1 TAC Report to the ERCOT Board February 21, 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 TAC Report to the ERCOT Board March 21, TAC Summary 3 unanimous PRRs 3 unanimous PRRs TAC discussion regarding Board Retreat Action Items TAC.
Advertisements

Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee February 7, 2008.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Sandy Morris August 5, 2010.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee September 7, 2006.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee January 8, 2008.
July 30, 2015 TAC Meeting Update to COPS Michelle Trenary August 12, 2015.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee May 4, 2006.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee April 8, 2010.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee June 4, 2009.
Technical Advisory Committee Presentation to the ERCOT Board of Directors July 21, 2009.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Sandy Morris October 6, 2011.
March 26, 2015 Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Update to RMS Kathy Scott April 7, 2015 TAC Update to RMS 1.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee March 4, 2010.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee August 7, 2008.
1 TAC Report to the ERCOT Board October 18, 2005.
SCR746 – Dynamic Rating Data to TSP Using ICCP Link Background for ERCOT Board February 21, 2006.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Sandy Morris November 3, 2011.
March 7, 2013 Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) meeting update to RMS Kathy Scott March 20, 2013TAC Update to RMS 1.
Technical Advisory Committee Presentation to the ERCOT Board of Directors October 17, 2006.
Technical Advisory Committee Presentation to the ERCOT Board of Directors June 16, 2009.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee June 3, 2010.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Tom Burke June 7, 2012.
1 TAC Report to the ERCOT Board June 21, TAC Summary 8 PRRS 8 PRRS Withdrawal of PRR 552 Withdrawal of PRR 552 Potomac Recommendations Potomac.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee April 9, 2009.
1 Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee January 12, 2006.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee May 4, 2007.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee May 8, 2008.
1 TAC Report to the ERCOT Board February 16, 2005.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee February 2, 2006.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee January 6, 2010.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Tom Burke September 7, 2012.
1 Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee January 6, 2004.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee October 6, 2006.
Technical Advisory Committee Presentation to the ERCOT Board of Directors March 21, 2007.
Technical Advisory Committee Presentation to the ERCOT Board of Directors May 16, 2007.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee November 2, 2006.
1 TAC Report to the ERCOT Board January 17, 2006.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Rob Bevill January 5, 2012.
1 Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee December 1, 2005.
Technical Advisory Committee Presentation to the ERCOT Board of Directors September 16, 2008.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee October 1, 2009.
Role of Account Management at ERCOT 2006 TAC Subcommittee Review ERCOT Board February 21, 2006.
1 TAC Report to the ERCOT Board November 14, 2006.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Tom Burke April 5, 2012.
Technical Advisory Committee Presentation to the ERCOT Board of Directors October 21, 2008.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee September 3, 2009.
TAC Update April 7, Update Nodal Protocol Revision Requests (NPRRs) (Vote): –NPRR306, Revisions to Protected Information to Include Black Start.
NPRR 649 Board Appeal Koch Ag & Energy Solutions February 9,
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Tom Burke January 3, 2013.
COPS SEPTEMBER 2014 UPDATE TO TAC 9/25/2014 Harika Basaran, Chair Tony Marsh, Vice Chair.
Technical Advisory Committee Presentation to the ERCOT Board of Directors May 20, 2009.
Technical Advisory Committee Presentation to the ERCOT Board of Directors November 17, 2008.
Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee July 1, 2010.
1 Summary of TAC Procedures May 5, Revision of TAC Procedures Project began in October 2004 to incorporate the Commercial Operations Subcommittee.
Jan 22, TAC Report to the ERCOT Board January 22, 2003.
1 TAC Report to the ERCOT Board July 18, TAC Summary 4 PRRs for approval (3 unanimous) 4 PRRs for approval (3 unanimous) 5 Nodal PRRs for approval.
Technical Advisory Committee Presentation to the ERCOT Board of Directors July 15, 2008.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Sandy Morris May 5, 2011.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee May 7, 2009.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Tom Burke November 29, 2012.
February 26, 2015 Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Update to RMS Kathy Scott March 3, 2015 TAC Update to RMS 1.
1 Commercial Operations Working Group Update to TAC April 7, 2005.
Technical Advisory Committee Presentation to the ERCOT Board of Directors April 18, 2007.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee October 5, 2007.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee June 05, 2008.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee
TAC Report to the ERCOT Board
TAC Report to the ERCOT Board
Technical Advisory Committee
Presentation transcript:

1 TAC Report to the ERCOT Board February 21, 2006

2 TAC Summary Report on Goals from TAC Planning Retreat Report on Goals from TAC Planning Retreat 4 Unanimous PRRs 4 Unanimous PRRs Return of PRR 567 Return of PRR 567 SCR 746 SCR 746 Consideration of Temporary Change to 2005 Annual Validation Consideration of Temporary Change to 2005 Annual Validation

3 PRR 543 – Schedules & Emergency Assistance Over CFE-ERCOT DC Ties Purpose(ERCOT) Addresses the use of Back-to-Back ties and BLTs with CFE during emergency conditions Benefit Greater reliability in emergency conditions Market Impact None System Change NoN/A AssumptionsN/A TAC Vote Unanimously recommends approval; all segments present Effective Date March 1, 2006

4 PRR 543 – Schedules & Emergency Assistance Over CFE-ERCOT DC Ties Impact Analysis Item Reviewed Description NoImpact Credit Monitoring/Liability Budget Staffing Computer Systems Business Functions Grid Operations Impact Risk exists when energy flows to CFE from ERCOT Contract required prior to ERCOT use of PRR

5 PRR 627 – RMR Transmission Issues & RMR Contract Extension Purpose (TXU, IOU) Establishes TDSP reporting requirements regarding RMR exit strategy implementation; codifies ERCOT ability to extend RMR/MRA contract if exit strategy delayed Benefit Increases transparency regarding RMR/MRA exit strategy implementation Market Impact Increases transparency regarding RMR/MRA exit strategy implementation (Change from Recommendation Report) System Change NoN/A AssumptionsN/A TAC Vote Unanimously recommends approval; all market segments were present Effective Date March 1, 2006

6 PRR 627 – RMR Transmission Issues & RMR Contract Extension Impact Analysis Item Reviewed Description NoImpact Credit Monitoring/Liability Budget Staffing Computer Systems Business Functions Grid Operations Impact

7 PRR 638 – Change Settlement Invoice Due Date from 16 Calendar Days to 5 Bank Business Days Purpose (TXU, IOU, COPS) Changes the Settlement Invoice Due Date from sixteen (16) calendar days to five (5) Bank Business Days. Benefit Accurate settlement data Market Impact Accurate settlement data System Change NoN/A AssumptionsN/A TAC Vote Unanimously recommends approval; all segments present Effective Date March 1, 2006 – TAC recommends change to April 1, 2006

8 PRR 638 – Change Settlement Invoice Due Date from 16 Calendar Days to 5 Bank Business Days Impact Analysis Item Reviewed Description NoImpact Credit Monitoring/Liability Budget Staffing Computer Systems Business Functions Grid Operations Impact

9 PRR 638 – Change Settlement Invoice Due Date from 16 Calendar Days to 5 Bank Business Days On 2/2/06, TAC discussed the possible negative effects of the combined impact of implementing PRR638 and the transition to 10-day Initial Settlement under PRR568 (Change Initial Settlement from 17 days to 10 Days) on some QSEs. COPS recommended that the implementation date of PRR638 be delayed to April 1, 2006 to avoid any overlap. TAC unanimously approved this recommendation.

10 PRR 639 – Notification of Repairs to EPS Facilities Under Emergency Conditions Purpose (TXU, IOU, MWG) Allows TDSP to repair EPS meter prior to notifying ERCOT in emergency situations Benefit Allows for more timely repairs of EPS meters during emergency situations Market Impact N/A System Change NoN/A AssumptionsN/A TAC Vote Unanimously recommends approval; all segments present Effective Date March 1, 2006

11 PRR 639 – Notification of Repairs to EPS Facilities Under Emergency Conditions Impact Analysis Item Reviewed Description NoImpact Credit Monitoring/Liability Budget Staffing Computer Systems Business Functions Grid Operations Impact

12 PRR 567 – Simplified 3-Part Bidding for A/S On 11/15/05, the Board granted TXU’s appeal and remanded the CBA to TAC for further development of the costs and benefits of this PRR and reconsideration of the priority and ranking assignment. On 12/1/05, TAC voted to refer this PRR to PRS to review the CBA and the priority and ranking assigned to this PRR. The motion was approved by hand vote. On 1/19/06, ERCOT Staff gave a presentation on the potential resource impacts resulting from the implementation of this PRR. ERCOT noted that the long-term impacts are fairly minimal. The short-term resource impacts, however, are substantial. The implementation of this PRR would require the same resources as needed for the implementation of the Nodal market and could result in a delay of the Nodal market implementation if PRR567 was given higher priority. TXU presented the revised CBA and the underlying methodology. The revised CBA showed a $10 million benefit resulting from this project. TXU emphasized that this is a conservative number because the benefit calculation showed a range of $10 to $20 million. Participants questioned the validity of the underlying assumptions of the methodology. 2/2/06, TAC voted to endorse the revised CBA and retain the original priority and ranking as recommended by PRS. The motion passed with two representatives from the Consumer segment abstaining from the vote. All market segments were present.

13 PRR 567 – Simplified 3-Part Bidding for A/S Purpose (Constellation, IPM) PRR creates parameters for start-up costs, capacity offers, minimum operating costs and others that would allow ERCOT to reduce AS costs and provides for make-whole payments where appropriate Benefit Greater participation in A/S markets; lower AS costs Market Impact Requires redesign of bid submittal interface with ERCOT systems; may also require more complex bidding strategy System Change Yes Net Benefits -- $6.3MM; Ratio – 3.21 Assumptions TXU analysis of each day (11/04-10/05); High Implementation Cost Case -- $3MM; in effect 12 months; reduced benefits by 50% for conservatism TAC Vote TAC voted to retain the original priority of 1.2 and ranking of 54.5 with 2 consumer segment representatives abstaining Effective Date Upon system implementation

14 PRR 567 – Simplified 3-Part Bidding for Ancillary Services Impact Analysis Item Reviewed Description NoImpact Credit Monitoring/Liability Budget Staffing Computer Systems Business Functions Grid Operations Impact $1 to $3 Million Impacts several systems

15 SCR 746 Dynamic Rating Data to TSP Using ICCP Link Provide transmission element dynamic rating data used by ERCOT to the Transmission Service Provider (TSP) of the facility through the Inter-Control Center Protocol (ICCP) link. ERCOT and the TSP need to use the same rating for transmission facilities. Both entities must also use the correct ratings. By providing the data using the ICCP link it will make the comparison of the data used by the TSP and the data used by ERCOT by computers easier and more timely. This will improve the accuracy of the data used by both the TSP and ERCOT. Reliability Operations Subcommittee unanimously approved SCR 746 On 1/12/06, TAC voted to recommend approval of SCR746 and assigned a priority of 1.1 and ranking of 9.5. There were two votes against the motion (Consumer segment) and one abstention (Consumer segment). All market segments were present for the vote.

16 SCR 746 Dynamic Rating Data to TSP Using ICCP Link CBA shows overall cost of $454,890 Benefit: Early identification of transmission line rating errors Cost: Cost to upgrade ICCP to accommodate line rating data Why did ROS and TAC overwhelmingly approve a SCR with project cost to the market? It is because of the stakeholder belief in the importance and the potential magnitude of the “non-quantifiable impacts” This SCR aims to reduce network model errors. The economic benefits, in terms of unnecessary congestion costs incurred due to erroneous limitations, depend upon a number of factors including (1) how many errors exist; (2) how many errors would be eliminated by this SCR; and (3) the congestion costs caused by the errors. Network model errors can cause congestion if transfer limits are set artificially low due to the errors. Conversely, network errors can cause reliability problems if transfer limits are set artificially high due to the errors. Therefore, in addition to reducing congestion costs, this SCR also improves reliability, which is difficult to quantify in terms of economic benefit.

17 Recommended Board Actions Approval Approval PRR 543 – Schedules & Emergency Assistance Over CFE-ERCOT DC Ties (unanimous)PRR 543 – Schedules & Emergency Assistance Over CFE-ERCOT DC Ties (unanimous) PRR 627 – RMR Transmission Issues & RMR Contract Extension (unanimous)PRR 627 – RMR Transmission Issues & RMR Contract Extension (unanimous) PRR 638 – Change Settlement Invoice Due Date from 16 Calendar Days to 5 Bank Business Days with effective date change (unanimous)PRR 638 – Change Settlement Invoice Due Date from 16 Calendar Days to 5 Bank Business Days with effective date change (unanimous) PRR 639 – Notification of Repairs to EPS Facilities Under Emergency Conditions (unanimous)PRR 639 – Notification of Repairs to EPS Facilities Under Emergency Conditions (unanimous) PRR 567 – Simplified 3-Part Bidding for A/S – Priority and RankingPRR 567 – Simplified 3-Part Bidding for A/S – Priority and Ranking SCR 746 Dynamic Rating Data to TSP Using ICCP LinkSCR 746 Dynamic Rating Data to TSP Using ICCP Link Temporary Change to 2005 Annual ValidationTemporary Change to 2005 Annual Validation