Welcome To Implementation Science 8 Part Webinar Series Kathleen Ryan Jackson Erin Chaparro, Ph.D University of Oregon.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Advertisements

SISEP Dean Fixsen, Karen Blase, Rob Horner, and George Sugai
Coaching Makes a Difference
Establishing an Effective Network of PB4L: School wide Coaches
Welcome Coaching Competency Driver Thanks to State Implementation & Scaling-up of Evidence Based Practices Oregon.
A Quick Look at Implementation Science Mary Louise Peters Technical Assistance Specialist National Early Childhood Technical Assistance Center
Welcome Oregon Scaling-up EBISS Beliefs and Skills for Effective RTI Implementation Oregon.
Planning for Success: Using Implementation Data to Action Plan for Full and Sustained Implementation Barbara Sims Caryn Ward National SISEP Center National.
Welcome Oregon Scaling-up EBISS Coaching Makes a Difference Evidence Based Observation and Feedback Oregon 1.
Building a Data Culture Data Guru Roles, Responsibilities & Expectations.
Rob Horner University of Oregon Implementation of Evidence-based practices School-wide behavior support Scaling evidence-based practices.
Professional Development and Technical Assistance: The National Blueprint for Success Tim Lewis, Ph.D University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral.
Welcome Oregon Scaling-up EBISS Coaching Makes a Difference Expanding and Refining the Coaches Role Oregon 1.
Theory to Practice: How One SEA Uses Implementation Science Minnesota Department of Education presentation for the CCSSO State Consortium on Educator Effectiveness.
Oregon’s Initiatives & Grants  Roadmap  Action  Responsibility Nancy Latini, Ph.D. Oregon Department of Education 2008.
Continuing QIAT Conversations Planning For Success Joan Breslin Larson Third webinar in a series of three follow up webinars for.
RE-EXAMINING THE ROLE OF PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND TRAINING EVALUATION THROUGH AN IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE LENS MICHELLE GRAEF & ROBIN LEAKE NHSTES June.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Welcome Oregon Scaling-up EBISS The District Data Team Meeting Blending Behavioral and Academic Multi-tiered Systems of Support Oregon.
Dean Fixsen, Karen Blase, Rob Horner, and George Sugai University of North Carolina – Chapel Hill University of Oregon University of Connecticut Scaling.

9/15/20151 Scaling Up Presentation: SIG/SPDG Regional Meeting October 2009 Marick Tedesco, Ph.D. State Transformation Specialist for Scaling Up.
Allison Metz, Ph.D., Karen Blase, Ph.D., Dean L. Fixsen, Ph.D., Rob Horner, Ph.D., George Sugai, Ph.D. Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute.
Missouri Integrated Model Mid-Year Meeting – January 14, 2009 Topical Discussion: Teams and Teaming Dr. Doug HatridgeDonna Alexander School Resource SpecialistReading.
Overview of the State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) Anne Lucas, WRRC/ECTA Ron Dughman, MPRRC Janey Henkel, MPRRC 2013 WRRC Leadership Forum October.
No, Not the Drivers Again! (Or, RTI is a Journey Not a Destination)
Barbara Sims, Co-Director National SISEP Center FPG Child Development Center University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Greensboro.NC March 20, 2013 Implementation.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
ISLLC Standard #2 Implementation
V Implementing and Sustaining Effective Programs and Services that Promote the Social-Emotional Development of Young Children Part I Karen Blase, Barbara.
Implementation Science Vision 21: Linking Systems of Care June 2015 Lyman Legters.
Data Coaching Institute: Day 2 Moving Toward Action ESD 113 Equity Through Service.
SectionVideo/PresentSlidesTotal Time Overview + Useable Intervention8:30 min Stages7:19 min Teams PDSA Terri present Drivers8:50 min Lessons Learned +
“Current systems support current practices, which yield current outcomes. Revised systems are needed to support new practices to generate improved outcomes.”
Implementing School-wide PBIS Pennsylvania PBIS Implementer’s Forum Rob Horner University of Oregon.
Presented by Shawn Fletcher Special Thanks To: Oregon DATA Project Team, EBISS, & David Douglas School District.
Team Choice Activity What would it be like to present to the school board and district leadership? 1.Need for a District Leadership Implementation Team.
Improving Outcomes for All Students: Bringing Evidence-Based Practices to Scale March 25, 2009 MN RtI Center Conference Cammy Lehr, Ph.D. EBP & Implementation.
Welcome Selection Competency Driver Thanks to State Implementation & Scaling-up of Evidence Based Practices Oregon.
Effective Behavioral & Instructional Support Systems Overview and Guiding Principles Adapted from, Carol Sadler, Ph.D. – EBISS Coordinator Extraordinaire.
Scaling-Up Within a Statewide Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS) SPDG National Meeting miblsi.cenmi.org.
Michelle A. Duda, Ph.D., BCBA, Dean L. Fixsen, Ph.D. & Karen A. Blase Ph.D., Melissa Van Dyke, LCSW Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute University.
Putting it all together: How Facilitative Administrations can use Performance Assessment and a Comprehensive Assessment System to support Staff Competency.
SW-PBIS Cohort 8 Spring Training March Congratulations – your work has made a difference Cohort 8.
Needs Assessment Presented By Ernest D. Pérez Capacity Building Assistance Trainer BORDER HEALTH FOUNDATION Tucson, Arizona CAPACITY BUILDING ASSISTANCE.
Rob Horner OSEP Center on PBIS Jon Potter Oregon RTI David Putnam Oregon RTI.
DEVELOPING AN EVALUATION SYSTEM BOB ALGOZZINE AND STEVE GOODMAN National PBIS Leadership Forum Hyatt Regency O’Hare Rosemont, Illinois October 14, 2010.
Notes by Ben Boerkoel, Kent ISD, based on a training by Beth Steenwyk.
Michelle A. Duda, Ph.D., BCBA, Dean L. Fixsen, Ph.D. & Karen A. Blase Ph.D., Melissa Van Dyke, LCSW Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute University.
Integrated System for Student Achievement SISEP in Illinois.
COSA SISEP PRESENTATION DAVID DOUGLAS SCHOOL DISTRICT APRIL 2010.
: The National Center at EDC
2011 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career 2.0 Six Years of SPPs: Lessons Learning for Designing, Implementing.
Michelle A. Duda, Ph.D., BCBA, Dean L. Fixsen, Ph.D. &
Barbara Sims Debbie Egan Dean L. Fixsen Karen A. Blase Michelle A. Duda Using Implementation Frameworks to Identify Evidence Based Practices 2011 PBIS.
Copyright © Dean L. Fixsen and Karen A. Blase, Dean L. Fixsen, Ph.D. National Implementation Research Network Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health.
Choice Activity What would it be like to present to the school board and district leadership? 1.The need for an EBISS District Leadership Implementation.
Help to develop, improve, and sustain educators’ competence and confidence to implement effective educational practices and supports. Help ensure sustainability.
AVID Leading College & Career Readiness Districtwide - Transforming Student Outcomes AVID's mission is to close the achievement gap by preparing all students.
Vermont Integrated Instruction Model (ViiM) Highlights August 2012.
EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION: EXPLORATION
RDQ 5 District Coaching Capacity Discussion Leader: George Sugai, University of Connecticut.
An Introduction to Implementation Tools to Help Build Implementation Capacity SPDG Evaluators May 2012 Michelle A. Duda, Dean L. Fixsen,
RtI Innovations: Evaluation Anna Harms & Jose Castillo
Assessing Readiness Erin Chaparro, Ph.D. Kimberly Ingram-West, Ph.D.
RtI Coordination: Supporting Training
February 21-22, 2018.
Installation Stage and Implementation Analysis
Dr. Phyllis Underwood REL Southeast
Presentation transcript:

Welcome To Implementation Science 8 Part Webinar Series Kathleen Ryan Jackson Erin Chaparro, Ph.D University of Oregon

Thanks to the State Implementation & Scaling-up of Evidence Based Practices University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Kathleen Ryan Jackson Erin A. Chaparro, Ph.D Oregon Scaling-Up EBISS Blog

The Stages of Implementation Kathleen Ryan Jackson University of Oregon

Objectives 1.Understand the key activities and outcomes achieved for each stage of implementation. 2.Understand the importance of the exploration stage and readiness as you move through each stage of implementation.

Objectives: You’ll be able to answer the questions 1.What is the most under-utilized stage of implementation? 1. The four important activities in the exploration process are…

HOW: Stages of Implementation Implementation Occurs in Stages. Exploration Installation Initial Implementation Full Implementation Full implementation can take up to four years under optimal conditions. Fixsen, Naoom, Blase, Friedman, & Wallace,

Exploration The Most Important & Most Under-utilized Stage Formalizing teaming structures Determining need and identifying options Assessing “fit” and feasibility Promoting “buy-in” Re-assessing facilitators and barriers to implementation 8

Installation A Decision is Made to Move Forward Actively engaged in “set-up” – Structural and instructional changes – Infrastructure development Training and coaching routines defined – Resources consumed Leadership maintains focus and momentum Buy-in continues 9

Initial Implementation Working Through the Awkwardness Managing change – Maintaining the focus – Managing expectations Providing training and coaching – Building leaders support staff implementation – Reorganizing school roles, functions, structures Resolving systems issues – Rapid problem solving (PDSA) 10

Full Implementation New Learning is Integrated at All Levels All student’s benefit from the EBP All staff are supported Data are collected and used for decision making Policies, procedures, guiding documents in place Supportive and functional administrative environment 11

Reflect on your your elementary reading program… Identify “missed stages” or “missed steps” that will be important for you to complete in order to establish or strengthen buy-in and a collective commitment from all staff. Identify the Stage of Implementation that best describes your current level of implementation.

Exploration The Most Important & Most Underutilized Stage 13

Exploration 5 Main Activities 1.Formalize teaming structures 2.Determine need and identify options 3.Assess “fit” and feasibility 4.Promote “buy-In” for the initiative and for implementation supports 5.Re-assess needs, resources, support and feasibility 14

1. Formalize Team Structures Form and link the teaming structures Identify who is... Responsible for the work Responsible for decision making and or recommendations Representative team Range of stakeholders who will be impacted by the new initiative

2. Determine Need - Identify Options Assess student, school and district performance and needs Using current, relevant, and reliable data Explore evidence based options to meet needs What Works Clearing House National Center on Response to Intervention Experts and publishers of evidence-based practices (EBPs) 16

3. Assess Fit and Feasibility Assess fit of EBP with needs of students Resources of schools and the district Examine implementation requirements Costs, time required, funding, materials Training, coaching, data infrastructure Implementation support – who and how often Contact and observe other successful implementers Observe and interview other districts Ask, how can we repurpose the success of others? 17

3. Assess Fit and Feasibility Conduct an infrastructure analysis Assess Readiness to adopt a sustainable practice Assess Capacity of district and school staff Assess available Resources and resource reallocation Analyze facilitators and barriers Observe structural and organizational changes needed in schools and district. What should be replicated and strengthened? Cost of technical assistance, training, coaching 18

3. Assess Fit and Feasibility “Due diligence during mutual assessment and selection will help in gathering the information needed to make a decision about whether or not to adopt a new EBP and move forward.” 19

4. Promote Buy-In The key role of the District Leadership Implementation Team is to develop collaboration and co-ownership. Create opportunities for stakeholders to learn about options under consideration Ask questions about benefits and challenges Gain confidence in managing the identified risks Develop belief that the district is committed to providing the support required to implement and sustain the practice overtime 20

5. Reassess and Decide Collect all information Re-assess facilitators and barriers Ask What is the strength of the EBP? Does the EBP meet our current need? Does it fit our current priorities and values? Do we have the resources required? Do we have the capacity? Are we ready to implement and replicate the EBP? 21

Stages of Implementation Analysis: Where are We? b-SISEP-StagesOfImplementationAnalysisWhereAreWe.pdf

Reflect on your your elementary reading program… What steps could you go back and complete to strengthen buy-in and readiness for implementation of your elementary reading program? What exploration steps has your district done a thorough job of completing?

Knowledge Check 1.What is the most under-utilized stage of implementation? 2. What are four important activities in the exploration process are?

Knowledge Check Answers 1.What is the most under-utilized stage of implementation is exploration? 2. The four important activities in the exploration process are: Formalize teaming structures Determine need and identify option Assess “fit” and feasibility Promote “buy-in”

Resources and References SISEP: Stages of Implementation tation.fpg.unc.edu/files/resources/AIHub-SISEP- StagesOfImplementationAnalysisWhereAreWe.pdf Oregon Scaling-Up EBISS Blog

Thank You Kathleen Ryan Jackson Erin A. Chaparro, Ph.D