FINAL CLEAN POWER PLAN Before the Virginia Energy Efficiency Council Virginia Department of Environmental Quality November 12, 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IBM Corporate Environmental Affairs and Product Safety
Advertisements

EPA’S DRAFT GUIDELINES TO STATES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF STATE 111(d) PLANS MIDWESTERN POWER SECTOR COLLABORATIVE JUNE 17, 2014 FRANZ LITZ PROGRAM CONSULTANT.
EPA’s Clean Power Plan Proposed Rules for Reducing GHG Emissions from Power Plants Presentation to ACPAC June 16,
EDDIE TERRILL AIR QUALITY DIVISION DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AUGUST 21, 2014 EPA’s 111(d) Clean Power Plan Rule: A DEQ Perspective.
EPA Clean Power Plan. Emission Targets StateInterim Goal Final Goal 2030 AECI 2013 Net Rate Interim Reduction Final Reduction Missouri 1,6211,5441, %21.3%
Clean and Affordable Energy Future in Northwest U.S. Nancy Hirsh NW Energy Coalition October 1, 2014.
Update on EPA Activities MOPC July 15-16, Current Known Impacts –Retirements –De-ratings –Outage Impact Studies Proposed Clean Power Plan 2 Topics.
Air and Waste Management Association-Gulf Coast Chapter Meeting October 7, 2014.
EPA Rulemakings to Set GHG Emission Standards for Power Plants National Hydropower Association Webinar Kyle Danish February 14, 2014.
Air Protection Branch 1. 2 Air Quality Activities Support the Mission of the Air Protection Branch Monitor and Report Air Quality Data Analysis and Planning.
Western States Energy & Environment Symposium October 27, 2009.
Clean Air Act Section 111(d) Indiana Energy Association September 11, 2014 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., BCEE Commissioner IN Department of Environmental Management.
EPA Basics on Clean Air Act Sec. 111(d) Reducing Carbon Emissions from Existing Power Plants NW Energy Coalition May 2, 2014.
CHEAPER AND CLEANER: Using the Clean Air Act to Sharply Reduce Carbon Pollution from Existing Power Plants, Delivering Health, Environmental and Economic.
Energy Efficiency in the Clean Power Plan Opportunities for Virginia Mary Shoemaker Research Assistant Spring 2015 VAEEC Meeting May 11, 2015.
Pennsylvania Draft Regulations for the Control of Mercury From Coal-fired Electric Generating Units Allegheny Section- AWMA Air Quality Issues Workshop.
OPTIONS FOR STATES IMPLEMENTING CARBON STANDARDS FOR POWER PLANTS ARKANSAS STAKEHOLDER MEETING MAY 28, 2014 FRANZ LITZ PROGRAM CONSULTANT.
EPA’s Final Clean Power Plan: Overview Steve Burr AQD, SIP Section September 1, 2015.
1 Public Hearing to Consider Proposed Amendments to the Emission Inventory Criteria and Guidelines Regulation for the AB 2588 Air Toxics “Hot Spots” Program.
Air Quality Benefits from Energy Conservation Measures Anna Garcia April 2004.
Clean Power Plan - Final Rule Overview Mark Leath, PE Prepared for - Missouri Air Conservation Commission September 24, 2015.
Clean Air Act Section 111(d) Indiana State Bar Association Utility Law Section September 4, 2014 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., BCEE Commissioner IN Department.
Restoring VA Waters the TMDL Way Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Regional Administrator U.S. EPA Region 3.
EPA’s Proposed Federal Clean Power Plan Steve Burr AQD, SIP Section October 6, 2015.
Senate Select Committee on Climate Change and AB 32 Implementation December 3, 2013.
CLEAN POWER PLAN. OVERVIEW The final rule released in August 2015: Sets first-ever limits on carbon pollution from power plants Sets achievable standards.
Stationary and Area Source Committee Update OTC Committee Meeting September 13, 2012 Washington, D.C. Hall of the States 1.
EPA’s Clean Power Plan: Compliance Options and Engagement Opportunities Vicki Arroyo, Executive Director Gabe Pacyniak, Mitigation Program Manager Lissa.
EPA’s Proposed Clean Power Plan House Committee on Natural Resources and Environment February 12, 2015 Tegan B. Treadaway Assistant Secretary Office of.
California Energy Commission IEPR Lead Commissioner Workshop University of California, Irvine August 17,
Sustainable Energy Plan June 22, 2002 Sustainable Development Council John Auguste (Ministry of Works, Communications, and Public Utilities)
Indiana Energy Conference EPA Clean Power Plan—111(d) November 13, 2014 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., BCEE, Commissioner IN Department of Environmental Management.
Revisions to Primacy State Underground Injection Control Programs Primacy State Implementation of the New Class V Rule.
CLEAN POWER PLAN PROPOSAL Reducing Carbon Pollution From Existing Power Plants Kerry Drake,Associate Director Air Division, US EPA, Region 9 California.
2014 Program Priorities January 23, Outline Major 2014 Goals 2013 Accomplishments Major 2014 Activities Partnerships 2.
L. David Glatt North Dakota Department of Health Environmental Health Section.
June 26, Background of Federal GHG Regulation Supreme Court determines greenhouse gases (GHGs) are “air pollutants” under the Clean Air Act U.S.
1. Stationary and Area Sources Committee Recommendations OTC Annual Meeting 2010 Baltimore, MD 2.
Clean Power Plan Handbook For the National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates | ©2015 Synapse Energy Economics Inc.
Overview of EPA’s Final Clean Air Act Section 111(d) Emissions Guidelines for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Existing Electric Generating Units Overview.
Clean Power Plan: Overview of Proposed Federal Plan and Model Rules Clean Power Plan: Overview of Proposed Federal Plan and Model Rules Air Quality Committee.
Clean Power Plan – Now What? OCTOBER 16, 2015 FALL PR-MR & MARKETING MEETING.
Amy L. Stein Associate Professor of Law University of Florida Levin College of Law 1 University of San Diego School of Law 2015 Climate and Energy Law.
1 Consideration of Final Rulemaking Clean Air Interstate Rule Environmental Quality Board Meeting Harrisburg, PA December 18, 2007 Joyce E. Epps Director,
National Tribal Air Association Webinar October 15, 2015.
Clean Power Plan TENNESSEE MINING CONFERENCE AGENDA November 3, 2015 John Myers Director, Environmental Policy and Regulatory Affairs.
Clean Power Plan Compliance Pathways
CLEAN POWER PLAN: Opportunities for Energy Efficiency in Affordable Housing Todd Nedwick Housing and Energy Efficiency Policy Director National Housing.
Clean Energy Incentive Program (CEIP) Training for Tribal Communities Farmington, New Mexico | Tuba City, Arizona December 7 – 10, 2015.
1 Special Information Session on USEPA’s Carbon Rules & Clean Air Act Section 111 North Carolina Division of Air Quality Special Information Session on.
11 AB 32 Climate Change Scoping Plan Progress Report October 21, 2010 California Air Resources Board.
Impacts of Environmental Regulations in the ERCOT Region Dana Lazarus Planning Analyst, ERCOT January 26, 2016.
Clean Air Act Section 111 WESTAR Meeting Presented by Lisa Conner U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air and Radiation November 6, 2013.
Middle Fork Project Relicensing Process Plan April 25, 2006.
Strategic Plan Development Status Technical Analysis Forum meeting October 11, 2007.
Clean Power Plan – Understanding the Implications for Regional Energy Delivery Kevin Gunn Midwest Energy Policy Conference October 6, 2015.
Reaching Clean Power Plan Goals at ‘No’ Cost: Securing the Smart Grid’s Potential.
Peter McGrath Moore & Van Allen, PLLC Environmental Regulation: Update 2015.
Kansas City Power & Light and KCP&L Greater Missouri Operations – Suggestions for Chapter 22 Revisions Missouri Public Service Commission Meeting Aug 31,
© 2015 Haynes and Boone, LLP Overview of the EPA Clean Power Plan Suzanne Beaudette Murray February 19, 2016 Tulane Environmental Law Summit.
Clean Power Plan Kyra Moore Director, Air Pollution Control Program Prepared for: Midwest Energy Policy Conference October 6, 2015.
 Final Plan published on October 23, 2015  Employs different method to develop state targets  Uses the proposal’s first three building blocks ◦ BB1.
The Clean Power Plan.  Standards of Performance for GHG Emissions from New, Modified, and Reconstructed Stationary Sources (111(b)).  Carbon Pollution.
Western State Targets and Key Issues Patrick Cummins, CNEE September 10, 2015.
Regional Implications of the Clean Power Plan Lanny Nickell Midwest Energy Policy Conference October 6 th,
Final Rulemaking: 25 Pa. Code Chapters 121 and 139 Measurement and Reporting of Condensable Particulate Matter Emissions Environmental Quality Board Meeting.
NSPS Rulemakings for Greenhouse Gas Emissions
IMPLICATIONS AND STRATEGIES
Clean Air Act Section 111(d)
Workshop Technical and Policy Studies to Support the Annex
Presentation transcript:

FINAL CLEAN POWER PLAN Before the Virginia Energy Efficiency Council Virginia Department of Environmental Quality November 12, 2015

FINAL PLAN BASICS  Final Plan released on August 3, 2015  Employs different method to develop state targets  Uses the proposal’s first three building blocks  BB1 - Increased power plant efficiency  BB2 - Shift of generation to NGCC  BB3 - Increase renewable energy  Fourth proposed building block (energy efficiency) is not included in developing final rule’s state targets 2

FINAL PLAN BASICS  Uses regional generation and emission data to develop standard emission rates for coal and natural gas  1,305 lbs/MWh for coal plants  771 lbs/MWh for natural gas combined cycle plants (NGCC)  Uses these rates and 2012 generation mix to develop state specific goals  For Virginia: Coal (1,305 lbs/MWh * 31%) + NGCC (771 lbs/MWh * 69%) = 934 lbs/MWh  VA’s interim goal set at 1,047 lbs/MWh beginning in 2022  Final compliance still required by

HOW DOES THE FINAL PLAN ADDRESS VIRGINIA’S COMMENTS? Equity – the final rule uses national standards that reduces inequity between state goals State goals – the final rule reduces differences in state goals and any resulting economic disadvantages between Virginia and its neighbors Zero emitting sources – the final rule dispenses with the arbitrary crediting of some clean power generation and will allow credit for new nuclear investments in the future Renewable energy – the final plan is based on an updated national assumption of RE potential and VA’s higher rate goal will lessen the need for major RE ramp-up in the near term Interim targets – the final rule delays the interim compliance period to 2022 and raises the previously front loaded VA interim goal to avoid the compliance “cliff” Mass limits – the final rule provides both rate and mass limits for states to use Reliability – the final rule provides a reliability safety value to address emergency situations and optional set-asides to assist single source assets. 4

VIRGINIA GOALS IN DETAIL 5

VIRGINIA EMISSION RATE GOALS

VIRGINIA MASS EMISSIONS GOALS

STATE COMPLIANCE PLANS  State can develop a compliance plan subject to EPA timetables and approval  Flexibility within CPP guidelines  Myriad issues  Blessing and curse  Can adopt EPA model rule  Presumptively approvable  Proposed by EPA on October 23 rd for rate and mass approaches and open to public comment  Final sometime next year  States that do not develop and implement an approved EPA compliance plan will have a federal plan imposed on them and implemented by EPA  No flexibility or state control  Proposed by EPA on October 23 and open to public comment  Final sometime next year 8

STATE COMPLIANCE OPTIONS  The two main compliance plan options are:  A state emissions standard plan, or  A state measures plan  Under an emissions standard plan:  Use established overall rate or mass goals or specific rate/mass goals for specific sources  Can include only existing (rate) or existing & new sources (mass)  Can participate in intra or interstate trading facilitated by EPA  Compliance is determined at the “stack” through monitoring  Rate based program would require generation and tracking of “emission reduction credits” from RE and EE projects  Under a state measures plan:  Include a mixture of measures to be implemented by the state including RE and EE standards and other measures  States choosing this option must also adopt a federally enforceable “backstop” 9

10

STATE COMPLIANCE TIMELINE  September 6, 2016 – initial submittal with optional extension request  September 6, 2017 – Progress report for states with extensions  September 6, 2018 – Final state plans  July 1, 2021 – Milestone status report  January 1, 2022 to December 31, 2024 – first interim compliance period  January 1, 2025 to December 31, 2027 – second interim compliance period  January 1, 2028 to December 31, 2029 – third interim compliance period  July 1, 2030 – Interim period compliance demonstration  July 1, 2032 and every three years forward – Final compliance demonstration 11

VIRGINIA’S PUBLIC PARTICIPATION APPROACH  Informal 60-day public comment period (August 13 – October 13)  Listening sessions in all 6 Regions (September – October)  Greenhouse gas web page (ongoing)  RSS feeds (ongoing)  Meet with stakeholders (ongoing)  Facilitated stakeholder process 12

PLANS AND PLAN COMPONENTS  Initial Plan or Extension Request due September 2016  Identify final plan approaches under consideration and describe progress made to date  Explain why additional time is needed to submit a final plan  Demonstrate opportunity for public comment, including “meaningful engagement” with “vulnerable communities”  Include a non-binding statement of intent to participate in the Clean Energy Incentive Program 13

PLANS AND PLAN COMPONENTS  Progress report due September 2017  Summarize status of each component of the final plan  Commit to a plan approach, including draft or proposed legislation and regulations  Provide updated roadmap with a schedule and milestones for completing the final plan, including updates to community engagement undertaken and planned 14

PLANS AND PLAN COMPONENTS  Final plan due September 2018  Identification of affected EGUs  Emission standards  A federally enforceable backstop that will be put into place if there is a triggering event  Identification of monitoring, reporting, and recordkeeping requirements for each affected EGU  Process, contents, and schedule for state reporting  Subject to formal 30-day public comment period and mandatory hearing 15