Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental II: Inclusive Practice.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RIDE – Office of Special Populations
Advertisements

Professional Learning Community Secondary Leaders
Agenda December 11, 2008 Learning by Doing Break
Pre Planning: Identification of Need 1. Develop/Review Student Learning Expectations 2. Examine alignment of learning expectations with assessments 3.
Agenda - January 28, 2009 Professional Learning Community – Jefferson HS Learning by Doing What does the data tell us? ITED results SIP Goals Data Questions.
Chad Allison May 2013  1-2 Formal Classroom Evaluations  Drop-in Visits.
PORTFOLIO.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Thank you!. At the end of this session, participants will be able to:  Understand the big picture of our new evaluation system  Create evidence-based.
CEP’s State and National Schools of Character Summary of 2011 Program Changes.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Curriculum and Instruction Summit November 15 th and 16 th, Presented by Magaly Ronan,
WELCOME TO CHICAGO. We Celebrate Having YOU Here! 2 CPS- Department of Language and Cultural Education.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Teachers for A New Era Neag School of Education Alumni Survey Results for the Graduates of Teachers for A New Era (TNE) Assessment Committee.
CA 2012 ELD Standards Session 3 ESC North 2/5/15.
Session Materials  Wiki
Strategic Planning Board Update February 27, 2012 Draft - For Discussion Purposes Only.
Welcome to Presentation to House Education and Early Learning and Human Services Committees January 17,
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
School Improvement Improving what’s happening in the classroom for students with disabilities: instruction & its impact on student learning Systems that.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
Improving Teaching and Learning: One District’s Journey Curriculum and Instruction Leadership Symposium February 18-20, 2009  Pacific Grove, CA Chula.
Cami Abernathy Candidate Teaching Summit Presentation "People don't care how much you know until they know how much.
Let’s Get S.T.A.R.T.ed Standards Transformation and Realignment in Thompson.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
Your Name Teaching Portfolio (Begin Year-End Year)
Promoting Equity: Response to Intervention at Tier II Presented by Alli Rudich – Principal Heidi Pergande - Reading Specialist Donges Bay School Mequon-Thiensville.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Urban Implementation of Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports in Public and Charter Schools Presenters: Stephanie Wood-Garnett, Executive Director.
Sequoyah Elementary Chippewa Valley Schools Home of the Thunderbirds.
Van Hise School Improvement Plan Input Session September 9, 2014.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental I: Core Curriculum & Instruction.
Literacy Coaching: An Essential “Piece” of the Puzzle.
{ Data Driven Instruction Shifting from “what is taught” to “what is learned”
Mathematics Program Improvement Review. KWL Complete the following sections of the KWL Chart K – What you know? W – What you want to know? We will complete.
Your Page Name – Internet Web Browser Fundamental II: Inclusive Practice Giggle Search Search Apps for 21 st Century.
Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental IV: Multi-Tiered System of Supports.
TOSA Content Fundamental II. TOSA AGENDA Content for TOSAs Pink Wednesday Material Planning time.
ISLLC Standard #1 Implementing a Shared Vision Name Workshop Facilitator.
STANDARD 4 & DIVERSITY in the NCATE Standards Boyce C. Williams, NCATE John M. Johnston, University of Memphis Institutional Orientation, Spring 2008.
Graduate School of Education Leading, Learning, Life Changing Emerging Trends in K-12 Education in Oregon Patrick Burk, PH.D. Educational Leadership and.
By Billye Darlene Jones EDLD 5362 Section ET8004-1B February, 2010.
Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental II: Inclusive Practice.
Principal – Adriene Stephenson. Enrollment – 371 General Education – 83% SPED – 17% LEP – Less than 1% African American – 75% White – 22% Asian, Hispanic,
Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental III: Climate and Engagement.
The Leadership Challenge in Graduating Students with Disabilities Guiding Questions Joy Eichelberger, Ed.D. Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance.
Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental I: Core Curriculum & Instruction Session 3.
Candidate Assessment of Performance CAP The Evidence Binder.
Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental III: Climate and Engagement.
Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental II: Inclusive Practice.
Candidate Assessment of Performance CAP The Evidence Binder.
Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental III: Climate and Engagement 11/13/15.
Blue Friday PLC Fundamental I: Core Curriculum & Instruction.
Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental I: Core Curriculum & Instruction Session 2.
Summer Series, 2007 Building Capacity to Make Research-Based Practice Common Practice In Georgia Utilizing the Keys to Quality.
Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental IV: Multi-Tiered System of Supports.
Creative Curriculum and GOLD Assessment: Early Childhood Competency Based Evaluation System By Carol Bottom.
A lens to ensure each student successfully completes their educational program in Prince Rupert with a sense of hope, purpose, and control.
NM Teacher Evaluation Planning & Preparation Creating an Environment of Learning Professionalism Teaching for Learning Evaluation.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
TOSA Content Fundamental III. Consensogram 7 stickies 1-4 (1 low, 4 high)
Professional Learning Communities
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
Tiered Instruction System A District and School Partnership
Looking Forward to a Great School Year!
School Improvement Planning that increases CCRPI Scores!
MEAP Results.
Monarch Academy, Aspire Public Schools (CA)
Presentation transcript:

Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental II: Inclusive Practice

Working Agreements Ask questions. Engage fully. Integrate new information. Open your mind to diverse views. Utilize what you learn. How do we hold each other accountable? *Taken from LF.org…

Learning Intentions Overview – Survey feedback Where are we going? Artifacts What does District data tell us about 1 and 5? – Dive more deeply into Expectation 1 and 5 School/classroom implications What happens next?

Professional Learning Community Four Essential Questions for Teacher PLC What do we expect our students to learn? How will we know they are learning? How will we respond when they don’t learn? How will we respond if they already know it? Four Essential Questions for Principal PLC What do we expect our Inclusive Practice to look like? How will we know we are learning? How will we respond to challenges? How will we respond if practices have been established?

More Alike Than Different

Get out your phone Stand up Find a person you do not know One partner find a picture on phone The other partner will try to match. Keep looking for pictures until you find a match Share about your photos When instructed, find a new partner

Survey feedback Time to Collaborate Content Aligned

Artifacts Expectations E1 : ALL instructional staff embrace and demonstrate ownership for ALL students E5: All staff participate in professionals learning to develop crucial cultural competency to enhance understandings and practices with diverse students and families. Guiding Questions How are PLC’s structured for all instructional staff? Scheduling? How is CC a part of your school culture?

Inclusive Practice Expectations 1.ALL instructional staff embrace and demonstrate ownership for ALL students. Are we providing the time for all teachers to communicate about all students? (GATE, ELL, SpEd, Reg Ed). How do we remove labels while providing needed supports? How much of ownership for all students is cultural? How do we make meetings (IEP specifically) not a burden? Do all teachers have high expectations for ALL learners? How is this assessed for evidence at a site? How can gen.Ed teachers with resource kids to be involved in the writing of the IEP? How do we support schools to embrace the most complex students?

Inclusive Practice Expectation 5. All staff participate in professional learning to develop crucial cultural competency to enhance understandings and practices with diverse students and families. How to build this capacity from PLC to “practice” ! Best model to change belief systems? How do we break away from district driven cultural competencies to community driven? How are school’s eliciting parental involvement in bringing cultural competency to those who teach their kids? How do we differentiate the professional learning for the instructional staff and paraprofessional? Do we need a cultural competency refresher for all?

Modified Jigsaw Instructions Part 1: Read your section of the text. Go to your numbered chart. As a team summarize your findings on the chart in a few sentences. Part 2: Write something you can do to improve this phase at your school Upon signal, move to next chart, read, discuss and add an action step

Disproportionality At the conclusion of SY , special education students represented 13.26% (N = 8,276) of the WCSD student population. 64% were Male (vs. 51.8% in the overall district) 36% were Female (vs. 48.2% in the overall district) IEP students in by race/ethnicity: 21% were Native American (vs. 1.7% in the overall district) 18% were African American (vs. 2.5% in the overall district) 15% were Hispanic (vs. 38.1% in the overall district) 13% were White (vs. 47.2% in the overall district) 12% were Multiracial (vs. 5.1% in the overall district) 10% were Pacific Islander (versus 0.9% in the overall district) 6% were Asian (versus 4.5% in the overall district) IEP students in by Special Population status: 23% qualified as having limited English proficiency (LEP; 16.4% district) 61% were eligible for free or reduced lunch (FRL; 47.3% district)

Did we accomplish our Learning Intentions? Overview Working Agreements Expectation 1 and 5 Desired outcomes from PLC time at LTL

Closure For next time… Expectation 3: All Students are held to grade level expectations and beyond. Expectation 4: Scaffolding is a key component of differentiated classrooms. Think Culturally Responsive Practice What artifact / data / information do you want to discuss with your colleagues? PLC* - Share your Professional Learning Commitment* with your accountability partner. Session Evaluation