Developing Questions That Matter

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol
Advertisements

Exit Tickets across the Curriculum
Kagan Structures WALT– introduce Kagan structures in order to broaden teaching and learning methodology WILF improved knowledge of Kagan structures.
Cooperative Learning NAR Project CfE Level 4 Algebra Mathematics Association 2011 Conference Saturday 17th September 2011 Monica Kirson, Maths Teacher.
Focused Note Taking Essential Question: How does focused note taking increase my chances of earning an advanced grade?
Literacy Test Preparation
Socratic Seminars. We will end the year with an in-class discussion project called Socratic Seminars. We will use our class novel to get ideas for discussion.
December 13, 2011 ICSD facilitated by Dr. Heather Sheridan-Thomas & Cheryl Covell TST BOCES Network Team Lead Evaluator of Teachers Training: Session 4.
Checking For Understanding
Introduction to the OSSLT (FORMAT OF THE TEST ; language & KEY WORDS)
STRUCTURED ACADEMIC CONTROVERSY Mrs. Moss’s 8 th grade social studies.
“Charting the Course Together” Implementing the Common Core State Standards -Mathematics- Middle School Leadership Teams February 6, 2014.
Grade 5, Module 1: Unit 2 Lesson 15
Teaching Critical Thinking- Think-Pair-Share Clare Kilbane, Ph.D.
A Framework for Inquiry-Based Instruction through
21 st Century Lessons Surface Area of a Rectangular Prism Day 2 (of 2) Mrs. Thompson Level 1 1.
Bell Work. Have you ever watched someone win a game again and again? Do you think that person just has good luck? In many cases, winners have strategies.
WRITING IN MATH CLASS THE HOW TO’ S FOR ELEMENTARY Jeanine K Brizendine Math Specialist.
Using Assessments and Data to Improve Student Learning Day 2 1.
New Teachers’ Induction January 20, 2011 Office of Curriculum and Instruction.
The Why, What, When, How, and How- to of Book Clubs
Name Workshop Facilitator Instructional Leadership: Creating Demand.
Student Growth in the Washington State Teacher Evaluation System Michelle Lewis Puget Sound ESD
Thematic Unit “Exploring Board Games” By: Amy Dotson.
Bell Ringer What did you do to motivate students in the first few weeks of school?
21 st Century Lessons Equivalent Expressions 1. Warm Up OBJECTIVE: Students will be able to identify when two expressions are equivalent. Language Objective:
Dred Scott: Could slaves and their descendents ever have the rights of citizens in the United States? Academic Controversy.
Welcome Science 5 and Science 6 Implementation Workshop.
Day 3 Professional Learning for Mathematics Leaders and Coaches— Not just a 3-part series 1.
Understand the purpose and benefits of guiding instructional design through the review of student work. Practice a protocol for.
Please get your journal and performance assessment book
Candidate Assessment of Performance Conducting Observations and Providing Meaningful Feedback Workshop for Program Supervisors and Supervising Practitioners.
Purposeful Speaking and Listening.. My goal for today  Engage you in a few different purposeful speaking and listening strategies that you can take and.
Introduction to the ERWC (Expository Reading and Writing Course)
The Background & Research
One Form of Argument… “Argument” in NGSS In science, the production of knowledge is dependent on a process of reasoning from evidence that requires a.
Monday September 14th, 2015 Planner: – HW: Safety rules poster due Wed. 9/16 – Safety Quiz tomorrow - based on rules You Need: – Today: Daily 5 To Do:
Bell Work Please write the fraction, decimal AND percent. 1)Convert 4/5 to a decimal and a percent. 1)Convert.675 to a fraction and a Percent. 1)Convert.
Starting Class Each Day / Lesson 1.Log into google classroom & open “C&E Journal” document. – Classroom.google.com – Insert a line / create separation.
Innovate. Engage. Empower THE ONECLAY WRITES SCORING EXPERIENCE WELCOME! FIND A SEAT TALK TO OTHERS AT YOUR TABLE AND DISCUSS SUCCESSES SO FAR THIS YEAR.
GREAT EXPECTATIONS: THE POWER OF SETTING OBJECTIVES September 2014 Ed Director Meeting.
Marking and Feedback CPD Student approach to marking.
End of Unit 2 Assessment, Part 1: Drafting The Argument Essay.
SIOPSIOP #8: Review and Assessment. Assessment & Review Content Select techniques for reviewing key content concepts Incorporate a variety of assessment.
Calibrating Feedback A Model for Establishing Consistent Expectations of Educator Practice Adapted from the MA Candidate Assessment of Performance.
Good Morning Please come in and pick a table. At least 2 people need to sit at each table. Take a piece of purple paper out of the basket. Trace your hand.
1. 4:00 - 4:05 PM Welcome 4:05 – 6:15 PMShared Expertise 6:15 - 6:30 PMPrayer Break 6:30 - 7:15 PMDebate in science classes 7:15 - 7: 30 PMSurvey and.
INTEGRATING WRITING INTO INSTRUCTION: WRITING TO LEARN.
Inquiry Road Map A Guidance System for 21 st Century Learning By Mary Ratzer.
Claims, Evidence, and Reasoning
Texas: Prelude to Civil War Teresa Goodin. The Annexation of Texas  Why did Americans immigrate to Texas in the mid 1800s?  Why did Texas declare its.
Assessment and UBD Wednesday, August 7, 2013 SSDSRV – Summer Institute.
E XPLANATION AND A RGUMENTATION IN S CIENCE Sara Dozier Integrated Middle School Science Partnership Date.
Learning Objectives for Senior School Students. Failing to plan is planning to fail. / Psychology of Achievement /
Socratic Seminar Waiver Day Purdy and Snellgrove January 11, 2016.
Measuring Polygon Side Lengths
Series of Paragraphs Expressing an Opinion
Socratic Conversation
Cornell Notes.
Question to be debated here
Literacy Test Preparation
Small Group Discussions
Should university be free?
Change and continuity in immigration (c )
1) 2) 3) 4) 5) Warm Up/Do Now Evaluate: OBJECTIVE: Try these problems
Fishbowl Discussion Directions:
Unit 2/ lesson 10 End-of-unit 2 Assessment
Scientists argue, but they argue about ideas.
Series of Paragraphs.
Writing Algebraic Expressions
Presentation transcript:

Developing Questions That Matter

Think – Pair – Share What makes a good question? With your partner brainstorm things that make a good question. One person in the pair will record your thoughts The other person will share the groups ideas with the whole team

New Blooms

What makes a good question? Stimulates interest/arouses curiosity Connects with all students on their level/with their background (all can respond to some degree) Purposefully advances educational goal Gets to an understanding (not just a fact!)

A look at some questions

Break

21st Century Skills! Creativity Collaboration Communication Critical Thinking

Structured Academic Controversy (SAC) Question as driving force in lesson

SAC Instructions 1. You get into your assigned pairs and groups. A. The pair is your partner who will be on your side B. The other pair that makes up your group is your opponents

SAC Instructions 2. With your partner, you will come up with the three best arguments for your side (I have assigned it). I have given you a few arguments, but you may also come up with your own.

SAC Instructions 3. Write down the three main arguments you and your partner will use in the space provided. Again, you may come up with your own reasons as well.

SAC Instructions Round 1 The top pair will go first, arguing their side. Each person must say and explain at least one point. The bottom pair will listen and write down at least one relevant question to ask the other side. The bottom pair should ask the top pair their question. The top pair should respond. [Bottom pair: Be sure to write down the question in the space provided]

SAC Instructions 6. When I say so, the bottom pair will argue their side. Each person must say and explain at least one point. 7. The top pair will listen and write down at least one relevant question to ask the other side. The top pair will ask their question and the bottom pair will respond. [Top pair: Be sure to write down the question in the space provided]

SAC Instructions Round 2 When I say so, you will then switch positions. With the same partner, come up with at least three main arguments for your new side (if you argued we should drop the bomb in round one, you will now be arguing that we should not drop the bomb). [Write down the arguments in the space provided]

SAC Instructions Just like in Round 2, each side will get a chance to state and explain their reasons. The listening side should write down at least one question to ask the other side.

SAC Instructions Key points: Pick the best arguments and talk about them with your partner. When sharing your arguments, don’t just read them! Explain why you think that evidence is important. The question you ask the other side while you are listening might require more research. It is okay if they cannot answer you right away or if you cannot answer them right away.

When you are done… Flip to the very back and complete the exit ticket. Next class, I will collect this packet. We will be having a debate on this topic and you will get to pick your side based on your own opinion.

SAC—What makes a good question? Stimulates interest/arouses curiosity Connects with all students on their level/with their background (all can respond to some degree) Purposefully advances educational goal Gets to an understanding (not just a fact!)

Questioning for Scaffolding Thinking about your questions ahead of time can allow you to build interest, and understanding throughout a lesson.

Scaffolding What background information do I need students to access? What skills or facts do they need to know to be successful? What are my goals for the lesson? Can I use my questions to help guide them through the lesson?

Lesson on Electoral Process Questions to access background knowledge: Questions to build understanding: Questions to assess learning:

Rubric Lesson General Lesson: Explain to students that today they will be become the teacher, scoring the work of other students using the communication rubric we have previously gone over. Allow students to pair up, and hand out the exemplars. They may work in pairs to score the work. If they disagree on a score they should justify their reasoning to each other, but a consensus is not a requirement. Explain they need to be prepared to justify their scores to the class. Allow about 15-20 minutes for students to work. As class finishes display each piece of work on board and have students share their scores and justify. Share with the class what the teacher’s scored it. Discuss that when in doubt we go with the lower score to push them to do better.

Questions to Add Background knowledge: Building understanding: What types of things does a teacher want to see when grading a problem? Building understanding: Is it important to know the solution? What is the actual solution to the problem? Did anyone get to the same solution a different way? Is it acceptable to get to the answer different ways? What are some key words we would want to see in an explanation? Assessing outcomes: Why did you score it that way? Why did we do this lesson? What did you learn about what you should do when solving problems to score well on the rubric?

Reminder: Evaluation