Historic Preservation Memoranda of Agreement. What is an MOA? As part of the Section 106 review process, it is an agreement among an agency official,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Eligibility and Standards James Garrison Arizona State Historic Preservation Officer.
Advertisements

Advisory Council on Historic Preservation and Section 106
THE FOUR STEP SECTION 106 PROCESS: STEP THREE TENNESSEE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE SECTION All reproduction rights reserved.
State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) ACMP Conference Juneau, AK 2007.
ODOT’s Section 106 Training
Cultural Resources Categorical Exclusion Training Class.
Presented by: The Ohio Department of Transportation 1 36 CFR Part 800 Protection of Historic Properties Section 106 Managing the Environmental & Project.
Program Alternatives under 36 CFR Part 800 Dave Berwick Army Affairs Coordinator Advisory Council on Historic Preservation.
Geothermal Projects and Indian Tribes: Dealing with Cultural Resources Issues Michael P. O’Connell Stoel Rives LLP O R.
Section 106, Section 4(f) and You!: The Role of Consulting Parties in Transportation Projects Kevin Mock, Historic Preservation Specialist Pennsylvania.
Introduction to Historical Resources and Section 106 Division of Historical Resources (DHR) NH Department of Cultural Resources State Historic Preservation.
NATIONAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION ACT of 1966 as amended Garry J. Cantley Regional Archeologist Bureau of Indian Affairs.
The National Register of Historic Places. NOT THE: National Historic Registry National Historic Registry Historical List Historical List Historical Registry.
IDENTIFYING & EVALUATING HISTORIC PROPERTIES NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES –CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION HISTORIC.
Cultural Resources Management in the USFWS. Overview of Laws & Regulations 1906 – Present.
Dealing With Section 106: The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly.
NHPA, Section 106, and NEPA Highlights and Misconceptions.
Environmental Review Todd Levine Architectural historian, environmental reviewer, Connecticut Freedom Trail coordinator, Washington- Rochambeau Revolutionary.
Federal Preservation Activities: Part 1. What did With Heritage So Rich (1965) and the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 provide to administer.
A BEGINNERS GUIDE TO SUCCESSFUL COMPLETION OF THE SECTION 106 REVIEW PROCESS TENNESSEE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE: REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE SECTION.
Connecticut Department of Transportation Bureau of Policy & Planning.
Sacred Sites. Documentation Documentation: Forest Supervisor or Ranger District Offices may document Sacred site (s) information in a variety of ways.
Ohio Historic Preservation Office
Section 106 Processes A Guide to the Ideals and Reals of CRM.
Driving Indiana’s Economic Growth. Management and Preservation of Indiana's Historic Bridges: A Programmatic Approach Thanks to Mead & Hunt & FHWA-IN.
THE FOUR STEP SECTION 106 PROCESS: AN INTRODUCTION TENNESSEE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE SECTION All reproduction rights reserved.
COSCDA Workshop Renovation, Reconstruction and Renewal of Historic Properties and Neighborhoods Section 106 and Programmatic Agreements Overview.
Monroe Executed Programmatic Agreement The Army’s Responsibilities Include: Identify Significant Viewsheds (initiated)-18 Months =Oct 2010 Cultural Landscape.
Florida Cultural Resources and How They Relate to Your Public Works Project Presented by: Brent Handley, MA, RPA Archaeology Division Director.
Environmental Planning CULTURAL RESOURCES CH 5 - HO # 13
Mitigation in the Section 106 Process Dave Berwick Army Program Manager Advisory Council on Historic Preservation.
L O N G B E A C H, C A. Dean McMath Regional Environmental Programs Manager FAA – Southwest Region NEPA Essentials Selected Special.
Department of Natural Resources Historic Preservation Division Working Through The S106 Process FY 2015 CDBG Applicant Workshop December 4 th, 2014Meg.
Procedures and Processes Phase II: Evaluation CRM Phases I-III This presentation uses materials taken from Ricardo Elia’s Cultural Resources Archaeology.
1 ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING CULTURAL RESOURCES LAWS AND REGULATIONS CH 5 CH 5 HO # 13, 13a, 13b
Positive Train Control Infrastructure: Section 106 Review Process under the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation’s May 2014 Program Comment For More.
Nadine Peterson Preservation Planner NH Division of Historical Resources Lynne E. Monroe Preservation Company Christopher W. Closs Christopher W. Closs.
Integrating Other Laws into BLM Planning. Objectives Integrate legal requirements into the planning process. Discuss laws with review and consultation.
Environmental Review Process for Responsible Entities 24 CFR Part 58 NEIGHBORHOOD STABILIZATION PROGRAM.
Section 106: Historic Preservation Review and Compliance as it relates to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 “How Can State Agencies Assist.
3D Technology and the Section 106 Process Matt Diederich Archaeologist Oregon State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) Oregon Heritage Programs Division.
National Historic Districts And Why Taylor Should Be Among Them.
By Rachel Coleman.  “ The head of any federal agency having direct or indirect jurisdiction over a proposed federal or federally assisted undertaking.
1 Historic Preservation Webinar "Reporting Through PAGE and to PMC"
Categorical Exclusion Training Class
NEPA and Section 106: An Introduction WISDOT MEETING NOVEMBER 3-4, 2015.
The Preservation Process. Sequence of Preservation actions 1. Setting standards or criteria that define what is worth preserving. 2. Undertaking a survey.
South Dakota State Historic Preservation Office and the Nebraska National Forests and Grasslands July 24, 2013 National Grasslands Visitor Center.
Cultural Resources office — St. Louis Planning & Urban Design Agency an introduction.
Suzanne Derrick Technical Director – Cultural Resources FCC Section 106 Process and the Archeology of Tower Siting Panelist Presentation May 4, 2016.
Railroad Towers ISSUES AND UPDATES FOR TOWERS PROPOSED IN RAILROAD RIGHTS OF WAY.
11 Federal Real Property Disposal: Historic Properties and Assets U.S. General Services Administration St. Augustine Lighthouse St. Augustine. FL Landholding.
Integration of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) NEPA and NHPA A Handbook for Integrating NEPA and.
The National Register. The National Register of Historic Places The National Register of Historic Places is authorized by Section 101 (a)(1)(A)of the.
National Treasures: Brownfields and the National Historic Preservation Act Brownfields 2006 Boston, MA.
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
101 New London Road Newark, Delaware
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project FERC Project No February 26, 2008.
Section 106 Consulting Parties Meeting
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Cultural Resources Categorical Exclusion Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental Services.
Navigating the SHPD Review Process
National Historic Preservation Act
National Historic Preservation Act
The Role of the SHPO John Pouley, Assistant State Archaeologist
Protecting What We Love Building What We Need – The “H” Factor
Programmatic Approaches to Section 106 Compliance
National Historic Preservation Act
National Historic Preservation Act
National Historic Preservation Act
Presentation transcript:

Historic Preservation Memoranda of Agreement

What is an MOA? As part of the Section 106 review process, it is an agreement among an agency official, the State Historic Preservation Officer, and possibly others, regarding the resolution of adverse effects on historic properties.

Section 106 of What? Section 106 is part of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (NHPA)

National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (NHPA) Established: –National Register of Historic Places –Advisory Council on Historic Preservation –State Historic Preservation Offices –Section 106 (Agency Responsibilities)

Section 106 Review Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (NHPA) requires Federal agencies to take into account the effects of their undertakings on historic properties, and afford the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation a reasonable opportunity to comment.

Initiate Section 106 Process Identify Historic Properties Assess Adverse Effects Resolve Adverse Effects MOA

Initiate Section 106 Process Identify Historic Properties Assess Adverse Effects Resolve Adverse Effects

Applicability Historic Preservation (“Section 106”) compliance is part of the Statutory Checklist, and is required for: –Categorically Excluded, Subject to 58.5, and –Environmental Assessment-level activities

Categorical Exclusion, Subject to Sec Public facilities improvements, “individual actions,” certain Rehabilitation, Acquisition…

Environmental Assessment All projects not Categorically Excluded or Exempt (e.g. New construction, Significant Rehabilitation, etc.)

Initiate Section 106 Process Identify Historic Properties Assess Adverse Effects Resolve Adverse Effects

Historic Properties Historic Properties are properties that are included in or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places

National Register Properties Property types –Buildings –Structures –Sites –Objects –Districts National, State, or local significance Pickerington Carnegie Library

National Register Properties Property types –Buildings –Structures –Sites –Objects –Districts National, State, or local significance Station Road Bridge

National Register Properties Property types –Buildings –Structures –Sites –Objects –Districts National, State, or local significance Miamisburg Mound

National Register Properties Property types –Buildings –Structures –Sites –Objects –Districts National, State, or local significance Hoffner Monument

National Register Properties Property types –Buildings –Structures –Sites –Objects –Districts National, State, or local significance St. Clairsville Historic District

National Register Properties Properties that are important in American history, architecture, archaeology, engineering, or culture, and that meet one or more of the National Register Criteria.

National Register Criteria A. Association with events B. Association with people C. Distinctive Design/construction –Distinctive construction characteristics –Work of a master –Artistic value –A distinguishable entity D. Data potential

National Register Criterion: A Pickerington Carnegie Library

National Register Criterion: B Jaret Kirtland House

National Register Criterion: C Station Road Bridge

National Register Criterion: D Miamisburg Mound

Integrity Properties must have integrity of (as appropriate) –Location –Setting –Design –Materials –Workmanship –Feeling and association

Initiate Section 106 Process Identify Historic Properties Assess Adverse Effects Resolve Adverse Effects

Criteria of Adverse Effect Undertaking may: –alter characteristics that qualify property for the National Register –diminish the property’s integrity Alteration may be direct or indirect

Examples of Adverse Effects Destruction Alteration Removal Changing use Alteration of setting Introduction of intrusive elements Neglect Transfer out of Federal ownership

Initiate Section 106 Process Identify Historic Properties Assess Adverse Effects Resolve Adverse Effects MOA

Adverse Effect... seek ways to avoid, minimize, or mitigate the adverse effects.

Consultation and Public Involvement State Historic Preservation Office Tribes Advisory Council on Historic Preservation Other Interested Parties Public

MOA Provides a summary of the consultation that occurred to resolve adverse effects Outlines roles, responsibilities, project implementation, and mitigation actions Execution and implementation of an MOA signifies the completion of the Section 106 process

Components of MOA Preamble (“Whereas” clauses) Stipulations General provisions Signatures

Examples of Mitigation: Architecture Documentation Public Education Alternative Preservation

Examples of Mitigation: Archaeology Avoidance Data recovery Public education

Signatures Signatories Agency Official SHPO ACHP (if participating in consultation) Invited Signatories Any consulting parties with responsibilities to carry out under the MOA Concurring Parties Consulting parties without responsibilities

How long does it take??