Adriana S. Forseto1, MD Walton Nosé1,2, MD

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
YAG capsulotomy K.P.SHANTHA SORUBARANI.
Advertisements

Comparison of Visual Outcomes With Toric IOL and With Limbal Relaxing Incisions in Cataract Surgery Eriko Fukuyama, MD Fukuyama Eye Clinic Fukuoka, Japan.
PMA P Phakic IOL for the correction of Myopia.
Comparison of corneal astigmatism measured with 3 devices Mariko Shirayama, M.D, Li Wang, M.D, PhD, Mitchell P. Weikert, M.D, Douglas D. Koch, M.D. Cullen.
Long-Term Follow-Up of Toric Intraocular Lens Implantation for Keratoconus Alejandro Navas, MD, MSc, Martha Jaimes, MD, Jesús Cabral, MD, Arturo Ramirez.
V. S. Liarakos, K. van Dijk, L. Ham, L. Baydoun and G.R.J. Melles Anterior Chamber vs Posterior Chamber IOL in DMEK for Pseudophakic Bullous Keratopathy.
Anupama Kotha 1, Simar J. Singh 1, William B. Trattler 1,2, Carlos Buznego 1,2 The authors have no financial interest in the subject matter of this poster.
A Prospective, Randomized, Comparative Evaluation of Patients with Contralateral Implantation of Two Aspheric Acrylic Intraocular Lenses R. Cionni, MD.
Anterior Chamber Depth, Iridocorneal Angle Width, and Intraocular Pressure Changes After Phacoemulsification: Narrow vs Open Iridocorneal Angles Huang.
Phacoemulsification with Goniosynechialysis in the Management of Refractory Acute Angle-closure Glaucoma Ghasem Fakhraie*, MD, Mahmoud Jabbarvand, MD,
David Zadok MD, Isaac Avni MD
Intraocular lens dislocation secondary to haptic torsion Lawrence E. Lohman, MD FACS Matthew C. Willett, MD.
Comparison of Nd:YAG Laser Capsulotomy Rates after implantation of 2 IOLs: One Hydrophilic Acrylic and the other Silicone with sharp posterior optic edge.
Dept. of Ophthalmology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany. Outcome after big-bubble deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty.
Evaluation of Corneal Parameters and Spherical Aberration After DSAEK Measured with Pentacam System Orkun Muftuoglu, Pawan Prasher, R. Wayne Bowman, Steven.
Phacoemulsification in eyes with previous anterior chamber phakic IOL surgery Walton Nosé, MD, PhD 1,2 Adriana dos Santos Forseto, MD 1 Mariana Ávila,
Hayashi Eye Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan
Purpose: Introduction:  At initial evaluation: For post-op day # 0 patients: Pre-op VA was 20/50.6 (0.395 ± 0.198); Post-op VA was 20/102.0 (0.196 ± 0.162);
Biometric Accuracy in High Hypermetropes and Myopes
Occurrence of Retinal Detachment After Cataract Surgery Peter Jeppesen MD, PhD and Thomas K. Olsen, MD, DMSc Department of Ophthalmology Århus University.
EVALUATION OF ANTERIOR CHAMBER SULCUS SUPPORTED INTRAOCULAR LENS BY PROF. HAMED NASER EL- DIN TAHA HAED OF OPHTHALMOLOGY DEPT. SAUDI GERMAN HOSPITAL JEDDAH.
Astigmatism management with toric intraocular lenses in cataract patients Adriano Guarnieri 1-2, Luis W. Lu 3-4, Alfonso Arias- Puente INCIVI, Madrid,
Endothelial Dystrophy Association with Hyperopia Glenn W. Thompson, M.D. Timothy P. Page, M.D. Authors have no financial interest.
Effect of Aspherical Intraocular Lens on Blue-on-Yellow Perimetry  No eye had intraoperative complications. At 12 months after surgery, all the lenses.
Khairidzan Mohd Kamal MD
Reproducibility of Optical Measurements in Pseudophakic eyes Using Double-Pass Measurement System St Thomas Hospital, London Anish Dhital, David Spalton,
Endothelial Keratoplasty in Patients With an Anterior Chamber Intraocular Lens: A Montreal Experience Georges M. Durr, MD 1,2 Johanna Choremis, MD, FRCSC.
Analysis of Ocular Wavefront Aberrations in Post Penetrating Keratoplasty Eyes with Two Different Hartmann-Shack Aberrometers Adriana S. Forseto 1, MD;
The authors have no financial interest in the subject matter of this poster. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES.
REFRACTIVE OUTCOMES WITH TORIC ICL IMPLANTS CHIEF AUTHOR: Dr. D.RAMAMURTHY CO – AUTHOR: Dr. R.CHITRA The authors have no financial interest in the subject.
LONG TERM OUTCOMES OF RESTOR IOL IMPLANTATION Lori Dao, Orkun Muftuoglu, V. Vinod Mootha, Steven M. Verity, R. Wayne Bowman, H. Dwight Cavanagh, James.
Outcomes of Transscleral Sulcus Fixation of Intraocular Lenses through a 2.4-mm Incision with an Injector System: 1-Year Follow-Up Akiko Masai, MD, Tomoichiro.
Influence of IOL optic material on posterior capsule opacification and visual function Ken Hayashi, MD Hideyuki Hayashi, MD Hayashi Eye Hospital, Fukuoka,
Futoshi Taketani, MD,PhD,
Johns Hopkins Hospital
LogMAR-Analysis of multifocal intraocular lenses: Clinical performance A. Mannsfeld, I.-J. Limberger, A. Ehmer, M.P. Holzer, G. U.Auffarth International.
Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness, Anterior Chamber Depth, and Central Corneal Power Measurements between Two Scheimpflug Imaging Systems Yuichi.
Comparison of visual function following piggyback implantation of Acrysof ReSTOR intraocular lenses with Tecnis multifocal ZM900 intraocular lenses. Rodrigo.
O.I.I. EC-3 Hydrophobic Acrylic Intraocular Lens: The European Experience Thierry Amzallag, M.D. Institut Ophtalmique Somain, France.
EXPERIENCE WITH A PMMA KERATOPROSTHESIS AT THE FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SAO PAULO, BRASIL Oliveira LA, M.D; Sousa LB, M.D; Hofling-Lima AL, M.D; Freitas D,
9-Month Results after Implantation of a new accommodative IOL that works with one focus Mark Tomalla M.D.* Clinic for Refractive and Ophthalmic Surgery,
Simulated Experiments on IOL Power Calculation Using Anterior Segment OCT Dong Hyun Jo, M.D., 1,2 Mee Kum Kim, M.D., 1,2 Won Ryang Wee, M.D. 1,2 1 Department.
F.I. Camesasca, MD Zeiss Invent ZO Aspheric IOL: Long-Term Results of Refractive and Aberrometric Analysis F. I. Camesasca* P. Vinciguerra.
Dissatisfication After Multifocal Intraocular Lens Implantation in Taiwan Yu Wei Lin, MD (Presenting Author); Ching-Ju Hsieh; Lin-Chung Woung The authors.
Liquifaction Method and Extent of Posterior Capsule Opacification: Two-Year Follow-up Marie Kalfertova, Mariya Burova, Pavel Rozsival, Nada Jiraskova Nada.
Long-term results of Phakic Refractive Lens (PRL™) implantation in high myopic eyes. Ioannis G. Pallikaris 1, 2, MD, PhD, Maria I. Kalyvianaki 1, MD, PhD,
Corneal CXL in Pediatric Patients with Progressive Keratoconus Stephanie Wise, Christian Diaz, Karolien Termote, Paul J. Dubord, Martin McCarthy, Sonia.
Pseudoexfoliation syndrom and cataract: results and complication frequency in immature and mature cataract surgery Marijana Bilen Babić Department of.
Comparison of Endothelial Cell Loss After Phacoemulsification Performed by Third Year Residents and Anterior Segment Surgeons Alexandra Braunstein, MD.
Clinical applications of Scheimpflug imaging in cataract surgery
Corneal Pachymetry in Prediction of Refraction After Cataract Surgery
Authors have no any financial interest in the subject matter
Aliki Liaska, Dpt of Ophthalmology,
World Cornea Congress VI April 7-9, 2010
Nienke Visser, Tos T.J.M. Berendschot, Rudy M.M.A. Nuijts
Comparison of corneal powers obtained from four different devices
Poster Number: P90 Category: Intraocular Surgery (Cataract and Refractive) Optimization of IOL Power Calculation Constants: By Unit or by Surgeon? Nathaniel.
Results of corrective surgery: secondary lens implantation at a cataract surgery training centre Mehul Shah,shreya shah, adway appalware,pramod upadhyay,
Hayashi Eye Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan
New 3-Dimensional Scheimpflug Analysis of Cataract Density
Anand K Shah MD1 Neda Shamie MD1 Paul Phillips MD1 Mark A Terry MD1,2*
Joshua C. Teichman, MD Richard Lee, MD Andrea Butler, BSc
Khairidzan Mohd Kamal MD
Hayashi Eye Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan
Kellan Tetraflex KH3500 Accommodative IOLs vs. Acri
Long term PCO preventive effect of capsular bending ring
Eye Clinic Day Hospital - SÃO Paulo - Brazil
SUBLUXATION LENS, A NO-RING APPROACH
Karen Chia, MD Chan Tat Keong, MD Peter Tseng, MD Doric Wong, MD
Michael Goodman, Alexandra Paul and Andrew Hsu
Presentation transcript:

Adriana S. Forseto1, MD Walton Nosé1,2, MD Changes in IOL Positioning and Refraction after Neodymium:Yag Laser Posterior Capsulotomy Adriana S. Forseto1, MD Walton Nosé1,2, MD 1Eye Clinic Day Hospital 2Federal University of São Paulo - UNIFESP São Paulo - Brazil The authors have no financial interest in the subject matter of this poster

Introduction Intraocular lens (IOL) positioning alteration is a possible complication of Neodymium:YAG laser posterior capsulotomy (Nd:YAG). Some studies have already been proposed to quantify IOL positioning changes after Nd:YAG by measuring the anterior chamber depth (ACD) pre and after the treatment. Using the Scheimpflug’s principle we can determine not only the ACD changes but also the actual value of IOL decentration and tilt. Purpose The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of Neodymium:YAG laser posterior capsulotomy (Nd:YAG) on intraocular lens (IOL) positioning and refraction

Methods Prospective study: 25 eyes (20 patients) Inclusion criteria Presence of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) Minimum post cataract surgery follow-up: 3 months The anterior chamber depth (ACD) and the IOL positioning changes (tilt and decentration) were measured using a Scheimpflug camera (EAS-1000; NIDEK): 4 measurements were obtained from each eye within 15 days prior to Nd:YAG and 30 days post treatment to assess the method’s reproducibility Changes in refraction and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were analyzed Statistical analysis: parametric and nonparametric testing (significant level: p < 0.05)

Example of decentration and tilt analysis of a posterior chamber IOL pre Nd:YAG using the Scheimpflug camera Two images of the anterior segment of the eye were obtained with the rotating CCD camera at the 45º and 135º angles The images were transferred to the computer for storage and analysis Measurements of the extension and direction of decentration (mm) and the degree of tilt (°) of the implanted IOL, were calculated through the IOL image modes of the apparatus

Results The mean time between cataract surgery and Nd:YAG: IOL type: 24 ± 20 months (range, 3 to 60 months) IOL type: 3-piece IOL: 12 eyes 1-piece IOL: 12 eyes unknown: 1 eye (impossible to evaluate: insufficient mydriasis) Nd:YAG energy power for 4.00mm capsulotomy opening: 1.7  0.3 mJ (range, 1.0 to 2.2 mJ) Complications: Retinal detachment (n = 1) Excluded because of poor post Nd:YAG eye fixation for evaluation

Results No statistically significant changes were observed comparing the mean pre and post Nd:Yag ACD (p=0.327) : Pre Nd:YAG: 4.14  0.39 mm Post Nd:YAG: 4.11  0.46 mm ACD pre Nd:YAG = 3.87mm ACD post Nd:YAG = 3.84mm

Results Reproducibility test of the Scheimpflug camera for IOL decentration and tilt Pre-Nd:YAG Decentration (mm) Post-Nd:YAG Decentration Pre-Nd:YAG Tilt (o) Post-Nd:YAG Measurements Mean  S.D. 1 0.34 0.31 0.38 0.26 3.40 2.39 3.27 1.73 2 0.32 0.28 0.33 0.20 2.98 2.21 2.79 1.71 3 0.17 3.36 2.92 2.53 1.52 4 0.36 0.35 3.49 3.07 1.65 Comparison 2 r = 0.41 p= 0.937 2 r = 1.39 p= 0.709 2 r = 4.85 p= 0.183 2 r = 6.45 p= 0.092 The four IOL positioning measurements taken from each eye were similar

Results Posterior chamber IOL decentration and tilt pre and post Nd:YAG Exam Decentration (mm) Tilt (o) Pre Nd:YAG 0.34  0.25 3.30  2.55 Post Nd:YAG 0.34  1.18 2.78  1.44 z= 0.24 p= 0.808 z= 1.14 p=0.235 There were no statistically significant differences between pre and post laser measurements

Results Correlation between the number and the power of laser shoots used and the post Nd:YAG IOL positioning percent variation Variation Number of laser shoots Power of laser shoots (mJ) Tilt rs= 0.08 p= 0.736 rs= 0.11 p= 0.651 Decentration rs= -0.01 p= 0.980 rs= 0.31 p= 0.166 No statistically significant correlation was observed between the number and power of laser shoots used and the IOL positioning percent variation

Results Association between the IOL type and its post Nd:YAG positioning percent variation (mean  standard deviation) IOL Decentration Tilt 1-piece 17.76  105.15 31.77  113.17 3-piece 14.67  43.00 13.35  75.27 U= 50.0 p=0.347 U=58.0 p= 0.651 No association was demonstrated between the type of the IOL and its positioning change post laser

Results No statistically significant changes were observed comparing the mean pre and post Nd:YAG mean Sph Eq refraction (p=0.362): Pre Nd:YAG: –0.65  1.47 D (range, -3.90 to +2.00D) Post Nd:YAG: –0.59  1.44D (range, -3.80 to +2.40D) The BCVA remained unchanged in 8 eyes and improved in 14 eyes. Only the case with retinal detachment lost lines of BCVA

Conclusions No statistically significant changes of the IOL positioning and refraction were induced by the Nd:YAG laser posterior capsulotomy