Overlay Networks - Path Computation Approaches draft-bardalai-ccamp-overlay-path-comp-02 Snigdho Bardalai Khuzema Pithewan Rajan Rao IETF-88, Vancouver.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
APNOMS03 1 A Resilient Path Management for BGP/MPLS VPN Jong T. Park School of Electrical Eng. And Computer Science Kyungpook National University
Advertisements

RSVP-TE Extensions for SRLG Configuration of FA
Protocol Extension Requirement for Cooperation between PCE and Distributed Routing Controller in GMPLS Networks draft-zhaoyl-pce-dre-01.txt Yongli Zhao,
A New Paradigm for Inter-Domain Traffic Engineering Adrian Farrel Juniper Networks
NEW OUTLOOK ON MULTI-DOMAIN AND MULTI-LAYER TRAFFIC ENGINEERING Adrian Farrel
1 LAYER 3 TSN – DRAFT 4 Jouni Korhonen, Philippe Klein July 2014 LAYER 3 FOR TSN.
Problem Statement and Architecture for Information Exchange Between Interconnected Traffic Engineered Networks draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-03.txt.
Layer 2 Gateway (L2GW) draft-xia-nvo3-l2gw-01
1 draft-ali-ccamp-rc-objective-function-metric-bound-02.txt draft-ali-ccamp-rsvp-te-include-route-02.txt draft-ali-ccamp-xro-lsp-subobject-02.txt CCAMP.
ITU-T Workshop “NGN and its Transport Networks“ Kobe, April 2006 International Telecommunication Union ITU-T Introduction to the Path Computation.
Draft-beckhaus-ldp-dod-00IETF 81: 25 July LDP DoD draft-beckhaus-ldp-dod-00.txt Thomas Beckhaus (Deutche Telekom AG) Bruno Decraene (France Telecom)
OLD DOG CONSULTING Traffic Engineering or Network Engineering? The transition to dynamic management of multi-layer networks Adrian Farrel Old Dog Consulting.
CS Summer 2003 Lecture 14. CS Summer 2003 MPLS VPN Architecture MPLS VPN is a collection of sites interconnected over MPLS core network. MPLS.
ACTN Use-case for On-demand E2E Connectivity Services in Multiple Vendor Domain Transport Networks draft-klee-actn-connectivity-multi-vendor-domains-01.
FIB Reduction in Virtual Subnet draft-xu-l3vpn-virtual-subnet-fib-reduction-00 Xiaohu Xu (Huawei) Susan Hares Yongbing Fan (China Telecom)
November th Requirements for supporting Customer RSVP and RSVP-TE over a BGP/MPLS IP-VPN draft-kumaki-l3VPN-e2e-mpls-rsvp-te-reqts-05.txt.
Kenji Kumaki KDDI, Editor Raymond Zhang BT Nabil Bitar Verizon
Signaling & Routing Extension for Links with Variable Discrete Bandwidth draft-long-ccamp-rsvp-te-availability-03 draft-long-ccamp-ospf-availability-extension-02.
Draft-boutros-bess-evpn-vpws-service-edge-gateway-00 Sami Boutros Ali Sajassi Patrice Brissette [Cisco Systems] Daniel Voyer [Bell Canada] IETF 92,
OSPF-TE Extensions for MLNMRN based on OTN draft-rao-ccamp-mlnmrn-otn-ospfte-ext-02 Rajan Rao Khuzema Pithewan
OSPF-TE extensions for OTN (draft-ashok-ccamp-gmpls-ospf-g709-03) CCAMP IETF-80 (Mar-2011) Rajan Rao Ashok Kunjidhapatham.
GVPNs: Generalized VPNs using BGP and GMPLS Toolkit draft-ouldbrahim-ppvpn-gvpn-bgpgmpls-06.txt Hamid Ould-Brahim Yakov Rekhter
Virtual Topologies for Service Chaining in BGP IP/MPLS VPNs draft-rfernando-bess-service-chaining-00 (previously draft-rfernando-l3vpn-service-chaining-04)
UNI Extensions for Diversity and Latency Support 13-Mar-13IETF 86 Orlando1 Don Dieter.
ZTE CORPORATION Extensions of BRPC and PCEP to Support Inter- AS Bidirectional LSP Path Computation draft-wang-pce-inter-as-extentions-00 Xuerong.
Forward-Search P2P/P2MP TE LSP Inter-Domain Path Computation draft-chen-pce-forward-search-p2p-path-computation draft-chen-pce-forward-search-p2mp-path.
IETF 66 L1VPN Basic Mode Draft draft-ietf-l1vpn-basic-mode-00.txt Don Fedyk (Editor) Yakov Rekhter (Editor)
IETF-70th Vancouver1 Extensions to GMPLS RSVP-TE for Bidirectional Lightpath with the Same Wavelength draft-xu-rsvpte-bidir-wave-01 Sugang Xu, Hiroaki.
PCE 64 th IETF PCE Policy Architecture draft-berger-pce-policy-architecture-00.txt Lou Berger Igor Bryskin Dimitri Papadimitriou.
Applicability of Existing Solutions to the Problem Space draft-takeda-l1vpn-applicability-03.txt.
L1VPN Extended Overlay Model draft-fedyk-ccamp-l1vpn-extnd-overlay-00 Don Dieter
Routing Information Protocol
Limit for content Do not exceed Limit for content Do not exceed Limit for content Do not exceed Limit for content Do not exceed Page 1 © The.
66th IETF, Montreal, July 2006 PCE Working Group Meeting IETF-66, July 2006, Montreal A Backward Recursive PCE-based Computation (BRPC) procedure to compute.
Forward-Search P2P TE LSP Inter- Domain Path Computation draft-chen-pce-forward-search-p2p-path-computation Huaimo Chen
Internet Traffic Engineering Motivation: –The Fish problem, congested links. –Two properties of IP routing Destination based Local optimization TE: optimizing.
Tunneling Continued/ End-to-End Principle CS 4251: Computer Networking II Nick Feamster Spring 2008.
MULTI-PROTOCOL LABEL SWITCHING By: By: YASHWANT.V YASHWANT.V ROLL NO:20 ROLL NO:20.
67th IETF San Diego November 2006 Applicability analysis of Generalized Multiprotocol Label Switching (GMPLS) protocols for the Layer 1 Virtual Private.
The Application of the Path Computation Element Architecture to the Determination of a Sequence of Domains in MPLS & GMPLS draft-king-pce-hierarchy-fwk-01.txt.
Support for RSVP-TE in L3VPNs Support for RSVP-TE in L3VPNs draft-kumaki-murai-ccamp-rsvp-te-l3vpn-01.txt Kenji Kumaki KDDI Corporation Tomoki Murai Furukawa.
GMPLS UNI Best Current Practices draft-beeram-ccamp-gmpls-uni-bcp-00.txt V.Beeram, I.Bryskin, W.Doonan (ADVA Optical Networking) J.Drake, G.Grammel (Juniper.
I2RS Overlay usecase 1 Fangwei hu Bhumip Khasnabish.
1 draft-ali-ccamp-te-metric-recording-02.txt CCAMP – IETF 84 – Vancouver July - August 2012 Zafar Ali Cisco Systems Clarence Filsfils  Cisco Systems Kenji.
OSPF-TE Extensions for MLN/MRN based on OTN draft-rao-ccamp-mlnmrn-otn-ospfte-ext-03 Rajan Rao Khuzema Pithewan
BGP extensions for Path Computation Element (PCE) Discovery in a BGP/MPLS IP-VPN draft-kumaki-pce-bgp-disco-attribute-03.txt Kenji Kumaki KDDI R&D Labs,
GMPLS Signaling Extensions for G
Applicability Statement for Layer 1 Virtual Private Networks (L1VPNs) Basic Mode draft-takeda-l1vpn-applicability-basic-mode-00.txt Deborah Brungard (AT&T)
Daniel King, Old Dog Consulting Adrian Farrel, Old Dog Consulting
Zhenbin Li, Kai Lu Huawei Technologies IETF 98, Chicago, USA
FlexE - Channel Control Work in the IETF
Daniel King, Old Dog Consulting Adrian Farrel, Old Dog Consulting
Daniel King, Old Dog Consulting Adrian Farrel, Old Dog Consulting
L1VPN Working Group Scope
PCEP extensions for a BGP/MPLS IP-VPN
An analysis of scaling issues in MPLS-TE backbone networks
FlexE - Channel Control Work in the IETF
Requirements for supporting Customer RSVP and RSVP-TE over a BGP/MPLS IP-VPN draft-ietf-l3vpn-e2e-rsvp-te-reqts-01.txt Kenji Kumaki KDDI R&D Labs,
ACTN Information Model
ACTN Information Model
Signaling RSVP-TE P2MP LSPs in an Inter-domain Environment draft-ali-mpls-inter-domain-p2mp-rsvp-te-lsp-01.txt Zafar Ali, Cisco Systems.
Zhenbin Li, Shunwan Zhuang Huawei Technologies
Extending MPLS/BGP VPNs to End-Systems
DetNet Configuration YANG Model
Satya Mohanty, Arjun Sreekantiah, Dhananjaya Rao, Cisco Systems
{Stewart Bryant, Mach Huawei
DetNet Information Model Consideration
draft-barth-pce-association-bidir-01
Karthik Sethuraman, NEC
Presentation transcript:

Overlay Networks - Path Computation Approaches draft-bardalai-ccamp-overlay-path-comp-02 Snigdho Bardalai Khuzema Pithewan Rajan Rao IETF-88, Vancouver

Problem Statement  Overlay networks don’t have visibility to server network topology to perform E2E TE path computation  Existing solutions are signaling based  RFC 4208 – server/core node selects the path  RFC 4874 – additional constraints in signaling  Existing solutions do not specify how the overlay network node (CE) determines the route/path to the destination

Applicable use cases Use Case #1: –Layer transition at server network edge Use Case#2: –Layer transition within server network

UC#1:Layer transition at server network edge (PE) CEs do not know which PE to select to get across provider network Layer transition at server edge node (PE)

UC#2:Layer transition within server network (P) Layer transition in a core node (P) CEs do not know which PE to select to get across provider network

So, the requirements 1.Need virtual / abstract topology to represent and contain the server network, irrespective of where the layer transition occurs. –This allows the CE nodes to select route or path to the destination. 2.Need to be able to establish the virtual /abstract topology that meets the constraints set by the customer network requirements.

What is covered in the draft Path computation approaches using existing methods: 1.PCE approach (RFC 4655) 2.Virtual topology approach 3.Hybrid approach –virtual topology and PCE combined

Comments? Thank You