Mohammad Alipour Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz Branch.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
By: Edith Leticia Cerda
Advertisements

Performance Assessment
School Based Assessment and Reporting Unit Curriculum Directorate
Analyzing Student Work
Performance management guidance
M. Reber © 5/1/2015 Document Development Cycle Creating Your User’s Guide Step-by-Step.
Young Researchers Experience. About the group.... Project aims: To learn about teaching as a career. What are the qualities and attributes of a good teacher?
How can we collect relevant evidence of student understanding?
Consistency of Assessment
Introducing the New College Scheme Seevic Performance Appraisal.
JHLA Junior High Literacy Assessment. The school year saw the first administration of the Junior High Literacy Assessment. The assessment was.
Empowering Staff Through Institute Planning (ESTIP) Executive Workshop Institute Name: XXXXXX Presenter: XXXXXX Date: XXXXXX.
How to prepare better reports
Formative and Summative Evaluations
Lesson Design Study Suggestions from our text: Leading Lesson Study.
Instructional Design Dr. Lam TECM 5180.
1 Training Counsellors for the Self-access Centre Pornapit Darasawang School of Liberal Arts King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi
Action Research: For Both Teacher and Student
INDEPENDENT WRITING Andrew Richardson & Taylor West.
Seevic Performance Appraisal
Instructional Design Diana Fisher. Instructional Design Instructional Design (ID) is a dynamic process with constant movement back and forth between steps.
Instructional Design Brian Newberry. Instructional Design Instructional Design is a systematic process for the creation of educational resources.
Using formative assessment. Aims of the session This session is intended to help us to consider: the reasons for assessment; the differences between formative.
ADEPT Framework
Design Document Susan Genden Wayne State University Design Document Susan Genden Wayne State University Digital Layout I: Adobe InDesign Training.
Kazakhstan Centres of Excellence Teacher Education Programme Assessment of teachers at Level Two.
Designing and Planning Technology Enhanced Instruction
Additional Unit 2 Lecture Notes New Instructional Design Focus School of Education Additional Unit 2 Lecture Notes New Instructional Design Focus School.
Lecture 8A Designing and Conducting Formative Evaluations English Study Program FKIP _ UNSRI
Planning and Writing Your Documents Chapter 6. Start of the Project Start the project by knowing the software you will write about, but you should try.
1 Technical & Business Writing (ENG-315) Muhammad Bilal Bashir UIIT, Rawalpindi.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline LEARNING OBJECTIVES REVIEW TEAM AND COUNTERPARTS Team Composition Qualification PREPARATORY PHASE.
Semester 2 Situation analysis TESL 3240 Lecture 3.
UNIVERSITY OF HUDDERSFIELD SUPPORTING PRE-SERVICE TRAINEES ON PLACEMENT Pre-service Mentor Training 2011.
Record Keeping and Using Data to Determine Report Card Markings.
M253 Team Work in Distributed Environments Week (3) By Dr. Dina Tbaishat.
Inclusion: Effective Practices for All Students, 1e McLeskey/Rosenberg/Westling © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved What.
TAA2 Assessor Workshop Learning and Innovation. PROGRAM OUTLINE Workshop Introduction Overview of the TAA Scheme Outline of the TAA2 Activity Break TAA.
 All of these standards depend on student's development of their academic language. Language plays a central role in the common core.  Many of the demanding.
How Much Do We know about Our Textbook? Zhang Lu.
Assessment. Workshop Outline Testing and assessment Why assess? Types of tests Types of assessment Some assessment task types Backwash Qualities of a.
An Introduction to Formative Assessment as a useful support for teaching and learning.
TAA1 TEACHER WORKSHOP Learning and Innovation. PROGRAM OUTLINE Workshop Introduction Overview of the TAA Scheme Outline of the TAA1 Process TAA 1 Action.
Working Effectively with Additional Adults
“Working With A Technical Editor” by Jean Hollis Weber Presented by: Paul Rattray July 2, 2007.
Mohammad Alipour Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz Branch.
Differentiation What is meant by differences between learners?
Small Group Instruction Prepared by Andrea Hnatiuk.
Lesson 3-Multimedia Skills. Overview Members of a multimedia team. Roles and responsibilities in a multimedia team.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline LEARNING OBJECTIVES REVIEW TEAM AMD COUNTERPARTS Team Composition Qualification PREPARATORY PHASE.
Collaboration. © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 2  Collaboration refers to “ongoing participation of two or more individuals who are.
February 19, 2013 EXPLICIT INSTRUCTION.  After achieving a working knowledge and components of explicit instruction, teachers will self-assess their.
Mohammad Alipour Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz Branch.
Instructional Design Course Evaluation Phase. Agenda The Evaluation Process Expert Review Small Group Review The Pilot Feedback and Revision Evaluation.
Balanced Writing Instruction Roles What it should look like in an classroom.
Ch5-4. MATERIALS. QUESTION 1.What are the three phases presented in this chapter for creating materials? 2.How are the three phases for creating materials.
Fifth Edition Mark Saunders, Philip Lewis and Adrian Thornhill 2009 Research Methods for Business Students.
Educational Publishing in WSOYpro Anita Seppovaara 2010 kaksi riviä.
Coursebook Evaluation II
Document Development Cycle
PLANNING AND DESIGNING A RESEARCH STUDY
Lesson Design Study Leading Lesson Study.
Ed 11: Beginning Field Experience
Mary Weck, Ed. D Danielson Group Member
Connecticut Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy
Tasks & Grades for MET1.
Tasks & Grades for MET2.
Tasks & Grades for MET3.
Unit 7: Instructional Communication and Technology
Presentation transcript:

Mohammad Alipour Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz Branch

One of the most difficult decisions in writing is deciding on the types of exercises that will be used. The issue is how to create exercises that engage learners in the use of skills and processes related to specific language teaching objectives. A review of the exercise types used in current commercial textbooks is a good starting point.

Materials writing projects are of different scopes and dimensions. Some may be the responsibility of an individual teacher; others may be assigned to a team of writers.

The management of a team-based writing project involves addressing the following issues: Selecting the project team: how many people will take part in the project and what will their roles and responsibilities be? In a small in-house project there may be two or three writers sharing responsibilities for all aspects of the project, however, the following people might be involved: Project director: responsible for overall management of the project, for setting goals and ensuring that targets are met, and for liaising with all parties involved. Writers: those responsible for writing all components of the course.

 Media specialist: a person who can help with such aspects of audiovisual materials and computer softwares.  Editor: a person who reviews everything the writers have produced and prepares the final version of the materials for publication or duplication.  Illustrator: someone responsible for preparing illustrations.  Designer: a person who is responsible for the layout, type, style, graphics, and the overall format of the materials.

A materials project always goes through several different stages of development. Typical stages might include: First draft Comments on the first draft Second draft Further comments Tryout of the materials Final revision of materials

These processes are not necessarily linear. Carey and Briggs (1977) comment: “Many activities occur simultaneously, and one often works one part of a product through a phase of design and then cycles back and begins the same phase again with another part of the product.”

A crucial source of input to the developmental process is critical feedback on materials as they are written. A key person is someone who can cast a critical eye over the materials as they are drafted and provide constructive feedback on them. People involved in a materials writing project should be open to feedback and suggestions and be prepared to undertake extensive revisions of materials if necessary. Things that seem perfectly obvious to the writer may not strike another person in the same way.

In commercial projects, this role is undertaken by editors and reviewers. In institutional projects, this responsibility needs to be assigned to a member of the project team. It is also useful to involve the participation of classroom teachers in the process to review materials as they are written. Focus groups can also be set up consisting of five or six experienced teachers who meet to discuss the materials in progress and give suggestions for improving them.

A writing schedule can now be developed with dates assigned for the different stages in the process. Even though aspects of the writing process are often critical, as noted, for practical planning purposes the different stages in the writing process need to be represented within a tentative time frame.

Piloting involves trying out materials with a representative group of learners and teachers before they are made available for wider use in order to identify problems or faults in them that can be identified before they are used more widely.

Piloting seeks to find answers to questions such as these: Are the materials comprehensible and the instructions clear? Do they contain any editorial or content errors? Is the pacing of the materials appropriate? Do the materials do what they are supposed to do? Do they address learners’ needs? Is there sufficient quantity of practice materials? Are the materials sufficiently interesting and engaging?

 The intention is to have a group of teachers and students work through the materials in conditions as close as possible to those under which the final version of the materials will be used.  However, it is often not impossible to pilot materials a near-final form, because art and design may await finalization of the manuscript.  A practical solution is to have sections of the materials piloted by different teachers rather than have a few teachers try out all of the materials. This can speed up the piloting process and enable more teachers to participate.  Following the piloting, both students and teachers complete a review sheet or questionnaire and may also be interviewed to find out what they think about the materials.  Any problems identified can be addressed at this stage. In some cases, this may involve a substantial rewriting of the materials.

Design issues refer to the layout of text and art on each page. An effective design is a major factor in the reception and usability of materials. Will art and illustrations be added to the manuscript and who will be responsible for these? Production issues relate to the printing of the materials. Will the materials be printed from the writers’ files, reset, photocopied, laser printed, or sent to a commercial printer?

No matter what form of materials teachers make use of, whether they teach from textbook, instructional materials, or teacher-prepared materials, the materials present plans for teaching. They do not represent the process of teaching itself. As teachers use materials, they adapt and transform them to suit the needs of particular groups of learners and their own teaching styles.

These processes of transformation are at the heart of teaching and enable good teachers to create effective lessons out of the resources they make use of. It is useful, therefore, to collect information on how teachers use course books and other teaching materials in their teaching.

The information collected can serve the following purposes: To document effective ways of using materials To provide feedback on how materials work To keep a record of additions, deletions, and supplementary materials Teachers may have used with the materials To assist other teachers in using the materials

Observation: classroom visits to see how teachers use materials and to find out how materials influence the quality of teaching and interaction that occurs in a lesson. Feedback sessions: group meetings in which teachers discuss their experience with materials. Written reports: the use of reflection sheets or other forms of written feedback in which teachers make brief notes about what worked well and what did not work well, or give suggestions on using the materials.

Review: written reviews by a teacher or a group of teachers on their experiences with a set materials and what they liked or disliked about them. Students’ review: comments from students on their experience with the materials.