Ground Beef Kristina Barlow, Priya Kadam, Stephanie Buchanan, Priscilla Levine.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 Across Establishment Ranking Concept For Processing and Slaughter February.
USDA Public Meeting; Control of E. coli O157:H7
Grinding Meat Food Safety Principles Retail Meat & Poultry Processing Retail Meat & Poultry Processing Training Modules Training Modules.
Targeted Food Safety Assessments Barb Masters OFW Law September 2015.
2 Objectives 1.To identify and distinguish among government agencies and their role in food safety 2.To analyze and apply the laws set by government agencies.
Final Rule for Sanitary Transportation. Background Proposed Rule: February 5, 2014 Public Comments: More than 200 Final Rule: On Display April 5, 2016.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 11 ISSUES FOR FUTURE DISCUSSION: E. coli O157:H7 DANIEL ENGELJOHN, Ph.D. Deputy.
Final Rule for Preventive Controls for Human Food
Recalls & Tracebacks Carrie Rigdon, PhD, MPH
The Role of USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service to Ensure Foodborne Disease Control and Prevention David Goldman, MD, MPH Assistant Administrator.
NEARS: Identifying environmental factors contributing to foodborne illness outbreaks Laura Brown, Ph.D. Division of Emergency and Environmental Health.
An Integrated Response
Trace for Food Industry Traceall. Track your products... one step back: The ability to accurately and quickly identify where your raw materials came.
Food Safety Regulations and Standards
E. Coli & Fresh Produce: Some Lessons Learned
Developing a Recall Plan for Meat and Poultry Products
Agenda SB 1383 Goals and Context Measurement Draft Regulations
Final Rule on Foreign Supplier Verification Programs
Presentation transcript:

Compliance and Investigations Division (CID)

Proposed Rules  Official establishments, and retail stores that grind raw beef products, will keep records.  Federal Register  Docket No. FSIS  Vol. 79, No. 140  July 22,

Summary  FSIS is proposing to amend its recordkeeping regulations to specify that all official establishments, and retail stores that grind raw beef products for sale, must keep records. 3

Records  Records will disclose the identity, and contact information of the supplier of all source materials, for each lot of raw ground beef. Records are required to:  Identify lot numbers.  Include date and time of each lot produced.  Include date and time when grinding equipment, and other related food contact surfaces, were cleaned and sanitized  *Include raw beef products ground at an individual customer’s request 4

Why?  FSIS Investigators, and other public health officials, use records to identify and trace back beef that may be the source of illness, to suppliers that produced the source material.  FSIS efforts to trace back ground beef products is often impeded due to the lack of documentation.  Without records, FSIS cannot conduct timely and effective consumer foodborne illness investigations. 5

What is Trace Back?  Actions taken to identify the flow of product back to the official establishment where the implicated product originated, or other official establishments, retail stores, warehouses, distributors, restaurants, or other firms in commerce 6

What is Trace Forward ?  Actions taken to identify potentially contaminated batches of meat, originating from the same official establishment, other establishments, retail stores, warehouses, distributors, restaurants, or other in commerce firms that may have been affected by contaminated product. 7

Background Info:  FSIS investigated 130 illness outbreaks from 2007 through  74 determined to be caused by the consumption of ground beef.  31 linked to ground beef at a retail venue. 8

President’s Food Safety Working Group Recommended a new public health-focused approach to food safety based on three core principals: 1. Prioritizing prevention 2. Strengthening surveillance and enforcement 3. Improving response and recovery 9

Objectives:  Quickly identify, and stop, outbreaks of foodborne illness.  Identify all remaining source material, removing it as quickly as possible, to prevent additional illnesses.  Develop a tracing system that shortens the time between outbreak detection, resolution, and recovery.  The system should permit rapid trace back to the source, protecting consumers and enabling industry to recover contaminated product quickly and accurately. 10

Current Law and Regulations:  21 U.S.C 642 – Establishments and retail stores that grind raw beef products for sale must keep records that will fully and correctly disclose all transactions involved in their businesses subject to the Act.  9 CFR (a) – Every person, firm, or corporation required by Section 642 of the FMIA to keep records must keep records that will fully and correctly disclose all transactions involved in businesses subject to the Act.  9 CFR (b) – Records specifically required to be kept include, but not limited to: bills of sale, invoices, bills of lading, and receiving and shipping papers. 11

Real World Examples:  In December 2011, a Maine-based grocery chain recalled an undetermined amount of fresh ground beef products that may have been contaminated with a multiple drug- resistant strain of Salmonella Typhimurium.  Initiated in response to illness.  FSIS was unable to determine suppliers of the beef, which accounted for 15 human illnesses.  The stores did not list all of the suppliers of the raw beef ground. 12

Same Retailer, Different Outcome:  June 2012  Illness outbreak involving 46 persons with Salmonella Enteritidis.  Same Maine-based grocery store.  This time, store had implemented improvements in their record system and grinding logs  FSIS was able to determine source.  Federal establishment recalled approximately 29,000 pounds of adulterated products. 13

Speaking of Grinding Logs… 14

Who’s Affected….  Approximately 76,093 retail stores and official establishments including:  64,380 supermarkets  5,924 meat markets  4,544 warehouse clubs and supercenters  1,245 official establishments 15

Costs?  Results in an estimated total cost to industry of about $2.69 million to $4.39 million dollars. 16

Benefits?  Lower direct costs for recalls  Decrease in the average volume of product recalled.  Reduced damage to reputation during food safety events.  Consumer confidence  Averted illnesses  Average cost per E. coli O157:H7 is $3281  Average cost per Salmonella is $2423  Proposed rule may result in net economic benefits due to cost savings for each averted ground beef linked foodborne illness. 17

18