Local Agency Formation Commissions Law, Policy and Practice Plumas Local Agency Formation Commission December 14, 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
California Association of Local Agency Formation Commissions LAFCo 101 A Special District Introduction to Local Agency Formation Commissions.
Advertisements

2013 Public Law Changes House Enrolled Act 1276 Public Law 6 Amends IC and Township Board Meetings Effective.
The Challenges of Providing Services in Unincorporated Areas Best Understood in the context of which services are provided John Benoit, LAFCO Executive.
Sacramento Local Agency Formation Commission Peter Brundage, Executive Officer; Donald J. Lockhart, Assistant Executive Officer; Diane Thorpe, Commission.
1 LAFCO FEES The Statutory and Legal Framework 2010 Annual CALAFCO Meeting Hilton Hotel, Palm Springs Scott Browne.
Area Commissions Purpose Area commissions are established to afford additional voluntary citizen participation in decision-making in an advisory.
1 SUSTAINING AGRICULTURE: SANTA CLARA LAFCO’s EXPERIENCE August 31, 2007 CALAFCO CONFERENCE Sacramento.
Fiscal Analysis of the Fair Rent and Home Ownership Initiative A Presentation to the Fillmore City Council June 23, 2006.
Procurement Lobbying Legislation New York State Bar Association December 9, 2005 (revised January 4, 2006)
CALAFCO Annual Conference, Palm Springs Neelima Palacherla LAFCO 201 Island Annexations in Santa Clara County.
Reprecincting and Redistricting December 2011 Michelle Brzycki Lori Clark Leslie Barnes Dale Simmons
School District Reorganization Brief Outline of Process.
LAFCO Procedures: There’s a Lot Going On Behind the Scenes Roseanne Chamberlain Executive Officer Amador LAFCO Staff Workshop April 3, 2008.
1 State Water Resources Control Board Environmental Review for State Bond Funded Grant Projects Presented by Lisa Lee, Environmental Review Unit.
Sector Planning Process Alachua County Commission July 8 th,
Introduction to Public Hospital Districts April 25, 2002 Association of Washington Public Hospital Districts.
Incorporation & Annexation Incorporation: establishment of city as legal entity –Reasons: provide town services (streets, law enforcement, water/sewer,
HELEN THIGPEN STAFF ATTORNEY LEGISLATIVE SERVICES DIVISION MONTANA LEGISLATURE EDUCATION AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMITTEE NOVEMBER 18, 2011 County Zoning.
Land Use & Code Basics Baseline Information on Permits and Processes.
Roles and Responsibilities in Municipal Land Use.
KATHRYN E. MEOLA, CHIEF DEPUTY SAN MATEO COUNTY COUNSEL’S OFFICE SHAWN MARSHALL, DIRECTOR LEAN ENERGY PENINSULA CLEAN ENERGY.
Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.
LAFCO RESPONSIBILITIES SPHERES OF INFLUENCE & MUNICIPAL SERVICE REVIEWS.
Oregon and Washington: A Comparison of State Mandated Land Use Planning Programs Presented by: Richard H. Carson, director Clark County Department of Community.
W HY C LERKS D O W HAT T HEY D O... Different Roles for Different LAFCOs  staff/county size makes a difference  clerks, secretaries, office assistants,
California Association of Local Agency Formation Commissions LAFCo 101 An Introduction to Local Agency Formation Commissions Bill Chiat, Executive Director.
Town of Olympic Valley Negotiation Process April 1, 2014.
Background Claremont residents and officials have voiced concerns over the water rate increases imposed by the Golden State Water Company (GSWC). On average,
Presentation to the Placer LAFCO Commission September 10, 2014.
FACTORS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE REVIEW OF PROPOSALS STUDY SESSION ON GOVERNMENT CODE §56668.
Sacramento Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) Incorporation and Annexation Process A Comparison November 1, 2005.
1 Workshop on the Directive 96/61/EC concerning (IPPC) Integrated pollution prevention and control INFRA Public participation & access to environmental.
2006 ANNUAL CONFERENCE CALIFORNIA SOCIETY OF MUNICIPAL FINANCE OFFICERS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING FOR SERVICES AND INFRASTRUCTURE Sam Sperry,
Mountain View Estates Annexation Process August 3,
1 LAFCO 101 New Commissioners and Staff Workshop CALAFCO CONFERENCE FOR 2009 Tenaya Lodge at Yosemite October 28, 2009.
SERVICE TO UNINCORPORATED COMMUNITIES GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION SERVICE TO UNINCORPORATED COMMUNITIES GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION August 30, 2007.
1 LAFCo 201 The Statutory and Legal Framework 2010 Annual CALAFCO Meeting Hilton Hotel, Palm Springs Scott Browne.
Amherst County Comprehensive Plan (Update)
Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code - MPC State enabling legislation for all municipalities except Pittsburgh and Philadelphia Newly Elected Officials.
Local Powers for Land Use Regulation. Local Land Use Powers Land use regulation is considered a residual power –In most circumstances, that is… –Power.
1 LAFCO Staff Workshop Crowne Plaza Hotel, San Jose Executive Officer Bob Braitman Legal Counsel Scott Browne.
FOR CLERKS AND RECORDERS  Planning Commission – public meeting and a public hearing  City Council – public hearing  Must contain: - a map of expansion.
Regional Behavioral Health Boards Chapter 31, Title 39 Idaho Code.
2010 CALAFCO Annual Conference Moderator: Brendon Freeman, Napa LAFCO.
MUNICIPAL SERVICE REVIEWS. Spheres of Influence and Municipal Service Reviews Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000 Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg.
California Association of Local Agency Formation Commissions.
ANNEXATION. WHY ANNEXATION CITIES PAY FOR A WIDE ARRAY OF SERVICES AND FACILITIES THAT BENEFIT ENTIRE REGIONS AND THE ENTIRE STATE. MOST STATES RECOGNIZE.
Repeal and Replace the Boundary Adjustment Act with the Urban Reserve Act.
WELCOME to the FIRE DISTRICT WORKSHOP San Joaquin LAFCo July 16, 2009.
Lecturer: Lina Vladimirovna Zhornyak, associated professor.
Advisory Bodies: The Brown Act, the First Amendment and Other Issues California Council of School Attorneys May 15, 2009 Burlingame, California © 2009.
ANNEXATION Statutory Overview July 19, 2011 David L. Yearout, AICP, CFM.
Meeting #25 OCTOBER 6, Allred Beckman Burcham Derivi Dougherty Escobar Jones Ornelas Sanguinetti Self White 1. Roll Call.
FIRE PROTECTION CONTRACTS Workshop on Senate Bill 239 (Hertzberg) July 21, 2016 Nevada LAFCo – Presented by P. Scott Browne, Counsel.
WHAT IS TAX INCREMENT FINANCING? Questions and Answers About TIF
Westin Horton Plaza, San Diego
Administrative Agencies
What’s Ahead Why LAFCo was created LAFCo’s role and functions
Planning Commission Public Hearing September 9, 2016
Contra Costa Watershed Forum May 11, 2016
- Public Hearing - Proposed Downtown Stockton Management District
Consideration of Action Re: Commercial Cannabis Businesses
Summary of Public Transit Evaluation
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK FEBRUARY 26, 2018 ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS CALLING FOR A SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN THE CITY OF PASADENA OF THE.
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK FEBRUARY 15, 2018 ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS CALLING FOR A SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN THE CITY OF PASADENA AND THE.
Board Organizational Meeting
By-laws of WVCO,Inc . By-laws Committee: Sandi Brown, Richard Clemmer, Elsie Tyree, Vicki Lee Jacobs, and Chair Nettie Lamerson.
LAFCO AND CEQA LAFCO Role as A Responsible Agency
Sacramento Local Agency Formation Commission
Incorporation and Annexation Process A Comparison November 1, 2005
Presentation transcript:

Local Agency Formation Commissions Law, Policy and Practice Plumas Local Agency Formation Commission December 14, 2015

LAFCo’s Function Implement State Policy on Local Agency Boundaries Oversee -- ◦ Creation of New Agencies ◦ Boundary Changes ◦ District Services ◦ Extensions of Services Outside Agency Boundaries 2

Why LAFCOs Came About Post World War II population and housing boom in California led to: ◦ Scramble to finance and extend services ◦ City annexation "wars," and proliferation of limited purpose special districts 3 In 1959, the Governor’s Commission on Metropolitan Area Problems was established and issued a report identifying problems and outlining recommendations.

Lofty Goals -- Legislative Direction From: California Legislature To: LAFCo Promote Orderly Growth and Development Discourage Urban Sprawl Preserve Open Space and Prime Agricultural Lands Efficient Extension of Government Services PS – Consider Provision of Housing for Persons and Families of All Incomes, as well as environmental justice, adequate water and Regional Transportation Plans 4

What the Courts have said LAFCO is engaged in the pursuit of an overriding State purpose State laws fully occupy the field LAFCO is quasi-legislative; limited legal challenge to LAFCO decisions LAFCO is independent, not part of County Government LAFCO is the ‘Legislature’s watch dog’ for governmental efficiency Cannot directly regulate land use, but must consider the impacts of land use in its determinations LAFCO appoints an Executive Officer to conduct its day to day business 5

What the Grand Juries have said.... LAFCO “was created by State Legislation to provide guidance and a legal check and has ultimate authority to approve, condition or deny each project” “LAFCo has a limited parameter of responsibility, but within that realm, has enormous power” “We see such authority causing inherent and perhaps necessary resentment, even animosity”

1963 – LAFCos Created 1965 – District Reorganization Act; Knox-Nisbet Act Municipal Organization Act (MORGA) on city procedures Deadlines to prepare spheres – LAFCOs must now plan Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act AB 1335 (Gotch) – Several reforms  LAFCO can initiate certain types of changes  LAFCO can waive conducting authority hearings  Easier to seat special districts on LAFCO AB 2838 (Hertzberg) – More reforms  Broaden LAFCO funding – not just the County anymore  LAFCO is the conducting authority for boundary changes  Require periodic (5-year) sphere of influence updates  Require Municipal Service Reviews to update spheres  Requires city/county discussion re city sphere expansions  Require cities to prezone land  Add new LAFCO factors – water supply, regional housing 7 Legislative History

LAFCO Today … 8

Balanced Interests – Independent Judgment 2 County Supervisors 2 City Council Members 1 public member 2 Special District members (in 30 of the 58 LAFCOs) One alternate member in each category 9 All commission members shall exercise their independent judgment on behalf of the interests of residents, property owners and the public as a whole … (Government Code Section )

LAFCos Are Independent Commissioners make final decisions Adopt local policies reflecting unique local circumstances Decisions cannot be appealed to other administrative bodies Executive Officer accountable only to Commission and statutes 10

11 LAFCO is subject to the Political Reform Act Annual filing of assets and campaign contributions is required, plus Automatic disqualification from decisions related to entitlements for use

LAFCO Staffing LAFCO provides for its own quarters, equipment, supplies and personnel. LAFCO appoints an Executive Officer to conduct the day-to-day business and make recommendations on proposals LAFCO appoints a Legal Counsel LAFCO may either contract for staff services or have employees accountable to LAFCO 12

LAFCO Funding & Budget LAFCO must adopt a budget for each fiscal year LAFCO is funded by the County, cities and special districts in equal thirds, or the Cities and the County in halves (in some cases) Authorized to charge fees to help offset expenses To reduce the budget from previous fiscal year, Commission must make a specific finding that it can complete its program with reduced funding 13

LAFCO Authority LAFCOs have broad authority to conditionally approve any proposal for a change of organization, reorganization, or sphere of influence. LAFCOs have this authority so they may effectuate the important policies LAFCOs are charged with protecting 14

As a Planning Agency LAFCO Prepares Municipal Service Reviews which examine public services Develops and updates Spheres of Influence for cities and districts Works cooperatively with public and private agencies and interests on growth, preservation and service delivery 15

As a Regulatory Agency LAFCO Manages modification of existing agencies and creation of new ones Can approve boundary changes if consistent with spheres Controls extension of public services Is prohibited from directly regulating how land is used, however LAFCo must consider impacts of land use when making its determinations 16

CEQA Applies to LAFCo Bozung decision: LAFCO approvals are "projects" under CEQA LAFCos are generally Responsible Agencies (using Lead Agency Environmental Documents) LAFCos sometimes act as Lead Agencies (e.g., spheres of influence) Categorical exemptions are tailored to LAFCO actions - Classes 19 and 20 17

Basic Procedures for a Change of Organization 18

Changes of Organization Annexation or Detachment Formation a new district or Incorporation of new city Disincorporation of city or Dissolution of district Consolidation of cities or districts Merger of district into a city Create subsidiary district, i.e., city governs a district Exercise of new or different functions or classes of services by special district, i.e. latent power Reorganization combines two or more changes of organization into one proceeding 19

Step 1 - Application to LAFCO Application Contents: Resolution of Application (from an agency) or a Petition (from a voter or landowner) Plan for Services required in all cases Application, map and legal description per LAFCO standards Property tax agreement if required per Revenue & Taxation Code 99 or Prezoning Ordinance (for city annexations) Environmental Document (EIR, N.D. or Notice of Exemption) LAFCO fee and/or deposit 20

Step 2 - LAFCO Review Accept application (must include Resolution of Application from an affected agency or Petition of Voters or Landowners) Staff review of application and supporting materials, including plan for service, maps, legal descriptions, CEQA documentation, etc. Certificate of Filing issued when documentation is deemed complete (90 day clock starts running) Public notice of LAFCO hearing (21 day notice) Executive Officer's report & recommendation published (5 days prior to hearing) 21

Step 3 – Commission Decision Commission reviews and approves or denies ◦ Terms and Conditions are permitted ◦ LAFCO determines the effective date ◦ CEQA determination Reconsideration of LAFCO decision Effect of LAFCO denial Proceedings lapse a year from LAFCO decision if not completed or extended 22

Step 4 - Protest Hearing, if needed No hearing required in some instances ◦ For uninhabited annexations with total landowner consent ◦ For inhabited annexations if all voters and owners have rec’d written notice and none have submitted written objections Special provisions for “island” annexations Protest hearing notices -- publish, post, mail Can delegate conduct of hearing to Executive Officer 23

Step 5 – Outcome of Hearing Number of protests determines outcome ◦ Terminate if majority protest ◦ Order change subject to election (only for inhabited territory) if protest threshold is reached ◦ Order the change without an election LAFCO order confirms results of hearing 24

Step 6 – Election, if Required Only County or a city conducts elections Where is the election held? Regular election v. mailed ballots Vote results -- Majority needed? Two thirds? Election expenses -- who pays? 25

Step 7 – Administrative Filing LAFCO staff records Certification of Completion (including resolution and map) LAFCO staff files Statement of Boundary Change with State Board of Equalization and County Assessor LAFCO staff notifies affected agencies and interested parties 26

LAFCo Considerations What factors does the Commission look at when it reviews a proposal? ◦ Logical progression of boundaries ◦ Adequate agency service capacity ◦ Need for services ◦ Fiscal issues ◦ Impacts on other agencies ◦ Compliance with statute and policy ◦ Public comments ◦ Consistency with the appropriate General Plan 27

Commission shall, as necessary, review and update each agency’s sphere every five years. In order to update a Sphere of Influence, a Municipal Service Review is necessary and LAFCo must make determinations with respect to the following: Growth and Population of an affected area Spheres of Influence and Municipal Service Reviews 28

Present and Planned capacity for Public facilities and adequacy of services Financial ability of agencies to provide services Status of and opportunities for, shared facilities Accountability for community service needs. Disadvantaged Communities LAFCo considers five factors when determining the sphere of an agency: ◦ Present and Planned Land Use ◦ Present and Probable Need for Services and Facilties ◦ Service and Facility Capacity ◦ Relevant Social and Economic Communities of Interest ◦ The presence of Disadvantaged Communities

LAFCoProcess Commission May Approve, Condition, or Deny Commission has broad authority to develop conditions Some Projects – new Cities – are subject to Election Any Project is subject to an Election if there is Significant Protest of Landowners or Residents 30

Conclusion LAFCo’s Function is: Quasi-Legislative Balances Competing Interests Decisions Must be Consistent with Policies Broad Discretion – Limited Jurisdiction Planning Responsibilities: Spheres and Service Reviews LAFCO acts as an independent referee among agencies and is distinct from a city/county or special district All of LAFCo processes are public 31