Interactions of Hadrons and Hadronic Showers

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Beam Composition for Biology
Advertisements

Quartz Plate Calorimeter Prototype Ugur Akgun The University of Iowa APS April 2006 Meeting Dallas, Texas.
Parameterized Shower Simulation in Lelaps: a Comparison with Geant4 Daniel Birt, Amy Nicholson.
Детектори - II 4-ти курс УФЕЧ Спирачно лъчение (bremsstrahlung) Z 2 electrons, q=-e 0 M, q=Z 1 e 0 A charged particle of mass M and charge q=Z.
Adam Para, Fermilab, March 23, Methodology  Use Hadr01 example  In G4SteppingVerbose::StepInfo() select all the steps with inelastic processes.
Particle interactions and detectors
Institut für Kernphysik Markus Horn ILIAS-N3, BSNS-working group meeting Valencia, Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe in der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft.
My Chapter 29 Lecture.
Chapter 30 Nuclear Physics
Neutron interaction with matter 1) Introduction 2) Elastic scattering of neutrons 3) Inelastic scattering of neutrons 4) Neutron capture 5) Other nuclear.
Nuclear Physics Properties of Nuclei Binding Energy Radioactivity.
Calorimetry and Showers Learning Objectives Understand the basic operation of a calorimeter (Measure the energy of a particle, and in the process, destroy.
Neutral Particles. Neutrons Neutrons are like neutral protons. –Mass is 1% larger –Interacts strongly Neutral charge complicates detection Neutron lifetime.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
Calorimetry: Energy Measurements
Nuclear and Radiation Physics, BAU, 1 st Semester, (Saed Dababneh). 1 Nuclear Reactions Categorization of Nuclear Reactions According to: bombarding.
Detectors of charged particles and ions 1) Gas filled detectors a) Ionization chambers b) Proportional counters c) Multiwire chambers d) Time projection.
Calorimeters A User’s Guide Elizabeth Dusinberre, Matthew Norman, Sean Simon October 28, 2006.
Radiology is concerned with the application of radiation to the human body for diagnostically and therapeutically purposes. This requires an understanding.
Stopping Power The linear stopping power S for charged particles in a given absorber is simply defined as the differential energy loss for that particle.
Nuclear Fission and Fusion
Integrated Science Chapter 25 Notes
Mauricio Barbi University of Regina TRIUMF Summer Institute July 2007
Nuclear Fundamentals Part I Unleashing the Power of the Atom.
 Nucleon: anything you find in the nucleus, includes protons and neutrons.
Ionizing Radiation, Nuclear Energy, & Elementary Particles
Lecture 1.3: Interaction of Radiation with Matter
Subatomic Physics Chapter Properties of the Nucleus The nucleus is the small, dense core of an atom. Atoms that have the same atomic number but.
LHC Detectors 101 Vivek Sharma (with slides stolen from talks of several people ) 1 Good review article: ARNPS 2006, “General purpose detectors for large.
Investigation of GeV proton-induced spallation reactions
Nuclear and Radiation Physics, BAU, First Semester, (Saed Dababneh). 1 Nuclear Reactions Sample.
1 Nuclear Stability The larger the atom, the greater the proportion of the nucleus that must be neutrons. –The A/Z ratio is greater than 2 (or the N to.
1 Alpha Decay  Because the binding energy of the alpha particle is so large (28.3 MeV), it is often energetically favorable for a heavy nucleus to emit.
Calorimeters Chapter 4 Chapter 4 Electromagnetic Showers.
Medical Imaging Radiation I. Naked to the Bone: Medical Imaging in the Twentieth Century (Paperback)by Bettyann Kevles Bettyann Kevles E=mc2: A Biography.
Calorimeters Chapter 21 Chapter 2 Interactions of Charged Particles - With Focus on Electrons and Positrons -
Advanced Burning Building the Heavy Elements. Advanced Burning 2  Advanced burning can be (is) very inhomogeneous  The process is very important to.
Monday, Oct. 16, 2006PHYS 3446, Fall 2006 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 3446 – Lecture #11 Monday, Oct. 16, 2006 Dr. Jae Yu 1.Energy Deposition in Media Total Electron.
C. Oppedisano for the ALICE Collaboration. 5 Jun 2012 C. Oppedisano 2/10 Centrality in p-A interactions can be defined through the number of collisions.
Basic Concepts of Nuclear Physics Part II By Benjamin Thayer PHY3091.
1 Interaction Between Ionizing Radiation And Matter, Part 3 Neutrons Audun Sanderud Department of Physics University of Oslo.
Accelerator Physics, JU, First Semester, (Saed Dababneh). 1 Electron pick-up. ~1/E What about fission fragments????? Bragg curve stochastic energy.
Interactions of Particles with Matter
Cosmic rays at sea level. There is in nearby interstellar space a flux of particles—mostly protons and atomic nuclei— travelling at almost the speed of.
1 Methods of Experimental Particle Physics Alexei Safonov Lecture #15.
Chapter 29:Nuclear Physics
David Argento (some aspects of) cosmogenic nuclide production.
5.3.4 Nuclear Fission and Fusion. (a) select and use Einstein’s mass–energy equation ΔE = Δmc 2.
Nucleon-Nucleon collisions. Nucleon-nucleon interaction at low energy Interaction between two nucleons: basic for all of nuclear physics Traditional goal.
Validation of EM Part of Geant4
Spring, 2009Phys 521A1 Neutrons Neutrons interact only strongly; they also decay, but not quickly; τ(n) ~ 886 s Cross-section depends on energy –slow neutrons.
Pion-Induced Fission- A Review Zafar Yasin Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences (PIEAS) Islamabad, Pakistan.
1 Calorimetry studies for future lepton colliders Andrea Delgado, Texas A&M University SIST Program Final Presentation, Fermilab August 2013.
NEEP 541 – Neutron Damage Fall 2002 Jake Blanchard.
Adam Para, Fermilab, February 16, Who Cares? What is the Problem? 2 Dual Readout Total Absorption calorimeter has very good energy resolution.
NUCLEAR ENERGY. The daughter nuclei in the reaction above are highly unstable. They decay by beta emission until they reach stable nuclei.
Spallation Eric Pitcher Head of Target Division February 19, 2016.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
E. Auffrey, A.Benaglia, P. Lecoq, M. Lucchini, A.Para CALOR 2016, D AEGU, R EPUBLICK OF K OREA May 19, 2016 Also TICAL ERC Grant, P. Lecoq et al.
Wednesday, Mar. 2, 2005PHYS 3446, Spring 2005 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 3446 – Lecture #11 Wednesday, Mar. 2, 2005 Dr. Jae Yu 1.Energy Deposition in Media Photon energy.
Calorimeters at CBM A. Ivashkin INR, Moscow.
Methods of Experimental Particle Physics
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #14 Energy Deposition in Media Particle Detection
Experimental Particle Physics
Chapter 4 Mechanisms and Models of Nuclear Reactions
Building the Heavy Elements
Experimental Particle Physics
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #14 Energy Deposition in Media Particle Detection
Presentation transcript:

Interactions of Hadrons and Hadronic Showers Chapter 5 Interactions of Hadrons and Hadronic Showers Calorimeters Chapter 5

Comparison Electromagnetic Shower - Hadronic Shower elm. Shower hadronic Shower Characterized by Interaction Length: Characterized by Radiation Length: SizeHadronic Showers >> Sizeelm. Showers Calorimeters Chapter 5

Hadronic Showers Hadronic Showers are dominated by strong interaction ! Distribution of Energy Example 5 GeV primary energy - Ionization Energy of charged particles 1980 MeV - Electromagnetic Shower (by 0->) 760 MeV - Neutron Energy 520 MeV - g by Excitation of Nuclei 310 MeV - Not measurable E.g. Binding Energy 1430 MeV 5000 MeV 1st Step: Intranuclear Cascade 2nd Step: Highly excited nuclei Fission followed Evaporation by Evaporation Distribution and local deposition of energy varies strongly Difficult to model hadronic showers e.g. GEANT4 includes O(10) different Models Further Reading: R. Wigman et al. NIM A252 (1986) 4 R. Wigman NIM A259 (1987) 389 Calorimeters Chapter 5

Detailed look into Hadronic Shower I -the electromagnetic component Simplified model - only  produced ’s are isotriplett ’s are produced democratically in each nuclear interaction 0 ->  electromagnetic component fem fem = 0.33 after 1st interaction fem = 0.33x2/3 + 1/3 = 0.55 after 2nd ia After b generations of interactions Electromagnetic Component increases with increasing energy of primary particle Calorimeters Chapter 5

fem as a function of the energy <m> Average multiplicity per interaction n Number of Generations k Slope Parameter Reality: Large electromagnetic component in high energetic showers e.g. Cosmic Air Showers Attention - Production of 0 ist statistical process At small energies: Small multiplicity Large statistical fluctuations in production of  ‘species’ Large fluctuations of electromagnetic component of shower Calorimeters Chapter 5

Differences Protons/Pions Smaller signal if Proton is primary particle Proton is Baryon Baryonnumber conservation Favors production of Baryons in cascade and Suppresses meson I.e. pi production Different Detector Response to different particles Difficult to calibrate calorimeters w.r.t hadronic responce Calorimeters Chapter 5

Hadronic Showers - The Nuclear Sector Internuclear Cascade Spallation Reaction Evaporation by excited nucleon 1) Internuclear Cascade Nucleus as Mini Calorimeter Interaction of incoming hadron with quasi free nucleons Strucked high energetic nucleons can escape the nucleon Fast Shower Component Nucleon with less energy remain bound in Nucleus Nucleus is left in excited state Dexcitation by Radiation of nucleons - Evaporation Calorimeters Chapter 5

Evaporation Neutrons Nearly all evaporated nucleons are soft neutrons Dexcitation happens ~ns after nuclear interaction Soft or Slow component of hadronic shower Maxwell-Boltzmann Kinetic Energy Evaporated Neutrons have On average 1/3 of nuclear binding energy Here T=2 MeV Number of neutrons produced in nuclear cascades are large Some numbers: 20 Neutrons/GeV in Pb 60 Neutrons/GeV in 238U, slow or thermalized neutrons induce nuclear fission by neutron capture Calorimeters Chapter 5

Analysis of Spallation nucleons I Empirical formular by Rudstam for spallation cross section Even the largest Partial cross section contributes only 2% to total spallation cross section Calorimeters Chapter 5

Analysis of Spallation nucleons II - Proton and Neutron Yield - Striking difference in Pb Protons cannot pass Coulomb barrier ~12 MeV Fe has lower Coulomb barrier  (n/p)Pb >> (n/p) Fe Binding Energy of Pb < Binding Energy of Fe Protons loose energy between Interactions due to ionization Smaller Contribution to Nuclear reactions On average more neutrons in Pb  More nucleons in ‘Pb’ cascades Calorimeters Chapter 5

Longitudinal Shower Profiles Signals from radioactive nuclei after 1 week exposure Of U stack to ~100Billion  of 300 GeV Longitudinal Profile is ‘frozen’ in U Stack Typical length 6 int - 9int Shape similar to electromagnetic showers Shower extension much larger Strong impact on design of calorimeters built for hadron Measurements - Hadron Calorimeters Calorimeters Chapter 5

Transversal Shower Profile Narrow core due to electromagnetic component Exponentially decreasing halo from non-elm. component Calorimeters Chapter 5

Decomposition of transversal Shower Profile Profile deduced from radioactivity at 4 int 237U created by 238U(,n)237U i.e. by fast compenent Close to the shower axis Fission Products i.e. 99Mo Created by MeV type evaporation neutrons 239Np created by 238U after Capture of thermalized (evaporation) neutrons Calorimeters Chapter 5

Shower Containment Longitudinal Containment Lateral Containment Shower absorbed After 9-10  Lateral Containment Shower absorbed After 3  Calorimeters Chapter 5