WF on Regulation and MCOT

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /412r0 Submission S. Choi, Philips Research July 2001 Slide 1 Aligning e HCF and h TPC Operations Amjad Soomro, Sunghyun.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /630r1a Submission S. Choi, Philips Research November 2001 Slide 1 HC Recovery and Backoff Rules Sunghyun Choi and Javier del Prado.
WF on PBCH Coverage Enhancement
Contents IEEE MAC layer operation Basic CSMA/CA operation
Session: IT 601: Mobile Computing IEEE e Prof. Anirudha Sahoo IIT Bombay.
Discussion of LAA LBT Categories
Doc.: IEEE /0007r0 SubmissionAlireza Babaei, CableLabsSlide 1 Comments on LAA EVM Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE
1 Medium Access Control Enhancements for Quality of Service IEEE Std e TM November 2005.
Distributed systems Module 1 -Basic networking Teaching unit 1 – LAN standards Ernesto Damiani University of Bozen-Bolzano Lesson 4 – Ethernet frame.
1 QoS Schemes for IEEE Wireless LAN – An Evaluation by Anders Lindgren, Andreas Almquist and Olov Schelen Presented by Tony Sung, 10 th Feburary.
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 November 2014
Doc.: IEEE /1187r1Sep 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Effect of Preamble Error Model on MAC Simulator Date: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
WF on DL LBT Scheme for DRS
3GPP TSG RAN WG1 # R1-15xxxx Fukuoka, Japan 25th – 29th May 2015
IEEE High Rate WPAN - MAC functionalities & Power Save Mode Mobile Network Lab. 정상수, 한정애.
Study on Coexistence of LAA and WiFi
IEEE Wireless LAN Standard. Medium Access Control-CSMA/CA IEEE defines two MAC sublayers Distributed coordination function (DCF) Point coordination.
IEEE EDCF: a QoS Solution for WLAN Javier del Prado 1, Sunghyun Choi 2 and Sai Shankar 1 1 Philips Research USA - Briarcliff Manor, NY 2 Seoul National.
Doc.: IEEE /0840r1 Submission AP Assisted Medium Synchronization Date: Authors: September 2012 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /0231r3 Submission March 2010 John R. Barr, JRBarr, Ltd. & NiCTSlide 1 Efficient Methods for Coexistence with Other 60GHz Systems Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0079r0 Submission September 2015 Andrew Myles (Cisco)Slide 1 Discussion of issues related to EN revision 16 September 2015.
Doc.: IEEE /0079r1 Submission September 2015 Andrew Myles (Cisco)Slide 1 Discussion of issues related to EN revision 16 September 2015.
WF on Support of EBF/FD-MIMO Features in TM9
WF on MCOT and CWS for LBT priority classes
WF on SIB1bis Transmission
WF on LAA DL Multi-Channel LBT
Doc.: IEEE /0024r0 Submission Feedback on 3GPP CRs: LAA Multi-Channel Access and Energy Detect (ED) Coexistence Slide 1 Date: Authors:
Design and Implementation of a Reservation-based MAC Protocol for Voice/Data over IEEE Ad-Hoc Wireless Networks Shiann-Tsong Sheu, Tzu-Fang Sheu.
Doc.: IEEE /1086r0 SubmissionSlide 1 Date: Authors: Improved Virtual Carrier Sensing Mechanism for 45GHz Sep ZTE Corp.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0098r0 January 2016 Assaf Kasher, IntelSlide 1 Channel bonding proposals Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1165r0 Submission November 2005 Fischer (Broadcom), Stephens (Intel) et. al.Slide 1 Joint Proposal MAC Report Notice: This document.
Resolutions to Static RTS CTS Comments
WF on MCOT limit Signaling and Modifying LBT type Ericsson, … 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 #85 R1-16xxxx Nanjing, China 23 rd – 27 th May 2016 Agenda item:
Doc.:IEEE /517r0 Submission August 2002 IBM Research Slide 1 Some Clarifications to IEEE e, Draft 3.2, August 2002 H.L. Truong and G. Vannuccini.
Doc.:IEEE /566r2 Submission November 2001 S. Choi, Philips & M.M. Wentink, Intersil Slide 1 Multiple Frame Exchanges during EDCF TXOP Sunghyun.
Offline discussion on remaining details on RRM measurements
WF on Bandwidth Part for DL common channel
WF on RA-RNTI design 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting NR#3 R1-171xxxx
Month Year doc: IEEE /xxxxr0
EA C451 (Internetworking Technologies)
Comments on LAA EVM Date: Authors: January 2015 Month Year
Lecture 27 WLAN Part II Dr. Ghalib A. Shah
Joint Proposal MAC Report
3GPP RAN1 #90 meeting summary on LAA Enhancements
WF on NB-IoT Radio Link Monitoring Performance Test Procedure
IEEE P Wireless RANs Date:
WF on remaining open items for allowing 1Tx transmission in LTE-NR DC
Motorola Mobility, Lenovo, …
Chapter 12 Multiple Access
IEEE Wireless LAN wireless LANs: untethered (often mobile) networking
Chapter 12 Multiple Access
Resource Allocation for Unassociated STAs – Follow Up
Chapter 12 Multiple Access
The Effect of Preamble Error Model on MAC Simulator
EDCF Issues and Suggestions
Performance evaluation of Real Time Communications over Wi-Fi
Comments on LAA EVM Date: Authors: January 2015 Month Year
Overlapping BSS Co-Existence
Regulatory Information for Low Latency Scanning in 5 GHz bands
July 2007 doc.: IEEE /2090r0 Aug 2007 Discussion on CCA Sensing on 20/40 MHz Secondary Channel with PIFS and DIFS Date: Authors: Notice:
NAV Operation Rules under HCF
HCF Channel Access And Inter-BSS Channel Sharing
3GPP RAN1 status on NR-Unlicensed
Comments on LAA EVM Date: Authors: January 2015 Month Year
Reserving STA Date: Authors: January 2011 January 2011
Status of NR-U - Wi-Fi coexistence
‘Shield’: Protecting High-Priority Channel Access Attempts
Jing Sun, Qualcomm Incorporated Rapporteur of Rel.16 NR-U Work Item
NAV Operation Rules under HCF
Month Year doc.: IEEE /1081r0 May, 2016
Presentation transcript:

WF on Regulation and MCOT 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 #83 R1-15xxxx Anaheim, USA, 15th - 22th November 2015 Agenda item: 6.2.3.1 Document for decision WF on Regulation and MCOT Ericsson, …

Access after successful random backoff Background The recommendation in section 9.19.3.3 in IEEE specification [1] states “In certain regulatory domains, channel sensing needs to be done at periodic intervals (for example, in Japan, this period is 4 ms). This means that the duration of a TXOP in these regulatory domains might not be more than this periodic interval. If longer durations are desired, then the TXOP holder needs to sense the channel at least once in the limit imposed in the regulatory domain, by waiting for at least for the duration of one PIFS during which it senses the channel. If it does not detect any energy, it may continue by sending the next frame. In other words, the total TXOP size assigned should include an extra time allocated (i.e., n × aSlotTime, where n is the number of times the STA needs to sense the channel and is given by Floor(TXOP limit/limit imposed in the regulatory domain). 34The TID value in the QoS Control field of a QoS Data+CF-Poll frame pertains only to the MSDU or fragment thereof in the Frame Body field of that frame. This TID value does not pertain to the TXOP limit value and does not place any constraints on what frame(s) the addressed STA may send in the granted TXOP.” [1] IEEE Std 802.11-2012, Part II: Wireless LAN MAC and PHY Specifications Channel is released due to TXOP limit. Example TXOP limit =5ms +PIFS 4ms 1ms Access after successful random backoff Channel is sensed to be idle for PIFS duration. Channel is released due to 4ms req.

Proposal Note: In Japan on 5 GHz unlicensed carrier, the maximum continuous transmission time after sensing the channel to be idle is limited to 4ms by regulation. For LAA operation in Japan, when the DL transmission burst is greater than 4 ms, the eNB may do the following: After the initial 4 ms of the DL transmission burst, the eNB can sense the channel to be idle for a single continuous interval of duration 34 µs before immediately continuing its transmission with the maximum continuous transmission time limit. The total sensing time and the transmission time should not be more than the MCOT + floor(MCOT/4ms )*34 µs where MCOT is the maximum channel occupancy time corresponding to the LBT priority class used for accessing the channel.