TCT 2015 | San Francisco | October 15, 2015 Howard C. Herrmann, MD on behalf of The PARTNER II Trial Investigators SAPIEN 3: Evaluation of a Balloon- Expandable.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
STS 2015 John V. Conte, MD Professor of Surgery Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine On Behalf of the CoreValve US Investigators Transcatheter Aortic.
Advertisements

Health-Related Quality of Life After Transcatheter vs. Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in High-Risk Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis Results From.
Three-year clinical and echocardiographic follow-up of aortic stenosis patients implanted with a self-expending bioprosthesis Sabine Bleiziffer German.
ACC 2015 Jae K. Oh, MD On Behalf of the US CoreValve Investigators Remodeling of Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve Is Responsible for Regression.
ACC 2015 Michael J Reardon, MD, FACC On Behalf of the CoreValve US Investigators A Randomized Comparison of Self-expanding Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic.
Susheel Kodali, MD on behalf of The PARTNER Trial Investigators
Susheel Kodali, MD on behalf of The PARTNER Trial Investigators
Lessons from TAVR Randomized Trials and Registries E Murat Tuzcu, MD Professor of Medicine Cleveland Clinic Financial disclosures: None PARTNER Executive.
Cost-Effectiveness of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement with a Self-Expanding Prosthesis Compared with Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in High Risk.
Long-Term Outcomes Using a Self- Expanding Bioprosthesis in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis Deemed Extreme Risk for Surgery: Two-Year Results From.
One Year Outcomes in Real World Patients Treated with Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation The ADVANCE Study Axel Linke University of Leipzig Heart.
INTERNATIONAL. CAUTION: For distribution only in markets where CoreValve® is approved. Not for distribution in U.S., Canada or Japan. Medtronic, Inc
University Heart Center Hamburg
AATS Annual Meeting 2015 | Seattle, WA | April 27, 2015 Appropriate Patient Selection or Healthcare Rationing? Lessons from Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.
A shifting paradigm of care: Advances in transcatheter heart valve procedures Sandra Lauck MSN, RN, CCN(C) Clinical Nurse Specialist, Arrhythmia Management.
PARTNER Objective To compare surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in high-risk patients with severe.
The Risk and Extent of Neurological Events Are Equivalent for High-Risk Patients Treated With Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement Thomas.
Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch in High Risk Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis in a Randomized Trial of a Self-Expanding Prosthesis George L. Zorn, III.
Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement with a Self-Expanding Prosthesis David H. Adams et al (U.S. CoreValve Clinical Investigators) Journal Club November.
Axel Linke University of Leipzig Heart Center, Leipzig, Germany Sabine Bleiziffer German Heart Center, Munich, Germany Johan Bosmans University Hospital.
Transcather Aortic Valve Replacement Using the Self-Expanding Bioprosthesis: First Report Using STS/ACC Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry CoreValve.
Postoperative Delirium is Associated with Increased Operative and One Year Mortality in Patients Treated with Surgical and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.
Disclosure Statement of Financial Interest Saibal Kar, MD, FACC
TCT 2015 | San Francisco | October 15, 2015 Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Failed Surgical Bioprostheses Danny Dvir, MD John G. Webb, MD and.
TCT 2015 | San Francisco | October 15, 2015 Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Failed Surgical Bioprostheses Danny Dvir, MD John G. Webb, MD and.
UC c EN. Through Medtronic sponsored research, the Transcatheter Aortic Valves clinical portfolio is studying over 11,000 subjects at over 125.
Martin B. Leon, MD on behalf of the PARTNER Investigators TCT 2010; Washington, DC; September 23, 2010 Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Inoperable.
Techniques in Transapical AVR Vinod H. Thourani, MD Professor of Surgery and Medicine Chief of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Emory Hospital Midtown Co-Director:
INTERNATIONAL. CAUTION: For distribution only in markets where CoreValve® is approved. Not for distribution in U.S., Canada or Japan. Medtronic, Inc
Vinod H. Thourani, MD on behalf of The PARTNER Trial Investigators
G. Michael Deeb, MD On Behalf of the US Pivotal Trial Investigators 3-Year Results From the US Pivotal High Risk Randomized Trial Comparing Self-Expanding.
Longest Follow-up After Implantation of a Self-Expanding Repositionable Transcatheter Aortic Valve: Final Follow-up of the Evolut R CE Study Stephen Brecker,
G. Michael Deeb, MD On Behalf of the CoreValve US Investigators
Lessons from PARTNER I (A & B) CRT, Washington DC, Feb 5, 2012
The Impact of Preoperative Renal Dysfunction on the Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Andres M. Pineda MD, J. Kevin.
Outcomes in the CoreValve US High-Risk Pivotal Trial in Patients with a Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality Less than or Equal to.
New Data from The PARTNER Trial
Trans- catheter aortic valve replacement vs
Late breaking news in heart valve disease
Highlights From the SAPIEN 3 Experience in Intermediate-Risk Patients Vinod H. Thourani, MD on behalf of the PARTNER Trial Investigators Professor.
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Using the Lotus Valve with Depth Guard First Report from the RESPOND Extension Study Nicolas M Van Mieghem, MD,
Raj R. Makkar, MD On behalf of The PARTNER Trial Investigators
Are we ready to perform TAVI in Intermediate Risk Patients?
Updates From NOTION: The First All-Comer TAVR Trial
Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Intermediate Risk Patients with Aortic Stenosis Description: The goal of the trial was to assess.
TAVR Requirements for the Cath Lab
Claret Cerebral Protection Device: Implications of the Sentinel Study
30-Day Safety and Echocardiographic Outcomes Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement with the Self-Expanding Repositionable Evolut PRO System.
First Report of Three-Year Outcomes With the Repositionable and Fully Retrievable Lotus™ Aortic Valve Replacement System: Results From the REPRISE I.
TAVI Passed the Exam and is Ready for Clinical Use in Inoperable Patients Disclosures Research Funding and Speaking Honoraria: Edwards Lifesciences.
Early Outcomes with the Evolut R Repositionable Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve in the United States Mathew Williams, MD, For the Evolut R US.
University of Pennsylvania
Early Feasibility Studies Investigator Perspective
Two-Year Outcomes With the Fully Repositionable and Retrievable Lotus™ Transcatheter Aortic Replacement Valve in 120 High-Risk Surgical Patients With Severe.
Longevity of transcatheter and surgical bioprosthetic aortic valves in patients with severe aortic stenosis and lower surgical risk Lars Sondergaard,
Latest Data from Balloon Expendable Trials
Vinod H. Thourani, MD on behalf of The PARTNER Trial Investigators
Insights from the NCDR® STS/ACC TVT Registry.
CoreValve Continued Access Study Shows Continued Improvement in 1-Year Outcomes With Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Steven J. Yakubov,
Paul Sorajja, MD for the Intrepid Global Pilot Study Investigators
Axel Linke University of Leipzig Heart Center, Leipzig, Germany
One Year Outcomes in Real World Patients Treated with Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation The ADVANCE Study Axel Linke University of Leipzig Heart.
TAVR or Surgery for Low Flow (LF) AS – Insights from the PARTNER Trial
University Heart Center Hamburg
Balloon-Expandable Transcatheter Valve System : OUS Data
TRANSCATHETER MITRAL VALVE IMPLANTATION FOR SEVERE MITRAL REGURGITATION: THE TENDYNE GLOBAL FEASIBILITY TRIAL 1 YEAR OUTCOMES David WM Muller, MBBS,
Late Follow-Up from the PARTNER Aortic Valve-in-Valve Registry
Samir R. Kapadia, MD On behalf of The PARTNER Trial Investigators
Five-Year Outcomes after Randomization to Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: Final Results of The PARTNER 1 Trial Michael J. Mack, MD.
Transcatheter versus medical treatment of symptomatic severe tricuspid regurgitation: a propensity score matched analysis Maurizio Taramasso MD, PhD from.
Presentation transcript:

TCT 2015 | San Francisco | October 15, 2015 Howard C. Herrmann, MD on behalf of The PARTNER II Trial Investigators SAPIEN 3: Evaluation of a Balloon- Expandable Transcatheter Aortic Valve in High-Risk and Inoperable Patients With Aortic Stenosis – One-Year Outcomes

Howard C. Herrmann, MD Within the past 12 months, I or my spouse/partner have had a financial interest/arrangement or affiliation with the organization(s) listed below. Grant/Research Support Grant/Research Support SAB (Equity) SAB (Equity) Honoraria Honoraria Abbott Vascular, Boston Sci, Cardiokinetx, Edwards Lifesciences, Gore, Medtronic, Mitraspan, Siemens, St. Jude Medical Abbott Vascular, Boston Sci, Cardiokinetx, Edwards Lifesciences, Gore, Medtronic, Mitraspan, Siemens, St. Jude Medical MicroInterventional Devices MicroInterventional Devices Edwards Lifesciences Edwards Lifesciences Affiliation/Financial Relationship Company Disclosure Statement of Financial Interest

Background The initial PARTNER Trial for high-risk (HR) and inoperable (INOP) patients demonstrated the early promise of TAVR with first generation devices.The initial PARTNER Trial for high-risk (HR) and inoperable (INOP) patients demonstrated the early promise of TAVR with first generation devices. At 1 year, mortality was 24% in HR (equivalent to SAVR) and 31% in INOP patients.At 1 year, mortality was 24% in HR (equivalent to SAVR) and 31% in INOP patients. 30-Day outcomes with the SAPIEN 3 (S3) TAVR system were presented at ACC 2015 demonstrating very low rates of adverse events.30-Day outcomes with the SAPIEN 3 (S3) TAVR system were presented at ACC 2015 demonstrating very low rates of adverse events. This presentation reports the study results in HR and INOP patients at 1 year.This presentation reports the study results in HR and INOP patients at 1 year.

2 Single Arm Non-Randomized Historical-Controlled Studies Intermediate Risk Operable (PII S3i) Intermediate Risk Operable (PII S3i) High-Risk Operable / Inoperable (PII S3HR) ASSESSMENT by Heart Valve Team n = 1076 Patients n = 583 Patients ASSESSMENT: Optimal Valve Delivery Access SAPIEN 3 Transfemoral (TF) TF TAVR SAPIEN 3 TAA TAVR SAPIEN 3 Transapical / Transaortic (TA/TAo) TF TAVR SAPIEN 3 Transfemoral (TF) TAA TAVR SAPIEN 3 Transapical / Transaortic (TA/TAo) The PARTNER II S3 Trial Study Design 1 Year

SAPIEN 3 Transcatheter Heart Valve Distinguishing Features Bovine pericardial tissue Outer sealing skirt to reduce PVL Low frame height Enhanced frame geometry for low delivery profile

Key Inclusion Criteria Risk determined by STS score and Heart Team:Risk determined by STS score and Heart Team: –High-Risk: STS score > 8 or Heart Team determination –Inoperable: Risk of death or serious morbidity > 50% (assessed by a cardiologist and 2 cardiac surgeons) Severe aortic stenosis determined by echocardiography:Severe aortic stenosis determined by echocardiography: –Valve area 40mmHg or peak velocity > 4 m/s

The PARTNER II S3 Trial Participating Sites 583 Patients Enrolled at 29 US Participating Sites Co-Principal Investigators Susheel Kodali Columbia University, NY Vinod Thourani Emory University, GA

The PARTNER II S3 HR / INOP Top 10 Enrollment Sites Cedars-Sinai Medical Ctr. (Los Angeles, CA) 73 Columbia University Medical Ctr. (New York, NY) 65 Emory University (Atlanta, GA) 63 University of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia, PA) 43 Heart Hospital Baylor Plano (Plano, TX) 30 Ochsner Hospital (New Orleans, LA) 26 University of Texas, Houston (Houston, TX) 25 Stanford University Medical Ctr. (Palo Alto, CA) 24 Newark Beth Israel Medical Ctr. (Newark, NJ) 21 Washington Hospital Ctr. (Washington, DC) 19

Study Flow 30 Day and 1 Year Patient Status 15 Deaths n = 583 n = 568 At 30 Days n = 568 At 30 Days 485 / 492 or 98.6% Follow-up at 1 year 485 / 492 or 98.6% Follow-up at 1 year 71 Additional Deaths 5 Withdrew Consent PII S3 HR / INOP

Baseline & Procedural Characteristics Median STS = 8.4% N = 583 Average Age = 82yrs

Baseline Patient Characteristics Demographics Characteristic (%) Overall (n=583) HR (n=384, 66%) INOP (n=199, 34%) p-value Age (yrs) Female gender STS Score (median) NYHA Class 3/ DM COPD - O 2 Dependent CKD - Creat. ≥ 2mg/dL Hostile Chest Atrial Fibrillation Permanent Pacemaker Frailty

Survival (All-Cause) S3 HR / INOP by Cohort at 1 Year 82.3% INOP 87.3% HR 85.6% Overall Survival (%) p (log rank) = 0.14 Numbers at Risk Overall HR INOP Months

Survival (All-Cause) S3 HR / INOP by Access at 1 Year 87.7% TF 74.7% TA / TAo 85.6% Overall Survival (%) p (log rank) = Numbers at Risk Overall TF TA / TAo Months

Survival (All-Cause) S3 HR / INOP Transfemoral Access at 1 Year 89.3% TF HR 84.3% TF INOP Survival (%) Numbers at Risk TF HR TF INOP Months

Disabling Strokes Modified Rankin Score ≥ 2, CEC Adjudicated 2.4% Stroke (%) Numbers at Risk Overall Months There was no difference between TF and TA / TAo. There was no difference between HR and INOP.

Other Clinical Outcomes S3 HR / INOP – 30 Days and 1 Year Clinical Outcomes (%) 30 Days 1 Year All-Cause Mortality Cardiac Mortality Cardiac Mortality All Stroke Disabling Stroke Disabling Stroke Rehospitalization New Permanent Pacemaker Surgical AVR Structural Valve Deterioration 00 Valve Thrombosis 00

NYHA Class Survivor Analysis p = NS p < # of Patients

Mean Gradient & Aortic Valve Area # of Patients mmHgcm²

Paravalvular Regurgitation Paired Analysis p = 0.99 # of Patients

1 Year KM Survival by 30-Day PVL 85.9% Mild 61.9% M / S 88.0% N / T Survival (%) Numbers at Risk None / Trace Mild Mod / Severe Months Overall: Log-Rank p-value = M / S vs Mild: Log-Rank p-value = M / S vs N / T: Log-Rank p-value = No statistical difference between None/Trace and Mild.

All-Cause Mortality at 1 Year Edwards SAPIEN Valves (As Treated Patients) SAPIENSXTSAPIEN 3 PARTNER I and II Trials TF Patients High-Risk Inoperable

Conclusions In high-risk and inoperable patients, the low rate of 30-day complications with the SAPIEN 3 TAVR system resulted in improved 1-year survival.In high-risk and inoperable patients, the low rate of 30-day complications with the SAPIEN 3 TAVR system resulted in improved 1-year survival. –Overall Survival: 85.6% –High-Risk Survival:87.3% –High-Risk TF Survival: 89.3% Between 30 days and 1 year, the rates of both disabling stroke and significant paravalvular AR remained low and stable, with no significant differences between TF and alternative access. There was no association observed between the occurrence of Mild PVL and mortality at 1 year. Hemodynamic valve performance and early symptomatic improvement were sustained at 1 year.

Implications The combination of new design features of SAPIEN 3, procedural improvements, operator experience and improved patient selection have all contributed to a low rate of important adverse events (including stroke) and a high rate of 1-year survival in high-risk and inoperable patients with severe AS.The combination of new design features of SAPIEN 3, procedural improvements, operator experience and improved patient selection have all contributed to a low rate of important adverse events (including stroke) and a high rate of 1-year survival in high-risk and inoperable patients with severe AS. These excellent 1 year follow-up data with SAPIEN 3 support the use of TAVR as the preferred therapy in high-risk and inoperable patients with aortic stenosis.These excellent 1 year follow-up data with SAPIEN 3 support the use of TAVR as the preferred therapy in high-risk and inoperable patients with aortic stenosis. The 1 year outcomes of the Intermediate Risk cohort will be available at ACC 2016.The 1 year outcomes of the Intermediate Risk cohort will be available at ACC 2016.