1 Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) the transmembrane + juxtamembrane domains L1CR1L2CR2 JM KinaseCT 644 1513124816216879551186 Extracellular portionIntracellular.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sample clean-up (MALDI)
Advertisements

Chromatography for Protein purification 1
ION EXCHANGE CHROMATOGRAPHY PREPARED BY- MD.MARUF HASSAN.
Expression Vector Expression of cloned genes produces large quantities of protein Components of expression vector 1. replication origin 2. polylingker.
Review: Amino Acid Side Chains Aliphatic- Ala, Val, Leu, Ile, Gly Polar- Ser, Thr, Cys, Met, [Tyr, Trp] Acidic (and conjugate amide)- Asp, Asn, Glu, Gln.
Protein Purification and Analysis Day 4. Amino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins.
Purification of Lipase NONG Yuan Supervisor: Prof. Jan-Christer Janson Department of Surface Biotechnology Uppsala Biomedical Center Uppsala University.
Growth and Purification of hFXR LBD Abby McArthur Dr. Victor Hsu
Bio 98 - Lecture 4 Amino acids, proteins & purification.
Immuno-affinity chromatography
Affinity Chromatography Yongting Wang Jan07. What is AC? Affinity chromatography (AC) is a technique enabling purification of a biomolecule with respect.
Metal Chelate Affinity Chromatography Wenbo Dong Yagmur Yagdiran.
Center for Human Genetics and Molecular Pediatric Disease
Supervisor: Dr. David Wishart
Immunoprecipitation JS Yu 2002/8/14 Rat brain (or HeLa cells) *weighting *homogenization (1 gm tissue/3 ml Homo buffer) *centrifugation (12000~15000 rpm,
Protein Purification. Why purify Proteins? Characterize Function Activity Structure Study protein regulation and protein interactions Use in assays Produce.
Cation Exchange Column CHEE450 Leslie Davis. Cation Exchange Following removal of biomass – processes supernatant Separate insulin precursor from glucose,
Ion Exchange Chromatography. Some ion exchangers are regarded as weak, that is functioning best over a comparatively narrow pH range, while others.
Protein purification Chromatography – Mikhail Tsvett (1901) pioneered the technique while attempting to separate yellow and red pigments from green leaves.
Nanoscale Biopolymers with Customizable Properties for Heavy Metal Remediation U Loi (Ann) Lao, Giri Prabhukumar, Jan Kostal, Mark Matsumoto, Ashok Mulchandani,
SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL consist of two figures: Figure S1 contains two SDS-PAGE gels showing the purification profile of the recombinant yeast and slime.
Chapter Five Protein Purification and Characterization Techniques
CHMI E.R. Gauthier, Ph.D. 1 CHMI 2227E Biochemistry I Protein purification and characterization.
Biochemistry February Lecture Analytical & Preparative Protein Chemistry II.
AC part 1 Aug Affinity Chromatography. AC part 1 Aug What is it used for? Monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies Fusion proteins Enzymes DNA-binding.
EXPRESSION / PURIFICATION ER ER / TIF2 COMPLEX FORMATION GR CONSTRUCT TIF2 CONSTRUCT ER CONSTRUCT EXPRESSION / PURIFICATION TIF2 CO-EXPRESSION GR / TIF2.
The investigations of structure and properties of membrane receptors: human EGFR and halobacterial HtrII Ivan L. Budyak Forschungszentrum Jülich, Deutschland.
Characterization of protein folding determinants for LIN-12/Notch-Repeats (LNRs) using Human Notch1 LNRB as a model system Sharline Madera Advisor: Dr.
Structural Analysis using NMR Naveena Sivaram Research Report # 5.
1 Expression of Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors.
1 Rhodopsin: Effect of replacement of amino acids in the predicted folding core of Rhodopsin Growth hormone receptor (GHR): Expression of Cytoplasmic domain.
1 Human metabotropic glutamate receptor 6: Expression and purification Kalyan Tirupula Graduate Student JKS Lab, UPitt.
Construction of Plasmids & Purification of Core-Haemagglutinin VLPs.
Group 4 Data Diane Meas The 3 A-Michaels (get it??) 3 amigos… a-michaels….
Presented by Subproject 6 of the MPEC Roadmap Grant P50 GM Membrane Protein Production for Crystallization Goals, Approach, Progress and Examples.
Figure 5: Expression and solubility tests for constructs of CoVs. Coronaviruses are complex, positive-sense RNA viruses that cause mild to severe respiratory.
Discussion Problems BT Protein Structure How do the amino acids differ from one another structurally? What properties differ? What are the kinds.
Protein Purification for Crystallization Dr Muhammad Imran Forman Christian College (A Chartered University) Dr Muhammad Imran Forman Christian College.
Preparation of Midi-Scale Plasmid DNA from E
Protein Identification using 2D LC/MS/MS based on pH Gradient and Reverse Phase Separation Column Technology Inc.,
Protein Overexpression in E. coli and
Protein Overexpression in E
Protein Purification bYSY.
Protein Overexpression in E. coli and
Ian Barr Feigon Lab, UCLA Chemistry Progress report: Shq1-CS domain; TER Stem Loop IV.
RASSF2DSARAH-GF (b) MST1-F (a) M F G 70 kD a 55 kD b 36 kD
Lecture 14 February 23, 2016 Biotech 3.
Immunoprecipitation JS Yu 2002/8/14
Ion Exchange Chromatography
VWF73, a region from D1596 to R1668 of von Willebrand factor, provides a minimal substrate for ADAMTS-13 by Koichi Kokame, Masanori Matsumoto, Yoshihiro.
Circulating forms of intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1 in mice lacking membranous ICAM-1 by Natasja K. van den Engel, Edmund Heidenthal, Antje Vinke,
Volume 14, Issue 9, Pages (September 2007)
Kre1p, the Plasma Membrane Receptor for the Yeast K1 Viral Toxin
Volume 7, Issue 8, Pages (August 2000)
Glen S. Cho, Jack W. Szostak  Chemistry & Biology 
1st LAB MEETING 김상범.
(a) (b) FhGALE M U I S W1 W2 E1 E2 E3 M - +
Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) the transmembrane + juxtamembrane domains CR1 L2 CR2 JM Kinase CT Extracellular.
Volume 95, Issue 5, Pages (November 1998)
Volume 7, Issue 8, Pages (August 2000)
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (March 2011)
Cellular localization of the Iff2, Iff3 (or -9), Iff5, Iff6, and Iff8 proteins. Cellular localization of the Iff2, Iff3 (or -9), Iff5, Iff6, and Iff8 proteins.
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages (January 2004)
Localization of the Iff8 extended protein.
ABCE1 splits 70S with the canonical aRF1 and the ribosome rescue factor aPelota. ABCE1 splits 70S with the canonical aRF1 and the ribosome rescue factor.
ABCE1 splits 70S with the canonical aRF1 and the ribosome rescue factor aPelota. ABCE1 splits 70S with the canonical aRF1 and the ribosome rescue factor.
Crystal Structure of the Extracellular Domain of a Human FcγRIII
Experiment 3 Separation of proteins by Anion exchange chromatography
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (February 2001)
Design and purification of CS1-NKG2D biAb by metal-affinity chromatography. Design and purification of CS1-NKG2D biAb by metal-affinity chromatography.
Presentation transcript:

1 Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) the transmembrane + juxtamembrane domains L1CR1L2CR2 JM KinaseCT Extracellular portionIntracellular portion L1CR1L2CR2 JM KinaseCT Extracellular portionIntracellular portion The transmembrane + juxtamembrane part ( a.a. + N-terminal 7His-tag) contains the transmembrane and the regulatory juxtamembrane (JM) domain

2 Important information about the tj-EGFR 73 amino acid residues (without tag) 73 amino acid residues (without tag) carries N-terminal 7His-tag carries N-terminal 7His-tag molecular weight is about 9,112 Da molecular weight is about 9,112 Da pI is around 11.5 pI is around 11.5 contains no Cys residues contains no Cys residues contains no aromatic residues (Trp, Tyr or Phe) contains no aromatic residues (Trp, Tyr or Phe) NMR structure of the juxtamembrane domain is available NMR structure of the juxtamembrane domain is available Choowongkomon et al. (2005), J. Biol. Chem.

3 Short overview of the work done 1.tj-hEGFR in DM Me-affinity Me-affinity reverse phase reverse phase cation exchange cation exchange 2.tj-hEGFR in OG Me-affinity Me-affinity reverse phase reverse phase cation exchange cation exchange size exclusion size exclusion 3.tj-hEGFR in N- lauryl sarcosine Me-affinity Me-affinity cation exchange cation exchange size exclusion size exclusion 4.tj-hEGFR in urea Me-affinity Me-affinity size exclusion size exclusion

4 Expression and solubilization of tj-EGFR in pET 27b+ in E.coli BL21(DE3) Codon Plus RP m m – marker (BenchMark) 1 – cells, clone #1 before induction 2 – cells, clone #1 after induction 3 – cell lysate, supernatant 4 – cell lysate, pellet 5 – solubilization in 2% DM, supernatant 6 – solubilization in 2% DM, pellet

5 buffer A = 50 mM NaP pH 8.0, 0.05% (w/v) DM buffer B = buffer A + 1 M NaCl Pilot purification of tj-EGFR in DM on HiTrap SP FF 1 ml m b m m – marker (BenchMark) b – sample before application

6 buffer A = 300 mM NaCl, 50 mM NaP pH 8.0, 0.05% (w/v) DM buffer B = buffer A mM imidazole also tried to use 250 mM histidine for elution: Cu 2+ ions elute at low histidine concentrations Pilot purification of tj-EGFR in DM on HiTrap Chelating 1 ml m b m – marker (BenchMark) b – sample before application

7 Scaling of purification of tj-EGFR in DM on HiTrap Chelating 1 ml m b m m m – marker (BenchMark) b – sample before application m

8 buffer A = 0.1% (w/v) TFA buffer B = 0.08% (w/v) TFA, 80% (v/v) acetonitrile Pilot purification of tj-EGFR in DM on RESOURCE RPC 3 ml m m – marker (Precision Plus)

9 buffer A = 300 mM NaCl, 50 mM NaP pH 8.0, 0.88% (w/v) OG buffer B = buffer A mM imidazole Pilot purification of tj-EGFR in OG on HiTrap Chelating 1 ml m b m – marker (BenchMark) b – sample before application

10 Scaling of purification of tj-EGFR in OG Hitrap Chelating Sepharose m S FT W1 W2 E m – marker (Precision Plus) S – sample before application (solubilized protein) FT – flow-through W1 – wash 1 W2 – wash 2 E – elution

11 Reconstitution of tj-EGFR in DMPC liposomes SDS-gelHis-blot m OG rec rec_s/_p m – marker (BenchMark) OG – sample before reconstitution (in 0.88% OG) rec – reconstituted protein rec_s – rec, supernatant rec_p – rec, pellet

12 CD spectrum of tj-EGFR and secondary structure prediction buffer = 50 mM NaP pH 6.0, 10% D 2 O, 0.88% (w/v) OG

13 buffer A = 50 mM NaP pH 8.0, 0.88% (w/v) OG buffer B = buffer A + 1 M NaCl Pilot purification of tj-EGFR in OG on HiTrap SP FF 1 ml m b m m – marker (BenchMark) b – sample before application

14 buffer A = 50 mM NaP pH 11.7, 0.88% (w/v) OG buffer B = buffer A + 1 M NaCl Pilot purification of tj-EGFR in OG on HiTrap SP FF 1 ml b m m – marker (BenchMark) b – sample before application

15 buffer A = 50 mM Gly-NaOH pH 8.6, 0.88% (w/v) OG buffer B = 50 mM Gly-NaOH pH 10.6, 0.88% (w/v) OG Pilot purification of tj-EGFR in OG on HiTrap SP FF 1 ml m m m – marker (BenchMark)

16 buffer A = 50 mM NaP pH 8.0, 0.88% (w/v) OG buffer B = 50 mM NaP pH 11.5, 0.88% (w/v) OG Pilot purification of tj-EGFR in OG on HiTrap SP FF 1 ml b m m m m – marker (BenchMark) b – sample before application

17 buffer A = 50 mM NaP pH 8.0, 0.88% (w/v) OG buffer B = buffer A + 1 M NaCl Pilot purification of tj-EGFR in OG on Mini S 4.6/50 PE m m m – marker (BenchMark)

18 buffer A = 0.1% (w/v) TFA buffer B = 0.08% (w/v) TFA, 80% (v/v) acetonitrile Pilot purification of tj-EGFR in OG on RESOURCE RPC 3 ml m m – marker (BenchMark) also tried to use TEA instead of TFA: much worse separation

19 buffer A = 20 mM NaP pH 7.0 buffer B = 70% (v/v) acetonitrile Pilot purification of tj-EGFR in OG on RESOURCE RPC 3 ml m and m – marker (BenchMark)

20 buffer A = 0.08% (w/v) TFA, 70% (v/v) acetonitrile Pilot purification of tj-EGFR in OG on Peptide Superdex 10/300 GL m m – marker (BenchMark)

21 buffer A = 150 mM NaCl, 50 mM NaP pH 8.0, 0.88% (w/v) OG Pilot purification of tj-EGFR in OG on Superdex /300 GL m m – marker (BenchMark) m

22 Pilot purification of tj-EGFR in sarcosine Hitrap Chelating Sepharose m S FT W1 W2 E m – marker (Precision Plus) S – sample before application (solubilized protein) FT – flow-through W1 – wash 1 W2 – wash 2 E – elution

23 buffer A = 50 mM NaP pH 7.0, 0.2% (w/v) N-lauryl sarcosine buffer B = buffer A + 1 M NaCl Pilot purification of tj-EGFR in sarcosine on Mini S 4.6/50 PE b m m m – marker (BenchMark) b – sample before application

24 buffer A = 300 mM NaCl, 50 mM NaP pH 8.0, 0.15% (w/v) N-lauryl sarcosine Pilot purification of tj-EGFR in sarcosine on Peptide Superdex 10/300 GL m m m – marker (BenchMark)

25 buffer A = 8 M urea, 50 mM NaP pH 8.0 buffer B = buffer A mM imidazole Pilot purification of tj-EGFR in urea on HiTrap Chelating 1 ml c m b c – crude cell extract solubilized in 8 M urea m – marker (BenchMark) b – sample before application (supernatant), in 8 M urea

26 buffer A = 8 M urea, 25 mM NaOAc pH 4.5 Pilot purification of tj-EGFR in urea on Peptide Superdex 10/300 GL m m m – marker (BenchMark)

27 buffer A = 300 mM NaCl, 50 mM NaP pH 8.0 buffer B = buffer A mM imidazole Pilot purification of tj-EGFR HiTrap Chelating 1ml m b m m m – marker (BenchMark) b – sample before application m b

28 buffer A = 50 mM NaP pH 8.0 buffer B = buffer A + 1 M NaCl Pilot purification of tj-EGFR on HiTrap SP FF 1 ml b m m m – marker (BenchMark) b – sample before application

29 What is yet to be done with tj-EGFR Compare the CD results with the new construct Compare the CD results with the new construct7His-transmembrane+juxtamembrane-StrepII Investigate dimerization (depends on lipids/detergent?!) Investigate dimerization (depends on lipids/detergent?!) Characterize in detail by CD spectroscopy under various conditions Characterize in detail by CD spectroscopy under various conditions Crystallize, do 15 N-NMR Crystallize, do 15 N-NMR

30 THANKS FOR YOUR ATTENTION