Diagnostic Test Characteristics Professor Mobeen Iqbal Shifa College of Medicine.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DiseaseNo disease 60 people with disease 40 people without disease Total population = 100.
Advertisements

TEACHING ABOUT DIAGNOSIS
Validity and Reliability of Analytical Tests. Analytical Tests include both: Screening Tests Diagnostic Tests.
Yasir Rudha, MD; Amr Aref, MD; Paul Chuba, MD; Kevin O’Brien, MD
Understanding Statistics in Research Articles Elizabeth Crabtree, MPH, PhD (c) Director of Evidence-Based Practice, Quality Management Assistant Professor,
Step 3: Critically Appraising the Evidence: Statistics for Diagnosis.
Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists Sensitivity and specificity Predictive values positive and negative Interpretation of results Sep 2007.
Clinical Decision Support: Using Logistic Regression to Diagnose COPD and CHF ©2012 Wayne G. Fischer, PhD 1 COPD patient inclusion criteria: Discharged.
V. Petrenkiene*, D. Petrauskas L. Kupcinskas, Lithuanian University of Health sciences Clinic of Gastroenterology Kaunas Utility of non-invasive markers.
© 2014 SynteractHCR. All rights reserved. SHARED WORK. SHARED VISION. Pitfalls in Companion Diagnostics Don't underestimate the power of conditional probabilities.
TUTORIAL SCREENING Dr. Salwa Tayel, Dr. A. Almazam, Dr Afzal Mahmood
Azita Kheiltash Social Medicine Specialist Tehran University of Medical Sciences Diagnostic Tests Evaluation.
SCREENING FOR DISEASE Nigel Paneth. THREE KEY MEASURES OF VALIDITY 1.SENSITIVITY 2.SPECIFICITY 3.PREDICTIVE VALUE.
Iowa State University College of Veterinary Medicine Principles of diagnostic sampling – the “ bead game” Pilot training school in PRRS diagnostics, 2012.
GerstmanChapter 41 Epidemiology Kept Simple Chapter 4 Screening for Disease.
Darlene Goldstein 29 January 2003 Receiver Operating Characteristic Methodology.
Statistical Fridays J C Horrow, MD, MSSTAT
Baye’s Rule and Medical Screening Tests. Baye’s Rule Baye’s Rule is used in medicine and epidemiology to calculate the probability that an individual.
Statistics for Health Care
1 The probability that a medical test will correctly detect the presence of a certain disease is 98%. The probability that this test will correctly detect.
(Medical) Diagnostic Testing. The situation Patient presents with symptoms, and is suspected of having some disease. Patient either has the disease or.
Screening Sherine Shawky, MD, Dr.PH Assistant Professor Public Health King Abdulaziz University College of Medicine
Statistics in Screening/Diagnosis
 Mean: true average  Median: middle number once ranked  Mode: most repetitive  Range : difference between largest and smallest.
Medical decision making. 2 Predictive values 57-years old, Weight loss, Numbness, Mild fewer What is the probability of low back cancer? Base on demographic.
Mother and Child Health: Research Methods G.J.Ebrahim Editor Journal of Tropical Pediatrics, Oxford University Press.
Lecture 4: Assessing Diagnostic and Screening Tests
Basic statistics 11/09/13.
Division of Population Health Sciences Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland Coláiste Ríoga na Máinleá in Éirinn Indices of Performances of CPRs Nicola.
Statistics for Health Care Biostatistics. Phases of a Full Clinical Trial Phase I – the trial takes place after the development of a therapy and is designed.
Principles and Predictive Value of Screening. Objectives Discuss principles of screening Describe elements of screening tests Calculate sensitivity, specificity.
Reliability of Screening Tests RELIABILITY: The extent to which the screening test will produce the same or very similar results each time it is administered.
Session 4: Assessing a Document on Diagnosis Peter Tarczy-Hornoch MD Head and Professor, Division of BHI Professor, Division of Neonatology Adjunct Professor,
Statistics. Statistics = everything you need to know, but continually want to forget!!!!
1 SCREENING. 2 Why screen? Who wants to screen? n Doctors n Labs n Hospitals n Drug companies n Public n Who doesn’t ?
Advanced Physical therapy Procedures Ahmed alhowimel.
Sensitivity & Specificity Sam Thomson 8/12/10. Sensitivity Proportion of people with the condition who have a positive test result Proportion of people.
1 Epidemiological Measures I Screening for Disease.
Evidence-Based Medicine Diagnosis Component 2 / Unit 5 1 Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 1.0 /Fall 2010.
Evaluating Results of Learning Blaž Zupan
Prediction statistics Prediction generally True and false, positives and negatives Quality of a prediction Usefulness of a prediction Prediction goes Bayesian.
Diagnostic Tests Afshin Ostovar Bushehr University of Medical Sciences Bushehr, /7/20151.
Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive Value
Predictive values prevalence CK and acute myocardial infarction –sensitivity 70% –specificity 80% –prevalence - 40% –prevalence - 20% –PPV and NPV.
Diagnostic Tests Studies 87/3/2 “How to read a paper” workshop Kamran Yazdani, MD MPH.
Unit 15: Screening. Unit 15 Learning Objectives: 1.Understand the role of screening in the secondary prevention of disease. 2.Recognize the characteristics.
Diagnostic Test Characteristics: What does this result mean
Screening.  “...the identification of unrecognized disease or defect by the application of tests, examinations or other procedures...”  “...sort out.
/ 101 Saudi Diploma in Family Medicine Center of Post Graduate Studies in Family Medicine EBM Diagnostic Tests Dr. Zekeriya Aktürk
Integrated Management of Childhood Illnesses
Laboratory Medicine: Basic QC Concepts M. Desmond Burke, MD.
Diagnosis Examination(MMSE) in detecting dementia among elderly patients living in the community. Excel.
Unit 4 Seminar Contd… (we shall pick up where we left off last seminar to discuss some key concepts)
ROC curve estimation. Index Introduction to ROC ROC curve Area under ROC curve Visualization using ROC curve.
Handbook for Health Care Research, Second Edition Chapter 11 © 2010 Jones and Bartlett Publishers, LLC CHAPTER 11 Statistical Methods for Nominal Measures.
Diagnosis:Testing the Test Verma Walker Kathy Davies.
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Receiver- Operator Characteristic Curves 10/10/2013.
Screening Tests: A Review. Learning Objectives: 1.Understand the role of screening in the secondary prevention of disease. 2.Recognize the characteristics.
Critical Appraisal Course for Emergency Medicine Trainees Module 5 Evaluation of a Diagnostic Test.
Screening for Disease: Part One
Diagnosis II Dr. Brent E. Faught, Ph.D. Assistant Professor
Hint: Numerator Denominator. Vascular Technology Lecture 34: Test Validation (Statistical Profile and Correlation) HHHoldorf.
The False Positive Paradox
دكتر محسن ميرزائي MD , MPH
Millie D. Long, Bruce E. Sands 
Figure 1. Table for calculating the accuracy of a diagnostic test.
Statistical significance using p-value
Issue Highlights Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Eldad S. Bialecki, Amobi M. Ezenekwe, Elizabeth M. Brunt, Brian T
Volume 156, Issue 4, Pages (March 2019)
Presentation transcript:

Diagnostic Test Characteristics Professor Mobeen Iqbal Shifa College of Medicine

Case At the local outpatient clinic of the department of gastroenterology, 100 consecutive patients are included in a study for a new non-invasive diagnostic test for detection of carcinoma of the colon. The new test was positive in 3 out of 4 patients with biopsy proven diagnosis of carcinoma. The test was also positive in 7 patients without biopsy proven carcinoma.

Disease presentDisease absent Test positive Test Negative

Disease presentDisease absent Test positiveTPFP Test NegativeFNTN

Disease presentDisease absent Test positive3 7 Test Negative189

Sensitivity= TP/TP+FN =3/3+1=3/4=0.75=75% SENSITIVITY The proportion of people with the diagnosis (N=4) who are correctly identified (N=3)

Specificity=TN/TN+FP =89/89+7=89/96=0.93=93% The proportion of people without the diagnosis (N=96) who are correctly identified (N=89)

PPV=TP/TP+FP =3/10=30%

NPV=TN/TN+FN =89/90=99%

Person without the disease Person with the disease Person who tests positive Person who tests negative True positive on the test False positive on the test True negative on the test False negative on the test

4 people with the disease, 3 are picked up by the test Person without the disease Person with the disease Person who tests positive Person who tests negative True positive on the test False positive on the test True negative on the test False negative on the test

test is positive for a further 7 people without disease Person without the disease Person with the disease Person who tests positive Person who tests negative True positive on the test False positive on the test True negative on the test False negative on the test Person without the disease Person with the disease Person who tests positive Person who tests negative True positive on the test False positive on the test True negative on the test False negative on the test

The remainder of the sample are negative on the test Person without the disease Person with the disease Person who tests positive Person who tests negative True positive on the test False positive on the test True negative on the test False negative on the test Person without the disease Person with the disease Person who tests positive Person who tests negative True positive on the test False positive on the test True negative on the test False negative on the test

SENSITIVITY Person without the disease Person with the disease Person who tests positive Person who tests negative True positive on the test False positive on the test True negative on the test False negative on the test Person without the disease Person with the disease Person who tests positive Person who tests negative True positive on the test False positive on the test True negative on the test False negative on the test SENSITIVITY is the proportion of people with the disease correctly identified by the test It measures the proportion of false NEGATIVES

SENSITIVITY Person without the disease Person with the disease Person who tests positive Person who tests negative True positive on the test False positive on the test True negative on the test False negative on the test Person without the disease Person with the disease Person who tests positive Person who tests negative True positive on the test False positive on the test True negative on the test False negative on the test In this case, sensitivity is ¾ or 75%

SPECIFICITY Person without the disease Person with the disease Person who tests positive Person who tests negative True positive on the test False positive on the test True negative on the test False negative on the test Person without the disease Person with the disease Person who tests positive Person who tests negative True positive on the test False positive on the test True negative on the test False negative on the test SPECIFICITY is the proportion of people without the disease correctly identified by the test It measures the proportion of false POSITIVES

SPECIFICITY Person without the disease Person with the disease Person who tests positive Person who tests negative True positive on the test False positive on the test True negative on the test False negative on the test Person without the disease Person with the disease Person who tests positive Person who tests negative True positive on the test False positive on the test True negative on the test False negative on the test In this case, specificity is (96-7)/96 or 93%

If someone is positive on the test, what are the chances that he/she has the disease? Person without the disease Person with the disease Person who tests positive Person who tests negative True positive on the test False positive on the test True negative on the test False negative on the test Person without the disease Person with the disease Person who tests positive Person who tests negative True positive on the test False positive on the test True negative on the test False negative on the test Probability = 3/10 = 30% This is the POSITIVE PREDICTIVE VALUE (the value of the test in predicting a positive result)

If someone is negative on the test, what are the chances that he/she does not have the disease? Person without the disease Person with the disease Person who tests positive Person who tests negative True positive on the test False positive on the test True negative on the test False negative on the test Person without the disease Person with the disease Person who tests positive Person who tests negative True positive on the test False positive on the test True negative on the test False negative on the test Probability = 89/90 = 99% This is the NEGATIVE PREDICTIVE VALUE (the value of the test in predicting a negative result)

SENSITIVITY, SPECIFICITY AND PREDICTIVE VALUES For sensitivity and specificity, the reference variable (‘denominator) is the DISEASE For predictive value, the reference variable (‘denominator’) is the TEST

acknowledgment Tom Sensky, Teaching EBM/EBMH St Hugh’s College Oxford for some of the slides in the presentation