Oppositions, Appeals and Oral Proceedings at the EPO Michael Williams.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PATENT OFFICE OF REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA. Introduction The provision in Article 108 (1) Council Regulation (EC) 40/94 on the Community trade mark (CTMR)
Advertisements

By David W. Hill AIPLA Immediate Past President Partner Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP Overview of the America Invents Act.
> AOAIOIP September 9, 2004, Cleveland September 10, Cincinnati EPO oppositions Christophe Saam.
© Kolisch Hartwell 2013 All Rights Reserved, Page 1 America Invents Act (AIA) Implementation in 2012 Peter D. Sabido Intellectual Property Attorney Kolisch.
THE COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH FOR CENTRAL MICHIGAN CONSUMER GRIEVANCE SYSTEM.
D ISPUTE R ESOLUTION - A COMPARISON. The legal system presents individuals with a range of ways in which they can resolve disputes. Taking a case to court.
The German Experience: Patent litigation and nullification cases
Mr. Marquina Somerset Silver Palms Civics
“Student Due Process” School Administrators of South Dakota April 7, 2015.
R.G.C. Jenkins & Co Patents – Designs – Trade Marks.
Trademark Protection Process Selection and US Registration 2006.
by Eugene Li Summary of Part 3 – Chapters 8, 9, and 10
AIA Strategies.
A Comparative Analysis of Patent Post-Grant Review Procedures in the U
The EPO and the Procedures
Meyerlustenberger Rechtsanwälte − Attorneys at Lawwww.meyerlustenberger.ch European Patent Law and Litigation Guest Lecture, Health and Intellectual Property.
The Unitary Patent One single patent covering 25 EU members October 2013 Rodolphe Bauer, Frédéric Dedek, Gareth Jenkins, Cristina Margarido Patent Examiners,
FICPI ABC 30/5/07The Unwritten Rules of the EPO – Richard Howson The Unwritten Rules of the European Patent Office Richard Howson Kilburn & Strode, UK.
J.A.Kemp & Co. London Munich Oxford. FICPI ABC MEETING 2007 EPC 2000 Alan M. Senior 30 May 2007.
Patent Protection in Europe
Patents- Practical Aspects of International Patent Procurement/Prosecution June 2015 Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) Practice Overview.
European Patent Law Update Presentation to the Houston Intellectual Property Law Association Stephen Gill 24 January 2008.
The Aarhus Convention and Access to Justice in Ireland Where are we now? Michael Ewing Coordinator of the Environmental Pillar
The European Patent Granting Procedure
Impact of US AIA: What Really Changed? 1 © AIPLA 2015.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. 2 Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due.
Patent Application Procedures in Europe by Dr. Ulla Allgayer Patent Attorney in Munich Germany.
Seminar Industrial Property Protection Prague, 4 June 2003 Patent Protection in Europe Heidrun Krestel Liaison Officer Member States Co-operation Programmes.
PATENT OPPOSITION AND STRATEGY Essenese Obhan, Obhan & Associates.
Heli PihlajamaaLondon, Director Patent Law (5.2.1) Clarity - Article 84 EPC.
Appeals in patent examination and opposition in Germany Karin Friehe Judge, Federal Patent Court, Munich, Germany.
Introduction to Patents Anatomy of a Patent & Procedures for Getting a Patent Margaret Hartnett Commercialisation & IP Manager University.
Yoshiki KITANO JPAA International Activities Center AIPLA Annual Meeting, 2014 IP Practice in Japan Committee Pre-Meeting Seminar Post-Grant Opposition.
1 Workshop on the Directive 96/61/EC concerning (IPPC) Integrated pollution prevention and control INFRA Public participation & access to environmental.
New rights for people complaining about adult social care providers – an introduction.
© 2004 VOSSIUS & PARTNER Opposition in the Procedural System by Dr. Johann Pitz AIPPI Hungary, June 2 – 4, 2004 Kecskemét.
Institut der beim Europäischen Patentamt zugelassenen Vertreter Institute of Professional Representatives before the European Patent Office Institut des.
New Ex Parte Appeal Rules Patent and Trademark Practice Group Meeting January 26, 2012.
© COPYRIGHT DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Post Grant Proceedings Before the USPTO and Litigation Strategies Under the AIA Panelists:David.
1 A decade of revisions at UNCITRAL Special Course 6 – James Castello Lecture 3 Arbitration Academy PA R I S SUMMER COURSES
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due to.
Chris Fildes FILDES & OUTLAND, P.C. IP Practice in Japan Committee Pre-Meeting AIPLA Annual Meeting, October 20, 2015 USPTO PILOT PROGRAMS 1 © AIPLA 2015.
Essential Question How does the Supreme Court function?
Takeo Nasu JPAA International Activities Center AIPLA 2015 Mid-Winter Institute IP Practice in Japan Committee Pre-Meeting Seminar Updates of Post Grant.
Derivation Proceedings Gene Quinn Patent Attorney IPWatchdog.com March 27 th, 2012.
Prosecution Group Luncheon Patent October PTO News Backlog of applications continues to decrease –623,000 now, decreasing about 5,000/ month –Expected.
Seminar on the Swiss Rules of International Arbitration Evidence & Hearings under the Swiss Rules Belgrade, 9 December 2015 University.
Chapter 15, Amended Article II Appeals To EPC Presented by EPD May 1, 2007 Presented by EPD May 1, 2007 BCC Public Hearing BCC Public Hearing.
CANCELLATION OF REGISTRATION OF DESIGN. Cancellation of Registration Outlines of Presentation Sec 19 (1) (a) to (e) and (2) Rule 29 (1) to (13) – Procedure.
ADVOCATE S The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, The Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Ordinance, 2015 C-17, II Floor, LSC I Paschimi Marg.
European Patent Attorneys Chartered Patent Attorneys Trade Mark Attorneys Practical approaches to appeals before the European Patent Office Paul Chapman.
CHAPTER 13: THE ORDER AND BEYOND Emond Montgomery Publications 1.
Oppositions, Appeals and Oral Proceedings at the EPO.
The Court System Chapter 5. Courts  Trial Courts- two parties Plaintiff- in civil trial is the person bringing the legal action Prosecutor- in criminal.
The Community Trade Mark (CTM) System. The Legal Framework Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark Council Regulation.
1 TOPIC III - PATENT INVALIDATION PROCEDURES EU-CHINA WORKSHOP ON THE CHINESE PATENT LAW HARBIN, SEPTEMBER 2008 Dr. Gillian Davies.
ARBITRATION ACT. Challenge of arbitrator The appointment of an arbitrator may be challenged on the issues of – (i) impartiality, – (ii) independence,
Customs Rulings and Protests Tips and Best Practices Atlanta International Forwarders and Brokers Association March 8,
Oral proceedings all’EPO in presenza di terze parti: la procedura e il comportamento in udienza 27 Aprile 2016, Bologna - Per seminario AIPPI Marco Conti.
PCT-FILING SYSTEM.
The influence of the Rules of Procedure on the decisions of the boards of appeal Apr-18 The influence of the Rules of Procedure on the decisions of the.
PATENT Designed and Developed by IP Laboratory, MNNIT Allahabad , Uttar Pradesh, India.
Nick Reeve Reddie & Grose LLP
Pretrial Conference After discovery, a pretrial hearing is held to clarify the issues, consider a settlement, and set rules for trial Once the trial court.
How the OHIM will handle Madrid filings
International Commercial Arbitration
USPTO Appeal Process: Appeal Strategies and New Rules
SIMAD UNIVERSITY Keyd abdirahman salaad.
Position of the Board of Appeal in the legal protection system for Community plant variety rights Gert Würtenberger.
Gordon HUMPHREYS Chairperson of the 5th Board of Appeal
Presentation transcript:

Oppositions, Appeals and Oral Proceedings at the EPO Michael Williams

Overview of EPO procedure FILE APPLICATION SEARCH AND EXAMINATION ORAL PROCEEDINGS APPEAL PROCEDURE ORAL PROCEEDINGS REFUSAL PATENT GRANTED N Y Y N GRANT? APPEAL ALLOWED?

Overview of opposition procedure PATENT GRANTED ORAL PROCEEDINGS NATIONAL LAW OPPOSITION PROCEDURE N Y APPEAL PROCEDURE PATENT MAINTAINED PATENT REVOKED ORAL PROCEEDINGS OPPOSITION FILED? LIMITATION PROCEDURE

OPPOSITION Procedure by which validity of patent can be challenged Opposition can be filed by anyone “Strawman” oppositions allowed Exception – patent proprietor cannot oppose his own patent New central limitation procedure allows patent proprietor to limit claims

Why file an opposition? Challenge takes place centrally at EPO Cheaper and easier than revocation at national offices Can be filed in English Opponent party to the proceedings Procedure can be used tactically (eg create uncertainty, delay final decision, add cost, systematic oppositions)

Nature of opposition proceedings Contentious proceedings between opponent and patent proprietor Heard by opposition division consisting of EPO examiners Some scope for opposition division to examine of its own motion President of the EPO can issue instructions to the opposition division

Grounds for Opposition Lack of novelty Lack of inventive step Not industrially applicable Not an “invention” (Article 52) Excluded from patentability (Article 53) Invention insufficiently disclosed Added subject matter

Opposition procedure Notice of opposition must be filed within nine months of date of grant Notice of opposition sets out the grounds on which the opposition is based Patent proprietor given four months to respond (extendable to six months) Usually one or more further rounds of submissions Oral proceedings usually appointed Decision usually taken at oral proceedings

APPEAL Procedure by which someone adversely affected by a decision of the EPO may challenge that decision Heard by a Board of Appeal Apply principles of court proceedings Independent of the President of the EPO

Appeal procedure File notice of appeal and pay appeal fee within two months of “notification” of decision File statement of grounds of appeal within four months Procedure then dictated by Board of Appeal Board may appoint oral proceedings

ORAL PROCEEDINGS Article 116 EPC states: “Oral proceedings shall take place … at the request of any party to the proceedings” Thus, if oral proceedings are requested, an adverse decision cannot be taken until oral proceedings have been held. Oral proceedings are not interviews

Overview of procedure Date for hearing set by division/board Any written submissions/amendments must be filed one month before the hearing Case presented orally Decision usually announced at end of hearing

Oral proceedings during examination Case heard by three–member Examining Division Not in public Can be fairly informal Applicant presents his case, issues are discussed, and Examining Division then takes decision

Oral proceedings during opposition Heard by three-member Opposition Division Adversarial in nature Held in public More formal – need to treat each side equally

Oral proceedings during appeal procedure Heard by Board of Appeal Fairly formal, in keeping with more judicial nature of appeal procedure Nature of proceedings depends on whether appeal is from examining division or opposition division (e.g. applicant only, proprietor and opponent) Case may be remitted to first instance Or final decision may be taken