1/9/20161 Engineering Economic Analysis Chapter 9  Other Analysis Techniques.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Incremental Analysis Lecture No. 21 Professor C. S. Park
Advertisements

Contemporary Engineering Economics, 4 th edition, © 2007 Incremental Analysis Lecture No. 28 Chapter 7 Contemporary Engineering Economics Copyright © 2006.
Lecture 7 Evaluating a Single Project PW, FW, AW IRR
Interest and Equivalence L. K. Gaafar. Interest and Equivalence Example: You borrowed $5,000 from a bank and you have to pay it back in 5 years. There.
Copyright Oxford University Press 2009 Chapter 9 Other Analysis Techniques.
State University of New York WARNING All rights reserved. No part of the course materials used in the instruction of this course may be reproduced in any.
Other Analysis Techniques
APPLICATIONS OF MONEY-TIME RELATIONSHIPS
Present Worth Analysis
Exam 4 Practice Problems Douglas Rittmann, Ph.D., P.E.
Engineering Economics Outline Overview
1 Dr. Lotfi K.GAAFAR Eng. Ahmed Salah RIFKY ENGR 345 Engineering Economy.
Other Analysis Techniques
Rate of Return Analysis
TM 661 Engineering Economics for Managers
Multiple Investment Alternatives Sensitivity Analysis.
Incremental Analysis Ismu Kusumanto.
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Chapter 10 Capital Budgeting Techniques.
Flash back before we compare mutually exclusive alternatives.
1 By Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ Gaziantep University Department of Civil Engineering CE ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS IN CONSTRUCTION CHP 7 -Benefit/Cost.
Slide to accompany Blank and Tarquin Basics of Engineering Economy, 2008 © 2008, McGraw-Hill All rights reserved Lecture slides to accompany Basics.
(c) 2001 Contemporary Engineering Economics 1 Chapter 7 Present Worth Analysis Describing Project Cash Flows Initial Project Screening Method Present Worth.
Contemporary Engineering Economics, 4 th edition, © 2007 Comparing Mutually Exclusive Alternatives Lecture No.18 Chapter 5 Contemporary Engineering Economics.
EVALUATING PROJECTS WITH THE BENEFIT / COST RATIO METHOD
FINAL EXAM REVIEW Spring Nominal and Effective Interest Rates Payment Period  Compounding Period Mortgages and Car Loans MARR and WACC Present.
Evaluating Projects with Benefit/Cost Ratio Method
Benefit/Cost Analysis Lecture slides to accompany
© 2012 by McGraw-Hill, New York, N.Y All Rights Reserved 9-1 Lecture slides to accompany Engineering Economy 7 th edition Leland Blank Anthony Tarquin.
EPT 221 Engineering Design Introduction to Engineering Economics.
Intro to Engineering Economy
FINAL EXAM REVIEW Fall Nominal and Effective Interest Rates Payment Period  Compounding Period Mortgages and Car Loans MARR and WACC Present Worth.
Chapter 10: Evaluating Projects with the Benefit-Cost Ratio Method
1 Internal Rate of Return Internal Rate of Return (IRR): The interest rate i* at which NPW = 0 Note: This is the same as finding the roots of a polynomial.
Comparing Projects Using Time Value of Money
The second objective today is to evaluate correctly capital investment alternatives when the time value of money is a key influence.
Engineering Economics. John Ayers September 17, 2004.
CHAPTER 11 EVALUATING PROJECTS WITH THE BENEFIT / COST RATIO METHOD $$$ $
Matakuliah: D0762 – Ekonomi Teknik Tahun: 2009 Benefit Cost Ratio Course Outline 8.
Slide Sets to accompany Blank & Tarquin, Engineering Economy, 6 th Edition, 2005 © 2005 by McGraw-Hill, New York, N.Y All Rights Reserved 9-1 Developed.
1 ECGD3110 Systems Engineering & Economy Lecture 7 Other Analysis Methods.
Pro Forma Income Statement Projected or “future” financial statements. The idea is to write down a sequence of financial statements that represent expectations.
Evaluating a Single Project
MIE Class #5 Manufacturing & Engineering Economics Concerns and Questions Concerns and Questions Quick Recap of Previous ClassQuick Recap of Previous.
© 2012 by McGraw-Hill All Rights Reserved 9-1 Lecture slides to accompany Engineering Economy 7 th edition Leland Blank Anthony Tarquin Chapter 9 Benefit/Cost.
12/17/2015rd1 Engineering Economic Analysis Chapter 15  Selection of a MARR.
Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. 1 Blank & Tarquin: 5th Edition. Ch. 9 Authored by: Dr. Don.
L:21 Incremental Analysis ECON 320 Engineering Economics Mahmut Ali GOKCE Industrial Systems Engineering Computer Sciences.
Project cash flow n A B Example 1: Consider the following two mutually exclusive investment projects. Assume.
Engineering Economics, Ejaz Gul, FUIEMS, 2009 Engineering Economics Lecture # 8 MARR, Analysis of Alternatives.
1 1. Order alternatives from lowest to highest initial investment. 2. Let Alternative A 0 (do nothing) be considered the current best. 3. Consider next.
2/20/2016rd1 Engineering Economic Analysis Chapter 8  Incremental Analysis.
2/22/2016rd Multiple Rates of Return nCash FlowCumulativeAdjusted 10% 20% 0-$500-$500 -$500 -$ (quadratic
Construction Accounting & Financial Management, 3/e Steven Peterson © 2013 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc Upper Saddle River, New Jersey All Rights.
Lecture No.18 Chapter 5 Contemporary Engineering Economics Copyright © 2010 Contemporary Engineering Economics, 5 th edition, © 2010.
ENGM 661 Engineering Economics for Managers InvestmentWorth Investment Worth.
Chapter 5 Present-Worth Analysis. 2 Loan versus Project Cash Flows Initial Project Screening Methods Present-Worth Analysis Methods to Compare Mutually.
Contemporary Engineering Economics, 6 th edition Park Copyright © 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Comparing Mutually Exclusive Alternatives.
1 Incremental Analysis A technique or approach that can be used with NPW, EAW, and later with IRR and Cost/Benefit to determine if an incremental expenditure.
Benefit Cost Analysis and Public Sector Economics
Chapter 5 PROJECT EVALUATION METHOD
Chapter 10: Evaluating Projects with the Benefit-Cost Ratio Method
Chapter 10: Evaluating Projects with the Benefit-Cost Ratio Method
Chapter 7 Present Worth Analysis
Chapter 5 PROJECT EVALUATION METHOD
RATE OF RETURN ANALYSIS CHAPTER 7
Chapter 10: Evaluating Projects with the Benefit-Cost Ratio Method
Chapter 10: Evaluating Projects with the Benefit-Cost Ratio Method
Steps of the Incr. Analysis Process
OUTLINE Questions? News? New homework due Wednesday
OUTLINE Questions? News? New homework due Wednesday
Presentation transcript:

1/9/20161 Engineering Economic Analysis Chapter 9  Other Analysis Techniques

Public Sector Projects Larger investment Longer life 30 to 50+ years (capitalized costs) (A/P, 7%, 30) = ; (AGP, 7%, 50) = No profit and Publicly owned Benefit citizenry (undesirable consequences) Lower MARR exempt from taxes called discount rate $ from taxes, bonds, and fees (toll roads), philanthropy Multiple criteria vice RoR Politically inclined vice economic Examples: Hospitals, parks and recreation, sports arenas emergency relief, airports, courts, utilities, schools 1/9/20162

Criticisms of B/C Used after the fact for justification rather than evaluation Serious distribution inequities; one group reaps the benefits while the other group incurs the costs The benefits to whosoever they accrue Qualitative information is largely ignored. Public policy generally should favor t the disadvantaged NOT a scientifically unbiased method of analysis 1/9/20163

4 Benefit/Cost Ratios B/C = PW of benefits = AW of benefits = FW of benefits PW of costs AW of costs FW of costs If B/C  1.0, accept project; else reject. Conventional B/C ratio = benefits – disbenefits = B - D costs C Modified B/C = benefits – disbenefits – M&O costs initial investment Salvage value is included in the denominator as a negative cost for the modified ratio. Ratios can change, but not the decision. (B D C) = (10 8 8)  B – C = 10 – 8 – 8 = -6

1/9/20165 Benefits. Costs, Disbenefits Build new Convention Center Benefits – improve downtown image, attract conferences, sports franchises, revenue from rental facilities, increased revenue for downtown merchants Costs – Architectural design, construction, design and construction of parking garage, facilities and maintenance, facility insurance Disbenefits -- loss of bike trail, park, nature trail, and pond loss of wildlife habitat in urban area

MIRR for Indeterminate IRR n cf$5K-7K2K2K (cubic )  and 2 complex roots Real root -1  Indeterminate IRR not positive By using a reinvestment rate of 15% and borrowing rate of 12% per year the MIRR gives (MIRR '( ) 12 15)  23.95% > 15% => good investment. PW(24%) = $2.81K 1/9/20166

7

8 Incremental Analysis Consider projects 20-year life with MARR at 6% A B C D E F 1 st cost $4K 2K 6K 1K 9K 10K PW benefit K 9500 B/C ratio B-D = 3360/1K = 3.36 => B > D A-B = 2630/2K = 1.32 => A > B C-A = 1400/2K = 0.70 => A > C E-A = 1670/5K = 0.33 => A > E and A is best. Notice that B has highest B/C ratio, but not chosen.

1/9/20169 Benefits - Disbenefits Benefits of airport runway expansion – reduced delays, taxing time, fuel costs, landing and departure fees, lost earnings from public point of view. Return to the moon? Disbenefits -- Undesirable consequences from a viewpoint May be included or disregarded in the analysis, but can make a distinctive difference in the analysis.

1/9/ Social Discount Rate B/C and Modified B/C ratios Benefits (B) Disbenefits (D) Costs (C) Present Worth (B, D, C) Disbenefits SUBTRACTED from Benefits Alternatives B D C (B – D)/C B/C  B  C  B/  C X (10 – 3)/5 = 1.4 9–7 = 2 6-5=1 2/1 = 2 Y (13 – 4)/6 = 1.5 Disbenefits ADDED to costs B/C B /C  B  C  B/  C X  10/8 = 1.25 Y  13/10 = B/C & Modified B/C Ratios

1/9/ Benefits, Disbenefits, or Costs Expenditure of $30M to pave highway $100K loss of revenue to farmers because of highway right-of-way $300K annual income to local businesses due to tourism $500K per year upkeep for causeway Fewer highway accidents due to improved lighting.

1/9/ Use rate of return (RoR) analysis for the following 3 mutually exclusive alternatives in reference to an unknown MARR. A B C First Cost$200$300$600 Uniform annual benefits Useful life (years) End salvage Computed RoR 15% 9% 11.7% Incremental RoR B - A => 100 = 17.4(P/A,i%,5) => i = -4.47% C - A => 400 = 105.5(P/A,i%,5) => i = 10% C - B => 300 = 88.1(P/A,i%,5) => i = 14.3% Conclude: if MARR  10% Choose C 10%  MARR  15% Choose A 15%  MARR Choose Do Nothing

1/9/ Incremental B/C Use benefit/cost ratio to select the best of the 5 mutually exclusive alternatives at 15%. Year U V W X Y Z B/C 1.14 ** ** By inspection U > Z, X > V, W < 1. Choose from U, X and Y. Start with X challenged by Y B/C Y-X = 10/25(A/P,15%,5)= 7.46 = 1.34 => Y is better B/C U-Y = 16/50(A/P,15%,5)=14.92 = => U is best.

1/9/ Example 9-6 Payback Period Year A B Payback for A (cum-add ))  ( ) => 2.5 years Payback for B = 2783/1200 = 2.32 years

Problem 9-8 Year 0 is akin to year 20 $100 on year 21 with $100 gradient from year 22 to 55. Compute future worth on 65 th birthday. (FGP (FGP (PGG ) 12 35) 12 10)  $1,160, /9/201615

1/9/ Problem 9-17 Geometric gradient, A 1 = 100, g = 100%, i = 10% n = 10 F 10 = ? (FGP (PGGG ) 10 10)  $113, (FGP $ )

Problem 9-30 Use benefit-cost analysis for the 5-year cash flows below at a MARR of 10%. ABC Cost$600$500$200 UAB B/C C (10%) = 58.3/(200*A/P,10%,5) = B/C B-C (10%) = 80.4/300(A/P, 10%, 5) = B/C A-B (10%) = 19.6/100(A/P, 10%, 5) = Conclude: Select B. 1/9/201617

1/9/ Problem 9-36 n A B C D E F MARR = 15% By inspection: A > F; D > B; B/C ratios: A = 1.14; C = 0.83; D = 1.21; E = 1.25 Incremental analysis: B/C E-D = (52-42)(P/A, 15%, 5) / (150 – 125) = 1.34 => E > D B/C A-E = (68-52)(P/A, 15%, 5) / (200 – 150) = 1.15 => A > E A is best.

Problem 9-46 ME A B First cost $500$800 UA Cost Life (years) 8 8 a)Compute payback if B is picked.  PB = 300/50 = 6 yrs. b)Use 12% MARR and B/C to select. 50(P/A, 12%, 8)/300 = 248/300 = => Select A 1/9/201619

1/9/ Problem 9-49 n MARR = 10% X Y Z B/C X < 1 by inspection and has zero rate of return B/C Y is dominated by Z which is best, showing a positive rate of return ($16.67) at 10%. PW Z (10%) = (P/A, 10%, 4) = = $16.67

1/9/ Problem 9-57 A B MARR = 12% First cost$500$800 UAB Life 8 8 Incremental payback = (800 – 500)/50 = 6 years. By inspection both A and B have B/C ratios > 1. B/C B-A = 50 / 300(A/P,12%,8) = 50 / 60.4 A is better than B

Problem 9-67 AB First cost$55K$75K Annual expenses Operations Maintenance Taxes/Insurance Find useful life for equivalency at 10% MARR 55K K(P/A,10%,n) = 75K K(P/A,10%,n) 20 = 3.75(P/A,10%, n) (P/A,10%, n) = => 8 years At 0% MARR, (P/A, 0%, n) = => n = years 1/9/201622

Breakeven 1. A firm can buy parts from a supplier for $96 delivered or can make for $46. A fixed cost of $8000 per year is needed to make the parts. Find the number of units per year for which the cost of the two alternatives will break even. Cost to make = Cost to buy => x = 96x => x = 160 parts. 2. A firm can least a fleet of cars for its sales personnel for $15 per day plus $0.09 per mile for each car. Alternatively the firm can pay each salesperson $0.18 per mile to use his or her own car. How many miles per day must a salesperson drive to break even? x = 0.18x => x = 167 miles. 1/9/201623

Breakeven Initial cost is $200M with 20% salvage value within 5 years. Cost to produce car is $21K but expected to sell for $33K. Production capacity for year 1 is 4000 cars. Rate is 12%. Find uniform amount of production increase to recoup investment in 3 years? $200M = (33 – 21)K(P/A, 12%, 3) * (X ) 1/9/201624

Sensitivity 3.ABC MARR = 6% First Cost$2K$4K$5K UAB Life NPW(6%)$ Find the maximum first cost of B to become non-preferable. 639(P/A, 6%, 20) - FC B = 3029 => FC B = $ B is preferred if its initial cost does not exceed $ /9/201625

Sensitivity Analysis StrategyFirst CostSalvageAOC Life P $20K 0$11K 3 A ML 20K 0 9K 5 O 20K 0 5K 8 P 15K 500 4K 2 B ML 15K 1K 3.5K 4 O 15K 2K 2K 7 P 30K 3K 8K 3 C ML 30K 3K 7K 7 O 30K 3K 3.5K 9 A P = 20K(A/P, 12%, 3) + 11K = $19327; B P = $12,640; C P = $19,601 A ML = $14,548 B ML = 8229***; C ML = 13,276 A O = 9026B O = 5089; C O = /9/ MARR = 12%

A Bridge Life 30 yearsBid A ($M)Bid B MARR = 5% Material costs Labor costs Overhead costs Admin & legal Annual OC Annual revenue ?0.40 Annual benefits Find annual benefits for Bid A to be equivalent to Bid B. 374, ,000 – 220,000 + X = 1 451, , , ,000 ans /9/201627

Future Worth Analysis The firms has retained earnings of $1.2M, $1M and $950K respectively 3, 2, and 1 year ago. This year the firm has $1.8M to invest. The MARR is 18%. Find the value of a project that can undertaken at 25% down payment. Present value of funds is $4,485, E6 = $6,285, /9/201628

Breakeven Process A has fixed costs of $10K and unit costs of $4.50 each. Process B has fixed costs of $25K and unit costs of $1.50 each. At what level of annual production are the costs of the two processes the same? a)50 b) 500c) 5000 d)50, X + 10K = 1.5X + 25K 3X = 15K X = 5K 1/9/201629

Breakeven Trailers, Inc makes 30 per month but fixed costs are $750K/month with variable costs of $35K and production has dropped to 25 units per month in the last 5 months. Revenue generated is $75K per unit. a) How does 25 compare with BE? b) Calculate current profit. a) 75K * Q = 750K + 35K * Q => Q BE = units => 25 units is still above breakeven. b) 25(75 – 35)K – 750K = $250K/month 1/9/201630

Multiple Rates An investment pays interest at the rate of 10%, 12%, 11%, 8%, and 9% for 5 years. The equivalent uniform rate of interest is ____. If you invested $10K on this deal, how much would you have at the end of 5 years? (1 + i) 5 = 1.10 * 1.12 * 1.11 * 1.08 * 1.09 = (* ) = i = /5 – 1 = 10%. F = (FGP 10E3 10 5) = $16, /9/201631

$100K Budget at 10% Rate PlanInvestmentAnnual Profit I$20K$5K II$100K$16.5K III$70K$10K IV$50K$8.5K 1/9/ PlanAnnual Return I5K + (100 – 20)K * 0.10 = $13K II16.5K + (100 – 100)K * 0.1 = $16.5K Best III10K + (100 – 70)K * 0.1 = $13K IV8.5K + (100 – 50)k * 0.1 = $13.5K

Mutually Exclusively; No Replacement; 8% ABB- A First cost$10K$15K Annual maintenance $1K$500 Uniform annual benefit$3000$4500 Salvage value$1K$2K Life (years)85 1/9/ (IRR '( ))  25.17%

1/9/ Future Worth Analysis 9-7 Find the future worth of $50K in 5 years if invested at 16% with 48 compounding periods per year. F = 50K( ) 240 = $111, Salary is now $32K with $600 increase each year for 30 years of which 10% of yearly salary earns at 7% per year. Find future worth. F = 3200(F/A, 7, 30) + 60(P/G, 7%, 30)(F/P, 7%, 30) = $357,526.62