Preparing input for the TOPKAPI (TOPographic Kinematic Approximation and Integration) model PRASANNA DAHAL.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Model for Evaluating the Impacts of Spatial and Temporal Land Use Changes on Water Quality at Watershed Scale Jae-Pil Cho and Saied Mostaghimi 07/29/2003.
Advertisements

Application of the FEWS Stream Flow (SF) Model to the Limpopo Basin, Mozambique Final Report Tanya Hoogerwerf.
NWS Calibration Workshop, LMRFC March, 2009 Slide 1 Sacramento Model Derivation of Initial Parameters.
The Effects of Different Resolution DEMs in Determining Overland Flow Regimes Stacy L. Hutchinson 1, J.M. Shawn Hutchinson 2, Ik-Jae Kim 1, and Philip.
Runoff and Streamflow P Q
Hydrological Modeling for Upper Chao Phraya Basin Using HEC-HMS UNDP/ADAPT Asia-Pacific First Regional Training Workshop Assessing Costs and Benefits of.
LTHIA – Upgrades and Training Bernard A. Engel Tong Zhai Larry Theller Agricultural and Biological Department Purdue University In conjunction.
Runoff Processes Reading: Applied Hydrology Sections 5.6 to 5.8 and Chapter 6 for Tuesday of next week.
Green-Ampt Parameterization for Rainfall Excess Determination
CURVE NO. DEVELOPMENT STEP 8 Soils data, land use data, watershed data, and CN lookup table are used to develop curve numbers for use in the SCS Curve.
PrePro2004: Comparison with Standard Hydrologic Modeling Procedures Rebecca Riggs April 29, 2005.
Digital Elevation Model based Hydrologic Modeling Topography and Physical runoff generation processes (TOPMODEL) Raster calculation of wetness index Raster.
Week 22GEOG2750 – Earth Observation and GIS of the Physical Environment1 Lecture 18 Hydrological modelling Outline: – Basics of hydrology – Creating hydrologically.
Concept Course on Spatial Dr. A.K.M. Saiful Islam Application of GIS in Watershed Analysis Dr. A.K.M. Saiful Islam Institute of Water and Flood.
School of Geography FACULTY OF ENVIRONMENT School of Geography FACULTY OF ENVIRONMENT GEOG5060 GIS and Environment Dr Steve Carver
Soil Erosion Assessment using GIS and RUSLE model
The Effect of Soil Hydraulic Properties and Deep Seepage Losses on Drainage Flow using DRAINMOD Debjani Deb 26 th April, 2004.
Soil Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) Model Input
Remote Sensing and GIS in Water Dr. A.K.M. Saiful Islam Hands on training on surface hydrologic analysis using GIS Dr. A.K.M. Saiful Islam.
SSURGO Dataset to File Geodatabase Import Tool One Example of Extending Capabilities through Python 2013 IGIC Conference Muncie, Indiana Chris Morse, NRCS.
Habitat Analysis in ArcGIS Use of Spatial Analysis to characterize used resources Thomas Bonnot
Updating Erosion Hazard Ratings in a Post-fire Assessment A GIS Tool for Soil Scientists.
LANDSLIDE SUCCEPTABILITY MAPPING (Case study of SRILANKA)
January 19, 2004USDA Conesus Lake Project GIS Modeling of Source Areas of Agricultural Nonpoint Source Pollution James Zollweg, Ph.D. SUNY-Brockport Earth.
Assessment of Hydrology of Bhutan What would be the impacts of changes in agriculture (including irrigation) and forestry practices on local and regional.
LL-III physics-based distributed hydrologic model in Blue River Basin and Baron Fork Basin Li Lan (State Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower.
Lecture Notes Applied Hydrogeology
Creating Watersheds and Stream Networks
Onion creek catchment modeling using PIHM By, Harish Sangireddy PhD Candidate The University of Texas at Austin.
Watershed Modeling using HEC-HMS and EPA-SWMM ©T. G. Cleveland, Ph.D., P.E. 10 July 2012 Lesson 2.
DIGITAL ELEVATION MODELING GEOG 421: DR. SHUNFU HU, SIUE Project One Steve Klaas Fall 2013.
Surface Water Hydrology: Infiltration – Green and Ampt Method
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Norman B. Bliss, ASRC Federal InuTeq Contractor to the USGS 6/4/2015 A continental view of soil.
Evaluating and Mapping the Stability of Slopes in Napa County with a GIS-based Model Dongyuan Wang Ph.D candidate in geotechnical engineering The University.
1 of 30 GIS for Reservoir Management: Estimating Original Gas In Place Jeffrey Vu, M.GIS Candidate Dr. Patrick Kennelly, Advisor.
A Soil-water Balance and Continuous Streamflow Simulation Model that Uses Spatial Data from a Geographic Information System (GIS) Advisor: Dr. David Maidment.
Watershed Modeling Approaches Distributed: CASC-2D (CSU, U Conn, WMS) overland flow: 2-D diffusion wave with explicit FD channel flow: 1-D diffusion wave.
Introduction to the TOPMODEL
Building an OpenNSPECT Database for Your Watershed Shan Burkhalter and Dave Eslinger National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Office for.
Parameterisation by combination of different levels of process-based model physical complexity John Pomeroy 1, Olga Semenova 2,3, Lyudmila Lebedeva 2,4.
Characterization of Watersheds from DEMs using Spatial Analyst/ArcHydro Robert G. Burns, P.G. Engineering Geologist DWR – Division of Safety of Dams Watershed.
Surface Water Surface runoff - Precipitation or snowmelt which moves across the land surface ultimately channelizing into streams or rivers or discharging.
Kristina Schneider Kristi Shaw
6. Drainage basins and runoff mechanisms Drainage basins Drainage basins The vegetation factor The vegetation factor Sources of runoff Sources of runoff.
DEVELOPMENT OF A CELL BASED MODEL FOR STREAM FLOW PREDICTION IN UNGAUGED BASINS USING GIS DATA P B Hunukumbura & S B Weerakoon Department of Civil Engineering,
DIRECT RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH FOR UNGAUGED BASINS USING A CELL BASED MODEL P. B. Hunukumbura & S. B. Weerakoon Department of Civil Engineering, University of.
Mapping of soil moisture content by SWAT and GIS programming GEOG 593.
Mapping of soil moisture content by SWAT and GIS programming Yuri Kim Jessica Jahnke GEOG 593.
-gSSURGO- Using the Soil Data Management Toolbox Steve Peaslee USDA-NRCS National Soil Survey Center Lincoln, Nebraska March.
Agricultural Land Use as it Relates to Land Slope James Plourde, Dr. Bryan Pijanowski Human-Environment Modeling & Analysis Laboratory Purdue University.
Application of TOPMODEL GIS for Bear River Watershed
Graduate Students, CEE-6190
Modeling Source-water Contributions to Streamflow
NFIE-Geo HMS Model: Extraction Tool
Simulation of stream flow using WetSpa Model
Digital model for estimation of flash floods using GIS
Utah State University GIS in Water Resources CEE 6440 Term Project
Modified Rational Method for Texas Watersheds
Spatial Models – Raster Stacy Bogan
Kristina Schneider Kristi Shaw
Infiltration and unsaturated flow (Mays p )
Continuous runoff simulation model below Red Butte Creek Reservoir including snowmelt Term Project, CEE6440, Fall2016.
Lecture 22: Using ArcToolbox Tools in Python
Infiltration and unsaturated flow (Mays p )
Emma Gildesgame, Katie Lebling and Ian McCullough
Automation of Input data preparation of TOPNET model using Python
A Geographic Information System Tool for Hydrologic Model Setup
Upper Bear River Watershed Analysis using Topmodel
Digital Elevation Model based Hydrologic Modeling
Environmental Modelling with RASTER DEMs: Hydrologic Features
Presentation transcript:

Preparing input for the TOPKAPI (TOPographic Kinematic Approximation and Integration) model PRASANNA DAHAL

Introduction to TOPKAPI  TOPKAPI is physically-based fully-distributed rainfall-runoff model, used mainly in Europe  Beside subsurface, overland and channel flow, it includes components representing infiltration, percolation, evapo-transpiration and snowmelt.  It can be applied at increasing spatial scales without losing model and parameter physical interpretation  Allows to study the evolution of all the hydrological state variables of the catchment, such as rainfall, temperature, evapotranspiration, soil moisture conditions, snow accumulation and runoff generation.  pyTOPKAPI is the open source version of TOPKAPI

Parameters used in the model  Slope of overland  Slope of channel  Soil Depth  Saturated hydraulic conductivity  Residual soil moisture content  Initial Saturation of soil reservoir  Water content overland  Saturated soil moisture content  Manning’s coefficient for overland  Manning’s coefficient for channel  Bubbling pressure  Pore size distribution

Challenges in use of TOPKAPI in the US  TOPKAPI has modules to prepare those data, but require rasters not common to the US these days, viz. GLCC land cover Soil type as classified by SIRI, Soil texture as defined by Midgley et al (1994)  In the US, we have better data (finer resolution and measured values instead of derived ones) available  Hence, GIS services and SSURGO data was used to derive the same final watershed parameters required by the model * This project is an attempt to meet the challenge TOPKAPI Recommended approach

Step 1:GIS services  A ArcGIS tool to download data  Use of ArcGIS services to get:  National Land Cover Dataset (NLCD) map  NHDplus streams (not required)  Soils HSG, USDA (not required) *Used part of the same code written by Cynthia V. Castro, student of Dr. Maidment. A slice of the code

 Step2: DEM processing  Project the files to Projected coordinates (UTM)  Following ArcGIS tools were used to obtain three input rasters: a) Flow direction, b) Strahler order, and c) Stream  Fill  Flow direction  Flow Accumulation  Raster Calculation  Extract by mask  StreamLink  StreamToFeature  StreamOrder WorkFlow in the DEM processing code

Step2: continued... Reclassify tool was used to reclassify:  NLCD raster to Manning’s coefficient  Strahler order to Manning’s Coefficient Reclassifying results in two more input rasters; Overland and channel manning’s coefficient Loop-up tables Reclassifying

 Rest of the data obtained using SSURGO  First; SSURGO data was downloaded for study region from web (  SSURGO divides our region into multiple polygon called map-units  Python code was used to extract the required data for each map units  Step3: Use of SSURGO to obtain data

SSURGO database (a relational database) Tables below were joint into one using keys from the same colored fields Values were averaged out; one for one Mukey (i.e. corresponding to one map unit)

Step3: Use of SSURGO to obtain data (continued…) Methodology of extracting the data  Any soil type is composed of different percentage of Sand, Silt and Clay.  Texture name of each soil layer can be found in Chorizon table in SSURGO.  The look up table by Rawls et al (1982), was joined with Chorizon table from SSRUGO  Weighted average was taken to compute the value for each Map Unit. *Python module “pandas” was used to carry out tasks.

Step4: Values for each map unit to Rasters  The table obtained from the end of Step3 was joined to Polygon shapefile in Spatial folder from SSURGO  ArcGIS tool, Feature to Raster was used to convert the feature from SSURGO to the rasters.  Value of the rasters are taken from fields from the joint table, which are Porosity, Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity, Bubbling pressure, Pore size distribution, and residual water content. Example of Raster files created Saturated Hydraulic ConductivitySaturated Soil Moisture Content

Limitation and Future works  Use of pandas module for part of the work has restricted running all of the scripts run from ArcGIS because ArcGIS python environment do not come with pandas.  There are missing data for soil type identified as ‘weather rock’ in the SSURGO database  SSURGO data will have to be downloaded manually

Thank You.  Questions?