SESSION # 3 STIFFNESS MATRIX FOR BRIDGE FOUNDATION AND SIGN CONVETIONS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Beam Elements Jake Blanchard Spring 2008.
Advertisements

Prepared by J. P. Singh & Associates in association with Mohamed Ashour, Ph.D., PE West Virginia University Tech and Gary Norris Ph.D., PE University.
JP Singh and Associates in association with Mohamed Ashour, Ph.D., P.E. Gary Norris, Ph.D., P.E. March 2004 COMPUTER PROGRAM S-SHAFT FOR LATERALLY LOADED.
Definition I. Beams 1. Definition
WIND FORCES.
Beam-Columns.
8.6 Frictional Forces on Collar Bearings, Pivot Bearings and Disks
Overview of Loads ON and IN Structures / Machines
1D MODELS Logan; chapter 2.
Micromechanics Macromechanics Fibers Lamina Laminate Structure Matrix.
Caltrans Guidelines on Foundation Loading Due to Liquefaction Induced Lateral Spreading Tom Shantz, Caltrans 2010 PEER Annual Meeting.
Modeling for Analysis CE Design of Multi-Story Structures
Beams and Frames.
Prepared by J. P. Singh & Associates in association with
Introduction to Finite Elements
AERSP 301 Bending of open and closed section beams
1 Classes #9 & #10 Civil Engineering Materials – CIVE 2110 Buckling Fall 2010 Dr. Gupta Dr. Pickett.
Experimental & Analytical Studies of Drilled Shaft Bridge Columns Sandrine P. Lermitte, PhD Student Jonathan P. Stewart, Assistant Professor John W. Wallace,
STRUCTURAL MECHANICS: CE203
Prepared by J. P. Singh & Associates in association with Mohamed Ashour, Ph.D., PE West Virginia University Tech and Gary Norris Ph.D., PE University of.
Soil Pile Group Interaction in FB-MultiPier
Matrix Methods (Notes Only)
Bars and Beams FEM Linear Static Analysis
READING QUIZ The resultant force of a given couple system is always _______. A) positive B) negative C) zero D) None of the above.
Professor Joe Greene CSU, CHICO
ENGR 220 Section 12.1~12.2.
One-Dimensional Problems
Beam Deflection Review ( )
Beams Beams: Comparison with trusses, plates t
CHAP 4 FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF BEAMS AND FRAMES
Chapter 12 Deflection of Beams and Shafts
Seismic LRFD for Pile Foundation Design
MANE 4240 & CIVL 4240 Introduction to Finite Elements
Beam Analysis Civil Engineering and Architecture
Soil-Pile Interaction in FB-MultiPier
7.2 Shear and Moment Equations and Diagrams
Beams Session Subject: S1014 / MECHANICS of MATERIALS Year: 2008.
Analysis of Laterally Loaded Drilled Shafts and Piles Using LPILE
Reference Manual Chapter 9
Jurg Conzett – Traversina Bridge
CIVL3310 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
Civil Engineering Materials – CIVE 2110
1 NEESR Project Meeting 22/02/2008 Modeling of Bridge Piers with Shear-Flexural Interaction and Bridge System Response Prof. Jian Zhang Shi-Yu Xu Prof.
THE ANALYSIS OF BEAMS & FRAMES
Mechanics of Materials – MAE 243 (Section 002) Spring 2008 Dr. Konstantinos A. Sierros.
ME16A: CHAPTER FIVE DEFLECTION OF BEAMS. CHAPTER FIVE - DEFLECTION OF BEAMS P A yAyA B x v.
Mechanics of Materials – MAE 243 (Section 002) Spring 2008 Dr. Konstantinos A. Sierros.
By Prof. Dr. Wail Nourildean Al-Rifaie
In-span loads on beam elements So far we have only been able to apply loads at nodes. example How do we then tackle loads away from nodes, or continuous.
COMBINED LOADING.  Analyze the stress developed in thin-walled pressure vessels  Review the stress analysis developed in previous chapters regarding.
Stress and Strain ( , 3.14) MAE 316 – Strength of Mechanical Components NC State University Department of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering Stress.
1 Pile Groups Most pile foundations contain group of piles instead of single pileThe supporting capacity of a group of ‘n’similar piles in many cases (not.
Physics 207: Lecture 13, Pg 1 Lecture 13 Goals: Assignments: l HW5, due tomorrow l For Wednesday, Read all of Chapter 10 Chapter 9 Chapter 9  Employ.
Medical Instrumentation Ⅱ 동서의료공학과 이건우 -Sensor-
1 CHAP 4 FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF BEAMS AND FRAMES FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS AND DESIGN Nam-Ho Kim Audio: Raphael Haftka.
5. Torsional strength calculation. 5.1 Torsional loads acting on a ship hull.
MESF593 Finite Element Methods
Mechanics of Materials -Beams
Deflection and Stiffness
Longitudinal Strain Flexure Formula
C. K. Pithawalla College of Engg. & Tech.
Measurements 17GN1001 Measurement of FORCE and STRAIN
Overview of Loads ON and IN Structures / Machines
Experiment # 2 Torsion Test
Equivalent Systems.
PRINCIPLES OF STIFFNESS METHOD FOR BEAMS AND PLANE FRAMES
FINITE ELEMENT METHOD (INTRODUCTION)
Idealized Model of Column Buckling in Frame Column Buckling in Frame
FINITE ELEMENT METHOD (INTRODUCTION)
CHAPTER SIX DEFLECTION OF BEAMS.
Presentation transcript:

SESSION # 3 STIFFNESS MATRIX FOR BRIDGE FOUNDATION AND SIGN CONVETIONS

Loads and Axis F1 F2 F3 M1 M2 M3 X Z Y F1F1 F2F2 F3F3 M1M1 M2M2 M3M3 X Z Y

Y XX Z Z Y Foundation Springs in the Longitudinal Direction K 11 K 22 K 66 Column Nodes Loading in the Longitudinal Direction (Axis 1 or X Axis ) Single Shaft P2P2 K 22 K 11 K 66 P1P1 M3M3 Y Y XX P2P2 K 22 K 33 K 44 P3P3 M1M1 Y Y ZZ Loading in the Transverse Direction (Axis 3 or Z Axis )

Steps of Analysis Using SEISAB, calculate the forces at the base of the fixed column (P o, M o, P v ) Use S-SHAFT with special shaft head conditions to calculate the stiffness elements of the required stiffness matrix Longitudinal (X-X) K F1F1 = K 11 = P o /  (fixed-head,  = 0) K M3F1 = K 61 = M Induced /  K M3M3 = K 66 = M o /  (free-head,  = 0) K F1M3 = K 16 = P Induced / 

K11 = P Applied /  K66 = M Applied /  K61 = M Induced /  K16 = P Induced /  B. Zero Shaft-Head Deflection,  = 0  = 0  Applied P   = 0 Induced P Applied M Induced M A. Zero Shaft-Head Rotation,  = 0 X-Axis Linear Stiffness Matrix

Steps of Analysis K F1F K F1M3 0 K F2F K F3F3 K F3M K M1F3 K M1M K M2M2 0 -K M3F K M3M3 F1 F2 F3 M1 M2 M3 Using SEISAB and the above spring stiffnesses at the base of the column, determine the modified reactions (P o, M o, P v ) at the base of the column (shaft head) 123123123123

Steps of Analysis Keep refining the elements of the stiffness matrix used with SEISAB until reaching the identified tolerance for the forces at the base of the column Why K F3M1  K M1F3 ? K F3M1 = K 34 = F 3 /  1 and K M1F3 = K 43 = M 1 /  3 Does the linear stiffness matrix represent the actual behavior of the shaft-soil interaction?

Linear Stiffness Matrix K K 16 0 K K 33 K K 43 K K K K 66 F1 F2 F3 M1 M2 M3 Linear Stiffness Matrix is based on Linear p-y curve (Constant E s ), which is not the case Linear elastic shaft material (Constant EI), which is not the actual behavior Therefore,  P, M =  P +  M and  P, M =  P +  M 123123123123

Shaft Deflection, y Line Load, p y P, M > y P + y M yMyM yPyP y P, M y p (E s ) 1 (E s ) 3 (E s ) 4 (E s ) 2 p p p y y y (E s ) 5 p y MoMo PoPo PvPv Nonlinear p-y curve As a result, the linear analysis (i.e. the superposition technique ) can not be employed Actual Scenario

  Applied P Applied M A. Free-Head Conditions K11 or K33 = P Applied /  K66 or K44 = M Applied /  Nonlinear (Equivalent) Stiffness Matrix

K K K K K K 66 F1 F2 F3 M1 M2 M3 Nonlinear Stiffness Matrix is based on Nonlinear p-y curve Nonlinear shaft material (Varying EI)  P, M >  P +  M  P, M >  P +  M 123123123123

Shaft-Head Stiffness, K11, K33, K44, K66 Load Stiffness Curve Shaft-Head Load, P o, M, P v P 1, M 1 P 2, M 2

Linear Stiffness Matrix and the Signs of the Off-Diagonal Elements K F1F K F1M3 0 K F2F K F3F3 K F3M K M1F3 K M1M K M2M2 0 -K M3F K M3M3 F1 F2 F3 M1 M2 M3 123123123123 Next Slide

F1F1 X or 1 Z or 3 Y or 2 Induced M 3 11 K 11 = F 1 /  1 K 61 = -M 3 /  1 X or 1 Z or 3 Y or 2 M3M3 33 K 66 = M 3 /  3 K 16 = -F 1 /  3 Induced F 1 Elements of the Stiffness Matrix Next Slide Longitudinal Direction X-X

F3F3 X or 1 Z or 3 Y or 2 Induced M 1 33 K 33 = F 3 /  3 K 43 = M 1 /  3 X or 1 Z or 3 Y or 2 11 K 44 = M 1 /  1 K 34 = F 3 /  1 M1M1 Induced F 3 Transverse Direction Z-Z

MODELING OF INDIVIDUAL SHAFTS AND SHAFT GROUPS WITH/WITHOUT SHAFT CAP

K 33 = F 3 /  3 K 44 = M 1 /  1 K 22 = F 2 /  2 F2F2 F3F3 M1M1 Y Y ZZ F2F2 F3F3 F2F2 F3F3 K 22 K 33 K 44 Y Y ZZ Single shaft

PvPv PoPo MoMo y Cap Passive Wedge Shaft Passive Wedge Shaft Group with Cap

Ground Surface Shaft Group (Transverse Loading) (with/without Cap Resistance) With Cap P axial = P v / n + P from Mo P o = Pg = P Cap + P h * n P Cap P axial PhPh K axial K Lateral K rot. (free/fixed) n piles Kg axial Kg Lateral Kg rot. No Cap P axial = P v / n P o = Pg = P h * n M shaft = M o /n PvPv PoPo MoMo

Ground Surface Shaft Group (Longitudinal Loading) (with/without Cap Resistance) With Cap (always free) P axial = P v / n P o = Pg = P Cap + P h * n M shaft = M o /n P Cap P axial PhPh K axial K Lateral K rot. (free) n piles Kg axial Kg Lateral Kg rot. No Cap P axial = P v / n P o = Pg = P h * n M shaft = M o /n PvPv PoPo MoMo

SHAFT GROUP EXAMPLE PROBLEM EXAMPLE PROBLEMS

Single Shaft with Two Different Diameter

Example 3, Shaft Group (WSDOT) (Longitudinal Loading) Shaft Group Loads Ground Surface 60 ft 20 ft 8 ft 52 ft 6 ft PvPv PoPo MoMo

Average Shaft (????) Shaft Group Example 3, Shaft Group (WSDOT) Longitudinal Loading)

Example 3, Shaft Group (WSDOT) (Transverse Loading) Shaft Group Loads Ground Surface 60 ft 20 ft 8 ft 52 ft 6 ft 10 ft PvPv PoPo MoMo

Average Shaft Shaft Group Example 3, Shaft Group (WSDOT) (Transverse Loading)

The moment developed at the column base is a function of F v, F H, and 