Budgets 101 Tina Cunningham, CRA

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FACILITIES AND ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS (F&A) Understanding Indirect Costs.
Advertisements

Office of Sponsored Projects Administration COST ACCOUNTING STANDARDS.
DIRECT BENEFITS OF AN INDIRECT COST RATE
1 Fiscal Compliance Requirements for Sponsored Programs University of Missouri – St. Louis College of Education March 6, 2009.
Regulation Grant Brown Bag Session February 12, 2013.
Detailed Budget Development and Templates Presented by: Office of Sponsored Programs March 12, 2009.
OMB Circular A-21 General Overview – F&A OSP Brown Bag Norm Hebert, Director December 8, 2005.
Cost Share Fundamentals. Learning Objectives Todays presentation will focus on: Cost share – The What and Why The different types of cost sharing Sponsor.
The University of Texas at Arlington Office of Research and Office of Accounting and Business Services Brown Bag Training Session Two: Indirect Costs.
MARCH 26,2013 PRE-AWARD MATTERS THAT AFFECT POST-AWARD COMPLIANCE MODULE SERIES 3, SESSION III AAPLS (APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON SERIES)
Intro to Budgeting Lori Schultz, Sponsored Projects Services Sept 2014.
Budgeting 101 Sponsored Programs Administration 2012 Research Seminar Series.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION OF COST ALLOCATION Presenters: Steven J. Zuraf, Branch Chief for Colleges/Universities, Non-Profits & Hospitals.
KUMC Research Institute How to Think Through a Grant Budget Sponsored Programs Administration (SPA) Presented by.
Budget 101 Overview of a typical grant budget Erin Scott, CRA.
Fiscal Compliance Requirements for Sponsored Programs University of Missouri College of Agriculture, Food and Natural Resources December 11, 2009.
Indirect Cost Presented by Bonita Brown HMEP Grant Program
CREATING AND UNDERSTANDING BUDGETS Office of Research and Sponsored Programs Jack Gelfand, Director Maria Nakamura, Associate Director
The University of Texas at Arlington Office of Research and Office of Accounting and Business Services Brown Bag Training Session Three: The 1,2,3’s of.
Fiscal Compliance Why it matters… University of Delaware.
Angie Templeton & Nicole Cobb Grants & Contracts Administrators Sponsored Programs Administration.
If the funder provides specific guidelines related to format or contents of your budget… FOLLOW THEM! Otherwise, your proposal may not make it out of.
HOW TO WRITE A BUDGET…. The Importance of Your Budget Preparation of the budget is an important part of the proposal preparation process. Pre-Award and.
Presented by the Office of Research Development & Services and Sponsored Programs Administration.
9/25/2013. AGENDA  Introduction & General Overview  F&A Definition and Category Application  Application of F&A Cost Rates  The Distribution Basis.
“Grants Boot Camp” Workshop Series January 9, 2014 Creighton University Sponsored Programs Administration 2500 California Plaza, Omaha, NE  Phone:
MANAGING SPONSORED PROJECTS FINANCIAL COMPLIANCE May 1, 2008 Office of Grants &Contracts Accounting.
KEYS TO SUCCESS NCURA Region IV Spring Meeting April 27 – 30, 2014 © 2014 National Council of University Research Administrators Cost Principles: It Depends!
1 Sponsored Programs AdditionalReviewSteps. 2 Sponsored Program Section Content How to Identify a Sponsored Program Types of Costs Review Budget to Actual.
U N I V E R S I T Y OF F L O R I DA Building Realistic Budgets Judy Harris, Proposal Processing Division of Sponsored Research.
Sponsored Programs Services (SPS) PROPOSALS. What is the PI’s role in the proposal?  Contact the central pre-award center,
Cost Sharing on Contracts and Grants October 16, 2001.
Chad Cook Fiscal Analyst 2 Sponsored Programs Services Lourana Swayne Grant and contract coordinator Office of Grant and Research Development Presented.
Managing Your Grant Award August 23, 2012 Janet Stoeckert Director, Research Administration Sr. Administrator, Basic Sciences Keck School of Medicine 1.
Cost Principles provide guidance for determining eligible costs and whether those costs are direct or indirect. Outlined in detail in OMB Circular A-21.
SBIR Budgeting Leanne Robey Chief, Special Reviews Branch, NIH.
Proposal Budget Building Part II of II CALS Research Division Julene Gaspard Meredith Luschen Becky Bound September 16, 2008 Website:
Cost Sharing James Trotter Quality Standards Manager Sponsored Projects Administration.
 The Facilities and Administrative Rate (F&A Rate) is the mechanism used to reimburse the University for the infrastructure support costs associated.
Adult Education and Literacy Budget Development and Cost Allocation.
COST SHARE Neta Fernandez Director, Grants and Contracts.
Let’s Talk Cost Sharing Sherrelle Vaughn Sponsored Programs Accounting and Reporting July 17, 2012.
Time with Office of Sponsored Programs May 4, 2010 Topic: Allowability.
Office of Sponsored Programs All rights reserved GTRC Budgets & submitting your proposal –To give an overview of the guidelines and fundamentals of a proposal.
Prepared by the Office of Grants and Contracts1 The Basics of Grants Administration.
MAY 10, 2011 SESSION 6 OF AAPLS – BUDGET PREPARATION & IMPLICATIONS OF COST SHARE APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON SERIES Module C: Budget.
1 SPS Primer SPS Primer Workshop Cost Accounting Considerations When Preparing Budgets for Sponsored Proposals Division of Financial Affairs.
Kuali Financial Systems – Financial Administrator Development Series - October, 2006 Indirect Cost Facilities and Administrative (F&A) Costs.
Intro to Budgeting. Today’s Agenda  Where do we start?  Basic framework for budgeting in sponsored research  OMB 2 CFR 200: Uniform Guidance  The.
Cindy Collins ETEC 665 The Proposal Budget The ABCs of Constructing A Budget.
What’s MTDC Mean To Me? Alexia Lewis Office of Research & Sponsored Programs September, 2006.
Department of Community and Senior Services Jason Stempinski, CIA Compliance Manager COST ALLOCATION PLAN Presented by:
OMB Circular A-122 and the Federal Cost Principles Copyright © Texas Education Agency
IUP Research Institute University Square 1179 Grant Street, Suite One Indiana, PA Telephone: (724) Fax: (724)
12/11/20071 Indirect Cost Study Facilities and Administrative (F&A) Costs Indiana University Sally Link Cost Accounting Manager Financial Management Services.
Office Of Sponsored Programs Allowable Costs. What is 2 CFR Chapter 1 and 2 parts 200 Subpart E (OMB Uniform Guidance)? A document that contains Principles.
Office of Sponsored Research and Programs (OSRP)
Budget Development Sponsored Programs Administration
Building A Budget Jenn Garye, Office of the VP for Research
Budget Development “SPEAR” Workshop.
Project Budgeting.
2015 Leadership Conference “All In: Achieving Results Together”
Overview of a typical grant budget
Federal Cost Principles & Compliance
Introduction to Indirect Costs Claiming Your “Fair Share”
Overview of a typical grant budget
Project Budgeting.
Budgets.
Office of Sponsored Research and Programs (OSRP)
Budgets and Budget Justifications: NIH and Beyond
Presentation transcript:

Budgets 101 Tina Cunningham, CRA Assistant Director, Sponsored Programs Administration Mississippi State University Carly Cummings, PhD Assistant to the Dean of Research College of Arts & Sciences, Mississippi State University

The Plan Basic framework for budgeting in sponsored research Topics include: OMB Circular A-21 General Costing Principles Direct vs. Indirect Costs Mechanics of Building a Budget

OMB Circular A-21 What is it? Allowability principles for the reimbursements of costs associated with federally sponsored projects Guidance for determining direct and indirect costs

Basic Principles of Costing OMB A-21, C.2 Reasonable – OMB A.21, C.2(a) Allocable – OMB A.21, C.2(b) Consistent – OMB A.21, C.2(c) Allowable – OMB A.21, C.2(d)

Reasonable Prudent person test Considerations : Generally recognized as necessary Complies with Federal and State laws and regulations Did individuals involved act with due prudence? The extent the actions taken are consistent with institutional policies and procedures

Allocable To be allocable, expenses. . . . Are incurred solely for the project, OR Benefit both project and other work in a proportion that can approximated, OR Are necessary for the overall operation of the institution and is deemed assignable in part to a sponsored project

Consistent Costs must be given consistent treatment Institution must estimate costs during proposal preparation consistent with its cost accounting standards All costs incurred for the same purpose, in like circumstances, are either direct costs only or F&A costs only Institution's Disclosure Statement (DS-2) will provide details on how costs will be budgeted and expensed

Allowable The cost must conform to any requirements, limitations, etc. put forth by all of the following: OMB Circulars Sponsor guidelines Award document Institutional policies Allowability applies to both direct and F&A costs For ex.: Sponsored Programs expenses are not allowable as a direct cost, but are allowable as an F&A cost

Direct vs. Indirect Direct Costs (OMB A-21 D.1.) Can be identified specifically with a particular sponsored project, OR Can be directly assigned to projects relatively easily with a high degree of accuracy Indirect Costs (aka Facilities & Administrative Costs, Overhead) (OMB A-21 E.1.) Incurred for common or joint objectives - cannot be identified readily and specifically with a particular sponsored project

Direct Costs Examples: Salaries Fringe (sometimes) Travel Supplies/Commodities Services/Contractuals/Subcontracts Equipment

Indirect Costs (F & A Costs) Facilities Depreciation and use allowances Interest of debt associated with certain buildings Equipment and capital improvements Operation and maintenance expenses Library expenses Administrative General Administrative and general expenses Departmental administration Sponsored programs administration Student administration and services

Direct Costs vs. Indirects (cont.) Costs must be treated consistently - either a direct or an F&A cost ‘like costs in like manner’ Institution’s DS-2 often details which costs will be viewed as direct vs. indirect

Disclosure Statement (DS-2) Example: Travel costs incurred while performing the function of general university activity, such as travel by executive officers meeting with the State Board of Trustees to discuss general university business, would be classified as indirect costs. Travel by a university employee related to carrying out the functions of a specific contract or grant would be classified as a direct charge to that contract or grant.

Mechanics of Building a Budget Basic Principles All costs budgeted must be in accordance with the principles presented Reasonable, Allocable, Consistent, Allowable Properly budgeted as direct vs. indirect All costs budgeted should be viewed in relation to the project and its needs

Mechanics of Building a Budget (cont’d) Personnel Principal Investigator, project team, students Best to do this section first - many other expenses will be determined by this budget line Calculations Percentage of effort or person months 9-month vs. 12-month employees Rates should be based on current salaries; escalations allowed for future budget periods Check RFP, meet with PI/Research team.

Mechanics of Building a Budget (cont’d) Fringe Benefits Direct or Indirect – consult institution F&A agreement Rate may/may not be negotiated Different rates for different employee classes Calculations Rates are applied to budgeted salary amounts

Mechanics of Building a Budget (cont’d) Travel Project related conferences, project review meetings, data collection, etc. For budgeted project personnel Calculations Based on federal (U.S. General Services Administration) or state/university rates, if lower Per diem rates: http://www.gsa.gov/portal/category/21287 Mileage: http://www.gsa.gov/portal/content/100715

Mechanics of Building a Budget (cont’d) Equipment Institutional definition of equipment is found in your F&A rate agreement Nonexpendable Tangible Useful life of > 1 year Acquisition cost of $5,000 or more per unit The federal threshold; your institutional threshold may be lower

Mechanics of Building a Budget (cont’d) Materials and Supplies Items to be used for the project Molecular biology supplies (enzymes, reagents, tubes, etc.) to be used for DNA sequencing Services/Contractuals Services to be performed by another entity for the project Third party vendor will perform DNA sequencing

Mechanics of Building a Budget (cont’d) Subawards Subaward is distinguished from a vendor by the intellectual contribution to the project outcome Must receive SOW, budget, and budget justification from subrecipient Subaward budget must comply with sponsor guidelines, subrecipient institution policies, and all federal regulations.

Mechanics of Building a Budget (cont’d) Graduate Student Tuition Rates vary between institutions Calculation is based on student’s budgeted effort

Mechanics of Building a Budget (cont’d) Participant Costs Broadly defined: “Support provided when a sponsor funds a project or activity in connection with formal meetings, conferences, symposia, or training programs” Specifically, participant support costs are those costs paid to (or on behalf of) participants in such events Treatment of participant costs vary from agency to agency

Mechanics of Building a Budget (cont’d) Facilities and Administrative Costs (F&A) Applied to costs specified in negotiated rate agreement Modified Total Direct Cost (MTDC) All costs excluding tuition, equipment, patient care, off-site rentals, scholarships, fellowships, and all subaward costs exceeding $25,000 Salary and Wages Salary, Wages, and Fringes Sponsor may place further restrictions

Sponsor Budget Restrictions USDA Consultant limit – current $598/day ($74.75/hr) F&A restriction – 30% Total federal funds awarded NSF No F&A on participant costs NIH Genomics restriction: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-10-097.html Salary cap ($179,700) Modular budget for $250,000 total DIRECT costs 30%TFFA = 42.857% TDC New GPG excludes all participant costs

Cost share Anything necessary for the completion of the project that is not paid for by the sponsor Irrelevant what the source of funds are: Institution Third party Etc. These are really important – lots of conversation about type of funds, etc. That is irrelevant.

Cost share (cont’d) Two categories Committed – must be tracked Required by sponsor (committed in proposal) Not required, but committed in the proposal Not required, but implied through regulation Uncommitted – does not need to be tracked Typically after the fact ‘Volunteering’ of institution resources Will explain implied in more detail in the next slide

Cost share (sort of!) Does a PI have to charge their time to the project? No, BUT their time will be cost share, and some portion of it must be committed cost share and tracked See OMB Memo 01-06 http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/memoranda_m01-06/ Obviously we don’t encourage cost sharing OMB memo says all projects must have some committed effort and thus must be tracked

Allowability of cost share expenses Must be allowable as a direct cost Other important criteria: Expense must be incurred during the project period Can only be used as cost share once Cannot be being charged to the feds already (typically F&A costs) If cost share is required – this is what you need to consider

Time for budget problems!!

Dr. Jones ($50,000 annual salary/9 month faculty/0 Dr. Jones ($50,000 annual salary/9 month faculty/0.62 FTE) plans a one year project. The project will require 10% of his time. Calculate the salary and fringe expenses. What does 10% mean? 10% of a 12 month equivalent or 10% of his actual appointment? Because of this uncertainty, the recommendation is to always use person months.

Dr. Jones ($45,000 annual salary/9 month faculty/0 Dr. Jones ($45,000 annual salary/9 month faculty/0.50 FTE) plans a one year project. The project will require two months of effort. Calculate the salary and fringe expenses (use 30% fringe rate). First calculate total months in the appointment Then calculate monthly salary Then calculate project salary charges

Total months in appointment Monthly salary Solution Total months in appointment 9 month appointment x 0.50 FTE = 4.5 months Monthly salary $45,000 annual salary / 4.5 months = $10,000/month Salary: 2 months x $10,000/month = $20,000 Fringe: $20,000 x 30% = $6,000

Dr. Smith ($120,000 annual salary; 12 month appointment) has a one year research project (7/1/14-6/30/15). This project will require 3 months of his time. In addition, he will need $2,000 for travel to collect samples for his experiments and $3,000 for chemical supplies to run the necessary tests. The sponsor will pay full facilities and administrative costs. What is the total budget amount? Assume 30% fringe rate. Figure first at 50% MTDC – then at 60% SWF

Salary: $120,000/12 x 3 = $30,000 Fringes: $30,000 x 30% = $ 9,000 Travel: $ 2,000 Supplies: $ 3,000 TDC: Sum of all direct costs $44,000 F&A (MTDC): $44,000 x 50% = $22,000 Total Cost: Sum of TDC + F&A= $66,000

Salary: $120,000/12 x 3 = $30,000 Fringes: $30,000 x 30% = $ 9,000 Travel: $ 2,000 Supplies: $ 3,000 TDC: Sum of all direct costs $44,000 F&A (SWF): $39,000 x 60% = $23,400 Total Cost: Sum of TDC + F&A= $67,400

Dr. Smith is doing a one year research project (7/1/14-6/30/15) Dr. Smith is doing a one year research project (7/1/14-6/30/15). He will work 2.0 summer months on the project (his 9-month salary is $90,000). He will need two full time graduate students who will make $20,000/yr. He will need a specialized piece of equipment for testing material strength and costs $25,000. It will also be necessary to pay a colleague at Arch Rival University (ARU) $40,000 to do part of the work. Sponsor will pay full F&A. What is the total budget amount? Variables: fringe= 30% and 10% Tuition = $7,500 per student F&A = 50%

Tuition: $7,500 x 2 students = $15,000 Equipment: $25,000 Salaries: $60,000 PI: $90,000/9 x 2 = $20,000 GRA: $20,000 x 2 = $40,000 Fringes: $10,000 PI: $20,000 x 30% = $6,000 GRA: $40,000 x 10% = $4,000 Tuition: $7,500 x 2 students = $15,000 Equipment: $25,000 Subaward: $40,000 TDC: Sum of all direct costs $150,000 MTDC: $150,000 – 15,000 – 25,000 – 40,000 + 25,000 = $95,000 F&A: $95,000 x 50% = $47,500 Total Cost: TDC + F&A $197,500

A sponsor limits the project budget total to $150,000 and will pay our full federally negotiated F&A rate of 50% MTDC. The project budgets nothing that would be excluded for F&A purposes (tuition, equipment, etc). How much money is available in direct costs?

Available Direct Costs: Calculation check: $100,000 x 50% = $50,000 $150,000/1.50 = $100,000 in direct costs Calculation check: $100,000 x 50% = $50,000 $100,000 + 50,000 = $150,000

Really just algebra! D = Direct Costs D + (D x 50%) = 150,000 1D + 0.50D = 150,000 1.5D = 150,000 1.5𝐷 1.5 = 150,000 1.5 D = 100,000 / 1.5

Starting with the available direct costs ($100,000) in the previous problem, assume we need $5,000 for travel and $5,000 for printing and the rest is for salary and fringe for faculty and professional staff. What would be allocated now to both salary and fringe? Use 20% fringe rate

Available Direct Costs: $100,000 −5,000 −5,000=$90,000 (for salary/fringe) Salary (backwards budgeting again): $90,000 1.20 =$75,000 Fringes will be the difference $90,000 −$75,000=$15,000

Questions? Tina Cunningham Carly Cummings tcunningham@spa.msstate.edu ccummings@deanas.msstate.edu