This research is supported in part by three grants from the National Science Foundation: Developing a research-based learning progression for the role.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
An inquiry learning progression for carbon-transforming processes Dr. Jenny Dauer Michigan State University Department Teacher Education.
Advertisements

Charles W. (Andy) Anderson June 16, 2008 Learning Progressions in Environmental Science Literacy.
Teaching Experiments and a Carbon Cycle Learning Progression 2009 AERA Presentation Written by: Lindsey Mohan and Andy Anderson (Michigan State University)
A Cross-cultural Study: Comparing Learning Progression for Carbon-Transforming Processes of American and Chinese Students 2010 NARST Presentation Written.
This research is supported in part by three grants from the National Science Foundation: Developing a research-based learning progression for the role.
This research is supported in part by three grants from the National Science Foundation: Developing a research-based learning progression for the role.
Learning Progressions in Environmental Science Literacy Presentation at the Learning Progressions in Science (LeaPS) Conference, Iowa City, IA. Written.
Karen Draney (University of California, Berkeley) Lindsey Mohan (Michigan State University) Philip Piety (University of Michigan) Jinnie Choi (University.
This research is supported in part by three grants from the National Science Foundation: Developing a research-based learning progression for the role.
Learning Progressions Immersion Activity Power point presented to teachers during professional development to help teachers learn about learning progressions.
Carbon Teaching Experiment Introduction Power point Power point presentation for teachers to introduce them to the carbon teaching experiment during professional.
This research is supported in part by three grants from the National Science Foundation: Developing a research-based learning progression for the role.
This research is supported in part by three grants from the National Science Foundation: Developing a research-based learning progression for the role.
Questions for Interview Data 1.Which transcripts go together? Try to put together the 4 sets of 4 transcripts each that came from the same students. 2.What.
Promise and Problems of Learning Progression-guided Interventions Hui Jin, Hyo Jeong Shin, Michele Johnson, Jinho Kim.
Assessing K-12 Students’ Learning Progression of Carbon Cycling Using Different Types of Items 2010 NARST Presentation Written by: Jing Chen and Charles.
Understanding of Carbon Cycling: An Interview Study in the US and China 2009 NARST Presentation Written by : Hui Jin, Li Zhan, Charles W. Anderson (Michigan.
A comparison study on American and Chinese secondary students’ learning progression for carbon cycling in socio- ecological systems 2009 AERA Presentation.
Center for Curriculum Materials in Science AAAS, Michigan State University, Northwestern University, University of Michigan Presented at the Knowledge.
Presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, March 31, 2008 Learning Progressions in Environmental Science.
ENVIRONMENTAL LITERACY This research is supported in part by grants from the National Science Foundation: Developing a Research-based Learning Progression.
ENVIRONMENTAL LITERACY PROJECT This research is supported in part by grants from the National Science Foundation: Developing a Research-based Learning.
Biogeochemical Cycles Honors Biology. Recall Energy FLOWS through ecosystems ◦Sun  Chemical Energy  Usable Energy  Heat (glucose, food) (ATP) Energy.
Why do students have so much trouble tracing matter through ecological processes and systems? Laurel Hartley, Charles (Andy) Anderson, Brook Wilke Acknowledgement:
Analyzing students’ learning performances in terms of practices for developing accounts Hui Jin, Jiwon Kim and Charles W. Anderson.
This research is supported in part by three grants from the National Science Foundation: Developing a research-based learning progression for the role.
LEARNING PROGRESSIONS TOWARD ENVIRONMENTAL LITERACY Charles W. Anderson, Lindsey Mohan, Hui Jin, Jing Chen, Phil Piety, Hsin-Yuan Chen Karen Draney, Jinnie.
This research is supported in part by grants from the National Science Foundation: Developing a Research-based Learning Progression for the Role of Carbon.
A K-12 LEARNING PROGRESSION TO SUPPORT ENVIRONMENTAL LITERACY MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY Environmental Literacy Research Group.
This research is supported in part by the National Science Foundation Center for Curriculum Materials in Science grant (ESI ) and a Michigan State.
LEARNING PROGRESSIONS TOWARD ENVIRONMENTAL LITERACY Charles W. Anderson, Beth Covitt, Kristin Gunckel, Lindsey Mohan, In-Young Cho, Hui Jin, Christopher.
ENVIRONMENTAL LITERACY Developing a Learning Progression for Energy and Causal Reasoning in Socio-ecological Systems 2010 NARST Presentation Written by:
Charles W. (Andy) Anderson Michigan State University Conference of the Ecological Society of America Milwaukee, August 6, 2008 Approaching Ecological Literacy.
The Effects of Teaching Materials and Teachers’ Approaches on Student Learning about Carbon- transforming Processes Li Zhan, Dante Cisterna, Jennifer Doherty,
Connections between students’ explanations and interpretations of arguments from evidence Allison L. Freed 1, Jenny M. Dauer 1,2, Jennifer H. Doherty 1,
Diagnostic Testing of Science Concepts K ESA/SER Joint Meeting Brook J. Wilke, Christopher D. Wilson & Charles W. (Andy) Anderson.
Charles W. (Andy) Anderson September 18, 2008 Learning Progressions in Environmental Science Literacy.
ENVIRONMENTAL LITERACY PROJECT This research is supported in part by grants from the National Science Foundation: Developing a Research-based Learning.
MSU Environmental Literacy Project Kristin L. Gunckel & Blakely K. Tsurusaki MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY Environmental Literacy Research Group.
DIAGNOSTIC QUESTION CLUSTER (DQC) PROJECT Project goals, overview Concept Inventories (FCI) & Misconceptions DCQs – what they are, how developed, pedagogical.
A K-12 LEARNING PROGRESSION TO SUPPORT UNDERSTANDING OF WATER IN THE ENVIRONMENT Beth Covitt & Kristin Gunckel Geological Society of America, North-Central.
This research is supported in part by three grants from the National Science Foundation: Developing a research-based learning progression for the role.
Consistency in Students’ Accounts of Carbon-transforming Processes Hui Jin The Ohio State University Charles W. Anderson Michigan State University.
Carbon: Transformations in Matter and Energy Environmental Literacy Project Michigan State University Plants Unit Activity 3.2 Explaining How Plants Make.
ENVIRONMENTAL LITERACY This research is supported in part by grants from the National Science Foundation: Developing a Research-based Learning Progression.
Human Energy Systems Unit Activity 4.3: Carbon Fluxes
Ecosystems Unit Activity 3.1 Carbon Pools
Designing a Three-Dimensional Curriculum for Climate Change Education Informed by Learning Progression Research Hannah K. Miller, Johnson State College.
Carbon: Transformations in Matter and Energy
Animals Unit Activity 6.2a: Comparing Animals and Flames
Plants Unit Activity 6.2b: Functions of All Plants
MODERNIZING ECOLOGY CONTENT IN THE REQUIRED K-12 SCIENCE CURRICULUM:
Carbon: Transformations in Matter and Energy
Charles W. Anderson Michigan State University
Animals Unit Activity 6.2b: Functions of All Animals
Hui Jin, Li Zhan, Charles W. Anderson Michigan State University
Ecosystems Unit Activity 3.1 Carbon Pools
American and Chinese Secondary Students’ Written Accounts of Carbon Cycling in Socio-ecological Systems Jing Chen1, Charles, W. Anderson1, & Xinghua Jin2.
Carbon: Transformations in Matter and Energy
General Level Structure
Explaining Matter and Energy in Combustion and Life Scientific explanations of processes include answers to three questions: Question Rules to Follow Evidence.
Plants Unit Activity 6.2a: Comparing Plants and Animals
(Michigan State University)
Teaching Experiments and a Carbon Cycle Learning Progression
Carbon: Transformations in Matter and Energy
Long Term Ecological Research Math Science Partnership
Bell Ringer (FEB 22) In an ecosystem, which group would have the largest population: producers or consumers? Explain your answer.
Validation of a Multi-Year Carbon Cycle Learning Progression
Learning Progressions in Environmental Science Literacy
2009 AERA Annual Meeting, San Diego
Presentation transcript:

This research is supported in part by three grants from the National Science Foundation: Developing a research-based learning progression for the role of carbon in environmental systems (REC ), the Center for Curriculum Materials in Science (ESI ) and Long-term Ecological Research in Row-crop Agriculture (DEB Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. EVIRONMENTAL LITERACY ENVIRONMENTAL LITERACY Center for Curriculum Materials in Science (CCMS) Developing a K-12 Learning Progression for Carbon Cycling in Coupled Human and Natural Systems Lindsey Mohan, Jing Chen, and Charles W. Anderson, Michigan State University Framework for Carbon Cycling in Socio-ecological Systems  Carbon-transforming processes are uniquely important in socio-ecological systems and understanding those processes is essential for citizens’ participation in environmental decision-making.  Environmental science literate students should be able to use fundamental principles to explain biogeochemical processes:  Processes:  Generation of organic carbon  Transformation of organic carbon  Oxidation of organic carbon  Principles:  Tracing matter through processes  Tracing energy through processes  Change over time  Our study examines students’ accounts of tracing matter (or “stuff”) through processes. Methods and Goals of Analysis  Participants included students in grades 4-10 from 10 classrooms serving primarily suburban and rural public schools.  Assessments were paper-pencil tests developed over a three year period focused on the three carbon-transforming processes. We selected 14 items from our item pool that specifically asked students about matter in systems and processes.  Learning progressions are descriptive sequences of student’s thinking about a topic:  Upper Anchors- target performances or goals for science education  Lower Anchors- what students bring to science classrooms  Intermediate transitions- levels describing transitions between upper and lower anchors  Goals of analysis were to develop three products: 1.Tracing matter levels to describe students tracing of “stuff” through processes. 2.Exemplar response to represent characteristic explanations for a given level on each assessment item. 3.Analysis of 14 assessment items to further refine levels and identify trends across processes. Generation of organic carbon Tracing matter levels Trends in our learning progression Oxidation in human-engineered systems Transformation of organic carbon Oxidation of organic carbon in living systems What happens to an apple/dead tree when it rots? What gases do plants take in and how are they used? When Jared lost weight, where did the mass of his fat go? Elementary and middle school students are split between level 2 reasoning (matter disappears) and level 3 where matter is changed, but not at the cellular level. High school students are decidedly level 3, although some have an atomic-molecular account of cellular respiration. Is wood a mixture? When an acorn grows into a large tree, where did the increases in weight come from? What is food for the acorn (plant)? What gases do plants take in and how are they used? How could cutting down trees influence climate? Elementary & middle school students cluster around level 3, explaining photosynthesis in terms of materials going into the plant. High school students cluster around level 4 and focus on a cellular accounts of photosynthesis. What happens to a match when it burns? What happened to the gasoline when a car is empty? How could using gasoline affect global warming? What make materials energy-rich? Elementary students cluster around level 2, focusing on observable changes in match/gas and allowing matter to disappear. Middle and high school students cluster around level 3 indicating they do not understand combustion at an atomic-molecular level (e.g., matches turn to ash; gasoline evaporates). Is wood a mixture? When an acorn grows into a large tree, where did the increases in weight come from? What happens to an apple after you eat it? How could glucose from a grape give you energy to move your finger? Elementary and middle school students give level 3 explanations of digestion and biosynthesis, being able to trace materials through the body, but not to the cells. High school students range between level 3 and 5, showing they have cellular accounts of digestion & biosynthesis, but they cannot trace matter completely through these processes.  Invisible to Visible  Hierarchy of Systems- scale at which students trace matter expands  Connections between systems- students make connections between systems using matter  Events to Process  Causality- student learn to use matter (and energy) to explain why things happen  Conservation- students learn that matter cannot disappear  Connections- students learn to make connections between seemingly separate processes  Objects to Materials  Mixtures- students learn that carbon-containing molecules form many important mixtures  Gases are matter- students learn to trace gases into and out of processes We would like to thank Yong-Sang Lee at the University of California, Berkeley for his assistance in the data analysis process. We also acknowledge the contributions made by Hui Jin, Hsin-Yuan Chen, and Chris Wilson from Michigan State University and Karen Draney, Mark Wilson, and Jinnie Choi, at the University of California, Berkeley in developing the framework that guided our research. Human Social and Economic Systems Energy distribution Systems Transportation Systems Agricultural Systems Other land use and Settlement Atmosphere (Physical Systems) (composition of air; atmospheric CO 2 ) Biosphere (Biological Systems) (Food chains, growth & weight loss, carbon sequestration, organic carbon) Ecosystem services: Foods and fuels as the sources for energy consumption and alterations in land use Human Impact: human energy consumption and land use causing climate change over time Generation of organic carbon & harnessing energy (photosynthesis ) Movement of organic carbon & passing on energy Oxidation of organic carbon & energy dissipating (respiration, combustion) Environmental Systems CO 2 emissions Deforestation Food & Fuels Level 7: Quantitative Reasoning about Uncertainty Can explain sources and quantitative estimates of uncertainty associated with carbon fluxes and their influence on global warming. Level 6: Quantitative Model-based Reasoning Quantitatively traces matter within and between organisms and between living and non-living systems. Level 5: Qualitative Model-based Reasoning Qualitatively describes matter transformations during processes and conserves chemical substances. Level 4: “School Science” Narratives Recognizes matter transformations at the cellular and atomic- molecular level and attempts to conserve chemical substances. Level 3: Events Driven by Hidden Mechanisms Recognizes mechanisms for events at a hidden scale; conserves matter for visible physical changes. Level 2: Sequences of Events Describes observable changes in systems, but not attempt to conserve matter during those changes. Level 1: Egocentric Reasoning about Events Explains why events involving changes in matter happen in terms of human needs and intentions.