Student and Faculty Perceptions of Goal Achievement in General Education Courses C. “Griff” Griffin Director, General Education Grand Valley State University,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Association of American Colleges and Universities.
Advertisements

Strategies to Measure Student Writing Skills in Your Disciplines Joan Hawthorne University of North Dakota.
Pre and Post Assessments A quick and easy way to assess your Student Learning Outcomes.
Measuring Up on College- Level Learning Margaret Miller, Project Director September 2003.
APSU QEP. Explore practical learning experiences and opportunities to excel in life. APSU QEP.
Source Code: Assessing Cited References to Measure Student Information Literacy Skills Dale Vidmar Information Literacy and Instruction Librarian Southern.
GENERAL EDUCATION COURSE- BASED ASSESSMENT – IT’S EASIER THAN YOU THINK! C. Griffin.
Bridging Research, Information and Culture An Initiative of the Research and Planning Group for California Community Colleges Your Name Your Institution.
Organizing Assessment to Foster Students’ Best Work Council for the Advancement of Standards National Symposium November 16, 2009 Carol Geary Schneider.
Maximizing Your NSSE & CCSSE Results
Teaching Methods Related to Student Progress in Lower-level STEM Courses Steve Benton, Ph.D. Senior Research Officer IDEA Emeritus Professor, Kansas State.
Reflective Pathways from Theory to Practice Brewton-Parker College Education Division BPC Conceptual Framework.
Utilization-focused Assessment in Foundations Curriculum: Examining RCLS 2601: Leisure in Society Clifton E. Watts, PhD Dept. of Recreation & Leisure Studies.
Assessing Library Contributions to University Outcomes 9th Northumbria International Conference University of York, England Joe Matthews August 2011.
Mathematics Developmental Education in Texas Institutions of Higher Education Survey of Best Practices Adoption January 2003 Texas Higher Education Coordinating.
THE CBA ASSESSMENT CULTURE SURVEY The most important reason for the emphasis on assessment in the college is to meet AACSB and CSU requirements.
Graduate Program Assessment Report. University of Central Florida Mission Communication M.A. Program is dedicated to serving its students, faculty, the.
Educational Outcomes: The Role of Competencies and The Importance of Assessment.
Using Rubrics for Evaluating Student Learning Office of Assessment and Accreditation Indiana State University.
Promoting Student Engagement: Involving Students with NSSE Planning and Results William Woods University NSSE Users’ Workshop October 6-7, 2005.
Information Literacy and Assessment: The What, Why, Who, Where, When, and (most importantly) How.
Experiments and Observational Studies.  A study at a high school in California compared academic performance of music students with that of non-music.
Indiana Commission for Higher Education Public Square February 13, 2014 Cathrael Kazin, JD, PhD Chief Academic Officer 0.
Program Assessment Workshop Kathleen Harring. What is Assessment? Assessment is the systematic gathering and analysis of information to inform and improve.
Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Institutional Effectiveness Southern Association of Colleges and Schools February 2008 Stephen F. Austin State University.
Catherine Wehlburg, Ph.D. Assistant Provost for Institutional Effectiveness Texas Christian University TAMU Assessment Conference 2011.
CAA’s IBHE Program Review Presentation April 22, 2011.
Assessment of Student Learning Faculty In-service June 5, 2006.
Direct vs Indirect Assessment of Student Learning: An Introduction Dr. Sheila Handy, Chair Business Management and Co-Chair University Assessment Committee.
Essential Elements of a Workable Assessment Plan Pat Tinsley McGill, Ph.D. Professor, Strategic Management College of Business Faculty Lead, Assessment.
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services.
Results from The College at Brockport 2014 NSSE Survey Presentation to President’s Advisory Council– 3/4/15.
AAHE 2004 Connecting Public Audiences to the College Experience: A Model of General Education Assessment Susan L. Davis James Madison University A. Katherine.
Source Code: Simple Tool to Help Assess and Improve Student Research Writing Dale Vidmar Information Literacy and Instruction Librarian Southern Oregon.
Making It Meaningful: Authentic Assessment for Intentional Education David W. Marshall, PhD Joanna M. Oxendine, MEd.
Supporting Students’ Academic Success: What is in our locus of control? Kay M. Sagmiller, Ph. D.
Student Learning Outcome Assessment: A Program’s Perspective Ling Hwey Jeng, Director School of Library and Information Studies June 27,
FACILITATING AND DOCUMENTING STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES Chantal Levesque-Bristol Associate Professor of Psychology Director, Faculty Center for Teaching.
1 Presentation of Results NSSE 2005 Florida Gulf Coast University Office of Planning and Institutional Performance.
RE-ENGAGING THE CAMPUS IN DISCUSSING, DELIVERING, AND ASSESSING LEARNING OUTCOMES C. “Griff” Griffin, Director of General Education Wendy Wenner, Dean,
 Integrate the Bacc Core category learning outcomes into the course.  Clarify for students how they will achieve and demonstrate the learning outcomes.
GENERAL EDUCATION COURSE- BASED ASSESSMENT – IT’S EASIER THAN YOU THINK! C. Griffin.
Pilot Training for Volunteers General Education Assessment Committee.
Three GE Projects at SJSU Compass Project Stephen Branz & Maureen Scharberg (Debra David) GE Program Assessment Stephen Branz & Scot Guenter Integrated.
Using Peer Reviewed Research to Teach Reading, Critical Thinking and Information Literacy in Student Success Courses Dr. Christine Harrington Middlesex.
Standard Two: Understanding the Assessment System and its Relationship to the Conceptual Framework and the Other Standards Robert Lawrence, Ph.D., Director.
Creating a Culture of Accountability and Assessment at an Urban Community College Diane B. Call, President Paul Marchese, VP Academic Affairs, Liza Larios,
Fall 2011: Critical Thinking. General Education Requirements.
LCI/ IND 101 Survey Results Fall 2007 Analysis by I. Hibschweiler and Mimi Steadman.
Information Literacy: Assessing Your Instruction Texas Library Association District 10 Fall Workshop October 15, 2005 Michelle Millet Information Literacy.
Assessment of Course-Level Learning Outcomes in Psychology.
Learning Outcomesas part of the Assessment Cycle Kirsten Ogden Faculty Assessment Coach Pasadena City College 2014.
CCSSE 2012 Findings for Southern Crescent Technical College.
THE SOLUTION TO OUR WOES? PRESENTATION BY DR. RICHARD LEIBY DIRECTOR OF STRATEGIC PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Competency-based Assessment.
University of Montana: Scaling Up General Education Assessment Royce Engstrom & Nathan Lindsay March 1, 2016.
Institutional Effectiveness at MVCC Institutional Effectiveness at MVCC.
Assessment Reboot January 31, 2014 GAC 38. Review of Assessment Cycle Documenting & Reporting.
Overview of Types of Measures Margaret Kasimatis, PhD VP for Academic Planning & Effectiveness.
The University of Texas-Pan American Susan Griffith, Ph.D. Executive Director National Survey of Student Engagement 2003 Results & Recommendations Presented.
University Assessment Activities Mark Lyford Academic Affairs September 7, 2016.
GENERAL EDUCATION COURSE-BASED ASSESSMENT – IT’S EASIER THAN YOU THINK! C. Griffin.
Direct vs Indirect Assessment of Student Learning: An Introduction
GENERAL EDUCATION COURSE-BASED ASSESSMENT – IT’S EASIER THAN YOU THINK! S. Berlin.
GENERAL EDUCATION COURSE-BASED ASSESSMENT – IT’S EASIER THAN YOU THINK! C. Griffin.
GENERAL EDUCATION COURSE-BASED ASSESSMENT – IT’S EASIER THAN YOU THINK!
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services
GENERAL EDUCATION COURSE-BASED ASSESSMENT – IT’S EASIER THAN YOU THINK!
GENERAL EDUCATION COURSE-BASED ASSESSMENT – IT’S EASIER THAN YOU THINK! C. Griffin.
Information Literacy: What is it and Why Should I Care?
GENERAL EDUCATION COURSE-BASED ASSESSMENT – IT’S EASIER THAN YOU THINK!
Presentation transcript:

Student and Faculty Perceptions of Goal Achievement in General Education Courses C. “Griff” Griffin Director, General Education Grand Valley State University, Michigan

OVERVIEW Assessment of General Education Programs Assessing GVSU’s General Education Program Objectives Audit (survey) Results Reporting the Results

1. ASSESSING GE What do you assess? 1. Student Learning Outcomes All the goals, all the time, in all classes All the goals, all the time, in all classes All the goals, over a couple years, in each class All the goals, over a couple years, in each class Some of the goals in selected classes Some of the goals in selected classes 2. Satisfaction 3. Program assessment

Whom do you assess? Census Census Sample SampleRandomVolunteerStratified

What do you assess? All the goals, all the time, embedded All the goals, all the time, embedded All the goals, over a couple years, in each class All the goals, over a couple years, in each class Some of the goals in selected classes Some of the goals in selected classes

When do you assess GE? Just before graduation Just before graduation In the course In the course Some other time Some other time

What kind of measures do you use? Direct –they LEARNED it Direct –they LEARNED it Indirect – they SAY they learned it Indirect – they SAY they learned it

2. GVSU GENERAL EDUCATION PROGRAM Grand Valley State University 24,000 students in Grand Rapids, MI 24,000 students in Grand Rapids, MI 3 main campuses 3 main campuses Liberal education mission Liberal education mission Upcoming accreditation in Fall 2008 Upcoming accreditation in Fall 2008

General Education Program (280 courses) 1. Foundations – take 8 courses (100/200 level) (100/200 level) 2. Cultures – take 2 courses ( level) 3. Themes – take 3 courses ( level) Some courses count in more than one category.

Assessment Choices 1. Direct Measures – CLA test, in class measures 2. Indirect Measures – NSSE, CIRP, CSS, locally developed surveys

3. OBJECTIVES AUDIT (PERCEPTION SURVEY) Skills Goals 1.creative and critical thinking 2.articulate expression through effective speaking and writing 3.information literacy 4.integrate different areas of knowledge and view ideas from multiple perspectives. All classes must do 1-3, Themes must do 1-4. Foundations and Cultures need to do speaking … OR …writing

Content Goals Each Foundation, Culture, and Theme subcategory have unique content goals

Content Goals (3-10 goals) + Skills Goals (4-5 goals) = 7 to 15 goals

Why do an objectives audit? Advantages Advantages Quick Quick Perception matters Perception matters Disadvantages Disadvantages –Indirect –Bias – which way???

How do you administer it? Paper Paper Census = high return rate Electronic Electronic Doesn’t use class time Conscious effort to find it

Just students, just faculty, both, either? Just students, just faculty, both, either? Is it required? Is it required? –If volunteers, is that ok? –Is it random? Who should complete the audit?

The survey How well did this course achieve the following goals: The response choices are: strongly agree agree not sure disagree strongly disagree

4. RESULTS

Timing - End of Fall 2006 Timing - End of Fall 2006 –before finals –before on-line course evaluations –On-line for 10 days Participation Participation –99 courses (45%) –193 sections (23%)

Average=35

5. REPORTING THE RESULTS What’s the purpose of the objectives audit? It affects the reports! What’s the purpose of the objectives audit? It affects the reports! –Accreditation –Improvement –Both

Who do we give the results to? Who do we give the results to? – faculty who participated –all faculty –administration –students – other

What do we report? What do we report? aggregate to the University community disaggregate to college? disaggregate to department (just them or everyone sees it)?  disaggregate to individual faculty (just them or can the department see it)?

What is success? What is success? –70%, 80%, 90%, 100%? –Is it different depending on the course level? –Is it different for skills than for content goals?

Why aren’t we achieving all the goals (or as well as we want)? Why aren’t we achieving all the goals (or as well as we want)? –We’re not teaching it well –We are teaching it but students don’t know it –We’re not teaching it so students aren’t learning it (why??)

How do we fix the problem? How do we fix the problem? –Start teaching it –Teach it better –Tell the students they’re learning it –Remove the goal

CONCLUSIONS 1. Getting student perceptions can be easy and response rates can be high (45%) 2. Surveys can give you valuable information

3. Student (75%) and faculty (90%) perception is that we are achieving our goals 4. There are areas for improvement 5. Reporting will be challenging.

For more information: