Prosecution Group Luncheon September, 2011. America Invents Act Passed House and Senate (HR 1249) Presidential Signature expected Friday Most provisions.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
P ROFESSOR R UTH O KEDIJI First to File Patent Systems How the New U.S. System Compares to other Systems Around the World.
Advertisements

MELISSA ASFAHANI Patent Attorney El Paso, TX
America Invents Act: Changes to U.S. Patent System
By David W. Hill AIPLA Immediate Past President Partner Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP Overview of the America Invents Act.
© Kolisch Hartwell 2013 All Rights Reserved, Page 1 America Invents Act (AIA) Implementation in 2012 Peter D. Sabido Intellectual Property Attorney Kolisch.
Patent Strategy Under the AIA Washington in the West January 29, 2013.
Joint Meeting of PIPLA and NJIPLA February 7, 2012 Kenneth N. Nigon RatnerPrestia 1.
Practical Effects of America Invents Act
April 24, 2012 Benoît Castel Young & Thompson U.S. Patent Law Reform Summary of H.R. 1249, “Leahy-Smith America Invents Act”
PATENT REFORM University of Rochester KATHRYN DOYLE, Ph.D., J.D. RIVERSIDE LAW, LLP.
© COPYRIGHT DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. The Leahy-Smith America Invents Act: Changes to United States Patent Law and Practice Steven.
©2011 Foley & Lardner LLP Attorney Advertising Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome Models used are not clients but may be representative of.
Director’s Meeting Legislation and Case Law Update by Dave Risley July 29, 2011.
Implementing First-Inventor-to-File Provisions of the AIA By: Scott D. Malpede, Seth Boeshore and Chitra Kalyanaraman USPTO Rules Effective March 16, 2013.
INTRODUCTION TO PATENT RIGHTS The Business of Intellectual Property
The America Invents Act (AIA) - Rules and Implications of First to File, Prior Art, and Non-obviousness -
U.S. ARMY ARMAMENT RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT & ENGINEERING CENTER (ARDEC) Presented to: Federal Laboratory Consortium Northeast Region 25 Feb 2014 Mr. Tim.
Post-Issuance Proceedings Under the AIA Thomas F. Cotter Briggs and Morgan Professor of Law University of Minnesota Law School.
BIPC.COM STRATEGIC CONSIDERATIONS OF POST ISSUANCE PATENTABILITY REVIEW: THE NEW, OLD, AND NO LONGER Presented By: Todd R. Walters, Esq. B UCHANAN, I NGERSOLL.
Administrative Trials
America Invents Act (AIA) Changes in Patent Law That Impact Companies May Mowzoon: Mowzoon Law Office, PLLC 1.
Patent Law Under the America Invents Act
Filing Compliant Reexam Requests Andy Kashnikow SPE, Central Reexamination Unit Andy Kashnikow SPE, Central Reexamination Unit June, 2010.
1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association CURRENT TRENDS/EFFECTS OF AIA on US Patent Practice at the US Patent.
© COPYRIGHT DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. The Leahy-Smith America Invents Act: Changes to United States Patent Law and Practice Charles.
AMERICA INVENTS ACT A Look Into The Future
HOW WILL THE AMERICA INVENTS ACT (AIA) CHANGE THE WAY WE PROTECT AMERICAN IMAGINEERING? Michael A. Guiliana April 24, 2012 Disney’s Grand Californian Hotel.
USPTO Implementation of the America Invents Act Teresa Stanek Rea Deputy Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Deputy Director of the.
The U.S. Patent System is Changing – A Summary of the New Patent Reform Law.
AIA Strategies.
America Invents The Patent Reform Act of 2011 March 29, 2011.
0 Charles R. Macedo, Esq. Partner. 1 Brief Overview of Priority Under AIA Implications for Public Disclosures and Private Disclosures Role of Provisional.
Anthony Venturino MILANO 10 February 2012 SELECTED PROVISIONS OF THE LEAHY Smith AMERICA INVENTS ACT OF 2011 AIPPI - AIPLA 1 © AIPLA
“IP Universities” Istanbul, May 16 to 18, 2012 Albert Long Hall, BOGAZICI UNIVERSITY America Invents Act and Its Impact on UniversitiesGokalp.
Post-Grant Proceedings Under The America Invents Act Los Angeles Intellectual Property Law Association “Washington in the West” Conference January 29,
ROPES & GRAY LLP Understanding The Leahy-Smith America Invents Act Denise L. Loring Practising Law Institute November 14, 2011.
© 2011 Baker & Hostetler LLP BRAVE NEW WORLD OF PATENTS plus Case Law Updates & IP Trends ASQ Quality Peter J. Gluck, authored by.
Impact of US AIA: What Really Changed? 1 © AIPLA 2015.
A Practical Guide For Prosecutors Patent Prosecution Under The AIA William R. Childs, Ph.D., J.D. August 22, 2013.
1 Patent Law in the Age of IoT The Landscape Has Shifted. Are You Prepared? 1 Jeffrey A. Miller, Esq.
Investing in research, making a difference. Patent Basics for UW Researchers Leah Haman Intellectual Property Associate WARF 1.
2011 US Patent Law Reform & A Global Prosecution Strategy by Lowe Hauptman Ham & Berner LLP Suite Diagonal St Alexandria VA Tel. (703)
Leahy-Smith America Invents Act J. Gibson Lanier, JD, PhD Ballard Spahr LLP.
Leahy-Smith America Invents Act Some Prosecution and Litigation Perspectives Jeffrey D. Mills Dean M. Munyon Austin Intellectual Property Law Association.
Christopher J. Fildes Fildes & Outland, P.C. Derivation Proceedings and Prior User Rights.
The America Invents Act Patent Reform in 2011 Presented by Justin Leonard.
Post Grant Challenges: Strategy and Considerations after the America Invents Act of 2011 IP Law & Management Institute November 7, 2011 Justin J. Oliver.
Post-Grant & Inter Partes Review Procedures Presented to AIPPI, Italy February 10, 2012 By Joerg-Uwe Szipl Griffin & Szipl, P.C.
1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association Update on AIA Implementation Especially post grant processes Alan J. Kasper AIPLA/JPO.
1 1 AIPLA American Intellectual Property Law Association Updates on the USPTO Chris Fildes AIPLA-JPAA Joint Meeting April 9, 2013.
1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association The Presumption of Patent Validity in the U.S. Tom Engellenner AIPLA Presentation to.
1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association Interplay between Litigation and the AIA __________ An Overview John B. Pegram Fish.
New Sections 102 & 103 (b) Conditions for Patentability- (1) IN GENERAL- Section 102 of title 35, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: -`Sec.
America Invents Act. FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO © 2011 | 2 First-to-File  U.S. will switch to a first-inventor-to-file.
Side 1 Andrew Chin AndrewChin.com A Quick Survey of the America Invents Act Patent Law October 12, 2011.
© COPYRIGHT DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Post Grant Proceedings Before the USPTO and Litigation Strategies Under the AIA Panelists:David.
America Invents Act  Date of enactment: 9/16/11  First-to-file provisions effective 18 months after enactment – March 16, 2013  Applications filed on.
The New Tool for Patent Defendants - Inter Partes Review Daniel W. McDonald George C. Lewis, P.E. Merchant & Gould, P.C. April 16, 2014 © 2014 Merchant.
Derivation Proceedings Gene Quinn Patent Attorney IPWatchdog.com March 27 th, 2012.
Patent Reform Becomes Law: Overview of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act Presented to the MSBA Computer & Technology Law Section September 13, 2011 By:
T HE L EAHY -S MITH A MERICA I NVENTS A CT The Toledo Intellectual Property Law Association Presented By: November 16, 2011.
Prosecution Group Luncheon March, S.23: Patent Reform Act of 2011 Senate passed 95-5 (3/8); no House action as yet First to File Virtual (Internet)
The Impact of Patent Reform on Independent Inventors and Start-up Companies Mark Nowotarski (Patent Agent)
Presentation at Biotechnology/ Chemical/Pharmaceutical Customer Partnership Program Partnership Program March 15, 2005 POST-GRANT REVIEW: A COMPARISON.
Recent Developments in Obtaining and Enforcing Intellectual Property Rights in Nanocomposites Michael P. Dilworth February 28, 2012.
Prosecution Group Luncheon
CBM/PGR Differences Differences in time periods of availability, parties who have standing, grounds of challenge available, standards of review, and.
America Invents Act: Litigation Related Provisions
Status Report Austin Intellectual Property Law Assoc. August 16, 2011
SMITH-LEAHY AMERICA INVENTS ACT
Presentation transcript:

Prosecution Group Luncheon September, 2011

America Invents Act Passed House and Senate (HR 1249) Presidential Signature expected Friday Most provisions take effect either 12 or 18 months from enactment

America Invents Act—Effective Dates Generally: effective 1 year after enactment (~9/16/2012) Immediate effect Prior user defenseBest mode changes Tax strategy provisionMarking provision Effective 18 mos. after enactment (~3/16/2013) First to file (applies to apps. with claims with EFD after that effective date)

America Invents Act First to File Post-grant Review/Citation of Art (3d party/supp. exam) –Transitional Procedure for certain Bus. Method Patents Prior use defense Tax strategies deemed within prior art Elimination of Best Mode as Invalidity Basis Marking issues

America Invents Act—First to File Section 102 rewritten—prior art is (a)(1) Publicly available before effective filing date Exceptions [(b)(1)]: disclosures less than 1 year before EFD are not prior art under (a)(1) if –By inventor or one who obtained it from inventor –Disclosure was previously disclosed by inventor (a)(2) Patents/published applications of other inventor, having prior EFD Exceptions [(b)(2)]: disclosures not prior art under (a)(2) if –Obtained from inventor –Publicly disclosed by inventor before reference’s EFD –Disclosure and claimed invention subject to common ownership

America Invents Act—First to File Section 103: A patent may not be obtained if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains.

America Invents Act—First to File Derivation proceedings Patents: new sec. 291, civil action (1 year deadline) Applications: new section 135, petition akin to post-grant petitions Note: current secs. 102(g), 135, 291 remain in effect for applications and patents with claim(s) having EFD before the effective date (March 2013)

America Invents Act—Post-Grant Review Inter Partes Review (Ch. 31; replaces inter partes reexam) Basis: 102/103, over patents or printed publications Petition to cancel claim(s) (with references, expert declarations, argument), decision whether to grant is not appealable Timing: after 9 months from issue, or after Ch. 32 post-grant review Post-Grant Review (Ch. 32) Basis: any invalidity ground in sec. 282 Similar petition process Timing: within 9 months after issue

America Invents Act—Post-Grant Review Transitional program for “covered business method patents” (Ch. 32 procedure, where patent is in suit) Regulations from PTO within one year from enactment Estoppel (akin to interference), stay, joinder provisions Settlement provision precludes estoppel Claims can be amended during proceeding; intervening rights arise

America Invents Act—Citation of Art Third-party submissions Sec. 301: patents/publications or owner’s court/PTO statements can be filed at any time Amended sec. 122: patents/publications can be filed pre-issuance (w/relevance statement) Patent Owner’s Supplemental Examination Step prior to requesting reexamination PTO can institute reexamination Chance to cure possible inequitable conduct

America Invents Act—Prior Use Defense For good-faith commercial user of process or machine, manufacture, composition used in process For uses 1 year before infringed patent’s effective filing date; abandonment re-starts the clock Clear and convincing standard of proof Premarket regulatory, nonprofit lab use is “commercial” Personal defense; transfer only with sale of business Exception for university plaintiffs No defense for derivers

America Invents Act Other provisions of note 14: Strategies for reducing/deferring tax liability are insufficient to distinguish from prior art (with exceptions) 15: Best mode Absence no longer an invalidity ground No longer required for 119(e)/120 priority

America Invents Act—Other 16: Marking Qui tam suits eliminated Competitive injury by false marking actionable Virtual marking (“Patented; see 17: Codification/extension of Knorr-Bremse: failure to obtain or disclose advice of counsel cannot be used to prove willfulness/intent to induce infringement

America Invents Act—Effective Dates Generally: effective 1 year after enactment (~9/16/2012) Immediate effect Prior user defenseBest mode changes Tax strategy provisionMarking provision Effective 18 mos. after enactment (~3/16/2013) First to file (applies to apps. with claims with EFD after that effective date)