Aura HDF-EOS File Format Guidelines: Overview and Status Cheryl Craig.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
28 March 2003e-MapScholar: content management system The e-MapScholar Content Management System (CMS) David Medyckyj-Scott Project Director.
Advertisements

Product Quality and Documentation – Recent Developments H. K. Ramapriyan Assistant Project Manager ESDIS Project, Code 423, NASA GFSC
Health Ingenuity Exchange (HingX) Best Practices for User Groups and Resource Registration.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology MLS Level 3 Products Paul Wagner 1, Yibo Jiang.
How to Document A Business Management System
SOFTWARE QUALITY ASSURANCE Maltepe University Faculty of Engineering SE 410.
DESIGNING A PUBLIC KEY INFRASTRUCTURE
IS 214 Needs Assessment and Evaluation of Information Systems Managing Usability © Copyright 2001 Kevin McBride.
CS 5521 Configuration Management the problem Not a simple task! –Different versions of software usually is in the field during the life cycle –Different.
ÆKOS: A new paradigm for discovery and access to complex ecological data David Turner, Paul Chinnick, Andrew Graham, Matt Schneider, Craig Walker Logos.
Software Documentation Written By: Ian Sommerville Presentation By: Stephen Lopez-Couto.
Tutorial Introduction Fidelity NTSConnect is an innovative Web-based software solution designed for use by customers of Fidelity National Title Insurance.
Page 1 ISMT E-120 Desktop Applications for Managers Introduction to Microsoft Access.
Software Configuration Management (SCM)
The HDF-EOS5 Tutorial Ray Milburn L3 Communciations, EER Systems Inc McCormick Drive, 170 Largo, MD USA
05 December, 2002HDF & HDF-EOS Workshop VI1 SEEDS Standards Process Richard Ullman SEEDS Standards Formulation Team Lead
LBTO IssueTrak User’s Manual Norm Cushing version 1.3 August 8th, 2007.
EARTH SCIENCE MARKUP LANGUAGE “Define Once Use Anywhere” INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND SYSTEMS CENTER UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA IN HUNTSVILLE.
Information Assurance The Coordinated Approach To Improving Enterprise Data Quality.
Profiling Metadata Specifications David Massart, EUN Budapest, Hungary – Nov. 2, 2009.
Important ESDIS 2009 tasks review Kent Yang, Mike Folk The HDF Group April 1st, /1/20151Annual briefing to ESDIS.
MODIS Land and HDF-EOS HDF-EOS Workshop Presentation September 20, 2000 Robert Wolfe NASA GSFC Code 922, Raytheon ITSS MODIS Land Science Team Support.
U.S. Department of Agriculture eGovernment Program August 14, 2003 eAuthentication Agency Application Pre-Design Meeting eGovernment Program.
A Metadata Based Approach For Supporting Subsetting Queries Over Parallel HDF5 Datasets Vignesh Santhanagopalan Graduate Student Department Of CSE.
11 October 2015 MAVIS v “Sneak Preview”. 11 October 2015 Enhancements in the Release  Reference Material  Brief Accessioning View  Template.
Metadata and Geographical Information Systems Adrian Moss KINDS project, Manchester Metropolitan University, UK
Why do I want to know about HDF and HDF- EOS? Hierarchical Data Format for the Earth Observing System (HDF-EOS) is NASA's primary format for standard data.
An IDL-BasedValidation Toolkit: Extensions to use the HDF-EOS Swath Format Ken Stone, Center for Lower Atmospheric Studies - University of Colorado, Boulder.
CCSM DATA MANGEMENT POLICY The Community Climate System Model (CCSM) Data Management Policy documents the procedures for the management of model data produced.
SunGuide® Software Development Project Release 4.3 Express Lanes Enhancements Design Review December 15, 2009 December 15, 20091R4.3 Design Review.
NMP EO-1 TECHNOLOGY WORKSHOP Section 2 Meeting Objectives.
IUFRO International Union of Forest Research Organizations Eero Mikkola The Increasing Importance of Metadata in Forest Information Gathering The Use of.
The HDF Group November 3-5, 2009 HDF-OPeNDAP Project Update HDF/HDF-EOS Workshop XIII1 Joe Lee and Kent Yang The HDF Group James Gallagher.
HDF-EOS Workshop VII1 HDF-EOS5 Validator Tool Bob Bane Jingli Yang Richard Ullman Data Usability Task NASA/GSFC.
John Peoples for the DES Collaboration BIRP Review August 12, 2004 Tucson1 DES Management  Survey Organization  Survey Deliverables  Proposed funding.
PDS Geosciences Node Page 1 Archiving Mars Mission Data Sets with the Planetary Data System Report to MEPAG Edward A. Guinness Dept. of Earth and Planetary.
HDF OPeNDAP Project Update MuQun Yang and Hyo-Kyung Lee The HDF Group March 31, Annual briefing to ESDIS10/31/2015.
DOC ID © Chevron 2005 Knowledge Management and Open Standards Chevron Perspective John Hanten Chevron Technology Ventures Energistics 2007 Annual Meeting.
HDF4 OPeNDAP Project Progress Report MuQun Yang and Hyo-Kyung Lee 1 HDF Developers' Meeting11/24/2015.
March 2004 At A Glance autoProducts is an automated flight dynamics product generation system. It provides a mission flight operations team with the capability.
Chapter 6 CASE Tools Software Engineering Chapter 6-- CASE TOOLS
Technical Overview. Project Overview Document Library Document List Index TransmittalsPlanning.
The HDF Group Data Interoperability The HDF Group Staff Sep , 2010HDF/HDF-EOS Workshop XIV1.
CISB113 Fundamentals of Information Systems IS Development.
Robert Wolfe NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Code 614.5, Greenbelt, MD Robert Wolfe NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Code 614.5,
Breakout Session Assignments and Goals. Summary of Objectives and Charge to Breakout Groups Desired outcome: a comprehensive vision for NACP Data Management.
ADASS the Planning and Scheduling Perspective Roadmap: - How planning and scheduling fits in at ADASS - ADASS planning and scheduling posters and presentations.
Data File Formats: netCDF by Tom Whittaker University of Wisconsin-Madison SSEC/CIMSS 2009 MUG Meeting June, 2009.
1 The Sakai Community Practice Work Group: Progress Statement Mark J. Norton, Chairman.
MISR Geo-registration Overview Brian E. Rheingans Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology AMS Short Course on Exploring and Using.
HDF-EOS Workshop IV September 19-21, 2000 Richard E. Ullman ESDIS Information Architect NASA/ GSFC, Code 423.
GES DISC Experience with HDF Formats for MeaSUREs Projects by James Johnson NASA/GES DISC (Wyle Inc.) April 17, 2012.
HDF-EOS Aura File Format Guidelines Cheryl Craig HDF-EOS Workshop IV Sept 20, HDF-EOS Aura File Format Guidelines Cheryl Craig September 20, 2000.
OMI L2G and L3 Status Peter Leonard – OSST June 21, 2006.
CF 2.0 Coming Soon? (Climate and Forecast Conventions for netCDF) Ethan Davis ESO Developing Standards - ESIP Summer Mtg 14 July 2015.
IPDA Architecture Project International Planetary Data Alliance IPDA Architecture Project Report.
IV&V Facility 7/28/20041 IV&V in NASA Pre-Solicitation Conference/ Industry Day NASA IV&V FACILITY July 28, 2004.
Chapter 7 Computer-Aided Design and Drafting in Architecture.
1 MAPPS Software Review Board MAPPS SRB – part II ESAC, Madrid, Spain 3 rd June 2016 ESA-ESTEC - “MAPPS Software Review Board” – MAPPS SRB - Part II, ESAC,
HDF/HDF-EOS Meeting Oct th 2008, Aurora CO Proposal for adding Named Dimensions to HDF5 Arrays Daniel Kahn Science Systems and Applications, Inc.
Data Grids, Digital Libraries and Persistent Archives: An Integrated Approach to Publishing, Sharing and Archiving Data. Written By: R. Moore, A. Rajasekar,
NASA Earth Science Data Stewardship
Charles Acton NAIF Manager JPL July 18, 2007
Plans for an Enhanced NetCDF-4 Interface to HDF5 Data
Implementing Revit and Putting ACE BIM and CAD Standards
NASA ROSES 2007: Decision Support through Earth Science Research Results Improving an Air Quality Decision Support System through the Integration of Satellite.
HDF-EOS Aura File Format Guidelines
HDF-EOS Workshop XXI / The 2018 ESIP Summer Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Aura HDF-EOS File Format Guidelines: Overview and Status Cheryl Craig

Aura HDF-EOS File Format Guidelines: Overview and Status 2 December 2, 2005 What is Aura? NASA atmospheric chemistry satellite launched July 15, 2004 Four instruments with separate instrument teams (HIRDLS, MLS, OMI and TES) Developed a set of Guidelines on top of HDF/HDF-EOS for storing each instrument’s data in a single common format

Aura HDF-EOS File Format Guidelines: Overview and Status 3 December 2, 2005 Why discuss Aura Approach? Aura experience demonstrates that it is possible for developers at diverse locations creating multiple products from several instruments to agree on important common data product formats Common formats substantially simplify end user’s tasks when combining data observed by one or more instruments Common formats simplify the task of developing both the data sets themselves and of tools for manipulating them. Provides lessons learned from a successful effort to develop common standards over multiple instruments at distributed locations Provides insight as to time and effort to produce a set of data guidelines

Aura HDF-EOS File Format Guidelines: Overview and Status 4 December 2, 2005 What are the Aura Guidelines? A set of Guidelines explicitly defining format of similar data products from multiple instruments. A set of naming conventions, units, metadata definitions (via HDF/HDF-EOS attributes) and data organization conventions.

Aura HDF-EOS File Format Guidelines: Overview and Status 5 December 2, 2005 Goals of Standardization Allow easier sharing and use of data –Data products which are the same between instruments have common structure and definitions –Identify and include attributes which aid in developing user software –Allow use of a single HDF/HDF-EOS library for all products –Provide consistent and accessible definition of data formats applicable to multiple instruments and products Reduce development effort and support reuse by enabling application of software to multiple instruments and products

Aura HDF-EOS File Format Guidelines: Overview and Status 6 December 2, 2005 Key Elements for developing a standard Identify a community of data producers and users who could benefit from standardization Get buy-in from every member of community Identify common elements which could benefit from standardization – these are the only fields you need to standardize Develop a consistent structure for describing data formats that can be applied even to unstandardized elements

Aura HDF-EOS File Format Guidelines: Overview and Status 7 December 2, 2005 HDF/HDF-EOS Elements standardized Dimensions and ordering of dimensions for each field Names of fields (includes capitalization and spacing) Data types for each field Attributes for each field, their types and definitions –Title, Units, MissingValue, UniqueFieldDefinition Units for each field (eliminates need to do conversions when using data from multiple instruments)

Aura HDF-EOS File Format Guidelines: Overview and Status 8 December 2, 2005 Aura Guidelines Approval Process Strawman produced based on community requirements Edited via extensive use of –Named authors – required to respond –Silent authors – could respond if desired –Document passed to members for extensive editing Controversial items were brought to individual teams for discussion by Guidelines group member(s) Telecons/DSWG breakout meetings held for items which required discussion Major releases of document voted upon by named authors

Aura HDF-EOS File Format Guidelines: Overview and Status 9 December 2, 2005 Results of Aura Standards We have simplified the use and development process for both data producers and data users Provides defined approaches for software. Once the initial definition effort was complete developers could concentrate on science issues and not worry about how to format the data Assures that features that support subsequent software development are included Users can work with multiple parameter data sets with consistent geolocation, altitude and parameter definitions thus simplifying or eliminating much of the resampling and data conversion steps often required.

Aura HDF-EOS File Format Guidelines: Overview and Status 10 December 2, 2005 Lessons Learned Communicate early, before individual team’s decisions on data files have been made Exchange data sets early on to assure common understanding of the standards Include software engineers and scientists in discussion group Be willing to compromise – will never match your “perfect data set” – remember benefits Group leader must be firm, no issues left unresolved Requires specific commitment of effort by every team and a dedicated coordinator to develop, publish and maintain documents Document needs to be detailed – every item not spelled out is subject to interpretation and alternate implementation

Aura HDF-EOS File Format Guidelines: Overview and Status 11 December 2, 2005 Where is Aura going from here? Extending Aura Guidelines to cover Level 3 data (gridded and zonal mean data) Creating a Technical Note for NASA’s Earth Science Data System Working Group –Details of the Aura standard –Will provide information on how we created the guidelines

Aura HDF-EOS File Format Guidelines: Overview and Status 12 December 2, 2005 Minimal Standardization Encourage basic standards for HDF data files –Would suggest a set of attribute names attached to data fields which users could use or not as they see fit –Candidates would be Units, Scale, Offset, Title, etc. –Scale and Offset would include definition of how to apply them

Aura HDF-EOS File Format Guidelines: Overview and Status 13 December 2, 2005 Aura Document Location Current Authors: Cheryl Craig – NCAR (HIRDLS) David Cuddy – JPL (MLS) Scott Lewicki – JPL (TES) Pepijn Veefkind – KNMI (OMI) Peter Leonard – SSAI (OMI) Al Fleig – PITA (OMI) Paul Wagner – JPL (MLS) On Next Release: Christina Vuu – JPL (MLS)