Takaaki Kajita, ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo NOW2004, Sep 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Oscillation formalism
Advertisements

Recent Results from Super-Kamiokande on Atmospheric Neutrino Measurements Choji Saji ICRR,Univ. of Tokyo for the Super-Kamiokande collaboration ICHEP 2004,
Status of T2K Tokai to Kamioka Neutrino Project at J-PARC June 21, 2004 Koichiro Nishikawa Kyoto University.
Atmospheric Neutrinos Barry Barish Bari, Bologna, Boston, Caltech, Drexel, Indiana, Frascati, Gran Sasso, L’Aquila, Lecce, Michigan, Napoli, Pisa, Roma.
11-September-2005 C2CR2005, Prague 1 Super-Kamiokande Atmospheric Neutrino Results Kimihiro Okumura ICRR Univ. of Tokyo ( 11-September-2005.
Takaaki Kajita ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo Nufact05, Frascati, June 2005.
Super-Kamiokande Introduction Contained events and upward muons Updated results Oscillation analysis with a 3D flux Multi-ring events  0 /  ratio 3 decay.
G. Sullivan - Princeton - Mar 2002 What Have We Learned from Super-K? –Before Super-K –SK-I ( ) Atmospheric Solar –SNO & SK-I Active solar –SK.
T2K neutrino experiment at JPARC Approved since 2003, first beam in April Priorities : 1. search for, and measurement of,   e appearance  sin.
K2K : KEK-to-Kamioka Long Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Experiment Kenzo NAKAMURA KEK For the K2K Collaboration Les Houches EuroConference on Neutrino.
Near detectors for long baseline neutrino experiments T. Nakaya (Kyoto) 1T. Nakaya.
Performance of a Water Cherenkov Detector for e Appearance Shoei NAKAYAMA (ICRR, University of Tokyo) November 18-19, 2005 International Workshop on a.
1 Evidence of Neutrino Oscillation from Super-Kamiokande and K2K Neutrino physics at Super-Kamiokande –Detector overview –Atmospheric neutrinos –Solar.
S K Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations in SK-I An Updated Analysis Alec Habig, Univ. of Minnesota Duluth for the Super-Kamiokande Collaboration With much.
Background Understanding and Suppression in Very Long Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Experiments with Water Cherenkov Detector Chiaki Yanagisawa Stony Brook.
T2K experiment at J-PARC Epiphany 2010D. Kiełczewska1 For T2K Collaboration Danuta Kiełczewska Warsaw University & Sołtan Institute for Nuclear Studies.
New results from K2K Makoto Yoshida (IPNS, KEK) for the K2K collaboration NuFACT02, July 4, 2002 London, UK.
Super-Kamiokande – Neutrinos from MeV to TeV Mark Vagins University of California, Irvine EPS/HEP Lisbon July 22, 2005.
Shoei NAKAYAMA (ICRR) for Super-Kamiokande Collaboration December 9, RCCN International Workshop Effect of solar terms to  23 determination in.
1 Super-Kamiokande atmospheric neutrinos Results from SK-I atmospheric neutrino analysis including treatment of systematic errors Sensitivity study based.
5/1/20110 SciBooNE and MiniBooNE Kendall Mahn TRIUMF For the SciBooNE and MiniBooNE collaborations A search for   disappearance with:
Recent results from the K2K experiment Yoshinari Hayato (KEK/IPNS) for the K2K collaboration Introduction Summary of the results in 2001 Overview of the.
Present status of oscillation studies by atmospheric neutrino experiments ν μ → ν τ 2 flavor oscillations 3 flavor analysis Non-standard explanations Search.
Current and Near Future Long Baseline Experiments Stéphane T’Jampens CEA Saclay DSM/DAPNIA/SPP.
The Earth Matter Effect in the T2KK Experiment Ken-ichi Senda Grad. Univ. for Adv. Studies.
RECENT RESULTS IN K2K EXPERIMENT Shimpei YAMAMOTO (Kyoto Univ.) 10 th ICEPP 16-FEB-2004 Shimpei YAMAMOTO (Kyoto Univ.) 10 th ICEPP Symposium.
K2K NC  0 production Shoei NAKAYAMA (ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo) for the K2K Collaboration July 28, NuFact04.
Dec. 13, 2001Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Neutrino and Anti-Neutrino Cross Sections and CP Phase Measurement Yoshihisa OBAYASHI (KEK-IPNS) NuInt01,
Fermilab, May, 2003 Takaaki Kajita, ICRR, U. Tokyo ・ Introduction ・ JHF-Kamioka neutrino project -overview- ・ Physics in phase-I ・ Phase-II ・ Summary Outline.
Bruno Pontecorvo Pontecorvo Prize is very special for us: All the important works done by Super- Kamiokande point back to Bruno Pontecorvo – 1957 First.
1 DISCOVERY OF ATMOSPHERIC MUON NEUTRINO OSCILLATIONS Prologue First Hint in Kamiokande Second Hint in Kamiokande Evidence found in Super-Kamiokande Nov-12.
JHF-Kamioka Neutrino Oscillation Experiment using JHF 50 GeV PS Y.Itow ICRR,Univ.of Tokyo Jul27,2002 Jul27,2002 ICHEP02 Amsterdam Introduction Facility.
1 The JHF-Kamioka Neutrino experiment 1.Introduction 2.Overview of the experiment 3.Physics sensitivity in Phase-I 4.Physics sensitivity in Phase-II 5.Summary.
Atmospheric neutrinos
Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Oct. Neutrino Oscillation Experiment between JHF – Super-Kamiokande Yoshihisa OBAYASHI (Kamioka Observatory, ICRR)
Search for Electron Neutrino Appearance in MINOS Mhair Orchanian California Institute of Technology On behalf of the MINOS Collaboration DPF 2011 Meeting.
1 Long Baseline Neutrino Experiment in Japan III International Workshop on “Neutrino Oscillations in Venice” Koichiro Nishikawa Kyoto University February.
NuFact02, July 2002, London Takaaki Kajita, ICRR, U.Tokyo For the K2K collab. and JHF-Kamioka WG.
Road Map of Neutrino Physics in Japan Largely my personal view Don’t take too seriously K. Nakamura KEK NuFact04 July 30, 2004.
Rencontres de Moriond (6 th March 2005) C. Mariani (INFN Rome) for K2K collaboration March 6 th, XLth Rencontres de Moriond.
1 M. Yokoyama (Kyoto University) for K2K collaboration June 10 th, U.
Neutrino Oscillations at Super-Kamiokande Soo-Bong Kim (Seoul National University)
Takaaki Kajita (ICRR, U.of Tokyo) Production of atmospheric neutrinos Some early history (Discovery of atmospheric neutrinos, Atmospheric neutrino anomaly)
Takaaki Kajita (ICRR, U.of Tokyo) Production of atmospheric neutrinos Some early history (Discovery of atmospheric neutrinos, Atmospheric neutrino anomaly)
Accelerator-based Long-Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Experiments Kam-Biu Luk University of California, Berkeley and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
1 Status of the T2K long baseline neutrino oscillation experiment Atsuko K. Ichikawa (Kyoto univeristy) For the T2K Collaboration.
Recent Results from Super-K Kate Scholberg, Duke University June 7, 2005 Delphi, Greece.
CP phase and mass hierarchy Ken-ichi Senda Graduate University for Advanced Studies (SOKENDAI) &KEK This talk is based on K. Hagiwara, N. Okamura, KS PLB.
1 A study to clarify important systematic errors A.K.Ichikawa, Kyoto univ. We have just started not to be in a time blind with construction works. Activity.
Search for active neutrino disappearance using neutral-current interactions in the MINOS long-baseline experiment 2008/07/31 Tomonori Kusano Tohoku University.
Spring school “Bruno Touschek” (19 th May 2005) C. Mariani (INFN Rome) May 19 th, LNF Spring School “ Bruno Touschek ”
1 Translation from Near to Far at K2K T.Kobayashi IPNS, KEK for K2K beam monitor group (K.Nishikawa, T.Hasegawa, T.Inagaki, T.Maruyama, T.Nakaya,....)
Jul. 24, 2010Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Atmospheric Neutrino from SuperK2  Imaging Water Cherenkov detector  50kt Pure Water  32kt Inner Detector viewed by.
Takaaki Kajita ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo KIAS, Seoul, Nov Fig: Senda NP-4.
Review of experimental results on atmospheric neutrinos Introduction Super-Kamiokande MACRO Soudan 2 Summary Univ. of Tokyo, Kamioka Observatory.
Hiroyuki Sekiya ICHEP2012 Jul 5 The Hyper-Kamiokande Experiment -Neutrino Physics Potentials- ICHEP2012 July Hiroyuki Sekiya ICRR,
Neutrino Interaction measurement in K2K experiment (1kton water Cherenkov detector) Jun Kameda(ICRR) for K2K collaboration RCCN international workshop.
Observation Gamma rays from neutral current quasi-elastic in the T2K experiment Huang Kunxian for half of T2K collaboration Mar. 24, Univ.
Constraint on  13 from the Super- Kamiokande atmospheric neutrino data Kimihiro Okumura (ICRR) for the Super-Kamiokande collaboration December 9, 2004.
Current Status of the T2K Experiment Ryan Terri (for the T2K Collaboration) 31 May – 4 June 2010 Planck 2010, CERN.
Status of Super-Kamiokande, K2K and JHF ACFA LC Yuichi Oyama (KEK) for Super-Kamiokande collaboration, K2K collaboration and JHF collaboration.
New Results from MINOS Matthew Strait University of Minnesota for the MINOS collaboration Phenomenology 2010 Symposium 11 May 2010.
T2K Oscillation Strategies Kevin McFarland (University of Rochester) on behalf of the T2K Collaboration Neutrino Factories 2010 October 24 th 2010.
The XXII International Conference on Neutrino Physics and Astrophysics in Santa Fe, New Mexico, June 13-19, 2006 The T2K 2KM Water Cherenkov Detector M.
L/E analysis of the atmospheric neutrino data from Super-Kamiokande
T2KK sensitivity as a function of L and Dm2
T2KK Sensitivity of Resolving q23 Octant Degeneracy
Impact of neutrino interaction uncertainties in T2K
Conventional Neutrino Beam Experiment : JHF – Super-Kamiokande
L/E analysis of the atmospheric neutrino data from Super-Kamiokande
Presentation transcript:

Takaaki Kajita, ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo NOW2004, Sep 2004

Outline SK Atmospheric neutrino results   , L/E, and 3 flavor analysis K2K    from K2K-I and -II T2K (Future long baseline experiment) Summary Only 2 and 3 flavor neutrino oscillations

SK collaboration: Japan, USA, Korea, Poland

Event classification and statistics Fully Contained (FC) (E ~1GeV) (12180) Partially Contained (PC) (E ~10GeV) (911) Through-going  (E  ~100GeV) (1842) Stopping  (E  ~10GeV) (418) Red: observed number of events in SK-1 (total number = 15351)

Recent improvements New flux based on the 3 dimensional calculation Tuned neutrino interaction MC based on the K2K data 15  37 systematic error terms (S.Moriyama’s talk) 3D 1D   (deg)

Super-K atmospheric neutrino data 1489day FC+PC data day upward going muon data CC e CC 

Binning for 2 flavor oscillation analysis E Single- Ring  Multi- Ring  Up-stop Up-through 18 momentum bins x 10 zenith bins = 180 bins in total Single- Ring e PC Each box has 10 zenith bins Multi- GeV Sub- GeV CC e CC 

Neutrino oscillation parameters 90%C.L.     2  m2=2.1x10 -3,sin 2 2  =1.00 (full paper will be published soon)

oscillation decoherence decay  Further evidence for oscillations  Strong constraint on oscillation parameters, especially  m 2  -like multi-GeV + PC Should observe this dip! SK collab. hep-ex/

Selection criteria Following events are not used: ★ horizontally going events ★ low energy events Select events with high L/E resolution (  (L/E) < 70%) FC single-ring  -like Full oscillation 1/2 oscillation  (L/E)=70% Similar cut for: FC multi-ring  -like, OD stopping PC, and OD through-going PC 2121 FC  -like and 605 PC

L/E distribution MC (no osc.) 1489 days FC+PC  Evidence for oscillatory signature Mostly down-going Mostly up-going Osc. Decay Decoh. Decay and decoherence disfavored at 3.4 and 3.8  levels, respectively.

Allowed neutrino oscillation parameters  2 min =37.9/40  m 2 =2.4x10 -3,sin 2 2  =1.00 (sin 2 2  =1.02,  2 min =37.8/40 d.o.f) 1.9x10 -3 <  m 23 2 < 3.0x10 -3 eV < sin 2 2  23 (90% C.L.)  Stronger constraint on  m 2  Consistent with that of the standard zenith angle analysis

Search for non-zero  13 Electron appearance in the 5 – 10GeV(E ) upward going events. s 2 13=0.05 s 2 13=0.00 null oscillation MC, SK 20yrs Electron appearance 1+multi-ring, e-like, GeV cos  E (GeV) cos  Matter effect (  m 12 2 =0 assumed)

Super-K e-like data Multi-GeV, single-ring e-like Multi-GeV, multi-ring e-like (special) No evidence for excess of upward-going e-like events

Binning for 3flavor analysis E Single- Ring  Multi- Ring  Up-stop Up-through 37 momentum bins x 10 zenith bins = 370 bins in total Multi- Ring e Single- Ring e PC- stop PC- through Same as 2 flavor analysis Different binning from 2 flavor Special in the 3 flavor ana. Fewer number of events per bin Poisson statistics to claculate  2 Multi- GeV Sub- GeV CC e CC 

3 flavor analysis from Super-K Normal prelim. sin 2  13 sin 2  23 sin 2  13 m2m2

3 flavor analysis from Super-K Inverted prelim. sin 2  13 m2m2 sin 2  23 sin 2  13 No evidence for non-zero  13 (No information on the mass hierarchy)

Studies in progress…. Search for tau neutrino interactions Oscillation analysis with the solar terms Simulated  interaction Event rate = 1/kton/year Only upward going Statistical estimate of the  interactions P.Lipari NOON sub-GeV e-like events Peres, Smirnov NPB 680 (2004) 479 Also, M.Maltoni, this meeting, hep-ph/

SK-II atmospheric neutrino data DATA MC (no oscillation, normalized by live time) Live time FC + PC days Upward going  days MC (oscillation,  m 2 =2.1×10 -3 eV 2, normalized by live time) SK-II event Preliminary!

K2K Collaboration 250km JAPAN, KOREA, U.S.A., POLAND, CANADA, ITALY, FRANCE, SPAIN, SWITZERLAND, RUSSIA More details: K.Kaneyuki’s talk

K2K Analysis Overview Near detectors #, p  and    (E )near KEK Observation # and E  rec. Expectation # and E  rec. (sin 2 2 ,  m 2 ) SK Far/Near Ratio  (E )far int. MC Far/Near Ratio E  (GeV) beam MC w/ PION Monitor 12GeV PS (8.9×10 19 POT for Analysis)

Near detectors 1KT Water Cherenkov Detector (1KT) Scintillating-fiber/Water sandwich Detector (SciFi) Scintillator Bar Detector (SciBar) after 2003 Muon Range Detector (MRD) Muon range detector

Front detector measurements:  momentum and angular distributions   (deg.) 090 p  (MeV/c) kton water Cherenkov Also, measurements by SciFi, SciBar and MRD detectors. Prediction of the number of events( ) and spectrum at SK. QE 11 NC Dis Coh 

Event selection in Super-Kamiokande T SK T spill GPS SK TOF=0.83msec 108 events obs’d Decay electron cut E vis > 20MeV No activity in outer detector Event vertex in fiducial volume E vis > 30MeV Analysis time window  500  sec  5  sec T DIFF. (s) events exp’d

Summary of K2K-SK events K2KDATAMC FC 22.5kt ring  -like e-like 98.8 Multi Ring preliminary K2K I+II

K2K energy spectrum (based on single-ring  -like events) MC normalization: number of events E rec [GeV] Number of events Deficit of events MC (no osc.) MC (osc.) preliminary

Best fit values. sin 2 2  1.53  m 2 = 2.12  eV 2 Best fit values in the physical region. sin 2 2  1.00  m 2 = 2.73  eV 2  logL=0.64 Best fit oscillation parameters sin 2 2  =1.53 can occurr due to a a statistical fluctuation with 14.4% probability. Toy MC sin 2 2 m2m % preliminary 1.53

Allowed parameter region m 2 [eV 2 ] sin 2 2 preliminary Best fit values (in the physical region) sin 2 2  = 1.00  m 2 [eV 2 ] = 2.7   m 2 =(1.7~3.5)×10 -3 eV 2 (90% sin 2 2  =1.0 K2K SK(zenith) SK (L/E) 90%CL

K2K Super-Kamiokande 250km J-PARC JAERI Collaboration (at present): Canada, China, France, Italy, Japan, Korea, Poland, Russia, Spain, Switzerland, UK, USA T2K

T2K main physics goals Discovery of non-zero  13 Precise measurement of sin 2 2  23 and  m 23 2 (Discovery of non maximal  23 ?) Discovery of non-zero CP phase 1st phase 2nd phase If  13 ≠0 observed

J-PARC Facility Nuclear and Particle Experimental Facility Materials and Life Science Experimental Facility Neutrino to Kamiokande Linac (350m) 3 GeV Synchrotron (25 Hz, 1MW) Nuclear Transmutation 50 GeV Synchrotron (0.75 MW) J-PARC = Japan Proton Accelerator Research Complex Under construction, expected completion (Phase-I)= end 2007 LINAC 3GeV 50GeV dipole magnets 50GeV

T2K neutrino facility Near detectors (280m, and 2km(not approved yet) To SK T2KK2K E(GeV)50 12 Int.(10 12 ppp) 3306 Rate(Hz) Power(MW) OA3° OA0° OA2° OA2.5° Off axis beam facility

Measurement of  m 2 and sin 2 2  23 Data sample: SK Monte Carlo, Fully-contained single- ring, muon-like events. Event fraction Typical JHF neutrino energy Important to run the experiment with low energy beam. π π E from E  and 

~ OA 2.5 deg. ~ Reconstructed neutrino energy distribution No oscillation reconstructed E (GeV) non-QE  m 2 = 2.5 x10 -3 eV 2 Quasi Elastic reconstructed E (GeV)

Precise measurement of  23,  m 2 23 Assumed systematic errors normalization non-qe/qe ratio E scale Spectrum shape Spectrum width ( 5%) ( 1%) (20%) ( 5%)  (  m 2 23 ) <1×10 -4 eV 2  (sin 2 2  23 )~0.01 True  m 23 2 (10 -3 eV 2 )

 13 Present status: BG (NC  0 ….) Signal for non- zero  13 (   e ) sin 2  13 Allowed

Measurement of   e sin 2 2  13  (CC+NC)Beam e Osc’d e Signal+BG Expected signal for CHOO Z limit reconstructed E (GeV) exp’d signal+BG total BG  BG Number of events  m 2 (eV 2 ) sin 2 2  13  BG=10% Updated More details: K.Kaneyuki’s talk

T2K Phase-II ★ 0.77 → 4 MW beam power ★~ 1 Mton detector (Hyper-Kamiokande) CP Violation 10 6 events (both  and anti-  )

Assumptions Solid line: w/ matter Dashed line: w/o matter (not updated to the most recent solar parameters)

sin 2 2  13 =0.1  m 31 <0  m 31 >0 90%C.L. stat only 90%C.L. stat+2% syst. 3  stat only 3  stat+2% syst. # of e - events including BG # of e + events including BG CP phase Expected CP violation signal (example) Neutrino run=2years, anti-neutrino run=6.8years, 4MW, 0.54Mton fid. Vol.

3  CP sensitivity no BG signal stat only (signal+BG) stat only stat+2%syst. stat+5%syst. stat+10%syst. CHOOZ excluded sin 2 2  13  m 31 2 ~3x10 -3 eV 2 JHF-I: No indication for sin 2 2θ 13 3  CP sensitivity : |  |>20 o for sin 2 2  13 >0.01 with 2% syst. sin 2 2  13 sin 

Beam Transfer line from 3GeV to Material and Life science Facility) Decay Volume ~110m OA2 o OA3 o Target Station ~15m Dump ~10m Neutrino facility construction Construction started Expected completion: early 2009

Present atmospheric neutrino data from SK are nicely explained by    oscillations with;  m 2 =1.9 – 3.0 × eV 2 sin 2 2  > 0.90 (SK L/E analysis) Recent L/E analysis has shown evidence for “oscillatory” signature. No sub-dominant oscillation seen yet. K2K has confirmed neutrino oscillations using the accelerator beam. Neutrino oscillation results from K2K are in good agreement with the SK results. T2K, a precision neutrino oscillation experiment, will start in If non-zero  13 is observed in T2K phase-I, we would like to proceed to T2K phase-II to measure the CP phase.

End