Minnesota’s Urban Partnership Agreement UPA Timeline The UPA agreement with the US DOT requires that the project be operational by September 30, 2009,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Innovative Partnerships: Working Together for Exceptional Results Craig Lamothe, AICP Senior Project Manager Engineering & Facilities Metro Transit Mn/DOT.
Advertisements

Minnesotas Congestion Pricing Program Road User Charging Conference January, 2009 By Bernie Arseneau Minnesota (USA) Department of Transportation.
General Update March Background As the region grows, increased travel demand on our aging Metro Highway System will continue to create additional.
Transport for Canberra 07 November2013. Transport for NSW: Regional Transport Plan ACT, whilst not part of the region, is an important destination Transport.
EFFICIENT TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS IN MINNESOTA A JOINT PRESENTATION TO THE Transportation Funding Advisory Committee September 14, 2012.
Urban Partnership Agreement Summary Metropolitan Council Meeting September 12, 2007.
THE 2012 FINANCIALLY CONSTRAINED LONG-RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN (CLRP) AND THE FY TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (TIP) Transportation Planning.
TWIN CITIES METRO AREA TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM Transportation Funding Advisory Committee June 2012.
Kenneth R. Buckeye, AICP Minnesota Department of Transportation.
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Douglas R. Failing, P.E. Executive Director, Highway Program Public Private Partnerships CTF Transportation.
I-35W and 46 th Street Station Concept Service Plan and Construction John Dillery & Mac Sweidan Kingfield Neighborhood Association June 2010.
Presentation to the AMP Leadership Team Moving forward. April 17, 2013.
SR520 Urban Partnership Project 2008 ITS Washington Annual Meeting November 12th, 2008 – Seattle Jennifer Charlebois, P.E. Tolling and Systems Project.
Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator for Operations Federal Highway Administration Department of Transportation Enabling Congestion Pricing in the.
I-35W and 46 th Street Station Concept Service Plan Planning for the Future – BRT 46 th St Station Concept Plan Public Input.
1 1 Providing New Transportation Choices through Transit Prioritization Strategies BRT ON MANAGED LANES or PARK & RIDE on HOV LANES.
ICM Minnesota – Interstate 394 Brian Kary, Minnesota Department of Transportation.
Reducing Congestion: Urban Partnerships and Corridors of the Future Columbia Traffic and Safety Conference May 1, 2008 Allen Masuda Division Administrator.
The USDOT Urban Partners & FHWA August 20, 2007 Webcast with Division Offices Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator, Office of Operations Federal.
Less Stop More Go EXPRESS LANES Travel Choices and Strategies to Relieve Congestion Presentation to FDOT’s Annual ITS Working Group Meeting March 2008.
Jeffrey F. Paniati Executive Director Federal Highway Administration US Department of Transportation Washington, DC Reducing Congestion Tools of.
COTA Major Initiatives Ohio Planning Conference July 16, 2014.
Overview of Vehicle Assist and Automation (VAA)Technologies and Applications Rob Gregg Director, Transit Management & Innovation NBRTI/CUTR/University.
National Road Pricing Conference June 4, 2010 Jennifer Tsien, PBS&J Angela Jacobs, Federal Highway Administration.
National Road Pricing Conference June 4, 2010 Mark Burris, Texas Transportation Institute Jessie Yung, Federal Highway Administration.
TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Incorporating Pricing Strategies US Department of Transportation Incorporating.
Part 2: Congestion Pricing Policy Development
Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee December 14, 2010 Draft Long-Range Transportation Plan Destination 2035.
TSM&O FLORIDA’S STATEWIDE IMPLEMENTATION Elizabeth Birriel, PEElizabeth Birriel, PE Florida Department of TransportationFlorida Department of TransportationTranspo2012.
Active Traffic Management: The Next Step in Congestion Management NTOC Webinar Presented by Jessie Yung, P.E. Office of Transportation Management April.
Pat Bursaw, Minnesota DOT International Partnership Meeting Washington D.C. January 26, 2012.
Minnesota I-394 ICM Corridor. What is Integrated Corridor Management? Independent Network of Transportation Systems –Freeways, including managed lanes.
Urban Partnership Agreement Summary August 27, 2007.
I-35W and 46 th Street Final Service Restructuring Plan.
Urban Road Pricing: US DOT Congestion Initiative and Urban Partnerships 14 th World Congress on ITS IBEC Special Session October 10, 2007 Beijing Exhibition.
Early Implementation of Coalition Initiatives ARK-LA-TEX Rail Summit May 9, Transportation Department North Central Texas.
Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator for Operations Federal Highway Administration US Department of Transportation Congestion Initiative Update ITS.
North Central Texas Council of Governments Transportation Department Summary Presentation January 2004 MOBILITY 2025: THE METROPOLITAN.
The Transit “T” Craig Lamothe UPA Transit Project Manager City of Minneapolis City of Lakes Innovative Choices for Congestion Relief.
TRB Transportation Applications Conference Congestion-Free Freeways US Department of Transportation Establishing a Metropolitan.
Dallas ICM Pioneer Site Stage 1 Lessons Learned Webinar July 24, 2008.
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Overview of Metro’s Transportation Program Pam O’Connor Metro Chair July 25, 2007.
1 MetropolitanCouncil Transit CapitalImprovement ProgramOctober 22, 2008.
Mn/DOT Metro District 20- Year Highway Investment Plan Update: (Adopted: December 21, 2011) FHWA and Georgia Operations Summit and Planning for.
FAST Lanes Program Transportation and General Government Policy Committee Association of Metropolitan Municipalities August 16, 2004 Minnesota Department.
1 AGENDA OPEN HOUSE 6:00 PM  Review materials  Ask questions  Provide feedback  Sign up for list  Fill out comment cards PRESENTATION 6:30 PM.
Brian Kary Minnesota Department of Transportation.
US DOT Congestion Initiative Urban Partnership Agreements I-95 Corridor Coalition EPS Summit September 19, 2007 Boston, Massachusetts Jeffrey F. Paniati.
Congestion Pricing and Urban Partnerships Presentation 11 US Department of Transportation Part 4: Urban Partnership Agreements.
Weighing the Scenarios: The Costs and Benefits of Future Transit Service Produced for MTDB by The Mission Group © 2000 by The Mission Group. 1 Dave Schumacher.
US DOT Congestion Initiative Urban Partnership Agreements NTOC Summer Meeting September 7, 2007 Washington, DC Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator,
Regional Transportation Committee (RTC) 10-Year Project Milestone Policy Transportation and Trinity River Project Committee October 26, 2015.
THE EL MONTE HOV / BUSWAY: A Policy Driven Experiment in Congestion Management Frank Quon Division of Operations Deputy District Director HOV LANES IN.
1 MnDOT Metro District Proposed Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Amendment Metropolitan Council January 17, 2007.
1 December 12, 2007 I-35W Bridge Response Plan Update.
Managed Lanes and Bus Rapid Transit: Emerging New Financing Opportunities ENGINEERS PLANNERS ECONOMISTS Wilbur Smith Associates Ed Regan Senior Vice President.
I-15 Express Lanes Project January 2012 I-15 Express Lanes Project January 2012.
Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator for Operations Federal Highway Administration US Department of Transportation Congestion Initiative Update I-95.
Regional Transportation Management Center Shared Operations Center – Mn/DOT Traffic Operations – Mn/DOT Maintenance Dispatch – State Patrol Dispatch 400.
Metropolitan Council 1 Twin Cities Region Transportation Policy Plan Nacho Diaz Metropolitan Council Evaluating Economic and Community Impacts of Transit.
IH-10 Managed Lanes Project: A “Public-Public” Partnership ENGINEERS PLANNERS ECONOMISTS Wilbur Smith Associates Presented at the Value Pricing Conference.
Major Project Scoping Committee.  Two previous studies to develop improvements for the I-35W Corridor ◦ Project Limits were from 42 nd to I-94 ◦ Project.
Brian Kary Minnesota Department of Transportation.
STEERING COMMITTEE JANUARY 24, INTRODUCTIONS 2 WHO IS ON THE PROJECT TEAM?  Dakota County Regional Railroad Authority  Ramsey County Regional.
I-35W/Highway 62 Crosstown Commons Reconstruction Nathan Aul, Bob Krussow, and Michael Martin.
Metropolitan Council Transit Capital Improvement Program October 10, 2007.
RTD Board Update October 8, 2013 US 36 Bus Rapid Transit.
Integrating Transit and Highway Solutions In High Volume Corridors
D Line Project Overview
M14A/D Select Bus Service
Presentation transcript:

Minnesota’s Urban Partnership Agreement UPA Timeline The UPA agreement with the US DOT requires that the project be operational by September 30, 2009, with the exception of the Downtown Minneapolis Transit Lanes, which have a deadline of December 31, 2009, and the HOT lane in the area of the Crosstown, which will be completed in fall Legislative approval for tolling on I-35W is required before the UPA federal funds are released to Minnesota. Extensive planning, design and construction needs to be done in a short timeframe to make the system operational by the 2009 deadline. –The Downtown Minneapolis transit lanes require two construction seasons to complete both Marquette Avenue and 2 nd Avenue. The first construction season (2008) needs to be completed before the Republican National Convention in September Delays in the project start time would increase the cost of the project and require both avenues to be closed simultaneously. –Minnesota needs to begin work on right-of-way acquisition and design for park-and-ride lots and Cedar Avenue stations to meet the September 30, 2009 deadline. –The priced dynamic shoulder lanes and the HOT lane technology require two construction seasons to complete. The Urban Partnership Agreement Minnesota has been awarded $133.3 million through the US Department of Transportation’s Urban Partnership Agreement (UPA) program to reduce traffic congestion in the Twin Cities. Minnesota is required to provide a local match of $55.2 million. Money will be used to tackle congestion on I-35W primarily between downtown Minneapolis and the southern suburbs. Additional transit service and park and rides will also be developed on I-35W in the northern suburbs and on Highway 77. A coalition led by the Metropolitan Council and the Minnesota Department of Transportation applied for the funding in April Minnesota is one of five states selected by the US DOT to receive UPA funding. Minnesota intends to construct transit improvements, install an additional HOT lane, implement the use of dynamic shoulders, expand traffic management systems and promote telecommuting. Transit Improvements on I-35W and Highway 77 UPA funding will be used to provide additional transit service on the I-35W and Highway 77 corridors from Minneapolis to the southern suburbs. –Accelerate bus rapid transit — The UPA project will establish a shared BRT/HOT lane on I-35W from Minneapolis to Burnsville, and will accelerate portions of the Cedar Avenue Transitway by constructing online stations and utilizing existing bus shoulders on Highway 77/Cedar Avenue. –Expand express bus and park-and-ride facilities on I-35W and Highway 77 — New or expanded park and ride facilities on I-35W in both the north and south suburbs, and on Hwy 77. Additional bus service will then be provided to these park and rides. –Provide transit advantages at Highway 77 and Highway 62 interchange — Improve transit access from northbound Highway 77 to westbound Highway 62 bus shoulder. This improvement connects the Highway 77 BRT to I-35W. –Provide advanced traveler information for park-and-ride facilities — Real time congestion conditions, parking availability and bus arrival information will be provided. –Install transit driver guidance system — A lane guidance system developed by the University of Minnesota that allows buses to more safely navigate on bus-only shoulders or narrow lanes will be utilized.

Minnesota’s Urban Partnership Agreement Tolling/Congestion Pricing on I-35W The I-394 MnPASS lanes, opened in May 2005, have developed technology for congestion pricing that has been accepted by the general public. The UPA project will expand MnPASS to the I-35W corridor. Downtown Minneapolis Transit Lanes The UPA will expand the single bus lanes to two bus lanes on both Marquette and 2 nd Avenues. This will more than triple bus throughput and reduce bus travel time through the 16-block downtown area by 10 minutes. (purple circle) Technology for Arterial Traffic Management Cameras and instrumentation on arterial roadways connecting to the I-35W and Highway 77 corridors will improve traffic flow and provide traveler information for motorists. Transit signal priority on arterial roadways connecting to the I-35W and Highway 77 corridors will provide an advantage for transit and help maintain transit schedules. Telecommuting The goal of the UPA telecommuting strategy is to recruit partners (local employers) and increase the number of telecommuting workers by 500 individuals. September 12, 2007 Convert I-35W HOV lanes to MnPASS HOT lanes Convert the existing HOV lanes to I-35W MnPASS HOT lanes from Burnsville Parkway to I-494. (red line) Upon reconstruction of the Crosstown Project, open a new I-35W MnPASS HOT lane from I- 494 to 46th Street. (blue line) Implement a system of Priced Dynamic Shoulder Lanes From 46 th Street to downtown Minneapolis, replace current bus-only shoulders with priced dynamic shoulder lanes, which will allow buses to travel at free-flow freeway speeds instead of the current 35 mph limit on bus-only shoulders. The priced dynamic shoulder lanes will be used during peak periods and will operate as shared BRT/HOT lanes. (green line)