SAV Management Strategy 1 Title of Presentation Date Image or Graphic.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Nature Conservancy Visit nature.org/maryland.
Advertisements

Protecting Forests for the Long Haul Potomac Conservancys approach to improving water quality through forest conservation.
Planning for Our Future:
Harris Creek Case Study: Oyster Restoration and GIT Collaboration Chesapeake Bay Program Management Board August 2, 2012 Peyton Robertson Fisheries Goal.
Carin Bisland, Associate Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office Environmental Protection Agency December 4, 2014 The Bay’s Health & Future: How it’s doing.
Defining Restored Bay and Tidal Tributary Water Quality  Round Two  Draft Revised Oxygen, Water Clarity and Chlorophyll Criteria.
1 The Chesapeake Bay Program James Edward, Deputy Director EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office CAC meeting, June 1, 2012 EO Action Plan, Progress Report.
 Jennifer Volk Environmental Quality Specialist; UD Cooperative Extension Chair, Chesapeake Bay Program Water Quality Goal Implementation Team.
Update Chesapeake Action Plan – Report to Congress Strengthening the Management, Coordination, and Accountability of the Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership.
Chesapeake Bay Program Presented by: Elizabeth Mills, Heather Plumridge, Elizabeth Repko Possibilities, Problems, and Promise.
Maintaining healthy watersheds in the Chesapeake LGAC meeting December 4, 2014 Mark Bryer The Nature Conservancy Chair, Healthy Watershed Goal Team.
Submerged Aquatic Vegetation W HAT I S I T AND W HY I S I T I MPORTANT? Image provided by Ronald C. Phillips.
Point Source POLLUTION: CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES
Chesapeake Bay Program Decision Framework Implementation.
Indian Valley Meadow Restoration acre meadow located atop the Sierra Crest in Alpine County, CA. Headwaters of the Mokelumne River. Source for agricultural,
 To conserve our remaining natural resources for future generations  To protect a valuable economic revenue stream  To organize management efforts.
GIT 6 Role in Advising Management Board on Alignment Issues Carin Bisland, GIT6 Vice-chair.
Update on Forest Goals and Progress in the Chesapeake Bay Partnership Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting, 8/23/13 Sally Claggett & Julie Mawhorter, US.
Illinois RC & D Introduction to R esource C onservation & D evelopment Module 3: What makes it run?
Jan 2005 Kissimmee Basin Projects Jan Kissimmee Basin Projects Kissimmee River Restoration Project (KRR) Kissimmee Chain of Lakes Long Term Management.
Peyton Robertson, NOAA February Goal: Restore oyster populations in 20 tributaries by 2025 Tributary Selection: MD & VA Oyster Restoration Interagency.
OPTIMAL STRATEGIES FOR ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION UNDER CLIMATE CHANGE Koel Ghosh, James S. Shortle, and Carl Hershner * Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology,
Chesapeake Bay Program: Governance and Goals Options for Principals’ Staff Committee Consideration March 7, 2013.
Drafting the new Chesapeake Bay Agreement, Goals and Outcomes May 16, 2013.
1. Natural Resources Conservation Service Strategic Plan Strategic Plan
Being Accountable/Communicating Assessment Information to the Public in 2012 Update to the Management Board April 2012 Margaret Enloe, ACB CBPO and Nita.
Coastal Web Atlases in the Chesapeake Bay Region: Examples from Virginia and Maryland Marcia R. Berman Center for Coastal Resources Management Virginia.
Drafting the New Chesapeake Bay Agreement, Goals and Outcomes – Decision/Actions From Management Board Meetings June 13 and 18, 2013.
James Edward, Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office U.S. Environmental Protection Agency November 20, 2014 The Bay’s Health & Future: How it’s.
Drafting the new Chesapeake Bay Agreement, Goals and Outcomes May 16, 2013.
Progress on Coordinating CBP and Federal Leadership Goals, Outcomes, and Actions Principals’ Staff Committee Meeting 2/16/12 Carin Bisland, Associate Director.
CBP Agreement and EC Membership Options for Principals’ Staff Committee Consideration April 17,
Kevin Schabow-NOAA Chesapeake Bay Office Josh Falk-Smithsonian Env. Research Center Cat Stylinski-UMCES Appalachian Lab Innovative Approaches to the Meaningful.
Chesapeake Bay Initiatives John Kennedy VA DEQ, Chesapeake Bay Program
Water Quality and the Chesapeake Bay David O’Brien NOAA Fisheries Service Gloucester Point, VA.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey CBP Partnership Team- Enhance Monitoring in the Bay and its Watershed Scott Phillips, USGS Jonathan.
Sense and Sensibility: Hard choices and the future of Chesapeake Bay Ratana Chuenpagdee St. Francis Xavier University Antigonish, Canada Panel discussion,
Chesapeake Bay Program’s Baywide and Basinwide Monitoring Networks: Options for Adapting Monitoring Networks and Realigning Resources to Address Partner.
Taunton River Wild & Scenic Study A Partnership Effort on Behalf of The Taunton River.
Indicator Status Updates Overview Nita Sylvester, EPA CBPO Chair of STAR’s Indicator Workgroup.
CBP Agreement and EC Membership Options for Principals’ Staff Committee Consideration April 17, 2013 Draft 4/5/13 for MB Review 1.
Outcome: Submerged Aquatic Vegetation Goal: Sustain and increase the habitat benefits of SAV in the Chesapeake Bay 2017 Target: 90,000 acres Target:
Fran Dunwell Hudson River Estuary Coordinator Hudson River Estuary Program/NYSDEC.
Citizen Stewardship Outcome Kick Off Meeting 11/18/2014.
Visual Decision Frameworks –Habitat GIT Adaptive Management based on annual review. Share progress and address challenges and opportunities Adjust management.
Abridged Chesapeake Bay Agreement: Initial Reactions WRTC September 6, 2013.
Jeff Horan, Habitat GIT Chair February 16, 2012 CBP Decision Framework in Action.
National Fish and Wildlife Foundation Chesapeake Bay Stewardship Fund Program Update Chesapeake Bay Program Citizens Advisory Committee Thursday, February.
JULIE MAWHORTER MID-ATLANTIC URBAN & COMMUNITY FORESTRY COORDINATOR CHESAPEAKE TREE CANOPY STRATEGY & WORKPLAN UPDATE CITIZEN’S ADVISORY.
Peyton Robertson, Sustainable Fisheries GIT Chair PSC Meeting February 16, 2012 Sustainable Fisheries Goal Implementation Team: Key Accomplishments.
For EBTJV meeting October 26, 2010 Executive Order Strategy for Protecting and Restoring the Chesapeake Bay Watershed.
Rabbit Island, Alabama Seagrass Restoration Project Alabama Chapter This project focuses on restoration of seagrass beds contining shoal grass (Halodule.
Chesapeake Bay. Is the largest estuary in the United States The Bay’s watershed is 64,000 square miles (60% forested) and covers parts of 6 states These.
Chesapeake Bay Program
CRC Staffer Update Megan Hession Habitat Goal Implementation Team.
Tidal Wetlands and Shorelines in the Chesapeake Bay
Quarterly Progress Meeting - May 2017
Quarterly Progress Meeting - August 2017
Riparian Forest Buffers
Washington County Parks and Open Spaces
Engineer Research and Development Center
FISH HABITAT OUTCOME Gina Hunt MD. Department of Natural Resources
The Watershed Agreement and the Phase 3 WIPs
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service U.S.F.W.S.
Submerged Aquatic Vegetation Biennial Work plan Updates
I AM RACHEL FELVER. Hello!
Bay Grass Abundance 42% Bay Grass Abundance of Goal Achieved
What is a Watershed Implementation Plan?
VITAL HABITATS GOAL Restore, enhance and protect a network of land and water habitats to support fish and wildlife, and to afford other public benefits,
Moving Our Coastal Lakes Into a Healthier and More Resilient Future
Presentation transcript:

SAV Management Strategy 1 Title of Presentation Date Image or Graphic

SAV Management Strategy 2 Vital Habitats Goal: Restore, enhance and protect a network of land and water habitats to support fish and wildlife, and to afford other public benefits, including water quality, recreational uses and scenic value across the watershed. Submerged Aquatic Vegetation (SAV) Outcome: Sustain and increase the habitat benefits of SAV (underwater grasses) in the Chesapeake Bay. Achieve and sustain the ultimate outcome of 185,000 acres of SAV Bay-wide necessary for a restored Bay. Progress toward this ultimate outcome will be measured against a target of 90,000 acres by 2017 and 130,000 acres by 2025.

SAV Management Strategy 3 Importance: Underwater grasses provide significant benefits to aquatic life and serve critical functions in the Chesapeake Bay ecosystem. Underwater grasses add oxygen to the water; improve water clarity by helping suspended sediment settle to the bottom; provide shelter for young striped bass, blue crabs andother species; and reduce shoreline erosion. Increasing the abundance of grasses in the Bay and its rivers will dramatically improve the entire Bay ecosystem. Current Conditions: In 2013, there were an estimated 59,927 acres of underwater grasses in the Chesapeake Bay, achieving 32 percent of the 185,000-acre goal. How it was Derived: This outcome was derived from the Chesapeake Bay Program’s Submerged Aquatic Vegetation (SAV) Workgroup and is based on the acreage recorded in certain regions during certain high-growth years. Baseline: The baseline was generated from historical SAV abundance in the Chesapeake Bay.

SAV Management Strategy 4 For Participating Jurisdictions, with the exception of DC, it’s all State, Federal or Academic VOLUNTEERS? Would any LGAC members like to be SAV workgroup chair?

SAV Management Strategy 5 Factors influencing ability to meet goal –Habitat Conditions Water clarity most critical –Human Activities Physical disruption (dredging, fisheries, aquaculture, prop scarring etc), shoreline development –Research gaps What tools do local governments need to address these factors?

SAV Management Strategy 6 Local Engagement: Non-profit groups, such as the Chesapeake Bay Foundation, historically have been involved in implementing local community underwater grass plantings in partnership with schools. However, recent shifts in acreage goals have resulted in a decreased focus on implementation, and an increase in research efforts instead. Some local jurisdictions (Talbot, Baltimore Counties in Maryland for example) have been involved in underwater grass monitoring