Short-session Static and Kinematic Processing Short-session static: GAMIT processing, sessions 1-3 hours long Kinematic: TRACK processing, coordinates.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Track Short Course: Track Introduction and Commands Lecture 01 Thomas Herring, MIT Room A
Advertisements

Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue | A | Cambridge MA V F.
A quick GPS Primer (assumed knowledge on the course!) Observables Error sources Analysis approaches Ambiguities If only it were this easy…
Survey-mode measurements and analysis M. Floyd K. Palamartchouk Massachusetts Institute of Technology Newcastle University GAMIT-GLOBK course University.
Limits of static processing in a dynamic environment Matt King, Newcastle University, UK.
Examples of track use M. Floyd K. Palamartchouk Massachusetts Institute of Technology Newcastle University GAMIT-GLOBK course University of Bristol, UK.
Space Weather influence on satellite based navigation and precise positioning R. Warnant, S. Lejeune, M. Bavier Royal Observatory of Belgium Avenue Circulaire,
Track Tuning Lecture 08 Thomas Herring, MIT
GTECH 201 Session 08 GPS.
Introduction to and basics of processing with TRACK M. Floyd K. Palamartchouk Massachusetts Institute of Technology Newcastle University GAMIT-GLOBK course.
03/18/05OSU GAMIT/GLOBK1 TRACK: GAMIT Kinematic GPS processing module
Differential and precision GPS surveying for sub-meter and centimeter accuracy Feb 2007 Dr. Gary Oppliger.
Track Introduction and Commands Thomas Herring, MIT Room A
TrackRT Installation and Use Lecture 09 Thomas Herring
Planning for airborne LIDAR survey Dr.Lamyaa Gamal El-deen.
Mission Planning and SP1. Outline of Session n Standards n Errors n Planning n Network Design n Adjustment.
OPUS : Online Positioning User Service
Part VI Precise Point Positioning Supported by Local Ionospheric Modeling GS894G.
Effects of ionospheric small- scale structures on GNSS G. WAUTELET Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium Ionospheric Radio Systems & Techniques (IRST)
Modern Navigation Thomas Herring MW 11:00-12:30 Room A
1 LAVAL UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF GEOMATICS Mohammed Boukhecha (Laval University) Marc Cocard (Laval University) René Landry (École technique supérieure.
Best Practices for Real-Time GNSS Network Administration Webinar March 20, pm ET Key Considerations and Concerns When Using OPUS Projects to Position.
Part Va Centimeter-Level Instantaneous Long-Range RTK: Methodology, Algorithms and Application GS894G.
SVY 207: Lecture 13 Ambiguity Resolution
B ≥ 4 H & V, KNOWN & TRUSTED POINTS? B LOCALIZATION RESIDUALS-OUTLIERS? B DO ANY PASSIVE MARKS NEED TO BE HELD? RT BASE WITHIN CALIBRATION (QUALITY TIE.
P. Wielgosz and A. Krankowski IGS AC Workshop Miami Beach, June 2-6, 2008 University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland
09/24/2008Unavco Track Intro1 TRACK: GAMIT Kinematic GPS processing module
A Geodesist’s View of the Ionosphere Gerald L. Mader National Geodetic Survey Silver Spring, MD.
Introduction to High-Precision GPS Data Analysis: Towards a common language for the workshop.
GSI Japan - 21st of June 1999 GPS-Positioning using Virtual Reference Stations - Theory, Analysis and Applications Herbert Landau Spectra Precision Terrasat.
SP Swedish National Testing and Research Institute Real-Time GPS Processing with Carrier Phase FILTER PARAMETER INFLUENCE ON GPS CARRIER PHASE REAL-TIME.
Introduction to and basics of processing with TRACK
1 SVY 207: Lecture 12 GPS Error Sources: Part 2 –Satellite: ephemeris, clock, S/A, and A/S –Propagation: ionosphere, troposphere, multipath –Receiver:antenna,
SVY207: Lecture 17 Third party products and GPS processing procedures
Issues in GPS Error Analysis What are the sources of the errors ? How much of the error can we remove by better modeling ? Do we have enough information.
Towards optimizing the determination of accurate heights with GNSS APRIL 14, 2015 Dan Gillins, Ph.D., P.L.S. and Michael Eddy, Ph.D. student.
1 SVY 207: Lecture 12 Modes of GPS Positioning Aim of this lecture: –To review and compare methods of static positioning, and introduce methods for kinematic.
Survey-mode measurements and analysis T. A. Herring R.W. King M. A. Floyd Massachusetts Institute of Technology GPS Data Processing and Analysis with GAMIT/GLOBK/TRACK.
Error Modeling Thomas Herring Room ;
Kinematic processing with track Tutorial 03 and 04 Thomas Herring
Are thermal effects responsible for micron-level motions recorded at deep- and shallow-braced monuments in a short-baseline network at Yucca Mountain,
Civil and Environmental Engineering and Geodetic Science This file can be found on the course web page:
Real Time Stream Editor for PPP  Conventional approaches to Real Time Precise Point Position use ionosphere- free combination of code and phase observables.
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 09 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
Track Short Course: Track Examples Thomas Herring, MIT Room A
Geodetic Research Laboratory Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering University of New Brunswick 2/20/2016 K. Cove 1 Carrier Phase Differential.
Real Time Stream Editor for PPP  Conventional approaches to Real Time Precise Point Position use ionosphere-free combination of code and phase observables.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Menlo Park GPS data processing and archiving J.L. Svarc, J.R. Murray, Fred Pollitz, Scott Haefner,
Track Introduction and Commands Lecture 03 Thomas Herring, MIT Room A
Track Introduction and Commands Lecture 07 Thomas Herring, MIT Room A
Errors in Positioning Matt King, Newcastle University, UK.
Limits of static processing in a dynamic environment Matt King, Newcastle University, UK.
09/24/2008Unavco Track Intro1 TRACK: GAMIT Kinematic GPS processing module R King overview from longer T Herring.
Limits of static processing in a dynamic environment Matt King, Newcastle University, UK.
Elevation angle and phase residuals for single satellite
GLOBK Velocity Solutions
SVY207: Lecture 16 GPS Field Procedures and Computations
Tuning AUTCLN for editing
Understanding what sh_gamit does
Introduction to and basics of processing with TRACK
KINEMATIC GPS AND AMBIGUITY RESOLUTION PROBLEM
Elevation angle and phase residuals for single satellite
Kinematic Data Processing
Track Output Interpretation
Track Output Interpretation
Suggested Guidance for OPUS Projects Processing
Introduction to and basics of processing with track
Introduction to and basics of processing with track
Online Positioning User Service Review and new developments
Presentation transcript:

Short-session Static and Kinematic Processing Short-session static: GAMIT processing, sessions 1-3 hours long Kinematic: TRACK processing, coordinates estimated at each epoch; one or more sites may be moving High frequency multipath and sometimes atmospheric errors dominate and fail to average Shorter satellite tracks mean less time to separate the signatures in the data, leading to higher correlations and thus higher uncertainties in coordinates and ambiguity parameters Less averaging of noise and higher geometric uncertainties make ambiguity resolution more difficult; when it fails with short tracks, the uncertainties become much larger

A 2-hr session between 12:00 and 16:00 (left plot) would be much more likely to resolve ambiguities than a 2-hr session between 20:00 an 24:00 (right plot) Results may vary significantly with time of day

Continuous network in Italy used to test the effect of session length and network configurationon coordinate repeatabilities  Test site is PRAT Firuzabadi and King (2011)

Time series for 2-hr sessions with 4 reference sites. Note large sigmas on day 61 and outliers on days 62 and 63; with these removed the rms is 2 mm horizontal and 7 mm vertical

Precision vs Session Length for Network Processing Bars show repeatability in position over 31 days of test site with respect to networks of 2 to 16 sites spanning km. With at least 4 reference stations, outliers were less than 5% for sessions of 2 hrs or more.

Precision vs Session Length for Single Baselines Bars show repeatability in position over 31 days of a test site with respect to each of 7 sites km away in single-baseline processing. 10% of the 1- and 2-hr sessions had large uncertainties and were omitted. 1-hr results degrade significantly for baselines longer than 100 km

Cerca del Cielo earthflow, Ponce, Puerto Rico 10 GPS monuments (including one continuous) on the landslide, and 2 reference monuments outside Steady-state flow mm/d Maximum ~ 100 mm/d From G. Wang, 2010

Time series of bi-weekly GPS surveys Mar-Dec minute occupations GPS 07 and 13 near the head scarp GK03 and GP18 mid- slope From G. Wang, 2010

Time series of hourly and daily positions over 10 days

GAMIT Settings for Sessions < 3 Hours Consider using 15s sampling Run sh_gamit with the –sesinfo option specifying the start time, sampling interval, and number of epochs If more than one session per day, run sh_gamit with the –netext option, using a different letter for each session Don’t decimate the preliminary or final solutions Decimation factor = 1 Quick-pre decimation factor = 1

Kinematic GPS The style of GPS data collection and processing suggests that one or more GPS stations is moving (e.g., car, aircraft). The moving stations are kept stationary at the beginning and/or end of the track to resolve ambiguities; then phase lock is maintained (as best as possible) through the track To obtain good results for positioning as a function of time it helps if the ambiguities can be fixed to integer values. Although with the “back smooth” option in track this is not so critical. Program ‘track’ is the MIT implementation of this type of processing Unlike many kinematic processors,track pre-reads all data before processing. (But there is a real-time version, trackRT.)

General aspects The success of kinematic processing depends on separation of sites There are one or more static base stations and the moving receivers are positioned relative to these. For separations < 10 km, usually easy 10>100 km more difficult but often successful >100 km very mixed results depending on quality of data collected. (Seismological example results are from 400km baselines.)

Track features Track uses the Melbourne-Wubbena Wide Lane to resolve L1-L2 and then a combination of techniques to determine L1 and L2 cycles separately. “Bias flags” are added at times of cycle slips and the ambiguity resolution tries to resolve these to integer values. Track uses floating point estimate with LC, MW-WL and ionospheric delay constraints to determine the integer biases and the reliability with which they are determined. Kalman filter smoothing can be used. (Non-resolved ambiguity parameters are constant, and atmospheric delays are consistent with process noise). When atmospheric delays are estimated, the smoothing option should always be used.

Basic input Track runs using a command file The base inputs needed are: Obs_file specifies names of rinex data files. Sites can be K kinematic or F fixed Nav_file orbit file either broadcast ephemeris file or sp3 file Mode air/short/long -- Mode command is not strictly needed but it sets defaults for variety of situations

Some results Moving vehicle used for gravity measurments: 5-second sampling with stop and go GPS seismology: 1 HZ tracking of earthquake surface wave arrivals

Track of Map-view track of vehicle motion over 8 km

Vehicle height vs time

Zoom of height just before power failure

Surface waves from the December, 2000, M 6 San Simeon, Calliforna earthquake 1 Hz sampling

Detail around arrival time. Descriptiion and data on web site.

Summary Under favorable conditions and especially for short inter-site distances, both short-session static and kinematic processing can produce excellent results Use of more than a single reference site improves reliability TRACK’s forward-backward filtering improves reliablity of non-real-time kinematic tracking -- BUT there is now a real-time version (trackRT) available