LSC-Virgo Caltech on March 20, 2008 G080084-00-E1 AdvLIGO Static Interferometer Simulation AdvLIGO simulation tools  Stationary, frequency domain.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hiro Yamamoto LLO April 3, 2014 LIGO-G Core Optics related loss hierarchy of aLIGO Hiro Yamamoto LIGO/Caltech Introduction Loss related to geometry.
Advertisements

LIGO Laboratory1 Thermal Compensation Experience in LIGO Phil Willems- Caltech Virgo/LSC Meeting, Cascina, May 2007 LIGO-G Z.
Marcus Ng Mentor: Alan Weinstein Co-mentor: Robert Ward
LSC-Virgo Hannover on October 24, 2007 G E1 Scattering Loss Hiro Yamamoto - Caltech LIGO LIGO I mirror loss estimation surface figure,
LIGO NSF review, 11/10/05 1 AdLIGO Optical configuration and control Nov 10, 2005 Alan Weinstein for AdLIGO Interferometer Sensing and Control (ISC) and.
LIGO NSF review, 11/10/05 1 AdLIGO Optical configuration and control Nov 10, 2005 Alan Weinstein for AdLIGO Interferometer Sensing and Control (ISC) and.
LIGO-G W LIGO Scientific Collaboration Meeting – LLO March Summary of recent measurements of g factor changes induced by thermal loading.
Scattering loss (Hiro CIT on April 11, 2007 G Extra loss ~ 40ppm / mirror microroughness = 4~5 ppm? Visibility, recycling gain, large.
NSF : Nov. 10, LIGO End to End simulation overview  Time domain simulation written in C++  Like MATLAB with Interferometer toolbox  Major physics.
FFT study of the realistic Optics of LIGO I July 12th, 2004 Commissioning meeting Hiro Yamamoto, Biplab Bhawal, Xiao Xu (CIT-SURF)  LIGO I mirror phase.
20 Nov 2008G v21 Optical & Vacuum Equipment Layouts Dennis Coyne Mike Smith Luke Williams 20 Nov 2008 Adv. LIGO Team Meeting, Caltech, Pasadena,
LIGO- G05XXXX-00-R 40m meeting, May Experimental update from the 40m team 40m TAC meeting May 13, 2005 O. Miyakawa, Caltech and the 40m collaboration.
LIGO-G W 2005 CLEO/QELS Joint Symposium on Gravitational Wave Detection 1 High-Power Stabilized Lasers and Optics of GW Detectors Rick Savage.
Modeling beam and mirror distortions using modal models: FINESSE V.1 Charlotte Bond, Daniel Brown and Andreas Freise Tokyo Institute of Technology 21/06/2013.
GWADW 2010 in Kyoto, May 19, Development for Observation and Reduction of Radiation Pressure Noise T. Mori, S. Ballmer, K. Agatsuma, S. Sakata,
Design of Stable Power-Recycling Cavities University of Florida 10/05/2005 Volker Quetschke, Guido Mueller.
Optical Configuration Advanced Virgo Review Andreas Freise for the OSD subsystem.
Test mass dynamics with optical springs proposed experiments at Gingin Chunnong Zhao (University of Western Australia) Thanks to ACIGA members Stefan Danilishin.
1 The Status of Melody: An Interferometer Simulation Program Amber Bullington Stanford University Optics Working Group March 17, 2004 G D.
Amaldi conference, June Lock acquisition scheme for the Advanced LIGO optical configuration Amaldi conference June24, 2005 O. Miyakawa, Caltech.
G v5 1 Core Optics Components Technical Status NSF Review of Advanced LIGO Project April 2011 GariLynn Billingsley.
LIGO-G W Detector Commissioning Meeting – March 7, H1 arm cavity g factor changes resulting from 1064 nm heating Rick S, Malik R, Keita.
Matt Evans, LSC March 2003 (G E)1 Lock Acquisition in LIGO  Who am I? »Matt Evans »Caltech graduate  What is Lock Acquisition? »The process.
LIGO Laboratory1 Enhanced and Advanced LIGO TCS Aidan Brooks - Caltech Hannover LSC-VIRGO Meeting, October 2007 LIGO-G Z.
Advanced Virgo Optical Configuration ILIAS-GW, Tübingen Andreas Freise - Conceptual Design -
Koji Arai – LIGO Laboratory / Caltech LIGO-G v2.
LSC-March  LIGO End to End simulation  Lock acquisition design »How to increase the threshold velocity under realistic condition »Hanford 2k simulation.
AIGO 2K Australia - Italy Workshop th October th October 2005 Pablo Barriga for AIGO group.
LIGO LaboratoryLIGO-G R Coatings and Their Influence on Thermal Lensing and Compensation in LIGO Phil Willems Coating Workshop, March 21, 2008,
Advanced LIGO Simulation, 6/1/06 Elba G E 1 ✦ LIGO I experience ✦ FP cavity : LIGO I vs AdvLIGO ✦ Simulation tools ✦ Time domain model Advanced.
S. ChelkowskiSlide 1LSC Meeting, Amsterdam 09/2008.
Hiro Yamamoto GWADW Girdwood, Alaska LIGO-G Beam Splitter in aLIGO Hiro Yamamoto LIGO/Caltech BS02 to BS05? larger BS? BS in aLIGO IFO for.
G Z Test Mass Butterfly Modes and Alignment Amber Bullington, Stanford University Warren Johnson, Louisiana State University LIGO Livingston Detector.
First DR FFT Results on Advanced LIGO Using Perfect and Imperfect Optics By Ken Ganezer, George Jennings, and Sam Wiley CSUDH LIGO-G Z by Ken.
TCS and IFO Properties Dave Ottaway For a lot of people !!!!!! LIGO Lab Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research, Massachusetts Institute of.
LIGO Laboratory1 Thermal Compensation in LIGO Phil Willems- Caltech Baton Rouge LSC Meeting, March 2007 LIGO-G Z.
LSC Meeting at LHO LIGO-G E 1August. 21, 2002 SimLIGO : A New LIGO Simulation Package 1. e2e : overview 2. SimLIGO 3. software, documentations.
ACIGA High Optical Power Test Facility
1 Development schedule of Static IFO Simulation (SIS) Basic building blocks »Framework »mirror, cavity or propagator, detector FP cavity »Simple locking,
Mechanical Mode Damping for Parametric Instability Control
Equivalence relation between non spherical optical cavities and application to advanced G.W. interferometers. Juri Agresti and Erika D’Ambrosio Aims of.
Laguerre-Gauss Modes for Future Gravitational Wave Detectors Keiko Kokeyama University of Birmingham 2 nd ET Annual Erice, Sicily, Italy
G Z Mentor: Bill Kells Investigating a Parametric Instability in the LIGO Test Masses Hans Bantilan (Carleton College) for the LIGO Scientific.
Advanced Virgo: Optical Simulation and Design Advanced Virgo review Andreas Freise for the OSD Subsystem.
The Effect of Transverse Shifts on the LIGO Interferometer Doug Fettig - Oregon State University Mentor: Biplab Bhawal.
Effects of as-built Mirrors - analysis using FFT - Hiro Yamamoto, Biplab Bhawal, Xiao Xu, Raghu Dodda (SLU)  LIGO I mirror phase map  FFT tools  Thermal.
LIGO-G Z March 2007, LSC meeting, Osamu Miyakawa 1 Osamu Miyakawa Hiroaki Yamamoto March 21, 2006 LSC meeting Modeling of AdLIGO arm lock acquisition.
Monica VarvellaIEEE - GW Workshop Roma, October 21, M.Varvella Virgo LAL Orsay / LIGO CalTech Time-domain model for AdvLIGO Interferometer Gravitational.
Elba Gravitational Wave Adv. Detector Workshop1May 22, 2002 Simulation of LIGO Interferometers 1. End to End simulation 2. Lock acquisition 3. Noise.
LIGO-G D1 Losses in LHO HR Surfaces W. Kells LIGO Laboratory, Caltech With assistance from: H. Radkins, V. Parameshwaraiah, D. Cook, L. Zhang,
Hiro Yamamoto LIGO seminar on Dec. 1st, 2015 LIGO-G aLIGO test masses, revisited  Scattering and loss by test mass  Discrepancy between the measured.
LIGO-G D Core Optics Components (COC) Polishing Pathfinder Kickoff Advanced LIGO Project GariLynn Billingsley Caltech.
The Proposed Holographic Noise Experiment Rainer Weiss, MIT On behalf of the proposing group Fermi Lab Proposal Review November 3, 2009.
1 Cascina – October 19, 2011 ASPERA Forum Laurent Pinard Substrates, Polishing, Coatings and Metrology for the 2 nd generation of GW detector Laurent PINARD.
Hiro Yamamoto LVC March 15 th, 2016, Pasadena CA LIGO-G Mirror scattering loss analysis by integrating sphere measurement  Scattering and loss.
Testing Advanced LIGO length sensing and control scheme at the Caltech 40m interferometer. at the Caltech 40m interferometer. Yoichi Aso*, Rana Adhikari,
Main Interferometer Subsystem
H1 Squeezing Experiment: the path to an Advanced Squeezer
Interferometer configurations for Gravitational Wave Detectors
The Proposed Holographic Noise Experiment
Main Interferometer Meeting
Summary of IFO Spatial Mode Workshop
LIGO Core Optics: a decade of development and experience
Yoichi Aso on behalf of the LCGT ISC Group
LIGO Core Optics: a decade of development and experience
Modeling of Advanced LIGO with Melody
Scattering Loss Hiro Yamamoto - Caltech LIGO
Equivalence relation between non spherical optical cavities and application to advanced G.W. interferometers. Juri Agresti, Erika D’Ambrosio,
Advanced LIGO optical configuration investigated in 40meter prototype
Presentation transcript:

LSC-Virgo Caltech on March 20, 2008 G E1 AdvLIGO Static Interferometer Simulation AdvLIGO simulation tools  Stationary, frequency domain and time domain Stationary Interferometer Simulation, SIS, basic  Motivation  physics SIS applications  Stationary Michelson cavity  Beam splitter Wedge angle effect  Surface aberration Hiro Yamamoto, Caltech/LIGO

LSC-Virgo Caltech on March 20, 2008 G E Advanced LIGO Interferometer Simulation Tools modelDescriptionApplications Stationary Interferometer Simulation a.ka. FFT Stationary field simulation with detailed optics ✦ Effect of realistic optics  Finite size, surface aberration, thermal deformation ✦ Effect of realistic fields  Diffraction, scattering, excitation by complex mirror motion Opticle Frequency domain simulation with optical springs and quantum noises ✦ Control system design ✦ Trade study of optical system design ✦ Noise analysis with full control systems End to End model Time domain simulation of opto- mechanical system with realistic controls ✦ Lock acquisition design and test ✦ Study of transient and stability issues ✦ Analysis of subsystems with strong correlations

LSC-Virgo Caltech on March 20, 2008 G E3 SIS Basic Motivation AdvLIGO design tool Interferometer configuration trade study Effect of finite size optics  BS, flat, wedge angle, baffle, etc Tolerance of radius of curvature of COC mirrors Surface aberration  Requirements of the surface quality to satisfy the limit of loss in arm, total of 75ppm Subsystem performance simulation  TCS, ISC, COC, AOC,... Parametric instability  highly distorted field, hard to be expressed by simple functions

LSC-Virgo Caltech on March 20, 2008 G E4 SIS Basic Ingredient Requirements Details of Optics  surface map, size, flat, wedge angle, etc Flexibility  Various optics configurations  Now, only FP and couple cavity with BS Physics  Realistic locking by using error signals  Signal sideband generation  Built-in thermal deformation function Analysis tool  beam profiler  mode analysis

LSC-Virgo Caltech on March 20, 2008 G E5 SIS Basic Optics and fields

LSC-Virgo Caltech on March 20, 2008 G E6 SIS Basic Ingredients- 1 Signal Sideband Generation : any periodic motion of mirror surface δ(x,y) E ref E in Thermal deformation : Hello, Vinet Stored beam is used to calculate thermal effects THERMOELASTIC( beamSize, Psubs, Pcoat [, T0] ) THERMALPHASE( beamSize, Psubs, Pcoat [, T0] ) Lock Error signal = imag( CR*SB ) ~ imag( CR * promptly reflected CR )

LSC-Virgo Caltech on March 20, 2008 G E SIS Basic Ingredients - 2 l Random surface - 2D surface with f -power  NOISESPEC( rand_seed, rms, power, WykoIndex ) l Wedge angle of beam splitter 7  ROC = 3.4%  ROC = 6.8%

LSC-Virgo Caltech on March 20, 2008 G E Using SIS to study wedge angle effect Beam profile going to ITM from BS Power phase BS with original wedge ITM

LSC-Virgo Caltech on March 20, 2008 G E Using SIS to study wedge angle effect ITMX ITMY ExEy |Ex-Ey| 2

LSC-Virgo Caltech on March 20, 2008 G E Using SIS to study mirror rms requirement rms = 0.5nm rms = 0.7nm Zernike <=4 subtractedZernike <=5 subtracted 40ppm

LSC-Virgo Caltech on March 20, 2008 G E Diffraction effect in FP cavity 11

LSC-Virgo Caltech on March 20, 2008 G E12 Diffraction effect in Stable Michelson cavity N=512,W=70cmN=2048,W=70cm N=2048,W=6cm N=1024,W=6cm ITM.opt.AR_trans = if( pow(2*x/0.214,2)+pow(2*y/0.249,2) < 1, 1, 0 )

LSC-Virgo Caltech on March 20, 2008 G E13 Power loss on MMT3 (ITMY SRM case) Power(MMT2->MMT3)(y) Power(MMT3->BS)(x) Power(MMT2->MMT3)(x) loss = 330ppm (energy outside of MMT3 surface) MMT2RM MMT3ITM 26cm diffraction tail

LSC-Virgo Caltech on March 20, 2008 G E14 Loss under different conditions MMT aperture (cm) beam size on ITM (cm) Coupled cavity loss on MMT3 (ppm) 26cm6cmY-arm + SRM(*)330 26cm6cmX-arm + SRM(*)600 28cm6cmY-arm + SRM140 26cm5.5cm (**)Y-arm + SRM47 26cm5.5cm (**)X-arm + SRM60 (*) When a baffle is placed in front of ITMY, Y-arm+SRM configuration comes very close to X-arm+SRM case. (**) asymmetric case with 5.5cm on ITM and 6.2cm on ETM. With the baffle size of Mike's choice - 214mm x 249mm - the beam going through a baffle is cut off by 250ppm. If the baffle size of 1cm larger in both direction (224mm x 259mm), the cutoff is 55ppm. The numbers in the above table were calculated without baffles. 2076m m 1971m m ITM ROC ETM ROC

LSC-Virgo Caltech on March 20, 2008 G E15 Using SIS to study PI Signal generation by surface map Investigating a Parametric Instability SUFR project by Hans Bantilan, mentored by Bill Kells  G Z Simulate a stationary field for a given acoustic mode, instead of using modal expansion, to calculate the overlapping integral Combined with Dennis’ FEM package to calculate acoustic modes 9061 modes for f < 90KHz 15

LSC-Virgo Caltech on March 20, 2008 G E What you need to run SIS gcc compiler + fftw library or use program on Caltech machine SIS manual T Patience to simulate stable cavity – 2048 grids 16