Local Leadership: Do You Know How to Hire Effectively? Academic Senate for California Community Colleges Leadership Institute.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
W HAT IS M UTUAL AGREEMENT AND P ARTICIPATORY GOVERNANCE ? Dr. Eric Oifer Randy Lawson August 26, 2010.
Advertisements

Who Should we be Hiring? Minimum Qualifications? Recommended Qualifications? Dianna Chiabotti, Chair, Basic Skills Committee Michelle Pilati, Vice President,
Academic Senate Update Mark Wade Lieu President. Course Identifier Project (C-ID) Statewide Career Pathways (SCP) Lower Division Transfer Pattern (LDTP)
Overcoming the Rubber Stamp Phenomenon: The Shifting Sands of Curriculum and the Senate's Roles Comunicación y Gerencia Pat James Hanz Michelle Pilati.
Minimum Qualifications for Faculty A Discussion of What Is and What Might Be.
Participatory Governance, ASCCC/CCLC, Simpson, Clark, Walton, Lieu, Woodruff, Lay, Viar The Governance Show Ian Walton, Past President, ASCCC Mission College,
Kale Braden, Cosumnes River College Sherrie Guerrero, Associate Superintendent, Chaffey College David Morse, ASCCC Executive Committee.
Ensuring Proper Circulation and Setting Broken Bones: Curriculum/Senate Relations and Intersegmental Issues Richard Mahon and Michelle Pilati.
Navigating Through the Challenges of Minimum Qualifications and Equivalency Randy Beach, Representative At Large Craig Rutan, Area D Representative 2015.
Illinois Community College Board DUAL CREDIT: Proposed Rule Revisions & Updates.
Establishing Boundaries and Working Together: Effective Senate-Union Relations Stephanie Dumont, Area D Representative Lesley Kawaguchi, Area C Representative.
Academic Senate for California Community Colleges The Basis for Faculty Power: Title 5 Regulations and Education Code Mark Lieu, Vice President Jane Patton,
Adapted from a presentation by Mark Lieu Academic Senate for California Community Colleges - Leadership Institute 2006 Academic Senate for California Community.
Where is it Written? Ed. Code, Title 5, and Local Senates Dolores Davison, ASCCC Area B Representative Ginni May, ASCCC North Representative Faculty Leadership.
Participating Effectively in District and College Governance: Student Responsibilities Leadership Institute San Jose, 2004 Ian Walton, Vice President Wanda.
A Presentation to Early Childhood Educators Spring 2010 The Academic Senate + You.
Michelle Grimes-Hillman, South Representative Cynthia Rico, South Representative FACULTY LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE JUNE 11-13, 2015 SAN JOSE Empowering Local.
1 Effective Senates: The Key Ingredients of Collegial Consultation Angelica Bangle, Chris Hill, Wheeler North, Beverly Reilly, Cheryl Stewart.
The Many Roles of the Chief Instructional Officer Presented by Pam Deegan Monterey Bay March 22, 2011 Presented by Pam Deegan Monterey Bay March 22, 2011.
Bases for Academic Senates: What Are We And What Are Our Roles? Craig Rutan, Area D Representative Cynthia Rico, South Representative.
Hiring and Evaluation Processes: Building Future Successes Paul Starer and Lesley Kawaguchi Leadership Institute Hayes Mansion, San Jose, CA June 16, 2007.
ACADEMIC SENATE ORIENTATION 9/3/09 Welcome New and Returning Senators!
Duke Ellington “A problem is a chance for you to do your best.”
EMPOWERING LOCAL SENATES Kevin Bontenbal, South Representative Stephanie Dumont, Area D Representative.
Equivalence at MPC Goals: 1.Articulate to the MPC community the expectations for granting equivalency to faculty applicants 2.Clearly define roles and.
1 Am I Qualified for this Job? (Minimum Qualifications for Faculty or Management at a CCC) Presented by Sandra Lindoerfer and Rich Ghidella Citrus Community.
Jane Patton, President, ASCCC Lisa Legohn, LA Trade Tech.
Criminal Intent – Innate or Learned? Why We Do What We Do Ian Walton and Michelle Pilati.
+ Good Fences Make Good Neighbors: Senate-Union Relations (apologies to Robert Frost) Kevin Bontenbal - Cuesta College Don Gauthier – LA Valley College.
Minimum Qualifications, Equivalence and Faculty Service Areas Bob Cosgrove, Dave Degroot, Wheeler North Standards and Practices Committee Academic Senate.
Minimum Qualifications, Equivalence and Faculty Service Areas Jon Drinnon, Michelle Grimes-Hillman, Wheeler North Standards and Practices Committee Leadership.
Academic Senate for California Community Colleges ­– Leadership Institute 2008 Basics for Effective Senates Shaaron Vogel Wheeler North Academic Senate.
Minimum Qualifications and Equivalence Carlos Arce, Yolanda Bellisimo, David Morse Standards and Practices Committee Academic Senate for California Community.
Placement of Courses in Disciplines Dan Crump, American River College Michelle Grimes-Hillman, Mt San Antonio College ASCCC Curriculum Institute, July.
2010 Faculty Leadership Institute Local Senates & Curriculum Committees Richard Mahon, Area D Beth Smith, Treasurer.
Academic Senate; College of the Redwoods Senate Retreat 2014.
The Basis for Effective Senates Foothill College
Minimum Qualifications, Equivalence and Faculty Service Areas Dave DeGrout, Cheryl Aschenback, Jon Drinnon Standards and Practices Committee Academic Senate.
2011 ASCCC Curriculum Institute Marriott Mission Valley, San Diego July 14-16, 2011 Assigning Courses to Disciplines: Curriculum Opportunities Dianna Chiabotti,
Hiring and Evaluation Processes Greg Granderson & Pat James Hanz.
The Many Roles of the Chief Instructional Officer Presented by Pam Deegan San Diego October 25, 2011.
Minimum Qualifications and the Disciplines List Michelle Sampat, Mt. San Antonio College Lisa Cook, Laney College John Stanskas, ASCCC Executive Committee.
Intro to the Foothill College Academic Senate President Carolyn Holcroft Vice President/CCC Faculty Co-Chair Isaac Escoto Secretary/Treasurer Patrick Morriss.
Keeping your Senate Involved, Engaged and On Course Grant Goold Professor & Chair, Emergency Medical Services, American River College Area A, Academic.
The Role of Students in Participatory Governance Richael Young, College of San Mateo Barbara Illowsky, De Anza College.
Presented by the Outreach & Training Subcommittee of College Planning Council, as required by Section V.8 of the College Planning Council Handbook College.
Participating Effectively in District and College Governance The Law, Regulation and Guidelines Community College League OF CALIFORNIA ACADEMIC SENATE.
2016 Faculty Leadership Institute
Explaining and Communicating Faculty Purview over Curriculum to Board Members and External Stakeholders Larry Galizio, Community College League of California.
Local Senates and Boards
The Basis for Effective Senates
Rebecca Eikey, ASCCC Area C Representative Ginni May, ASCCC Treasurer
Curriculum Institute, July 13, 2018, 3:45 – 5:00
10+1 Governance and Union Issues: Similarities and Differences
Building Relations: Local Senates and Unions Roles and challenges
Assigning Courses to Disciplines: Curriculum Opportunities
10+1 Governance and Union Issues: Similarities and Differences
2018 Faculty Leadership Institute
Erosion of Senate Authority Over Curriculum?
Faculty Leadership Institute, June 17, 2017, Sacramento Sheraton
Your Senate & Curriculum Issues
The Various Roles of the CIO
What are the Roles of the cio?
The Various Roles of the CIO
Academic Senate for California Community Colleges
Trustees and Curriculum streamlining
The Many Roles of the Chief Instructional Officer
Academic Senate for California Community Colleges
Cheryl Aschenbach, ASCCC Secretary
Developing and Evaluating Processes and Practices
Presentation transcript:

Local Leadership: Do You Know How to Hire Effectively? Academic Senate for California Community Colleges Leadership Institute

According to the Education Code, the local academic senate works jointly with the local governing board to establish policies and practices for hiring faculty. Thus, it is imperative that local senates understand the laws, regulations, and Academic Senate- recommended practices to ensure they meet their consultative obligations—and hire effectively. The Hiring of New Faculty

Faculty: Those employees of a district who are employed in academic positions that are not designated as supervisory or management for purposes of Article 5. Faculty include, but are not limited to, instructors, librarians, counselors, community college health service professionals, disabled student programs and services professionals, extended opportunity programs and services professionals, and individuals employed to perform a service that, before July 1, 1990, required nonsupervisorial, nonmanagement community college certification qualifications. Those employees of a district who are employed in academic positions that are not designated as supervisory or management for purposes of Article 5. Faculty include, but are not limited to, instructors, librarians, counselors, community college health service professionals, disabled student programs and services professionals, extended opportunity programs and services professionals, and individuals employed to perform a service that, before July 1, 1990, required nonsupervisorial, nonmanagement community college certification qualifications. (Authority cited: Sections 66700, 70901, 87001, and 87002, Education Code) (Authority cited: Sections 66700, 70901, 87001, and 87002, Education Code)

. Definitions: Experience: The requirement is for the stated number of years of full-time experience or the equivalent in part-time experience. (Ed Code §53404). Experience: The requirement is for the stated number of years of full-time experience or the equivalent in part-time experience. (Ed Code §53404). Certificated Employees: Persons employed by districts pursuant to minimum qualifications (Ed Code §53405). Certificated Employees: Persons employed by districts pursuant to minimum qualifications (Ed Code §53405).

Requirement for Accredited Degrees and Units: All degrees and units used to satisfy minimum qualifications shall be from accredited institutions. All degrees and units used to satisfy minimum qualifications shall be from accredited institutions.

RESOURCES In the fall of 1989, the Academic Senate adopted two papers on faculty hiring: In the fall of 1989, the Academic Senate adopted two papers on faculty hiring: Contract Faculty Hiring Procedures: A Model Based on Assembly Bill 1725; and Part-time Faculty Hiring Procedures: A Model Based on Assembly Bill Contract Faculty Hiring Procedures: A Model Based on Assembly Bill 1725; and Part-time Faculty Hiring Procedures: A Model Based on Assembly Bill Faculty are encouraged to review both papers and, with them, the legislative intent language of AB 1725 §4, upon which the papers draw heavily. The models posited in those papers are still valid today. Faculty are encouraged to review both papers and, with them, the legislative intent language of AB 1725 §4, upon which the papers draw heavily. The models posited in those papers are still valid today.

A Re-examination of Faculty Hiring Processes and Procedures (ASCCC, Adopted Fall 2000) The California Education Code is unequivocal in its assignment of authority to faculty in the realm of hiring. Section (b) reads: The California Education Code is unequivocal in its assignment of authority to faculty in the realm of hiring. Section (b) reads: H iring criteria, policies, and procedures for new faculty members shall be developed and agreed upon jointly by representatives of the governing board, and the academic senate, and approved by the governing board.

Two things are significant here. First, this mandate appears in Education Code, rather than in Title 5 Regulations, and whereas both Education Code and Title 5 Regulations have the force of law, this mandate is clearly the express intent of the Legislature. this mandate appears in Education Code, rather than in Title 5 Regulations, and whereas both Education Code and Title 5 Regulations have the force of law, this mandate is clearly the express intent of the Legislature.

Second, there is no qualification of the mandate, no specification of circumstances wherein it would be permissible for boards to circumvent the requirement to reach joint agreement with the academic senates. there is no qualification of the mandate, no specification of circumstances wherein it would be permissible for boards to circumvent the requirement to reach joint agreement with the academic senates.

These two points combine to make the authority of faculty in hiring even stronger than in the ten-plus-one academic and professional areas specified in Title 5 § combine to make the authority of faculty in hiring even stronger than in the ten-plus-one academic and professional areas specified in Title 5 § That faculty have the discipline expertise and the motivation to set the highest possible standards in selecting those who will be their colleagues for the next twenty to thirty years is simply unarguable.

When Hiring Superintendents and Presidents: The Chair of a search committee for this administrative position is most frequently a senior administrator with academic or student services experience; it is also not uncommon to have a faculty member co-chair this responsibility. Such an arrangement builds district-wide trust in the entire selection process. The Chair of a search committee for this administrative position is most frequently a senior administrator with academic or student services experience; it is also not uncommon to have a faculty member co-chair this responsibility. Such an arrangement builds district-wide trust in the entire selection process.

Conducting a Successful CEO Search (Excerpted from the Community College League of California) Because the outcome of the selection process is so important, it should never be taken lightly or conducted in haste. The entire district—and particularly the board— will benefit from a comprehensive and thoughtful process that involves the appropriate constituencies of the institution and community and clarifies goals and priorities. Such a process allows the board to select a person it can support fully and establishes a foundation that enables the new leader to be effective. Because the outcome of the selection process is so important, it should never be taken lightly or conducted in haste. The entire district—and particularly the board— will benefit from a comprehensive and thoughtful process that involves the appropriate constituencies of the institution and community and clarifies goals and priorities. Such a process allows the board to select a person it can support fully and establishes a foundation that enables the new leader to be effective.

Conclusion: Faculty have a vested interest in who will be their colleagues, in who will teach and advise their students, in who will work with them “to develop and safeguard the curriculum and uphold the sort of instruction that is maximally productive of humane values and which contributes toward students becoming informed, compassionate and productive members of their communities.” Faculty have a vested interest in who will be their colleagues, in who will teach and advise their students, in who will work with them “to develop and safeguard the curriculum and uphold the sort of instruction that is maximally productive of humane values and which contributes toward students becoming informed, compassionate and productive members of their communities.” The Future of the Community College: A Faculty Perspective” (adopted Fall 1998) (The Future of the Community College: A Faculty Perspective” (adopted Fall 1998).