Validation of EM Part of Geant4

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Study of plastic scintillators for fast neutron measurements
Advertisements

Quartz Plate Calorimeter Prototype Ugur Akgun The University of Iowa APS April 2006 Meeting Dallas, Texas.
Parameterized Shower Simulation in Lelaps: a Comparison with Geant4 Daniel Birt, Amy Nicholson.
The performance of Strip-Fiber EM Calorimeter response uniformity, spatial resolution The 7th ACFA Workshop on Physics and Detector at Future Linear Collider.
Particle interactions and detectors
Detection of Gamma-Rays and Energetic Particles
W. Clarida, HCAL Meeting, Fermilab Oct. 06 Quartz Plate Calorimeter Prototype Geant4 Simulation Progress W. Clarida The University of Iowa.
BME 560 Medical Imaging: X-ray, CT, and Nuclear Methods
Particlesymbolrest energy in MeV electron e muon  neutral pion  charged pion   proton p neutron.
GLAST LAT Project Calibration & Analysis Meeting - August 29, 2005 Benoît Lott Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope Response of the GLAST LAT Calorimeter.
Electromagnetic Physics I Tatsumi KOI SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory (strongly based on Michel Maire's slides) Geant4 v9.2.p02 Standard EM package.
Francesco Longo University of Trieste and INFN-Trieste After some discussion at Perugia meeting (P.Boinee, R.Rando, R.Giannitrapani, J.Cohen-Tanugi) Analysis.
Electromagnetic Physics I Joseph Perl SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory (strongly based on Michel Maire's slides) Geant4 v9.3.p01 Standard EM package.
K. LaihemE166 collaboration LCWS06 Bangalore March 12th 2006 The E166 experiment Development of a polarized positron source for the ILC. Karim Laihem on.
J. Tinslay 1, B. Faddegon 2, J. Perl 1 and M. Asai 1 (1) Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Menlo Park, CA, (2) UC San Francisco, San Francisco, CA Verification.
Particle Interactions
T. BurnettGeant Workshop user presentation 1 Geant4 and GLAST Description of the mission and instrument Simulation requirements How we are a little.
Simulations with MEGAlib Jau-Shian Liang Department of Physics, NTHU / SSL, UCB 2007/05/15.
Tracker Reconstruction SoftwarePerformance Review, Oct 16, 2002 Summary of Core “Performance Review” for TkrRecon How do we know the Tracking is working?
Stopping Power The linear stopping power S for charged particles in a given absorber is simply defined as the differential energy loss for that particle.
RF background, analysis of MTA data & implications for MICE Rikard Sandström, Geneva University MICE Collaboration Meeting – Analysis session, October.
G EANT 4 energy loss of protons, electrons and magnetic monopole M. Vladymyrov.
Geant4: Electromagnetic Processes 2 V.Ivanchenko, BINP & CERN
R 3 B Gamma Calorimeter Agenda. ● Introduction ● Short presentation on the first ● Task definition for R&D period ( )
HYP03 Future Hypernuclear Program at Jlab Hall C Satoshi N. Nakamura Tohoku University 18 th Oct 2003, JLab.
Summary of Work Zhang Qiwei INFN - CIAE. Validation of Geant4 EM physics for gamma rays against the SANDIA, EPDL97 and NIST databases.
Geant4 Collaboration 1 Electromagnetic Physics Authors: P. Gumplinger, M. Maire, P. Nieminen, M.G. Pia, L. Urban Budker Inst. of Physics IHEP Protvino.
Lecture 1.3: Interaction of Radiation with Matter
Space Instrumentation. Definition How do we measure these particles? h p+p+ e-e- Device Signal Source.
Physics Modern Lab1 Electromagnetic interactions Energy loss due to collisions –An important fact: electron mass = 511 keV /c2, proton mass = 940.
Susanna Guatelli & Barbara Mascialino G.A.P. Cirrone (INFN LNS), G. Cuttone (INFN LNS), S. Donadio (INFN,Genova), S. Guatelli (INFN Genova), M. Maire (LAPP),
Oct. 22, G.Lima1 Delving Deeper into Geant4 Guilherme Lima DHCal Meeting October 22, 2003.
Calorimeters Chapter 4 Chapter 4 Electromagnetic Showers.
Alpha and Beta Interactions
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Joel Goldstein, RAL 1.Introduction & Accelerators 2.Particle Interactions and Detectors (2/2) 3.Collider Experiments.
1 Status and Plans for Geant4 Physics Linear Collider Simulation Workshop III 2-5 June 2004 Dennis Wright (SLAC)
Simulation of the energy response of  rays in CsI crystal arrays Thomas ZERGUERRAS EXL-R3B Collaboration Meeting, Orsay (France), 02/02/ /03/2006.
Interactions of radiation with Matter
Geant4 simulation for Balloon Flight Jan. 16, 2001 Software Workshop at SLAC Tsunefumi Mizuno.
Electrons Electrons lose energy primarily through ionization and radiation Bhabha (e+e-→e+e-) and Moller (e-e-→e-e-) scattering also contribute When the.
Precision Validation of Geant4 Electromagnetic Physics Geant4 DNA Project Meeting 26 July 2004, CERN Michela.
Interactions of Particles with Matter
Aa GLAST Particle Astrophysics Collaboration Instrument Managed and Integrated at SLAC/Stanford University The Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope (GLAST)
Gamma ray interaction with matter A) Primary interactions 1) Coherent scattering (Rayleigh scattering) 2) Incoherent scattering (Compton scattering) 3)
Degrader 58 Ni Beam Fragments Target FRS: FRagment Separator at GSI Darmstadt, Germany One single beam: 58 Ni, with energy varying between.1 and 1.7 GeV/nucleon.
Particle Detectors for Colliders Robert S. Orr University of Toronto.
GLAST The GLAST Balloon Flight experiment was performed with the collaboration of NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Stanford Linear Accelerator Center,
Interactions of Hadrons and Hadronic Showers
Event Analysis for the Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope Robin Morris, RIACS Johann Cohen-Tanugi SLAC.
1 FK7003 Lecture 17 – Interactions in Matter ● Electromagnetic interactions in material ● Hadronic interactions in material ● Electromagnetic and hadronic.
Comparison between BFEM data and G4 simulation October 18, 2001 Balloon Analysis VRVS meeting T. Mizuno, H. Mizushima, Y. Fukazawa, and T. Kamae
Validation of the bremssrahlung process IV Workshop on Geant4 physics validation Susanna Guatelli, Luciano Pandola, Maria Grazia Pia, Valentina Zampichelli.
The Luminosity Calorimeter Iftach Sadeh Tel Aviv University Desy ( On behalf of the FCAL collaboration ) June 11 th 2008.
Beam-Beam interaction SIMulation: GUINEA-PIG C. Rimbault, LAL Orsay CARE 05, Geneva, November 2005.
Validation of Geant4 EM physics for gamma rays against the SANDIA, EPDL97 and NIST databases Zhang Qiwei INFN-LNS/CIAE 14th Geant4 Users and Collaboration.
Validation of Geant4 (V4.2) for GLAST-LAT -Comparison with Theory, Beam Test Data and EGS4 – S. Ogata, T. Mizuno, H. Mizushima (Hiroshima/SLAC) P. Valtersson,
Tungsten-Silicon Luminosity Detector with Flat Geometry Ronen Ingbir Tel Aviv University High Energy Physics Experimental Group.
Energy Loss Simulation for the CDF Run II W Mass Measurement Tom Riddick University College London.
1 Study of Data from the GLAST Balloon Prototype Based on a Geant4 Simulator Tsunefumi Mizuno February 22, Geant4 Work Shop The GLAST Satellite.
Validation of GEANT4 versus EGSnrc Yann PERROT LPC, CNRS/IN2P3
E+/e- Backgrounds at BEPCII/BESIII JIN Dapeng Aug. 22, 2011.
Physics performance of a DHCAL with various absorber materials Jan BLAHA CALICE Meeting, 16 – 18 Sep. 2009, Lyon, France.
Chapter 2 Radiation Interactions with Matter East China Institute of Technology School of Nuclear Engineering and Technology LIU Yi-Bao Wang Ling.
“Performance test of a lead glass
Methods of Experimental Particle Physics
“minimum-ionisation” peak
Spectrometry of high energy gamma ray
Polarized Positrons at Jefferson Lab
GEANT Simulations and Track Reconstruction
NKS2 Meeting with Bydzovsky NKS2 Experiment / Analysis Status
Presentation transcript:

Validation of EM Part of Geant4 February 22, 2002 @ Geant4 Work Shop Tsuneyoshi Kamae/Tsunefumi Mizuno

Purpose and Plan of this Talk We have validated EM processes in Geant4 important for gamma-ray satellite GLAST. Energy range of GLAST is 20 MeV - 300 GeV. So we need to validate physics processed down to ~10 MeV and lower. Particle Ionization Energy Loss in Matters Bethe-Bloch Formula (pp. 3-5) Landau Distribution (pp. 3-5) Range (p. 6) Processed related to electromagnetic shower Pair creation (pp. 8-9) Bremsstrahlung (p. 10) Moller scattering/BhaBha scattering (pp. 11-12) Comparison of shower profile with experimental data (pp. 13-14) Comparison of shower profile with EGS4 (pp. 15-17) Tracker (Si, Pb) Calorimeter (CsI) We use Geant4 2.0

Ionization Energy loss in matters Shoot proton/electron in Pb and Si. Cutoff Length: 0.4mm(e-), 0.1mm(others) Thin absorber: Landau distribution Thick absorber: Bethe-Bloch formula Check mean energy loss (thick absorber), shape and most probable energy loss (thin absorber).

Bethe-Bloch formula for protons Geant4 well reproduces ionization energy loss in thick Si and Pb of proton down to 10 MeV

Landau Distribution for protons and electrons Fluctuation of energy loss and the most probable value in thin Si and Pb are appropriate.

Range of protons Shoot protons of 200 MeV and 1 GeV in CsI, Pb and W Compare the results with NIST data: (http://physics.nist.gov/PhysRefData/Star/Text/contents.html) Show good agreement within 0.6%.

Processes related to EM shower Pair creation (pp. 8-9) (and compton scattering and photo-electric effect) Bremsstrahlung (p. 10) Moller scattering (pp. 11-12) Bhabha scattering (pp. 11-12) We need to validate these processes, especially in low-energy, since Pair creation and EM shower are key processes to determine gamma-ray energy and direction in the GLAST. Low energy electrons may suffer large-angle scattering and cause trigger in the GLAST. Cutoff 0.04mm(e-) 0.01mm(others) Tracker (Si-Strip detectors) Calorimeter (CsI scintillator) e-

Pair creation – cross section Compare the cross section in Pb calculated by Geant4 with that of a reference (http://physics.nist.gov/PhysRefData/Xcom/Text) Geant4 correctly calculates cross section down to ~100 keV

Pair creation-angular distribution of emitted electrons e- 4 MeV Events/Bin Shoot 20 MeV gammas into Pb absorber (10% RL) Compare the angular distribution of generated e- with that of theoretical formula 0.125 0.25 0.375 0.5 Theta [rad] e- 18 MeV Events/Bin We found discrepancies for low energy electrons and fixed the code 0.125 0.25 0.375 0.5 Theta [rad]

Bremsstrahlung -- angular distribution of generated photons Shoot 20 MeV e- into Pb absorber (10% RL) Compare the angular distribution of generated photons with that of theoretical formula gamma 2 MeV gamma 6 MeV Geant4 well reproduces the angular distribution of photons generated via bremsstrahlung down to ~1 MeV gamma 10 MeV

Moller/Bhabha scattering (scattering with e-/e+) Shoot e- of 20 MeV and 100 MeV into Pb absorber (1% RL) Compare the angular distribution of scattered electrons with that of theoretical formula

Moller scattering (with e-) Bhabha scattering (with e+) Theoretical furmula Geant4 20 MeV 20 MeV 100 MeV 100 MeV G4 well reproduces the theoretical formula down to 20 MeV

EM shower profile – Crannell experiment (1) Cranell experimtns: Carol Jo Crannell, et al., Phys. Rev. 184 (1969) 426 shoot 1GeV e- into water tank (10 rings and 11 layers) Compare the G4 results with that of experimental data and EGS4 (Professor Nelthon and Liu).

EM shower profile – Crannell experiment (2) longitudinal profile lateral profiles Shower profile of G4 is narrower than that of experiment and EGS4

EM shower in Pb layers (1) To investigate the EM shower profile in the GLAST Tracker, we constructed 10 Pb layers(0.1RL each) with air (3cm). The radius is 0.2 Moliere radius (core of shower) Geant4 EGS4 20 MeV, longitudinal profile Pb lateral profiles air

EM shower in Pb and air (2) Geant4 Geant4 EGS4 EGS4 500 MeV, longitudinal profile 5 GeV, longitudinal profile lateral profiles lateral profiles Energy deposition is higher in Geant4 (low energy region) Geant4 shows narrower shower profile (and could not be solved by fixing the angular distribution of pair creation)

Effect of cutoff energy (length) 0.4mm, 0.04mm (e-), 0.1mm, 0.01mm(others) The discrepancy can not be attributed to cutoff length (energy) Geant4 EGS4 The reason of the narrower shower profile is unrevealed.

Summary We have validated EM part of Geant4 (2.0). Energy loss in matters is well simulated down to ~10 MeV. Angular distribution of pair-created e- was found to be inappropriate and fixed. Cross section of pair creation, angular distribution of bremsstrahlung/Moller scattering/Bhabha scattering were validated down to ~10 MeV. Shower profile of G4 is slightly narrower than that of experimental data and EGS4. The reason of this is unknown.