Submission doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/1289r2 Michelle Gong, IntelSlide 1 RTS/CTS Operation for Wider Bandwidth Date: 2010-11-09 Authors: Nov. 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PS-Poll TXOP Using RTS/CTS Protection
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /0324r0 Submission Slide 1Michelle Gong, Intel March 2010 DL MU MIMO Error Handling and Simulation Results Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0567r0 Submission Slide 1Michelle Gong, Intel May 2010 DL MU MIMO Analysis and OBSS Simulation Results Date: Authors:
Doc.:IEEE /0037r0 Submission Jan. 17, 2011 Yong Liu, MarvellSlide 1 BW Indication in Non-HT Frames Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0081r0 Michelle Gong, et alSlide 1 Transmission Rules for Wider Bandwidth TXOP Date: Authors: Jan
EETS 8316 : WIRELESS NETWORKS Vamsi Krishna Medharametla
Submission doc.: IEEE /1225r1 Considerations on CCA for OBSS Opearation in ax Date: Slide 1Huawei Authors:
11ac: 5G WiFi The trigger for 5GHz everywhere Led by Apple and other consumer specialists – In-home device sync, video, backup, etc – “Gigabit WiFi” on.
Doc.: IEEE /1019r1 Submission July 2011 MediaTek, Inc Slide 1 Supporting Large Number of STAs in ah Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-15/613r0 May 2015 Chinghwa Yu et al, MediaTek Inc.Slide 1 Box 5 Calibration Result Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1431r1 Submission September 2014 Issues on UL-OFDMA Transmission Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /0861r0 SubmissionSayantan Choudhury Impact of CCA adaptation on spatial reuse in dense residential scenario Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1420r1Nov 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Impact of Preamble Error on MAC System Performance Date: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /1404r0 Submission November 2014 Eisuke Sakai, Sony CorporationSlide 1 11aa GCR-BA Performance in OBSS Date: 2014/11/2 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1187r1Sep 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Effect of Preamble Error Model on MAC Simulator Date: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Submission doc.: IEEE /1208r1 September 2014 Jinsoo Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 MAC considerations on ax OFDMA Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/279r0 March 2012 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide ai simulations Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1303r5 Submission November 2010 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide 1 Overlapping BSS Co-Existence Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0831r0 Submission July 2010 Yusuke Asai (NTT)Slide 1 Frame Sequence of Interference Management Using Beamforming Technique in OBSS.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/0288r0 TXOP Sharing Operation for Relay Date: Slide 1Eric Wong, Broadcom Authors: March 2013.
Doc.:IEEE /0536r0 Submission May 11th, 2009 Slide 1 OBSS issue in ac Authors: Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0840r1 Submission AP Assisted Medium Synchronization Date: Authors: September 2012 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /610r1 Submission Vida Ferdowsi, Newracom May 2015 Slide 1 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Vida Ferdowsi Daewon Lee Reza Hedayat.
Doc.: IEEE / Submission September 2010 James Wang, MediatekSlide 1 Wide Band OBSS Friendly PSMP Date: 2010, September 13 Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1081r3 September, 2015 Jing Ma, NICTSlide 1 Further consideration on receive behavior based on the cascading structure.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1288r1 November 2015 K. Yunoki, KDDI R&D Labs.Slide 1 An issue of wider bandwidth operation at real denser environment.
Doc.: IEEE /0814r0 Submission July 2015 Simulation Results for Box5 Calibration Ke Yao, et, al. (ZTE) Slide 1 Date: Authors: NameAffiliationAddress .
Doc.: IEEE /1172r2 Submission September 2014 Eisuke Sakai, Sony CorporationSlide 1 Multicast Performance in OBSS Date: 2014/9/15 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE / ax Submission M. Shahwaiz Afaqui DSC calibration results with NS-3 Authors: Nov
Doc.: IEEE /1191r0 Submission September 2014 MAC calibration results Date: Authors: Zhou Lan (Huawei Technology)Slide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1265r1 November 2015 Slide 1 RTS*/CTS* for UL/DL OFDMA Control Date: Authors: NameAffiliationAddressPhone .
Submission Jul 2012 doc.: IEEE 11-12/0842r0 ZTE CorporationSlide 1 Short Beamforming Report Poll Frame Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0877r0 Submission July 2013 James Wang (MediaTek)Slide 1 HEW Beamforming Enhancements Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE / ax Submission M. Shahwaiz Afaqui DSC calibration results with NS-3 Authors: Nov
Doc.: IEEE /1149r0 Submission September 2010 Jarkko Kneckt, Nokia CorporationSlide 1 Operation rules for > 40MHz Bandwidth Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1373r1 November 2015 Narendar Madhavan, ToshibaSlide 1 Updated Box 5 Calibration Results Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0098r0 January 2016 Assaf Kasher, IntelSlide 1 Channel bonding proposals Date: Authors:
Resolutions to Static RTS CTS Comments
Doc.: ax Submission Sept 2014 Slide 1 Additional Test Cases for MAC calibration Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1392r5 SubmissionSuhwook Kim, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 Simulation results for Box 5 calibration Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Submission doc.: IEEE /0353r1 March 2016 Hanseul Hong, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 MU-RTS/CTS for TWT Protection Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0087r1 January 2016 Jinsoo Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 NAV cancellation issues on MU protection Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-15/1060r0 September 2015 Eric Wong (Apple)Slide 1 Receive Operating Mode Indication for Power Save Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0107r2 SubmissionLiwen Chu Etc.Slide 1 Channel Bandwidth Indication and Negotiation Date: Authors: Date: Jan, 2012.
Secondary Channel CCA of HE STA
Channel Width Selection Within TXOP
Wide Scanning Requests and Responses
Virtual CS during UL MU Date: Authors: March 2017
CCA schemes for the 120MHz spectrum in China
Flexible Wider Bandwidth Transmission
Full-Duplex based MAC enhancements
The Effect of Preamble Error Model on MAC Simulator
Updated Simulation Results for Box5
Fair Quiet for DFS Date: Authors: February 2008
Overlapping BSS Co-Existence
Overlapping BSS Co-Existence
VHT BSS Channel Selection
Overlapping BSS Co-Existence
Increased Network Throughput with Channel Width Related CCA and Rules
DL MU MIMO Error Handling and Simulation Results
TGac Coex Ad Hoc Report November 2010
RTS&CTS Exchange in wideband transmission
Box 5 Calibration Result
More Simulations on Secondary CCA
Channel Width Selection Within TXOP
Reserving STA Date: Authors: January 2011 January 2011
1MHz Dup Mode Date: Authors: Nov 2012 Month Year
System Level Simulator Evaluation with/without Capture Effect
DSC Calibration Result
CCA schemes for the 120MHz spectrum in China
Presentation transcript:

Submission doc.: IEEE /1289r2 Michelle Gong, IntelSlide 1 RTS/CTS Operation for Wider Bandwidth Date: Authors: Nov. 2010

Submission doc.: IEEE /1289r2 Outline Overview of n RTS/CTS operation RTS/CTS operation rules for wider bandwidth Simulation results –Two 40MHz BSSs and one 80MHz BSS (hidden nodes) Conclusions Michelle Gong, IntelSlide 2 Nov. 2010

Submission doc.: IEEE /1289r2 Current RTS/CTS rules for wider bandwidth become out- dated when 11ac starts to use more secondary channels Under current RTS/CTS rules for wider channels, a responder responds with CTS on all subchannels If an initiator receives a CTS on primary, it responds with Data on all subchannels This rule does not account for hidden node collisions on secondary channels This hidden node problem becomes more severe in 11ac –There are at most two non-overlapping 160MHz channels in 5 GHz Primary Secondary time Secondary40 time Slide 3 Michelle Gong, Intel RTS CTS Interference at responder Nov. 2010

Submission doc.: IEEE /1289r2 Definitions: dynamic BW operation and static BW operation Dynamic BW: 20/40/80 MHz –If 80 MHz is free, transmit using 80 MHz, else –If 40 MHz (including primary) is free, transmit using 40 MHz, else –If the secondary channel is not free, data is transmitted over the primary channel. Static BW: 0/80MHz –If at least one of the secondary channels is busy, the transmitter restarts the backoff procedure over the primary channel without incrementing the retry counter. Michelle Gong, IntelSlide 4 Nov. 2010

Submission doc.: IEEE /1289r2 RTS/CTS rules should be adjusted to account for secondary channel CCA Both initiator and responder are capable of dynamic BW operation –RTS is transmitted on channels that are sensed free at the initiator –CTS response is only sent on channels that are occupied by the RTS and are determined to be free at the responder (a valid PHY mode is used, meaning only 20/40/80/80+80/160MHz transmissions allowed) –RTS/CTS frames carry the available bandwidth information –Initiator transmits data only over channels indicated free by CTS response Michelle Gong, IntelSlide 5 time BA time BA RTS CTS Interference at responder Nov. 2010

Submission doc.: IEEE /1289r2 The initiator informs the responder whether it is capable of dynamic BW operation Depending on the initiator’s capability, the responder may or may not transmit a CTS frame If the initiator is only capable of static BW operation, the responder would not reply a CTS frame if any of the secondary channels is busy Include a bit in the RTS frame to indicate whether a STA is using dynamic BW operation –If the bit is set to 1, the initiator is using dynamic BW operation In the following example, the capability bit is set to 0 –The responder does not transmit a CTS frame if any of the secondary channels is busy Michelle Gong, IntelSlide 6 time RTS Interference at responder Nov. 2010

Submission doc.: IEEE /1289r2 Simulation parameters TXOP limit: 3ms 20MHz: 52 data subcarriers, 4 pilot tones 40MHz: 108 data subcarriers, 6 pilot tones 80MHz: 234 data subcarriers, 8 pilot tones Channel B SIFS=16 us, aSlotTime=9 us Packet size: 1500 bytes Data rate: MCS5 (64QAM, r=2/3) Control rate: MCS3 (16QAM, r=1/2) CWmin=7, CWmax=63 Max A-MPDU size: 128K octets UDP traffic Slide 7Michelle Gong, Intel Nov. 2010

Submission doc.: IEEE /1289r2 Simulation Scenario Two 40MHz BSSs and one 80MHz BSS AP1 and AP2 are hidden nodes with respect to each other on the secondary channels (CCA sensitivity = -82dB on all channels since 80MHz BSS’s secondary_40 overlaps with BSS_40MHz_1’s primary channel) STA1 and STA2 can hear both AP1 and AP2’s transmission BSS_40MHz_1 Channels: 44(p)+48 BSS_80MHz Channels: 36(p) AP1 AP2 STA2 Slide 8Michelle Gong, Intel STA1 AP3 STA3 BSS_40MHz_2 Channels: 36(p)+40 Nov. 2010

Submission doc.: IEEE /1289r2 RTS/CTS with receiver CCA improves the throughput of all three BSSs Michelle Gong, IntelSlide 9 RTS/CTS with BW indication BSS_80MHz (STA2) BSS_40MHz_1 (blue) BSS_40MHz_2 (green) Per BSS throughput (Mbps) 11n RTS/CTS (no receiver CCA ) BSS_80MHz (STA2) BSS_40MHz_1 (blue) Nov. 2010

Submission doc.: IEEE /1289r2 Without BW indication in RTS/CTS and receiver CCA, 80MHz STA suffers from constant collisions With RTS/CTS and receiver CCA, the initiator transmits RTS over all channels that it has sensed free; the receiver transmits CTS over the channels that meet the following conditions –1) The channel was indicated in the RTS frame –2) The channel was determined to be idle Because CTS indicates the channels that the receiver has sensed free, the initiator can avoid collisions over the subsequent data frame Michelle Gong, IntelSlide 10 BSS_80MHz primary time BA BSS_40MHz _1 primary time BA RTS CTS Nov. 2010

Submission doc.: IEEE /1289r2 Define the channel width selection rules to allow CTS being transmitted over narrower channels Michelle Gong, IntelSlide 11 Nov CH_BANDWIDTH RXVECTOR value CH_BANDWIDTH TXVECTOR value NON_HT_CBW20 NON_HT_CBW40NON_HT_CBW20 or NON_HT_CBW40 NON_HT_CBW80NON_HT_CBW20 or NON_HT_CBW40 or NON_HT_CBW80 NON_HT_CBW160NON_HT_CBW20 or NON_HT_CBW40 or NON_HT_CBW80 or NON_HT_CBW160

Submission doc.: IEEE /1289r2 Conclusions RTS/CTS accounting for secondary channel CCA can significantly improve the performance of an 80MHz STA in a hidden node scenario It is beneficial for both 40MHz STAs and 80MHz STAs that utilize wider channels Propose the following signaling method: Dynamic BW operation can be indicated in the RTS frame Channel bandwidth can be indicated in RTS/CTS frames Propose the following protocol rules: If the initiator is capable of dynamic BW operation, CTS sent in response to RTS shall be sent over channels occupied by the RTS AND that are determined to be idle at the responder If the initiator is incapable of dynamic BW operation, the responder shall not reply a CTS if one of the secondary channels is sensed busy at the responder Upon receiving a CTS frame, an initiator shall not transmit frames that occupy more bandwidth than the BW indicated in the CTS frame Slide 12Michelle Gong, Intel Nov. 2010

Submission doc.: IEEE /1289r2 Pre-motion 1 Do you support updating the TGac spec framework to include the following signaling method? –One bit in TBD-RTS frame to indicate dynamic BW operation (the bit setting to 1 indicates a transmitting STA uses dynamic BW operation) –Two bits in TBD-RTS frame and TBD-CTS frame to indicate available bandwidth (i.e. 20/40/80/160 MHz) Michelle Gong, IntelSlide 13 Nov. 2010

Submission doc.: IEEE /1289r2 Pre-motion 2 Do you support updating the TGac spec framework to include the channel width selection rules for TBD- RTS/TBD-CTS defined as follows? Michelle Gong, IntelSlide 14 CH_BANDWIDTH RXVECTOR value CH_BANDWIDTH TXVECTOR value NON_HT_CBW20 NON_HT_CBW40NON_HT_CBW20 or NON_HT_CBW40 NON_HT_CBW80NON_HT_CBW20 or NON_HT_CBW40 or NON_HT_CBW80 NON_HT_CBW160NON_HT_CBW20 or NON_HT_CBW40 or NON_HT_CBW80 or NON_HT_CBW160 Nov. 2010

Submission doc.: IEEE /1289r2 Pre-motion 3 Do you support updating the TGac spec framework to include the following protocol rule? If an initiator operates in dynamic operation mode: –Upon receiving a TBD-RTS frame and if NAV at the responder is not set, a responder shall respond with a non-HT TBD-CTS over the primary channel and may respond over the secondary channels that are indicated in the TBD-RTS and that have been detected idle by the responder (all transmissions shall use a valid PHY mode, i.e. 20/40/80/80+80/160MHz) Michelle Gong, IntelSlide 15 Nov. 2010

Submission doc.: IEEE /1289r2 Pre-motion 4 Do you support updating the TGac spec framework to include the following protocol rule? If an initiator does not operate in dynamic operation mode: –Upon receiving a TBD-RTS frame, a responder shall respond with a non-HT duplicate TBD-CTS frame over all channels indicated in the TBD-RTS frame only if all secondary channels indicated in the TBD-RTS frame have been detected idle by the responder (a valid PHY mode shall be used, i.e. 20/40/80/80+80/160MHz) Michelle Gong, IntelSlide 16 Nov. 2010

Submission doc.: IEEE /1289r2 Pre-motion 5 Do you support updating the TGac spec framework to include the following protocol rule? Upon receiving a TBD-CTS frame, an initiator shall not transmit data frames using more bandwidth than the BW indicated in the TBD-CTS frame (all transmissions shall use a valid PHY mode, i.e. 20/40/80/80+80/160MHz) Michelle Gong, IntelSlide 17 Nov. 2010