1 Historic Preservation Webinar "Reporting Through PAGE and to PMC"

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation and Section 106
Advertisements

Indian Environmental General Assistance Program (GAP) Guidance on the Award and Management of General Assistance Agreements for Tribes and Intertribal.
Cultural Resources Categorical Exclusion Training Class.
Jennifer Horn, Preservation Pennsylvania. Who is Preservation Pennsylvania? Pennsylvania’s only private, non-profit, statewide organization dedicated.
CSBG Policy and Procedures A Multi-Faceted and Useful Tool.
Program Alternatives under 36 CFR Part 800 Dave Berwick Army Affairs Coordinator Advisory Council on Historic Preservation.
Geothermal Projects and Indian Tribes: Dealing with Cultural Resources Issues Michael P. O’Connell Stoel Rives LLP O R.
Section 106, Section 4(f) and You!: The Role of Consulting Parties in Transportation Projects Kevin Mock, Historic Preservation Specialist Pennsylvania.
Section 106 The reasons, the actions, the participants.
Recently Issued OHRP Documents: Guidance on Subject Withdrawal and Draft Revised FWA Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Human Research Protections October.
1 Grant Award Process Monika Lacka U.S. EPA Region 5.
NHPA, Section 106, and NEPA Highlights and Misconceptions.
Connecticut Department of Transportation Bureau of Policy & Planning.
Driving Indiana’s Economic Growth. Management and Preservation of Indiana's Historic Bridges: A Programmatic Approach Thanks to Mead & Hunt & FHWA-IN.
THE FOUR STEP SECTION 106 PROCESS: AN INTRODUCTION TENNESSEE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE SECTION All reproduction rights reserved.
COSCDA Workshop Renovation, Reconstruction and Renewal of Historic Properties and Neighborhoods Section 106 and Programmatic Agreements Overview.
Roles and Responsibilities in Municipal Land Use.
Mitigation in the Section 106 Process Dave Berwick Army Program Manager Advisory Council on Historic Preservation.
Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research 1 Update on PHS New Rule on Financial Conflicts of Interest (FCOI) Presentation to Business Managers January.
1 ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING CULTURAL RESOURCES LAWS AND REGULATIONS CH 5 CH 5 HO # 13, 13a, 13b
Positive Train Control Infrastructure: Section 106 Review Process under the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation’s May 2014 Program Comment For More.
Accountability and Grants Management: Connecting the Dots U.S. Department of Labor, ETA, Region 4 Discretionary Grantee Training Conference March 1-2,
Nadine Peterson Preservation Planner NH Division of Historical Resources Lynne E. Monroe Preservation Company Christopher W. Closs Christopher W. Closs.
SAFETEA-LU Section 6002 “ Efficient Environmental Reviews for Project Decisionmaking”
Integrating Other Laws into BLM Planning. Objectives Integrate legal requirements into the planning process. Discuss laws with review and consultation.
Brette Kaplan, Esq. Erin Auerbach, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring Forum 2013
Environmental Review Process for Responsible Entities 24 CFR Part 58 NEIGHBORHOOD STABILIZATION PROGRAM.
Rebecca Nickleson, MS, CRA Assistant Director Office of Research & Sponsored Programs.
1 | Weatherization and Intergovernmental Programeere.energy.gov Overview of EECBG Program Notice 10-07B and SEP Program Notice A Reporting to DOE:
CIVIL RIGHTS IMPACT ANALYSIS Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Civil Rights Enforcement and Compliance.
By Rachel Coleman.  “ The head of any federal agency having direct or indirect jurisdiction over a proposed federal or federally assisted undertaking.
Department of Natural Resources Historic Preservation Division 1 Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act Review and Compliance for CDBG/CHIP.
Methods of Administration MOA Element 3 Assurances.
Office of Affordable Housing ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REVIEW PROCEDURES FOR THE HOME PROGRAM BY: GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS OFFICE OF AFFORDABLE.
Army BRAC Historic Preservation Opportunities and Challenges.
CDBG OOR Application Training. Agenda Introduction of Real Estate Production Staff Review Application Package o Funding Round Timelines o Eligible applicants.
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Program Small City and County Grant Kick-Off Meeting California.
Categorical Exclusion Training Class
Historic Preservation Memoranda of Agreement. What is an MOA? As part of the Section 106 review process, it is an agreement among an agency official,
Program Overview: HPF Grants to Tribes 1. National Historic Preservation Act Enacted in 1966 to Establish a Program for the Preservation of Historic Properties.
“SPEAR” W ORKSHOP O CTOBER 19 & 30, 2015 ANGELLE GOMEZ S UBAWARD R ISK A SSESSMENT / MONITORING.
South Dakota State Historic Preservation Office and the Nebraska National Forests and Grasslands July 24, 2013 National Grasslands Visitor Center.
FERPA for the Financial Aid Office NCASFAA Fall Conference November 2012.
Cultural Resources office — St. Louis Planning & Urban Design Agency an introduction.
OMB Circular A-122 and the Federal Cost Principles Copyright © Texas Education Agency
6/9/2016 Agenda Procedure Training Lori McWilliams, CMC Village Clerk.
Integration of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) NEPA and NHPA A Handbook for Integrating NEPA and.
What’s your friend up to? Subrecipient Monitoring Issues Tom Egan, MIT OSP Jeannette Gordon, Division of Grants Compliance and Oversight OPERA, OER, NIH.
Civil Rights Training The North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services Food Distribution Division March 2011.
Anth January 2012.
National Treasures: Brownfields and the National Historic Preservation Act Brownfields 2006 Boston, MA.
Recordkeeping Requirements
NRCS-Utah conducting an on-site field visit with Tribal partners.
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
101 New London Road Newark, Delaware
Program Overview: Tribal Preservation Program and HPF Grants to Tribes
Monte Mills Alexander Blewett III School of Law University of Montana
Section 106 Consulting Parties Meeting
Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality Water Resources Division
Susan Barnes Vice-Chairman Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
May 8, 2018 Marion Werkheiser, Cultural Heritage Partners
Cultural Resources Categorical Exclusion Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental Services.
Federal Rulemaking Process for Significant Regulatory Actions
National Historic Preservation Act
The Role of the SHPO John Pouley, Assistant State Archaeologist
© Paul Graham Washington Department of Transportation © Paul Graham
Protecting What We Love Building What We Need – The “H” Factor
Programmatic Approaches to Section 106 Compliance
National Historic Preservation Act
National Historic Preservation Act
Presentation transcript:

1 Historic Preservation Webinar "Reporting Through PAGE and to PMC"

2 Overview Introductions Historic Preservation 101 How to Report in PAGE How to Report to PMC Q & A

3 Introductions Christine Platt Patrick, DOE, Policy Advisor Lee Webb, Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP), Program Analyst and Liaison to DOE Melinda Armstrong, DOE, Attorney Advisor Sevan Petrossian, PAGE Training Coordinator, Data Tree Inc.

4 Historic Preservation 101 Historic preservation is a professional endeavor that seeks to preserve, conserve and protect buildings, objects, landscapes or other artifacts of historic significance under the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA). NHPA directs federal agencies to accomplish two primary tasks: –Take into account the effects of their actions on historic properties –Provide the ACHP a reasonable opportunity to comment ACHP administers the NHPA’s Section 106 review process and works with federal agencies to ensure compliance with their Section 106 responsibilities and to help improve how they consider historic preservation values in their programs. Section 106 applies to historic properties that are listed in or eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. Section 106 is a framework for problem solving, grounded in consultation, while providing stakeholders access to federal decision-making. Results of Section 106 consultation range from full preservation to total loss of historic properties.

5 Historic Preservation 101 Compliance DOE must ensure that its WAP, SEP, and EECBG recipients are compliant with Section 106 of the NHPA, consistent with DOE's 2009 letter of delegation of authority regarding the NHPA. DOE worked with the ACHP and NCSHPO to develop a prototype Programmatic Agreement (PA), to assist in streamlining Section 106 reviews, to date 39 PAs have been executed between DOE and states, with additional ones pending.  Each state can only have one PA; EECBG, SEP and WAP state agencies, SHPO, and DOE must be signatories  The PA is applicable to all recipients and subrecipients in the state Recipients (or subrecipients) are required to retain sufficient documentation to demonstrate that the recipient (or subrecipient) has received required approval(s) from the SHPO or THPO for the Project, or that the activity will not adversely affect an historic structure or site.

6 Historic Preservation 101 Sufficient Documentation Sufficient documentation includes, but is not limited to: –If Exempt Activity under PA: Spreadsheet or paperwork providing: (1) name of building, (2) Address, and (3) Reason exempt under PA –If not Exempt Activity, or State does not have a PA: Need to look at the specific state requirements to show compliance with Section 106 (each circumstance will be unique) –Items to look at: (1) Interagency Agreement Requirements, (2) Procedures outlined in the PA, (3) State Statutes, (4) State SHPO requirements, and (4) any MOA. –Some form of documentation that shows consultation with the SHPO, THPO, and DOE if applicable. –Retain any information that the SHPO requests –Documentation of the final determination (how the Section 106 process was resolved).

7 Historic Preservation 101 Defining Activity For the annual report, the form uses the term activity. An activity refers to: individual undertakings that comprise a project funded in whole or in part by U.S. DOE through EECBG, WAP, or SEP. –An Individual task completed at each building is a separate activity. Most of the time if all the work is at one building then that would be one activity. However, if some of the work is exempt and some of the work is not, then two separate activities would need to be reported accordingly. –Activities also must be separated based on funding source. If WAP is providing funding for a building for insulation and EECBG is also providing funding for lighting at the same building, this would be two separate activities.

8 Accessing Historic Preservation Reporting Module in PAGE

9 Annual Historic Preservation Report Screen

10 Reporting to PMC

11 U.S. Department of Energy HISTORIC PRESERVATION REPORT Historic Preservation Reporting Period: ____________________ Grant Number: ______________________________ 1a. State where recipient is located: ______________________________ 1b. Name of Recipient: ________________________________________ 1c. Have you utilized a U.S. DOE-executed Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement (PA) in order to comply with National Historic Preservation Act requirements for all or some of your U.S. DOE-funded EECBG, WAP, or SEP activities? Yes ____ No____ 1d. For any activities for which you did not utilize a PA for historic preservation review have you otherwise complied with National Historic Preservation Act requirements for those activities? Yes ____ No ____ 1e. Total number of activities being undertaken with DOE funds: ___________________________ If your answer to question 1c above is “yes” then please answer questions 2a through 3a: 2a. Identify the number of activities that were exempt from further historic preservation review under the PA due to property age. 2b. Identify the number of activities exempt from further historic preservation review per the PA list of exempt activities. 2c. Identify the number of activities exempt from further historic preservation review under the PA due to a prior review under a Section 106 Agreement for Community Development Block Grants (CDBG). 3. For any activities that you did not identify as exempt from further review under questions 2a, 2b, 2c, or 2d, please list the following: 3a. Number of Section 106 reviews completed under the PA.

12 Q & A

13 PAGE Reference Materials PAGE Help Contains –Step-by-Step instructions on the entry and submission process –Line Item instructions: Provides directions for each entry field PAGE Training Videos –5 minute Historic Preservation video available anytime from the PAGE Training Videos Link

14 Contacts and Resources Golden Field Office: Historic Preservation- Historic Preservation - n.html n.html Executed Programmatic Agreements - tml tml