Figure 1 – NSTX Upper Umbrella Assembly Upgrade Design: Version 3.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FEA Reference Guide See additional material herehere.
Advertisements

Figure 1 – NSTX Upper Umbrella Assembly Upgrade Design: Version 4.
Testing Test Setup TapLok Insert Shear Key Copper Threads Friction Tests Collar Shear Tests NSTX TF FLAG JOINT REVIEW 8/7/03 Michael Kalish.
Fasteners / Joint Design Michael Kalish NSTX TF FLAG JOINT REVIEW 8/7/03.
Summary of Twisted Racetrack / Clamp Analysis K. D. Freudenberg.
ME 450 Group Adrian Conrad Chris Cook Thomas Hylton Nathan Wagers High Pressure Water Fixture Conceptual Design Analysis December 10, 2007.
NSTX Thomson Scattering and NB Analysis Update: Maxwell Generated EM Loads and ANSYS WB Static Stresses
Finite Element Model Generation Model size Element class – Element type, Number of dimensions, Size – Plane stress & Plane strain – Higher order elements.
1 Design of Gridded-Tube Structures for the 805 MHz RF Cavity Department of Mechanical, Materials, and Aerospace Engineering M. Alsharoa (PhD candidate)
Lecture 2 – Finite Element Method
MUTAC Review, 9 April MuCOOL and MICE Coupling Magnet Status Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Berkeley CA
NSTX outer TF leg analysis (with diamonds not uniformly distributed) *Full 360º model *Al blocks connected to springs to simulate umbrella structure (stiffness.
Figure 1 – NSTX Upper Umbrella Assembly Upgrade Design: Version 3.
NSTX Center Stack Upgrade Workshop Brainstorming on Design Solutions for TF Joint C Neumeyer Jan 22, 2009.
Component Testing Test Setup TapLok Insert Shear Key Copper Threads Friction Tests Collar Shear Tests NSTX TF FLAG JOINT REVIEW 8/7/03 Michael Kalish.
Status of the Coil Structure Design and Magnetic-Structural Analysis Presented by X.R. Wang Contributors: UCSD: S. Malang, A.R. Raffray PPPL: H.M. Fan.
Status of Coil Structural Design and Magnetic-Structural Analysis Presented by X.R. Wang Contributors: ORNL: D. Williamson UCSD: S. Malang, A.R. Raffray.
NSTX ARMOR PLATE 2/18/10 NEUTRAL BEAM ARMOR PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS.
Fasteners / Joint Design Michael Kalish NSTX TF FLAG JOINT REVIEW 4/10/03.
FE calculations for the bolted helium vessel May 6th 2015
Fasteners / Joint Design Michael Kalish NSTX TF FLAG JOINT REVIEW 8/7/03.
Component Testing Test Setup TapLok Insert Shear Key Copper Threads
1 RF-Structures Mock-Up FEA Assembly Tooling V. Soldatov, F. Rossi, R. Raatikainen
Joint Institute for Nuclear Research Further optimization of the solenoid design A.Efremov, E.Koshurnikov, Yu.Lobanov, A.Makarov, A.Vodopianov GSI, Darmstadt,
Proposed TF Joint Design C Neumeyer 2/26/9 Notes: 1)Several concepts included are based on ideas developed by R Woolley 2)No analysis has yet been performed.
Analyses of Bolted Joint for Shear Load with Stainless Steel Bushing and Frictionless Shim-Flange Interface Two cases of shim plates were investigated.
NSTX TF Flag Joint Design Review OVERVIEW C Neumeyer 8/7/3.
NSTX Center Stack Upgrade Workshop Requirements & Design Point C Neumeyer Jan 22, 2009.
NSTXU-CALC Vessel Port Rework for NB and Thomson Scattering
NSTXU-CALC TF Flex Joint and TF Bundle Stub
Image courtesy of National Optical Astronomy Observatory, operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, under cooperative agreement.
JLAB CLAS12 Torus Structure The cold mass is composed of 6 coils, each inside a coil case, joined together at the inner radius by a hub and at the outer.
ANSYS for MEMS by Manjula1 FEM of MEMS on ANSYS MEMS Summer 2007 Why FEM for MEMS? Features in ANSYS Basic Procedures Examples.
Figure 1 – NSTX Upper Umbrella Assembly Upgrade Design: Version 3.
ITER In-Vessel Coils (IVC) Interim Design Review Thermal Structural FEA of Feeders A Brooks July 27, 2010 July 26-28, 20101ITER_D_353BL2.
An Analysis of Shell Structure for Dead Load H.M. Fan PPPL September 16, 2005.
Analyses of Bolted Joint for Bolt Preload and Shear Load
Hybrid Structure with Cooling John Cozzolino LARP Collaboration Meeting Port Jefferson, NY November 4-6, 2009.
Finite Element Analysis of the18 Turn Beam H. F. Fan November 5, 2004.
56 MHz SRF Cavity Cryostat support system and Shielding C. Pai
56 MHz SRF Cavity Thermal Analysis and Vacuum Chamber Strength C. Pai
ZTF Gasket and window stress under 1 atm pressure Callahan 10/23/2014.
NSTX Supported by NSTX Centerstack Upgrade Project Meeting P. Titus April 14, 2010 PF4/5 Terminal Stress Existing PF4/5 Support Weld Algorythm Moment Influence.
56 MHz SRF Cavity and Helium vessel Design
ME 272 Final Problem 3 By Valerie Lease
TF Joint Operations Review Simplified Modeling & Protection C Neumeyer 2/10/05 IP and OOP Load Modeling Linear Model of IP and OOP pressure at Joint FEMLAB.
S. Lassiter, P. Brindza, M. Fowler, E. Sun - Jefferson Lab G. Markham - NovaTech, B. Wands - Fermi Lab Abstract—Jefferson Laboratory is developing a set.
BoltJoin ppt P. Rogoff 3/24/2011. NSTX Supported by P. R. 3/9/2011 Update Ring Bolted Joint Design and Recommend the Joint Geometry using bolts.
issues 40 min. rep. rate Fabrication of flex sections –Water jet cut copper –Copper flat cable –Others – electroform brazed straps –Shape –OOP support.
Proposed TF Joint Design Concept #1 C Neumeyer 3/23/9 Notes: 1)Several concepts included are based on ideas developed by R Woolley 2)No analysis has yet.
NSTX Supported by NSTX Centerstack Upgrade Project Meeting P. Titus March Insulation Short Beam Tests – Failure Modes Ripple Loads on PF PF4/5.
NSTX NSTX LidsJuly 6, NSTX Supported by College W&M Colorado Sch Mines Columbia U CompX General Atomics INEL Johns Hopkins U LANL LLNL Lodestar.
Nonlinear Analyses of Modular Coils and Shell structure for Coil Cool-down and EM Loads Part 1 – Results of Shell Structure and Modular Coils H.M. Fan.
Figure 1 – NSTX Upper Umbrella Assembly Upgrade Design: Version 4
AWB NSTX TF Flag Joint Design Review April 10, 2003 Art Brooks.
Final_Bellows.ppt. The purpose for these analyses was to justify and select the appropriate NSTX Center Stack Update project VV Bellows. The bellows should.
NCSX NCSX TF Coil Conductor FDR 5/17/05 1 Michael Kalish NCSX TF Conductor.
Twisted Racetrack Revisited Model Changes: Side A has 10 turns Clamps have been modified to as built geometry. Property Changes (linear results.
Analysis of TF Load Paths and Vacuum Vessel Loading H. M. Fan Jan. 22, 2009.
NSTX Supported by NSTX Centerstack Upgrade Project Meeting P. Titus March F.
A PROPOSED TF JOINT DESIGN FOR THE NSTX CENTERSTACK UPGRADE Robert D Woolley 25 February 2009.
TS Cool Down Studies TSu Unit Coils (24-25) N. Dhanaraj and E. Voirin Tuesday, 10 March 2015 Reference: Docdb No:
NSTX TF outer leg analysis Because the stress on umbrella structure is too high, there are some ideas to reduce it, like adding a case to enhance the stiffness.
NSTX TF Flag Joint Design Review OVERVIEW C Neumeyer 8/7/3.
2K Cold Box Structural Analysis
2K Cold Box Structure Analysis
Fredrik Fors Mechanical Engineering, JLab 09/29/2016
Mechanical Modelling of the PSI CD1 Dipole
Date of download: 12/20/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Stress Analysis of Universal Tilt Kit Attachment Points
Presentation transcript:

Figure 1 – NSTX Upper Umbrella Assembly Upgrade Design: Version 3

Figure 2 – Single Segment Strap Assembly Version 3 with G10/ 304 SS Supports G10 Support 304 SS Support

Figure 3 – Single Segment Strap Assembly: Center Strap Only

B tor = 1 T I = 130 kA B pol =.3 T U rad thermal =.018 in U vert thermal =.3 in 38 Laminations: -.060” thk;.005” gap Mat’l: Copper Wt full = 37.4 lb (Wt arch = 20.4 lb) 2” 2.523” 7.5” R in = 3.160” R out = 5.688” 5” Figure 4 – Single Laminated Strap Assembly with Applied Fields and Current

x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x Out-of-Plane Load (z-direction) F op = 2*I*B pol *R F op = 2 x 130,000 A/ 38 x.3 T x 5.688/39.37 m F op = N = 66.6 lbf [per lamination] In-Plane Load (y-direction) F ip / L = I*B tor F ip / L = 130,000 A/ 38 x 1 T [per lamination] F ip / L = 3,421 N/ m x.2248 lbf/ N x 1 m/ in F ip / L = lbf/ in press ip = (F ip / L)/ w press ip = lbf/in / 2 in press ip = 9.77 lbf/ in 2 (applied to inside cylindrical faces) Calculated EMAG Loads B pol B tor I+I+ I+I+ R w F op press ip

Figure 5A – Single Lamination FEA Model: Mesh and Boundary Conditions 3 Elements thru Thickness Ux =.018 in Uy =.3 in Uz = 0 Press = 9.7 psi Force = 66.6 lbf Fixed

Figure 5B – Single Lamination Linear Results: von Mises Stress Loads: Combined Thermal Displacements, Emag Press. (In Plane) and Forces (OOP)

Figure 5C – Single Lamination Linear Results: von Mises Stress Loads: Thermal Displacements Only

Figure 5D – Single Lamination Linear Results: von Mises Stress Loads: In-Plane (Pressure) Load Only

Figure 5E – Single Lamination Linear Results: von Mises Stress Loads: Out-of-Plane (Force) Load Only

Large deflection = On Figure 5F – Single Lamination Nonlinear Results: von Mises Stress Loads: Combined Thermal Displacements, Emag Press. (In Plane) and Forces (OOP)

Baseline-Design MathCAD Flex Strap Lamination Analysis: Conclusions/ Recommendations ~3/4 overall stiffness due to Inner Strap Assy OOP torsional stress dominates in Outer Strap Assy; thermal displacement bending dominates in Inner Strap Assy OOP force proportional to radius Thermal displacement bending stress inversely proportional to radius Deflection force inversely proportional to radius Proposed Design: –Outer Assy: 12X.090” thick, 2.0” wide laminations –Inner Assy: 19X.060” thick, 2.0” wide laminations –Mat’l: Fully-hardened Cu-Zr

Baseline Design Proposed Design ASM International, “Atlas of Stress-Strain Curves”, Electrolytic Tough-Pitch Copper (C11000) Figure 5G – Copper Stress-Strain Curves versus % Cold Work Baseline Design and Proposed Design Combined-Load Stresses Shown

Baseline Design Proposed Design NIST Monograph 177, “Properties of Copper and Copper Alloys at Cryogenic Temperatures” Figure 5H – Copper Fatigue S-N Curves versus % Cold Work Baseline Design and Proposed Design Combined-Load Stresses Shown

Figure 5J – Single Lamination Nonlinear Results: Z-Deformations Loads: Combined Thermal Displacements, Emag Press. (In Plane) and Forces (OOP) Large deflection = On

Figure 5K – Single Lamination Nonlinear Results: Z-Deformations_Front Loads: Combined Thermal Displacements, Emag Press. (In Plane) and Forces (OOP) Large deflection = On

Figure 5L – Single Lamination Nonlinear Results: von Mises Stress Loads: Emag Pressure (In Plane) Only Large deflection = On σ hoop = P*R/ t = 9.77 psi x in/.060 in = 924 psi

Figure 5M – Single Lamination Pre-Stressed Linear Buckling Results Load multiplier LMF applies to all Emag loads and thermal displacements 1 st Mode Load Multiplier = nd Mode Load Multiplier = rd Mode Load Multiplier = Large deflection = Off 1 st Mode Load Multiplier = 58.4 (Nonlinear 1 st Mode Load Multiplier = 50)

Figure 5N – Single Lamination Nonlinear Buckling: Y-Deformation at Onset (1) Load multiplier factor LMF applies only Out-of-Plane Emag load Large deflection = On Y 080 LMF = 14

Figure 5P – Single Lamination Nonlinear Buckling: Y-Deformation at Onset (2) Load multiplier factor LMF applies only to Out-of-Plane Emag load Large deflection = On LMF = 26 Y 080

Conclusions Buckling due mostly to out-of-plane load. In- plane load (pressure outward) reduces buckling; thermal displacements slightly increase buckling. Good agreement between linear and nonlinear buckling results with load multiplier factor applied to both Emag loads and to thermal displacements. Load multiplier factor over 14 for nonlinear analysis with constant in-plane load and increasing out-of-plane load (conservative).

Figure 6A – 3 Lamination FEA Model: Mesh 3 Elements / Lamination

Large deflection = On Frictional contact (COF =.4) Figure 6B – 3 Lamination Nonlinear Results: von Mises Stress Loads: Combined Thermal Displacements, Emag Press. (In Plane) and Forces (OOP)

Figure 6C – 3 Lamination Nonlinear Results: Z-Deformations Loads: Combined Thermal Displacements, Emag Press. (In Plane) and Forces (OOP) Large deflection = On Frictional contact (COF =.4)

Figure 6D – 3 Lamination Nonlinear Results: Z-Deformations_Front Loads: Combined Thermal Displacements, Emag Press. (In Plane) and Forces (OOP) Large deflection = On Frictional contact (COF =.4)

Figure 6E – 3 Lamination Nonlinear Results: Contact Status Loads: Combined Thermal Displacements, Emag Press. (In Plane) and Forces (OOP) Large deflection = On Frictional contact (COF =.4)

Figure 6F – 3 Lamination Results: Linear Buckling Mode Multiplier Load Multiplier factor LMF applies to all Emag loads and thermal displacements Large deflection = Off Frictional contact (COF =.4) 1 st Mode Load Multiplier = nd Mode Load Multiplier = rd Mode Load Multiplier = 61.8

Figure 7A – Single Laminated Strap Assembly FEA Model: Bonded and Frictionless Contact Areas

3 elements/ lamination Figure 7B – Single Laminated Strap Assembly FEA Model: Mesh # Nodes = # Elements =

Fig. 7C –Laminated Strap Assembly FEA Results - Thermal Displacements Only: von Mises Stress Large deflection = Off Frictional contact (COF = 0)

Fig. 7D –Laminated Strap Assembly FEA Results – Thermal Displacements Only: Total Deformation Large deflection = Off Frictional contact (COF = 0)

T nodes Heat Gen JS F Lorentz B y =.3T B z = 1 T I = 130 kA Non-Linear Large Deflection Non-Linear Large Deflection Fig. 8A – Upper Flex Strap ANSYS Multiphysics Analysis Work Flow Diagram u x =.018” u y =.30”

Figure 8B – Single Segment_Center Strap Assembly: Mesh

Fig. 8C – Single Segment_Center Strap Assembly: von Mises Stress_Iso-View

Fig. 8D – Single Segment_Center Strap Assembly: von Mises Stress_Side View

Figure 8E – Single Segment_Center Strap Assembly: Joint Contact Pressure

Figure 8F – Single Segment_Center Strap Assembly: Thread Stress

Figure 9A – Strap-to-E Beam Joint Analysis: Solid Model

Figure 9B – Strap-to-E Beam Joint Analysis: Full-Load von Mises Stress

Figure 9C– Strap-to-E Beam Joint Analysis: Maximum Shear Stress Full-LoadPretension

Figure 9D – Strap-to-E Beam Joint Analysis: Contact Pressure Full Load PressureBolt Pretension-Only Pressure

Figure 9E – Strap-to-E Beam Joint Analysis: Contact Status Bolt Pretension-Only StatusFull Load Status

Figure 10A – Strap-to-TF Coil Outer Leg Joint: Solid Model

Figure 10B – Strap-to-TF Coil Outer Leg Joint Analysis: Full-Load Stress

Figure 10C – Strap-to-TF Coil Outer Leg Joint Analysis: Contact Pressure Full Load PressureBolt Pretension-Only Pressure

Fig. 10D – Strap-to-TF Coil Outer Leg Joint: TF Leg-Only Contact Pressure Full Load PressureBolt Pretension-Only Pressure

Figure 10E – Strap-to-TF Coil Outer Leg Joint Analysis: Contact Status Bolt Pretension-Only StatusFull Load Status

Fig. 11A – Single Segment_Center Strap Electric Model: Boundary Conditions 130,000 A 0 V

Figure 11B – Single Segment_Center Strap Electric Model Results: Voltage

Fig. 11C – Single Segment_Center Strap Electric Model Results: Current Density

Fig. 11D – Single Segment_Center Strap Electric Model Results: Joule Heat

Shear Key Copper Threads, Static Results (cont.) A-1 12,500lbs peak, 8 Threads A-2 12,620lbs peak, 8.5 Threads A-3 13,120lbs peak, 9 Threads A-4 12,500lbs peak, 8 Threads A-5 10,880lbs peak, 7 Threads A-6 12,380lbs peak, 8 Threads Correlation between pull out force and the number of threads pulled explains scatter By design shear key bolt will catch 8-9 threads