Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1401r0 Nov. 2013 Josiam, Kuo, Taori et.al., SamsungSlide 1 System Level Assessments for Outdoor HEW Deployments Date: YYYY-MM-DD.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /0044r0 Submission Proposed Changes to Simulation Scenario Date: 2015/01/12 Takeshi Itagaki, Sony CorporationSlide 1 Authors: January.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /1387r0 Submission Nov Yan Zhang, et. Al.Slide 1 HEW channel modeling for system level simulation Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0116r1 SubmissionYakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)Slide 1 Long-Term SINR Calibration for System Simulation Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/0381r0 March 2014 Filip Mestanov, Ericsson ABSlide 1 Stadium scenario for HEW Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/0996r2 Aug 2013 Josiam, Taori, Tong - SamsungSlide 1 Outdoor Channel Model Candidates for HEW Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-15/613r0 May 2015 Chinghwa Yu et al, MediaTek Inc.Slide 1 Box 5 Calibration Result Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0551r1 SubmissionSuhwook Kim, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 OBSS Preamble Detection Evaluation Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /0861r0 SubmissionSayantan Choudhury Impact of CCA adaptation on spatial reuse in dense residential scenario Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1207r1 Submission Imad Jamil (Orange)Slide 1 OBSS reuse mechanism which preserves fairness Date: Authors: September 2014.
Doc.: IEEE /1443r0 SubmissionEsa Tuomaala Adapting CCA and Receiver Sensitivity Date: Authors: Slide 1 November 2014.
Doc.: IEEE /1420r1Nov 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Impact of Preamble Error on MAC System Performance Date: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /1187r1Sep 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Effect of Preamble Error Model on MAC Simulator Date: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
802.11ax scenario 1 CCA Date: Authors: March 2015
Doc.: IEEE /0107 Jan 2014 SubmissionYonggang Fang et. al. (ZTE) HEW Evaluation Metrics Date: Slide 1 Authors: NameAffiliationAddress .
Doc.: IEEE /0116r0 SubmissionYakun Sun, et. Al.Slide 1 Long-Term SINR Calibration for System Simulation Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/0070r0 Jan 2014 Josiam et.al., SamsungSlide 1 Joint MAC/PHY Evaluation Methodology Date: Authors:
Doc. No. IEEE hew-r1 Submission July 2013 Klaus Doppler, NokiaSlide 1 Evaluation Criteria and Simulation Scenarios Date: July 16, 2013 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1153r0 Submission September 2013 Laurent Cariou (Orange)Slide 1 Simulation scenario proposal Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/0627r0 May 2014 Josiam et.al., SamsungSlide 1 Outdoor Channel Models for System Level Simulations Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0486r1 Submission May 2013 Ron Porat, Broadcom HEW- Metrics, Targets, Simulation Scenarios Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0612r0 May 2014 Jiyong Pang, et. al. HuaweiSlide 1 Calibration Procedures towards Integrated System Level Simulation Date:
Doc.: IEEE /1081r0 SubmissionSayantan Choudhury HEW Simulation Methodology Date: Sep 16, 2013 Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: ax Submission Sept 2014 Slide 1 Effect of CCA in residential scenario part 2 Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0328r0 Submission Dense Apartment Complex Throughput Calculations Date: Authors: Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide 1 Mar 2014.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0578r0 May 2014 Frank LaSita, InterDigitalSlide 1 Residential Scenario CCA/TPC Simulation Discussion Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0804r0 Submission July 2015 TG ax Outdoor Enterprise Scenario and DSC Date: Authors: Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 1.
Doc.: ax Submission July 2014 Slide 1 Proposed Calibration For MAC simulator Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1207r0 Submission Imad Jamil (Orange)Slide 1 OBSS reuse mechanism which preserves fairness Date: Authors: September 2014.
Doc.: IEEE /0889r0 Submission June 2014 Nihar Jindal, Broadcom Performance Gains from CCA Optimization Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /0523r0 Submission April 2014 Imad Jamil (Orange)Slide 1 MAC simulation results for Dynamic sensitivity control (DSC - CCA adaptation)
Doc.: IEEE /0757r0 Submission July 2013 Ron Porat, Broadcom Evaluation Methodology and Simulation Scenarios Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /610r1 Submission Vida Ferdowsi, Newracom May 2015 Slide 1 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Vida Ferdowsi Daewon Lee Reza Hedayat.
Doc.: IEEE /0328r1 Submission Dense Apartment Complex Throughput Calculations Date: Authors: Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide 1 Mar 2014.
Doc.: IEEE /1110r0 Amin Jafarian, Newracom 1 September 2015 BSS-TXOP NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Amin
Submission doc.: IEEE /0372r2 Slide 1 System Level Simulations on Increased Spatial Reuse Date: Authors: Jinjing Jiang(Marvell) March.
Doc.: IEEE /0799r2 Submission June 2014 Nihar Jindal, Broadcom Modifications to Simulation Scenarios and Calibration Process Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0680r1 SubmissionJiyong Pang, Huawei TechnologiesSlide 1 Reference Box5 Calibration Assumptions and Parameters Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0814r0 Submission July 2015 Simulation Results for Box5 Calibration Ke Yao, et, al. (ZTE) Slide 1 Date: Authors: NameAffiliationAddress .
Doc.: IEEE /0307r0 Submission January 2014 Nihar Jindal, Broadcom PHY Calibration Results Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/0866r0 July 2014 Johan Söder, Ericsson ABSlide 1 Traffic modeling and system capacity performance measure Date:
Doc.: IEEE / ax Submission M. Shahwaiz Afaqui DSC calibration results with NS-3 Authors: Nov
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1079r0 September 2013 Joseph Levy, InterDigital Communications Inc.Slide 1 Outdoor Stadium Simulation Details Discussion Date:
Doc.: IEEE / ax Submission M. Shahwaiz Afaqui DSC calibration results with NS-3 Authors: Nov
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-10/0858r1 July 2014 Josiam et.al., SamsungSlide 1 Analysis on Multiplexing Schemes exploiting frequency selectivity in WLAN Systems.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1373r1 November 2015 Narendar Madhavan, ToshibaSlide 1 Updated Box 5 Calibration Results Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE / Submission March 2013 Juho Pirskanen, Renesas Mobile CorporationSlide 1 Discussion On Basic Technical Aspects for HEW Date:
Doc.: IEEE /1392r5 SubmissionSuhwook Kim, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 Simulation results for Box 5 calibration Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /0889r3 Submission June 2014 Nihar Jindal, Broadcom Performance Gains from CCA Optimization Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /1054 Sept 2013 SubmissionYonggang Fang, ZTETX HEW Evaluation Metrics Suggestions Date: Slide 1 Authors: NameAffiliationAddress .
Doc.: IEEE /1226r0 Submission Sep 2014 Slide 1 SLS Box 1&2 Calibration Results Date: Authors: Russell Huang (MediaTek)
Submission doc.: IEEE /0871r1 Jul Jiyong Pang, et. al. Huawei Further Calibration Results towards Integrated System Level Simulation Date:
Dense apartment building use case for HEW
Simulation results for spatial reuse in 11ax
Performance Evaluation for 11ac
11ax PAR Verification using UL MU-MIMO
Verifying 11ax’s PAR by UL MU-MIMO
Performance Evaluation of OBSS Densification
TPC combined with channel allocation method for OBSS environment
Simulation results for
OFDMA performance in 11ax
Simulation Results for Box5
Dense apartment building use case for HEW
Joint submission for Box 5 calibration
Box5 Results of 11ac SS6 Date: Authors: Jan 2015 Sept 2014
802.11ax scenario 1 CCA Date: Authors: March 2015
802.11ax scenario 1 CCA Date: Authors: March 2015
System Level Simulator Evaluation with/without Capture Effect
DSC Calibration Result
Consideration on System Level Simulation
802.11ax scenario 1 CCA Date: Authors: March 2015
Presentation transcript:

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1401r0 Nov Josiam, Kuo, Taori et.al., SamsungSlide 1 System Level Assessments for Outdoor HEW Deployments Date: YYYY-MM-DD Authors:

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1401r0 Nov Josiam, Kuo, Taori et.al., SamsungSlide 2 Abstract We evaluate the system level performance of outdoor deployments based on.11ac standard. We construct 4 simulation settings each with different number of interferers. Assuming re-use 1 among APs, we evaluate the per-STA average throughput and the average system throughput. The per-STA average throughput CDF shows a low 5%ile value for outdoor environments.

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1401r0 System level evaluations Two types of system level evaluations have been presented so far for dense Wi-Fi deployments Real world Evaluations with data collected from deployed networks [2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 10] Simulation based modeling of throughput, access delay and other performance metrics [1, 4, 6, 9, 11, 13] Primary focus was on indoor environments and identifying pain- points in overlapping BSS deployments with interference Evaluation Methodology document under development also identify scenarios for evaluation [19] Outdoor specific parameters were identified in [20] and incorporated in [19]. Slide 3Josiam, Kuo, Taori et.al., Samsung Nov. 2013

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1401r0Nov Josiam, Kuo, Taori et.al., SamsungSlide 4 Evaluation in Outdoor Environments The exact methodology is still being developed. Objective of this evaluation is to generate an initial assessment of the system performance We make some assumptions on the system setting as well as the parameters chosen for evaluation

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1401r0 Simulation Settings Slide 5Josiam, Kuo, Taori et.al., Samsung Nov SETTING #1: Isolated AP [Iso AP] SETTING #2: CELL WITH NEIGHBORING INTERFERER [2 AP] Focus on two types of performance in presence of interferers Throughput with all APs and STAs Center AP alone with interference 4 different settings considered

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1401r0 Simulation Settings Slide 6Josiam, Kuo, Taori et.al., Samsung Nov SETTING #3: AP with one ring of interferers [7 AP] SETTING #4: AP with two rings of Interferers [19AP] Focus on a BSS performance in presence of interferers

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1401r0 Simulation Parameters ParameterValueParameterValue EnvironmentOutdoorEDCA AC_BE TXOP 1ms Inter-AP Separation 75mAggregationAMPDU: 64 Channel Model 2D SCM [ITU UMi, NLOS, 3kmph] Max. Retries10 Transmit Power AP: 23dBm STA: 19dBm RTS/CTSOn Bandwidth20 MHzBlock Ack.Enabled # of Antennas AP: 2 STA: 2 Traffic Model Packet Size Full Buffer 1500Bytes Antenna Gain AP: 0dBi STA: 0dBi Simulation time per drop 2s Link AdaptationSNR based# of drops5 Rx CCA Threshold -82dBm# of STAs per AP10 Slide 7Josiam, Kuo, Taori et.al., Samsung Nov. 2013

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1401r0 Metrics of interest Slide 8Josiam, Kuo, Taori et.al., Samsung Nov. 2013

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1401r0 CDF of average data throughput per STA Slide 9Josiam, Kuo, Taori et.al., Samsung Nov Throughput with all APs and STAs 5%ile throughput

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1401r0 CDF of average data throughput per STA Slide 10Josiam, Kuo, Taori et.al., Samsung Nov Center AP alone with interference 5%ile throughput

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1401r0 Average Data Throughput Simulation SettingWith all APs and STAsCenter AP alone Iso AP AP AP AP Slide 11Josiam, Kuo, Taori et.al., Samsung Nov Increasing the # of interferers reduces the average throughput seen in the coverage area of the center AP Trends get a little complicated when we consider the average over all cells. Different interference statistics (2-ring sees more interference free users) simulating with wrap around assumption may help alleviate this issue

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1401r0 Observations The average throughput seen in the center cell decreases with increasing number of interferers Each simulation setting results in a markedly different interference statistics as observed in the different CDF plots Very low 5%ile throughput A function of the system level parameters and operating environment Slide 12Josiam, Kuo, Taori et.al., Samsung Nov. 2013

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1401r0 Possible Next Steps Arrive at a common understanding on simulation parameters Discuss and subsequently agree on the different metrics of interest Average access delay, collision probability, … others? Slide 13Josiam, Kuo, Taori et.al., Samsung Nov. 2013

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1401r0 References hew-dense-apartment-building-use-case-for-hew.pptx hew-wlan-qoe-end-user-perspective-opportunities-to- improve.ppt hew-wi-fi-interference-measurements-in-korea.ppt hew-mac-efficiecy-analysis-for-hew-sg.pptx hew-understanding-current-situation-of-public-wifi- usage.pptx hew-performance-evaluation-for-11ac.pptx hew-wlan-network-behavior-under-heavy-load.ppt hew-impact-of-network-configuration-on-quality-of- experience-in-wlan-networks.ppt hew-evaluation-criteria-and-simulation-scenarios.ppt hew-issues-of-low-rate-transmission.pptx hew-hew-simulation-methodology.ppt hew-channel-modeling-for-dense-wi-fi-environments.ppt Slide 14Josiam, Kuo, Taori et.al., Samsung Nov. 2013

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1401r0 References hew-capacity-simulation-of-high-density-indoor-wlan- systems.pptx hew-outdoor-channel-model-discussions.pptx hew-summary-on-hew-channel-models.pptx hew-update-on-hew-channel-model.pptx hew-outdoor-channel-model-candidates-for-hew.pptx hew-simulation-scenarios.ppt hew-simulation-scenarios-document-template.docx hew-simulation-scenario-contribution-1153-on-dense- hotspot-and-outdoor-large-bss.docx Slide 15Josiam, Kuo, Taori et.al., Samsung Nov. 2013

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1401r0 APPENDIX Nov Josiam, Kuo, Taori et.al., SamsungSlide 16

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1401r0 Consensus on outdoor channel models Contributions have studied different outdoor channel models for simulation [12, 14, 17] and a summary is captured in [15] ITU Urban Micro Channel Model was a unanimous choice for some outdoor deployments Extensions to the channel model to support up to 160MHz bandwidth is under discussion [16] For the purposes of this discussion, we focus on ITU Urban Micro Channel Model using 20MHz bandwidth. Slide 17Josiam, Kuo, Taori et.al., Samsung Nov. 2013