Introduction Patients and Methods Results Conclusion Pericytes are a key component in the maturation of the VEGF driven tumor angiogenic process 1. Bevacizumab.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab (bev) vs FOLFIRI plus bev
Advertisements

Prospective evaluation of candidate SNPs of VEGF/VEGFR pathway in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients (pts) treated with first-line FOLFIRI plus.
Biomarker Analyses in CLEOPATRA: A Phase III, Placebo-Controlled Study of Pertuzumab in HER2- Positive, First-Line Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC) Baselga.
Abbreviations: RECIST, Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors; CR, complete response; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease; PD, progressive disease;
Mizutomo Azuma 1, Michael M. Shi 2, Christian J. Jacques 2, Carl Barrett 2, Kathleen D. Danenberg 3, Syma Iqbal 1, Anthony El-Khoueiry 1, Dongyun Yang.
Introduction Materials and Methods Results Conclusions CD133 Polymorphisms are associated with clinical outcome in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)
Introduction Patients and Methods Results Conclusion Wnt signaling is essential for embryonic development, stem cells and tissue regeneration. Colorectal.
C. Lieu, H. Tran, Z. Jiang, M. Mao, M. Overman, C. Eng, J. Morris, L. Ellis, J. Heymach, and S. Kopetz Departments of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology,
results from the phase III TRIBE trial
KRAS is mutated in about 40% of colorectal cancers; it is the only validated predictive marker used in patients with metastatic CRC 1. It is also a negative.
Fabio Puglisi Dipartimento di Oncologia Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Udine Antiangiogenic Treatment Mediterranean School of Oncology.
An update on biological therapies in colorectal cancer Mount Vernon Cancer Network Sept 05 Mark Harrison.
Adjuvant Therapy of Colon Cancer 2005 Daniel G. Haller, M.D. Abramson Cancer Center at the University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA.
Insert Program or Hospital Logo Introduction Melanoma is notoriously resistant to chemotherapy. While surgical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy can.
ARTERIAL THROMBOEMBOLIC EVENTS IN A POOLED ANALYSIS OF 5 RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED TRIALS OF BEVACIZUMAB WITH CHEMOTHERAPY JR Skillings Genentech, Inc, South.
A Micro RNA Polymorphism (MiRSNP) in 3’UTR of K-ras gene was associated with clinical outcome in mCRC patients treated with either single agent cetuximab.
Mizutomo Azuma 1, Dongyun Yang 2, Marinella Carpanu 3, Ellen Hollywood 3, Michael Lue-Yat 3, Wu Zhang 1, Kathleen D. Danenberg 4, Peter V. Danenberg 5,
Prospective study of EGFR intron 1 CA tandem repeats as predictive factor of benefit from cetuximab and irinotecan Antoniotti C 1, 2, Loupakis F 3, Cremolini.
Guanylyl Cyclase C (GCC) Lymph Nodes (LN) Classification as a Prognostic Marker in Patients with Stage II Colon Cancer: A Pooled Analysis Daniel J. Sargent,
High Cereblon Protein Expression Correlates with Improved Response and Survival in Myeloma Patients Treated with Lenalidomide 1 Cereblon Expression Predicts.
*University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
ICAM-1, GRP-78 and NFkB gene polymorphisms associated with clinical outcome in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with first line 5-FU.
Introduction Results Material and Methods Conclusions Genetic variants predict clinical outcome clinical outcome in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal.
Cancer Stem Cell SNPs Have Opposite Prognostic Outcome in Patients with Gastric Cancer Among Asian and Western Countries Melissa J. LaBonte 1, Takeru Wakatsuki.
Response rate using conventional criteria is a poor surrogate for clinical benefit on progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in metastatic colorectal.
S. K. Anderson 1, J. M. Lafky 1, X. W. Carrero 1, T. K. Kimlinger 1, T. M. Halling 1, S. Kumar 1, P. J. Flynn 2, H. M. Gross 3, K. A. Jaeckle 4, J. C.
Risk Stratified Analysis Improves Prediction of Treatment Benefit Over Subgroup Analysis: Findings from Intergroup N9741 HK Sanoff, ME Campbell, HC Pitot,
Intratumoral mRNA expression of genes involved in angiogenesis and HIF-1 pathway to predict outcome to VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) in patients.
Mace L. Rothenberg, M.D. Professor of Medicine Ingram Professor of Cancer Research Biomarkers in Colorectal Cancer Management: KRAS Mutations and EGFR.
Tumor clock protein PER2 as a determinant of survival in patients (pts) receiving oxaliplatin-5-FU- leucovorin as 1st line chemotherapy for metastatic.
CHFR METHYLATION AS AN EPIGENETIC MARKER FOR RECURRENCE OF COLON CANCER M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas Motofumi Tanaka, Salil Sethi, Donghui.
Transcription Factor 7-like 2 (TCF7L2) Polymorphism Was Associated with Worse Survival in Three Independent Cohorts from the USA, Austria, and Japan Rita.
KRAS status and efficacy in the first- line treatment of patients with mCRC treated with FOLFOX with or without cetuximab: The OPUS experience Carsten.
Final Efficacy Results from OAM4558g, a Randomized Phase II Study Evaluating MetMAb or Placebo in Combination with Erlotinib in Advanced NSCLC Spigel DR.
Cmab might have therapeutic benefit in Japanese patients with KRAS p.G13D mutant colorectal cancer. Limitations of this study are its retrospective design.
Preliminary Results from a Phase II study of FOLFIRI and Bevacizumab as First Line Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (Abstract #3579) S. Kopetz,
Cetuximab plus FOLFIRI in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: the influence of KRAS and BRAF biomarkers on outcome: updated data from the CRYSTAL.
Time to Secondary Resistance (TSR) After Interruption of Imatinib: Updated Results of the Prospective French Sarcoma Group Randomized Phase III Trial on.
1 CONFIDENTIAL – DO NOT DISTRIBUTE ARIES mCRC: Effectiveness and Safety of 1st- and 2nd-line Bevacizumab Treatment in Elderly Patients Mark Kozloff, MD.
Introduction Patients and Methods Results Conclusion Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the 108 patients included in the biomarker analysis. Objectives.
IntroductionPatient baseline characteristics Conclusion The process of EGFR recycling is important mechanism of resistance of cetuximab in colorectal cancer.
P.A. Tang 1, S. J. Cohen 1, G. Bjarnason 1, C. Kollmannsberger 1, K. Virik 1, M. J. MacKenzie 1, J. Brown 1, L. Wang 1, A. Chen 2, M. J. Moore 1 1 Princess.
Who can benefit from chemotherapy holidays after first-line therapy for advanced colorectal cancer ? N. Perez-Staub, B. Chibaudel, A. Figer, A. Cervantes,
Pharmacogenetic analysis in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients treated with second-line irinotecan (IR)+/- cetuximab (CB): The EPIC experience.
Identification of localized rectal cancer (RC) patients (pts) who may NOT require preoperative (preop) chemoradiation (CRT). D. Roda 1, M. Frasson 2, E.
Markers of Response for the Antiangiogenic Agent Bevacizumab Diether Lambrechts, Heinz-Josef Lenz, Sanne de Haas, Peter Carmeliet, and Stefan J. Scherer.
Complete pathologic responses in the primary of rectal or colon cancer treated with FOLFOX without radiation A. Cercek, M. R. Weiser, K. A. Goodman, D.
XXV^ Riunione Nazionale MITO Innovation in gynecologic cancer: optimal therapy, quality of life, precision medicine. Naples, June Targeting.
AR-V7 Splice Variant in Prostate Cancer : Taking Centre Stage
Chips? SNPs? or PCR? What do we really want and what do we need? Heinz-Josef Lenz, MD Professor of Medicine Co-Director, Colorectal Center Co-Director,
Blood-based biomarkers for cancer immunotherapy: Tumor mutational burden in blood (bTMB) is associated with improved atezolizumab (atezo) efficacy in.
Higher Vitamin D Levels Associated With Improved Survival in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual.
CCO Independent Conference Coverage
Prognostic Factors for First-line Chemotherapy + Bevacizumab or Cetuximab in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer CCO Independent Conference Highlights* of the.
TBCRC (the translational breast cancer research consortium) 005 Prospective study
IFM/DFCI 2009 Trial: Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT) for Multiple Myeloma (MM) in the Era of New Drugs Phase III study of lenalidomide/bortezomib/dexamethasone.
Phase III Trial (MPACT) of Weekly nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: Influence of Prognostic Factors of Survival J Tabernero,
A REVIEW AND UPDATE ON THE ANTI-ANGIOGENIC AGENT, ABT-510
VEGF and VEGFR1 Gene expression levels predict tumor recurrence in adjuvant colon cancer Yan Ning1, Georg Lurje1, Kathleen Danenberg2, Janine Cooc2, Dongyun.
BRAF mutant mCRC patients – What would you recommend? FOLFIRINOX/Bev
Axel Grothey Professor of Oncology Mayo Clinic Rochester
Genetic variants of kinases suppressors of Ras (KSR)in KRAS-BRAF
A subgroup analysis of a large multicenter study
Published online September 20, 2017 by JAMA Surgery
Cetuximab with chemotherapy as 1st-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of the CRYSTAL and OPUS studies according to KRAS.
Primary side of origin affects the outcome of mCRC patients treated with first-line FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab independently of BRAF status and mucinous.
Treated with Neoadjuvant Therapy
KSR1 gene polymorphism in mCRC patients treated with first-line FOLFIRI and bevacizumab Marta Schirripa1, Fotios Loupakis1, Chiara Cremolini1, Dongyun.
Coiffier B et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 265.
Presentation transcript:

Introduction Patients and Methods Results Conclusion Pericytes are a key component in the maturation of the VEGF driven tumor angiogenic process 1. Bevacizumab (BV), a humanized monoclonal antibody, is used to target this process in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) 2. However, a differential patient response to the addition of BV to a FOLFIRI chemotherapeutic backbone urges the use of biomarkers to personalize drug therapy 3. We performed an exploratory analysis in patients enrolled in either a phase 3 (TRIBE NCT ) or phase 2 trial (PROVETTA NCT ) treated with FOLFIRI+BV to identify potential predictive markers of outcome in genes related to the early steps of vessel maturation driven by pericytes. DNA was extracted from 424 patients’ blood or tissue treated with first-line FOLFIRI+BV and prospectively enrolled in a prospective pharmacogenomic translational study. Median follow up is 45.1 months and median PFS and OS were 10.4 and 27.3 months, respectively. Eight functionally significant SNPs; RGS5 (rs , rs ), PDGFRB (rs , rs ), CSPG4 (rs , rs ), and RALBP1 (rs10989, rs329007) were analyzed by PCR-based direct sequencing. All candidate SNPs were analyzed for association with tumor response rate (RR), progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). The associations between genetic variants and clinical outcome were examined using χ 2 test, log-rank test, and Cox regression models whenever appropriate. All tests were 2-sided and p values were not adjusted for multiple testing. Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the 424 patients included in the biomarker analysis. Objectives The aim of this study was to identify molecular predictors of response and survival to FOLFIRI+BV by evaluating single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in genes involved in the pericyte driven maturation of tumor vasculature to personalize treatment. Genetic variants in pericyte driven tumor vessel maturation genes predict treatment efficacy in mCRC patients treated with FOLFIRI/bevacizumab Nico B Volz 1, Wu Zhang 1, Dongyun Yang 1, Sebastian Stintzing 1, Yan Ning 1, Takeru Wakatsuki 1,Rita E El-Khoueiry 1, Joseph E Li 1, Adel Kardosh 1, Fotios Loupakis 2, Federica Marmorino 2, Carlotta Antoniotti 2, Heinz-Josef Lenz 1 1 USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA; 2 U.O. Oncologia Medica 2 – Aziendo Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy Patient Characteristics Abstract ID: 3566 Results P value was based on Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test for response, log-rank test for PFS and OS in the univariate analysis (†) and Wald test for PFS and OS in the multivariable Cox regression model (‡). Abbreviations: HR – hazard ratio Our initial results suggest that the PDGFRB polymorphism rs and the CSPG4 polymorphism rs may serve as a prognostic marker for the efficacy of FOLFIRI + BV treatment in patients with mCRC. Studies to confirm these preliminary findings are warranted. References 1. Weis, S. M. and D. A. Cheresh (2011). "Tumor angiogenesis: molecular pathways and therapeutic targets." Nat Med 17(11): Lambrechts, D., et al., Markers of Response for the Antiangiogenic Agent Bevacizumab. J Clin Oncol, He, K., et al., The effect of anti-VEGF drugs (bevacizumab and aflibercept) on the survival of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Onco Targets Ther, : p Fukushi, J., I.T. Makagiansar, and W.B. Stallcup, NG2 proteoglycan promotes endothelial cell motility and angiogenesis via engagement of galectin-3 and alpha3beta1 integrin. Mol Biol Cell, (8): p Weis, S. M. and D. A. Cheresh (2011). "Tumor angiogenesis: molecular pathways and therapeutic targets." Nat Med 17(11): Carmeliet, P. and R. K. Jain (2011). "Principles and mechanisms of vessel normalization for cancer and other angiogenic diseases." Nat Rev Drug Discov 10(6): Figure 2. In RGS5, rs , the hazard ratio in OS for patients with a GG genotype was significantly higher than in patients carrying any C allele (CC /CG). (HR: 1.43; 95% CI: 1.00 – 2.05; p = 0.044). Relevant Figure 1. Relevant Genes Involved Table 2. Significant polymorphisms and clinical outcome in first-line FOLFIRI+BV therapy. N%N% Age, years Lung mets Median (range)62 (25-81) Yes ≤ No > Mst site, n Sex M > F Time to mets ECOGPS Synchronous Metachronous Kohne Score Primary tumor site Low Right colon Intermediate Left colon High358.3 Rectum NA153.5 Colon, rectum10.2Primary tumor resected Unknown143.3Yes Liver-only disease No Yes Unknown10.2 No OS SNPNMedian, mo (95%CI) HR (95%CI)†HR (95%CI)‡ RGS5 rs p – value = 0.044p – value = 0.48 Any C (24.8, 32.1) 1 (Reference) G/G ( ) 1.43 (1.00, 2.05)1.14 (0.79, 1.65) PFS SNPNMedian, mo (95%CI) HR (95%CI)†HR (95%CI)‡ PDGFRB rs p – value = 0.11p – value = C/C (9.3, 10.6)1 (Reference) C/T (10.0, 12.3)0.80 (0.63, 1.00)0.73 (0.57, 0.92) T/T (8.3, 14.0)0.79 (0.53, 1.17)0.88 (0.59, 1.32) p – value = 0.035p – value = Any T (10.2, 12.3)0.79 (0.64, 0.99)0.75 (0.60, 0.94) CSPG4 rs p – value = 0.043p – value = 0.14 C/C (10.1, 12.1)1 (Reference) C/T (9.2, 10.6)1.23 (0.96, 1.57)1.20 (0.93, 1.54) T/T (9.4, 12.7)0.88 (0.63, 1.22)0.91 (0.64, 1.28) Tumor Response SNPNCR+PRSD+PD RALBP1 rs329007p – value = A/A (63%)96 (38%) A/G14073 (54%)63 (46%) G/G186 (35%)11 (65%) Figure 3. PDGFRB rs concluded patients with any T (CT/TT) allele were significantly associated with longer PFS compared to those with CC genotypes (median 9.9 vs 11.1 months, HR=0.79 [95%CI: ], p=0.035, log-rank test) which remained significant upon multivariate analysis (HR=0.75 [95% CI: ], p=0.013, log-rank test). Genotype