Alison Pamment 1, Steve Donegan 1, Calum Byrom 2, Oliver Clements 3, Bryan Lawrence 1, Roy Lowry 3 1 NCAS/BADC, Science and Technology Facilities Council,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Reading e-Science Centre Jon Blower Reading e-Science Centre Environmental Systems Science Centre University of Reading United Kingdom.
Advertisements

I2S2 - Infrastructure for Integration in Structural Sciences Cross-Institutional Pilot
1 UK e-Science All-Hands Meeting Nottingham, 2004 Enterprise specification of the NERC DataGrid Andrew Woolf, Ray Cramer.
Product Quality and Documentation – Recent Developments H. K. Ramapriyan Assistant Project Manager ESDIS Project, Code 423, NASA GFSC
V Alyssa Rosemartin 1, Lee Marsh 1, Ellen Denny 1, Bruce Wilson USA National Phenology Network, Tucson, AZ; 2 - Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak.
Information Modelling MOLES Metadata Objects for Linking Environmental Sciences S. Ventouras Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
National facility concerned with looking after and distributing marine data Part of NOC National Marine Facilities Serve science, education and industry,
BADC Workshop 2: BADC Services to Data Suppliers Royal Met. Soc. Conference – 14 September 2005 Ag Stephens et al.
NOAA Data Sharing Policy for Grants and Cooperative Agreements Ingrid Guch NOAA Environmental Data Management Committee.
European Space Weather Week 3 Brussels, November 13-17, 2006 Atmospheric Data Management - A Challenge - Anne De Rudder and Sue Latham Rutherford Appleton.
The MashMyData project Combining and comparing environmental science data on the web Alastair Gemmell 1, Jon Blower 1, Keith Haines 1, Stephen Pascoe 2,
NERC DataGrid Vocabulary Governance Vocabulary Workshop, RAL, February 25, 2009.
2.2 Data Group Membership: Reeves (chair), Lloyd, Morse. Reports to SSC. This group will be responsible for preparation of the AMMA-UK Data Protocol, which.
NERC Data Grid Helen Snaith and the NDG consortium …
Senior Review Evaluations (1 of 5) Proposals due: 6 March 2015 Panel evaluations: Week of 22 April 2015 Performance factors to be evaluated will include.
Elements of a Data Management Plan Alison Boyer Environmental Sciences Division Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
2 nd Training Workshop 4 – 5 June 2007 Common Data Index - CDI By Dick M.A Schaap Technical Coordinator SeaDataNet.
SeaDataNet Ontology Use Case Roy Lowry British Oceanographic Data Centre Coastal Atlas Interoperability Workshop, Corvallis, July (+ Lessons.
Submitting data to (and getting data from!) BODC Adam Leadbetter British Oceanographic Data Centre Joseph Proudman Building 6 Brownlow Street Liverpool.
CF Conventions Support at BADC Alison Pamment Roy Lowry (BODC)
1 The NERC DataGrid DataGrid The NERC DataGrid DataGrid AHM 2003 – 2 Sept, 2003 e-Science Centre Metadata of the NERC DataGrid Kevin O’Neill CCLRC e-Science.
NOCS, PML, STFC, BODC, BADC The NERC DataGrid = Bryan Lawrence Director of the STFC Centre for Environmental Data Archival (BADC, NEODC, IPCC-DDC.
1 SPSRB Decision Brief on Declaring a Product Operational Instructions / Guidance This template will be used by NESDIS personnel to recommend to the SPSRB.
DELIVERING ENVIRONMENTAL WEB SERVICES (DEWS) Partners: UK Met Office (Lead Partner), British Atmospheric Data Centre (BADC), British Maritime Technology.
Welcome!. Earth Science What is Earth Science? Earth science - the scientific study of Earth and the universe around it Earth science - the scientific.
‘intelligent openness’ The common objective of an RCUK data policy Gregor McDonagh
What is BODC? National facility concerned with looking after and distributing marine data Serve science, education and industry, as well as the wider public.
Local global disambiguation of terms and concepts The BCO-DMO metadata database uses controlled vocabularies to record many of the important pieces of.
VO Sandpit, November 2009 CEDA Metadata Steve Donegan/Sam Pepler.
Bob Keeley Marine Environmental Data Service Dept. of Fisheries and Oceans Ottawa, Canada Jun, 2006 SeaDataNet Meeting.
MEDIN Work Plan for By March 2011 MEDIN will be 3 years into the original 5 year development plan started in Would normally ask for continued.
Sarah Callaghan 1, Eric Guilyardi 2, Charlotte Pascoe 3 and the Metafor Project Team 1 BADC- UK, 2 University of Reading, UK.
An Integrated Global Atmospheric Chemistry Observations Strategy IGACO & WMO GAW and GEOSS Hennie Kelder Professor University of Technology of Eindhoven.
Best Practices Wiki Ruth Duerr NSIDC, IEEE Jay Pearlman, IEEE Siri Jodha Singh Khalsa, IEEE Report to GEO Committees February 2008.
EUM/SAF/VWG/02/0010, Rev. 3, May 2003 Page 1 The SAF Network Concept and Status Juha-Pekka Luntama, EUMETSAT GRAS Mission Scientist
OBSERVATIONS & PRÉVISIONS CÔTIÈRES SeaDataNet annual meeting, Madrid, March 2009 How to prepare data for integration in SeaDataNet.
The CF Conventions: Options for Sustained Support Involving Unidata Russ Rew Unidata Policy Committee May 12, 2008.
CF Metadata Conventions: Governance, Support, and Future Karl E. Taylor Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison Lawrence Livermore National.
Alison Pamment CF Standard Names Status and Development Alison Pamment
NERC Earth Observation Data Acquisition & Analysis Service The NERC Earth Observation Data Acquisition and Analysis Service (NEODAAS) is a NERC service.
Sarah Callaghan 1, Gerry Devine 2, Eric Guilyardi 3, Bryan Lawrence 1, Charlotte Pascoe 1, Lois Steenman-Clark 2 and the Metafor Project Team 1 NCAS-BADC;
Earth System Curator and Model Metadata Discovery and Display for CMIP5 Sylvia Murphy and Cecelia Deluca (NOAA/CIRES) Hannah Wilcox (NCAR/CISL) Metafor.
The Global Cryosphere Watch Jeff Key NOAA/NESDIS, Madison, Wisconsin USA South America GCW Meeting, Santiago, October
NESC Worshop – 07 September 2005 Development of a Marine Metadata Standard Greg Reed Executive Officer Australian Ocean Data Centre Joint Facility.
Alison Pamment CF Standard Names Status, Process and Development Alison Pamment
SOLAS and the British Atmospheric Data Centre Charles Kilburn Anne De Rudder.
1 Alison Pamment, 2 Calum Byrom, 1 Bryan Lawrence, 3 Roy Lowry 1 NCAS/BADC,Science and Technology Facilities Council, 2 Tessella plc, 3 British Oceanogrphic.
The Global Organization for Earth System Science Portals Don Middleton National Center for Atmospheric Research; Boulder, Colorado, USA Scientific Computing.
Metadata Development in the Earth System Curator Spanning the Gap Between Models and Datasets Rocky Dunlap, Georgia Tech 5 th GO-ESSP Community Meeting.
Eurostat Sharing data validation services Item 5.1 of the agenda.
Using a Simple Knowledge Organization System to facilitate Catalogue and Search for the ESA CCI Open Data Portal EGU, 21 April 2016 Antony Wilson, Victoria.
Lidar Radar Open Software Environment Mike Dixon, Wen-Chau Lee Mike Daniels, Charlie Martin Steve Cohn, Bill Brown Earth Observing Laboratory (EOL) National.
The CF Conventions: Governance and Community Issues in Establishing Standards for Representing Climate, Forecast, and Observational Data Russ Rew 1, Bob.
ICWG: CGMS-43, May 2015, Boulder, Colorado, USA. Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS Status report on the International Clouds.
GSICS Data and Products Servers Volker Gärtner (EUMETSAT) For GSICS Data Working Group.
Born Semantic: Linking data from sensors to users and balancing hardware limitations with data standards Justin Buck 1 Adam Leadbetter.
Introduction to BODC and GEOTRACES data office Edward Mawji British Oceanographic Data Centre
GSICS GDWG Report, Toulouse, 9 February GSICS Data Working Group Status Report V. Gaertner CMA, EUMETSAT, JMA, KMA, NOAA/NESDIS, WMO.
November 2, 2009 NOAA Climate Services Portal Prototype A collaborative, NOAA-wide prototyping effort featuring CPC, CPO, CSC, and NCDC A collaborative,
9/9/16 WHAT IS EARTH SCIENCE?
NERC DataGrid: Googling for Secure Data
Concept Proposal for RA-III Regional WIGOS Centre
TRSS Terminology Registry Scoping Study
GDWG Agenda Item: Tools for GRWG activities
IPCC Emission Factor Database (EFDB)
Common Framework for Earth Observation Data
Multidimensional Data and GIS
Task 5 : Supporting CCI Contributions to Obs4MIPs
School of Information Studies, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, USA
Persistent identifiers for instruments (PIDINST) working group
Presentation transcript:

Alison Pamment 1, Steve Donegan 1, Calum Byrom 2, Oliver Clements 3, Bryan Lawrence 1, Roy Lowry 3 1 NCAS/BADC, Science and Technology Facilities Council, 2 Tessella plc, 3 British Oceanographic Data Centre, National Oceanography Centre Logo. The CEDA vocabulary editor: a new tool for managing controlled vocabularies Funding for the development of the CF metadata conventions is provided by PCMDI (Program for Climate Model Data Intercomparison), Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, USA and by NERC (Natural Environment Research Council) through NCAS (National Centre for Atmospheric Science), UK. CF Standard Names: A Controlled Vocabulary CF (Climate and Forecast) standard names are a comprehensive list of terms for describing geophysical parameters in data files. They form one component of the metadata needed to fully describe an environmental dataset. (Other metadata include, for example, the name of the model or observing platform that produced the data). CF metadata were originally designed to describe numerical model data such as those produced by climate prediction or weather forecasting models. Increasingly, however, they are being used to describe observational datasets from instruments as diverse as tide gauges and satellite radiometers. CF metadata have been adopted as the standard in many large scientific projects, such as CMIP5 from which data will be shared by scientists around the world in preparing the next Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change assessment report. CF metadata will also be used to describe satellite data from the next series of NOAA polar orbiting satellites (JPSS) and are even being used to describe data from a model of the Martian climate. Managing A Controlled Vocabulary  Scientists wishing to write their data in CF- NetCDF files can propose new standard names by sending an to the CF mailing list. Each proposal should include an explanation of the name’s intended meaning and a suggestion of the appropriate units.  All members of the CF community are then invited to submit their comments on the proposal.  The public discussions are moderated by the standard names manager with the aim of reaching a consensus decision on the wording of new names, their explanations and units.  Once agreement is reached on a new name it can be accepted for inclusion in the published standard name table. A New Tool for Vocabulary Management: The CEDA Vocabulary Editor  When a new CF standard name is proposed an entry is created for it in the vocabulary editor using a web form. The data entry form is security protected so that only those authorized to edit the published vocabulary may effect changes.  A web page shows the progress of all vocabulary terms through the CF acceptance procedures. Colour coded backgrounds give the user a quick way of seeing the current status of each name, e.g. blue means a newly submitted proposal, amber means that a name has been formally accepted.  Once accepted, the editor can be used to simultaneously publish names on the CF website and in the NERC vocabulary server developed at the British Oceanographic Data Centre (BODC). A Sample Entry For A CF Standard Name Within the CEDA Vocabulary Editor