PROPERTY E SLIDES 3-05-13. YOSEMITE: Problem 4I HALF DOME.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
 Grant of land that is, in some manner, conditional  Grantee could lose the “bundle of sticks”  Conditions may be added to:  Fee Simple  Life Estate.
Advertisements

DEFEASIBLE FEES DEFEASIBLE FEES Restatement Terms FEE SIMPLE DETERMINABLE (to grantor; automatic) F.S. ON CONDITION SUBSEQUENT (to grantor; must act)
 In favor of a transferee (not the grantor), and  Does not qualify as a remainder.
1.  1. Future interest held by someone other than grantor ▪ Warning: Not all future interests held by a non- grantor qualify as remainders; they could.
(F) Reggie “to Veronica for life, then to Betty and her heirs if Betty attains the age of 21.” Veronica: Life Estate Betty: Contingent Remainder in Fee.
Defeasible Estates. Grant of land that is, in some manner, conditional. Can be added to: Fee Simple Life Estate Term for Years.
 An interest is not good* unless it must vest**, if at all, not later than 21 years after some life in being*** at the time of the creation of the interest,
©2011 Cengage Learning. California Real Estate Principles Chapter 2 Part II: Estates and Methods of Holding Title ©2011 Cengage Learning.
Rule Against Perpetuities. No interest is good unless it must vest or fail within some life in being at the creation of the interest plus 21 years.
{ Chapter 12 Property: Real Property, Leases & Mortgages.
Real Property  Land and anything that is permanently attached to land (e.g., buildings, bridge, trees, crops, etc.)  Includes:  buildings  Subsurface.
Copyright © 2004 by Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved. PowerPoint Slides to Accompany BUSINESS LAW E-Commerce and Digital Law International Law and Ethics.
Property Law Estates and Future Interests Boston College Law School November 1, 2006.
Property Law Estates and Future Interests Boston College Law School October 29, 2004.
 Grant of land that is, in some manner, conditional [not “absolute”]  Grantee could lose the “bundle of sticks”  Conditions may be added to:  Fee.
DEFEASIBLE FEES Cont’d Fee Simple Determinable Fee Simple on Condition Subsequent Mahrenholz v. County Board Distinguishing Fee Simple Determinable from.
Property I Professor Donald J. Kochan Class
Rule Against Perpetuities. Classic Statement of RAP An interest is not good unless it must vest, if at all, not later than 21 years after some life in.
The Shadow of the Past MUSIC: CHANT The Benedictine Monks of Santo Domingo de Silos CHAPTER 7: The Shadow of the Past MUSIC: CHANT The Benedictine Monks.
Mahrenholz P583: [A] grantor should give a FSD if he intends to give property for so long as it is needed for the purposes for which it is given and no.
PROPERTY A SLIDES Friday March 6 Music: Bach, Unaccompanied Cello Suites Yo-Yo Ma, Cello (Released 2006) ALMOST SPRING BREAK.
Weekend Schedule Class: Saturday 9:00 a.m.-10:20 a.m. Office Hours (Room 263) –Saturday 11-2 –Sunday 2-4:30 New on Course Page: Comments & Corrections.
An interest is not good unless it must vest, if at all, not later than 21 years after some life in being at the time of the creation of the interest,
CHAPTER 4 TEST LOGISTICS FOR TEST THURSDAY Room Assignments: – Last name A-P: Room F309 – Last name R-Z: Room A110 Have #2 Pencils Ready Get Anonymous.
MUSIC: Greatest Hits of 1790 Recorded Philharmonia Virtuosi of New York Richard Kapp, Conductor; Herbert Laws, Flute Chick Corea, Piano; Edward.
Shapira v. Union National Bank & DQS E13-E15. SHAPIRA: DISTINCTIONS Gift conditioned upon religious faith of beneficiary v. Gift conditioned upon marriage.
Revised Schedule TUE 11/1 8:00-9:20 WED 11/2 8:00-10:00 THU 11/3 8:00-9:20 SAT 11/5 9:00-10:20 MON 11/7 8:00-10:00 (Review) TUE 11/8 8:00-9:10 (Exam)
Slide Set Fifteen: Real Property – Estates in Land
Executory Interests. Elements of Executory Interests In favor of a transferee (not the grantor) but, not a remainder.
Right to possess and use forever Right to transfer all present and future rights (inheritable/devisable) Right to liquidate assets Default estate today.
MUSIC: Alicia de Larrocha, Piano THE ART OF ALICIA DE LARROCHA Performances Disc 1: Music of Johann Sebastian Bach & Joseph Hadyn.
PROPERTY D SLIDES : MAKE-UP CLASS
PROPERTY A SLIDES Tuesday March 17 Wynton Marsalis, Trumpet Classic Wynton (1998) Detailed Instructions on Course Page for Thursday: REDWOOD:
WHITE v. BROWN LIVE OAK Discussion Questions
PLEASE PUT ASSIGNMENT #4 FACE DOWN IN BASKET ON CHAIR  MUSIC: Bach, Concertos for Two Harpsichords ( ) THE ENGLISH CONCERT Trevor Pinnock, Conductor,
PROPERTY A SLIDES 3 x 5 = 15 Thursday March 5 Music: Isaac Stern, 60 th Anniversary Celebration (1981) Thursday March 5 Music: Isaac Stern, 60 th Anniversary.
Remaining Schedule Office Hours: 6:30-9 p.m. Deans’ Suite – Qs sent before 9 p.m. To be Posted Today –Slides from Today (Probs RSTU) –Suggested Analysis.
ESTATES & FUTURE INTERESTS THE SHADOW OF THE PAST:
PROPERTY D SLIDES Thursday March 6 Music: Bach, Unaccompanied Cello Suites Yo-Yo Ma, Cello (Released 2006) Lunch Today: Meet on 12:25 Grossman,
Future Interest Chart. Remainders Held by a third person (not the grantor) Created by the same instrument (deed or will) as the possessory interest Becomes.
PROPERTY D SLIDES Monday March 17 Music: Albéniz, Iberia Alicia Delarrocha, Pianist 2009 Re-recording of Grammy Winner for 1974 for Best Classical.
Estates & Future Interests Problems. Problem 1 “To A.”
THE SHADOW OF THE PAST MUSIC: CHANT THE BENEDICTINE MONKS OF SANTO DOMINGO DE SILOS CHAPTER 6: THE SHADOW OF THE PAST MUSIC: CHANT THE BENEDICTINE MONKS.
PROPERTY D SLIDES Tuesday March 4 Music: Isaac Stern, 60 th Anniversary Celebration (1981) Tuesday March 4 Music: Isaac Stern, 60 th Anniversary.
PROPERTY E SLIDES to Ernie for life then to Burt forever OLYMPIC: (4B) Kermit “to Ernie for life, then to Burt forever.” (Common Law) Ernie: Life.
PROPERTY D SLIDES Tuesday March 18 Music: Mozart, Horn Concertos Dennis Brain, Trumpet Philharmonia Orchestra (Recorded 2005)
PROBLEMS A-D Featuring the Mangos: Hutzler;GottLiebowitz;JMason; Sarinsky.
Review pRoblem R Renee conveys “to Stacy for life, then to my heirs, but should Stacy marry before she turns 35, to Marni.” AMBIGUITIES/QUESTIONS?
 In favor of a transferee (not the grantor), and  Does not qualify as a remainder.
PROPERTY E SLIDES DENALI: Problem 4M continued Denali Caribou.
PROPERTY D SLIDES Saint Patrick’s Day National Corned Beef & Cabbage Day.
PROPERTY D SLIDES National Sloppy Joe Day.
PROPERTY D SLIDES Florida Primary Day National Everything-You-Think is Wrong Day.
PROPERTY D SLIDES National Grammar Day The past, the present, and the future walked into a bar. It was tense.
National Pancake Day PROPERTY A SLIDES National Pancake Day.
National French Bread Day National Single Parent Day
National Barbie Day National Meatball Day
Chapter 48 Real Property.
National Ravioli Day PROPERTY A SLIDES National Ravioli Day.
Chapter 48 Real Property.
Rule Against Perpetuities Boston College Law School October 27, 2010
VISITORS FROM SECTION J: SEE ME FOR AVAILABLE SEATS
Agenda for 13th Class Admin stuff Name plates Lunch sign-up Handouts
Property Law Estates and Future Interests Boston College Law School
Agenda for 14th Class Admin stuff Name plates Handouts Slides Leases I
National Oreo Cookie Day National Dentist’s Day
National Orgeon Day National Proofreading Day
Real Property: Estates in Land Interests in Land – Future Interests
National Sloppy Joe Day
National Ravioli Day PROPERTY A SLIDES National Ravioli Day.
Presentation transcript:

PROPERTY E SLIDES

YOSEMITE: Problem 4I HALF DOME

YOSEMITE: (4I): O conveys "to J and her heirs so long as the premises are not used for sale of beer, wine, or liquor, and if beer, wine, or liquor is sold on the premises, O retains a right to re-enter the premises." J opens a restaurant that serves several dishes cooked with wine or flamed with brandy and at Sunday brunch offers a free glass of champagne. The restaurant is successful, and 11 years after its opening D wants to buy it and add a bar. Advise D.

YOSEMITE: (4I): O conveys "to J and her heirs so long as the premises are not used for sale of beer, wine, or liquor, and if beer, wine, or liquor is sold on the premises, O retains a right to re-enter the premises." MULTI-STEP ANALYSIS FSD or FSCS? Some Arguments Each Way CONDITION VIOLATED? EFFECT OF VIOLATION? ADVICE RE PURCHASE

YOSEMITE: (4I): O conveys "to J and her heirs so long as the premises are not used for sale of beer, wine, or liquor, and if beer, wine, or liquor is sold on the premises, O retains a right to re-enter the premises." MULTI-STEP ANALYSIS FSD or FSCS? CONDITION VIOLATED? – No Direct Sale of Liquor for $$$ – BUT: Cost of Alcohol Incorporated in Purchase Price; Diners Buying Alcohol in Meals EFFECT OF VIOLATION? ADVICE RE PURCHASE

YOSEMITE: (4I): O conveys "to J and her heirs so long as the premises are not used for sale of beer, wine, or liquor, and if beer, wine, or liquor is sold on the premises, O retains a right to re-enter the premises." MULTI-STEP ANALYSIS FSD or FSCS? CONDITION VIOLATED? EFFECT OF VIOLATION? ADVICE RE PURCHASE

YOSEMITE: (4I): O conveys "to J and her heirs so long as the premises are not used for sale of beer, wine, or liquor, and if beer, wine, or liquor is sold on the premises, O retains a right to re-enter the premises." Effect of Violation if J has FSD & O has Possibility of Reverter O gets legal title at moment of violation. If sufficient time has passed, J may have title through adverse possession

YOSEMITE: (4I): O conveys "to J and her heirs so long as the premises are not used for sale of beer, wine, or liquor, and if beer, wine, or liquor is sold on the premises, O retains a right to re-enter the premises." Effect of Violation if J has FSCS & O has Right of Entry Assuming O has not acted, O still has RE If O is aware of Julia’s use of alcohol, may be held to have waived the right to enforce regarding these kinds of uses of alcohol.

YOSEMITE: (4I): O conveys "to J and her heirs so long as the premises are not used for sale of beer, wine, or liquor, and if beer, wine, or liquor is sold on the premises, O retains a right to re-enter the premises." MULTI-STEP ANALYSIS FSD or FSCS? CONDITION VIOLATED? EFFECT OF VIOLATION? ADVICE RE PURCHASE?

DEFEASIBLE FEES: Effect of Transfer on Condition The purchaser/grantee of a defeasible fee takes subject to any condition not made irrelevant by the sale/transfer. Like purchaser/grantee of a Life Estate; usually can’t get more than grantor has.

DEFEASIBLE FEES: Effect of Transfer on Condition The purchaser/grantee of a defeasible fee takes subject to any condition not made irrelevant by the sale/transfer. Example: To J so long as alcohol is never used on the premises. Wording of condition not limited to J; appears to apply to anyone Condition survives sale.

DEFEASIBLE FEES: Effect of Transfer on Condition The purchaser/grantee of a defeasible fee takes subject to any condition not made irrelevant by the sale/transfer. Compare: To J so long as J never uses alcohol on the premises. Condition only places limit on J. Essentially void if J is not the owner. Once J is dead, condition can never be violated, so owner would have fee simple absolute.

YOSEMITE: (4I): O conveys "to J and her heirs so long as the premises are not used for sale of beer, wine, or liquor, and if beer, wine, or liquor is sold on the premises, O retains a right to re-enter the premises." J opens a restaurant that serves several dishes cooked with wine or flamed with brandy and at Sunday brunch offers a free glass of champagne. The restaurant is successful, and 11 years after its opening D wants to buy it and add a bar. Possible Advice to D?

YOSEMITE: (4I) Plausible Advice to Donald Includes: Buy both present estate and future interest (or “all rights” of both J and O) to merge into f.s.absolute Serve free liquor & raise prices (and argue waiver if O questions) Make purchase contingent on J insuring right to use alcohol (winning suit re adverse possession/ waiver/etc.; buying future interest/waiver from O) Find out if D is willing and able to sell beer/wine on nearby site for people to take into restaurant. (Clever Samuel Idea!)

Executory Interests Future interest in grantee Cuts off prior vested interest (present estate or reversion or vested remainder) rather than waiting for it to expire naturally.

Executory Interests Future interest in grantee Cuts off prior vested interest (present estate or reversion or vested remainder) rather than waiting for it to expire naturally. Shifting Executory Interest cuts off another grantee

Executory Interests EXAMPLES Shifting Executory Interest:, otherwise to Eric and his heirs. To Justin & his heirs so long as no tobacco is grown on the land, otherwise to Eric and his heirs.

Executory Interests EXAMPLES Springing Executory Interest: To Crystal if she passes the California bar exam. To Crystal if she passes the California bar exam. (Grantor is left with Fee Simple on Executory Limitation)

to Veronica for life (4F) Reggie “to Veronica for life, then to Betty and her heirs if Betty attains the age of 21.” Riverdale High Let’s Return to Problem 4F & Riverdale High

to Veronica for life (4F) Reggie “to Veronica for life, then to Betty and her heirs if Betty attains the age of 21.” Veronica: Life Estate Betty: Contingent Remainder in Fee Simple Reggie: Reversion What if Veronica dies while Betty is still age 17? – Life Estate is Over – Betty Can’t Take; Condition Not Met

to Veronica for life (4F) Reggie “to Veronica for life, then to Betty and her heirs if Betty attains the age of 21.” Veronica dies while Betty is still age 17 Common Law destroyed If contingency not met when prior estate ends, contingent remainder is destroyed. Betty has nothing. Reggie has fee simple absolute

Doctrine of Destructability of Contingent Remainders ( Common Law) First Common Application destroyed. If contingency not met when prior estate ends, contingent remainder is destroyed.

Doctrine of Destructability of Contingent Remainders ( Common Law) Overruled by statute or caselaw in every American jurisdiction except …

Doctrine of Destructability of Contingent Remainders ( Common Law) Overruled by statute or caselaw in every American jurisdiction except … FLORIDA

to Veronica for life (4F) Reggie “to Veronica for life, then to Betty and her heirs if Betty attains the age of 21.” Veronica dies while Betty is still age 17 Modern View (except FL) If contingency not met when prior estate ends, we wait to see if it is met later. executory interest. Betty’s remainder becomes an executory interest. Reggie takes possession and has fee simple on executory limitation (cut off if B turns 21)

to Veronica for life (4F) Reggie “to Veronica for life, then to Betty and her heirs if Betty attains the age of 21.” Veronica dies while Betty is still age 17 Modern View (except FL)

THE “READY BETTY” JOKE (right before break)

Doctrine of Destructability of Contingent Remainders ( Common Law) Second Common Application Where there is a life estate, one or more contingent remainders, and a reversion, and the life estate and reversion merge into a fee simple, the contingent remainders are destroyed..

Doctrine of Destructability of Contingent Remainders Second Common Application Sara “to Ivane for life, then to Shae if Shae passes bar exam.

Doctrine of Destructability of Contingent Remainders Second Common Application Sara “to Ivane for life, then to Shae if Shae passes bar exam. Ivane purchases Reversion from Sara  Fee Simple Absolute

Modern View (everywhere except Florida) Merger without Destruction Sara “to Ivane for life, then to Shae if Shae passes bar exam. Ivane purchases Reversion from Sara  F.S. on Exec. Lim. Shae’s Remainder Becomes Executory Interest

EVERGLADES: Thursday Set-Up for Problem 4O (Thursday) EGRET IN MANGROVE SWAMP

EVERGLADES: Thursday Set-Up for Problem 4O: Three Questions 1.Life estate determinable or fee simple determinable? 2.Is condition restraining 2d marriage void? 3.Is cohabitation a violation of a restraint on marriage? Then Work Through Decision-Tree

DENALI: Problems 4J-4M Denali Caribou

DENALI: (4J): Mary "to Rhoda for life, then to Ted if Ted gives Mary a proper funeral." Rhoda?

DENALI: (4J): Mary "to Rhoda for life, then to Ted if Ted gives Mary a proper funeral." Rhoda: Life Estate Ted?

DENALI: (4J): Mary "to Rhoda for life, then to Ted if Ted gives Mary a proper funeral." Rhoda: Life Estate Ted: Contingent Remainder (if today: in f.s.) Anything Else?

DENALI: (4J): Mary "to Rhoda for life, then to Ted if Ted gives Mary a proper funeral." Rhoda: Life Estate Ted: Contingent Remainder (if today: in f.s.) Mary: Reversion

DENALI: (4J): Mary "to Rhoda for life, then to Ted if Ted gives Mary Rhoda a proper funeral." Rhoda: Life Estate Ted? (Is change from Mary’s Funeral to Rhoda’s Significant?)

DENALI: (4J): Mary "to Rhoda for life, then to Ted if Ted gives Mary Rhoda a proper funeral." Rhoda: Life Estate Ted can’t possibly give Rhoda a “proper” funeral by the time Rhoda dies. –There will be a gap in time between the end of R’s life estate and Ted’s interest. –Thus, Ted’s interest cannot be a remainder; So Ted has …?

DENALI: (4J): Mary "to Rhoda for life, then to Ted if Ted gives Rhoda a proper funeral." Rhoda: Life Estate Mary: Reversion Ted: Springing Executory Interest (will cut off grantor’s interest: reversion)

EXAM TIP: USE COMMON SENSE!! Can’t give a “proper” funeral to a person until after the person has died. Similarly, if an interest is conveyed in a will, the grantor is dead.

Remainders: Additional Information

Alternative Contingent Remainders Two contingent remainders for which the event that causes one to vest will destroy the other.

Alternative Contingent Remainders Two contingent remainders for which the event that causes one to vest will destroy the other. Example: To Jenna for life, then to Erin and her heirs if she graduates from law school, but if she never graduates from law school, then to Becky and her heirs.

Alternative Contingent Remainders Two contingent remainders for which the event that causes one to vest will destroy the other. Example: To Jenna for life, then to Erin and her heirs if she graduates from law school, but if she never graduates from law school, then to Becky and her heirs. Here, only two possibilities: either (1) Erin will graduate from law school (and would then take) or (2) she will die before graduating from law school (Becky would then take)

Vested Remainder Subject to Divestment Vested Remainder followed by an Executory Interest that could cut it off before it becomes possessory. Same as Vested Remainder Subject to Complete Defeasance (P596)

Contingent Remainder (1) v. Vested Remainder Subject to Divestment (2) (1) To A for life, then to B & her heirs if she turns 21, but if B dies before 21, then to C and his heirs. Reversion in O. (2) To A for life, then to B & her heirs, but if B dies before 21, then to C & his heirs. (No Reversion in O)

Contingent Remainder (1) v. Vested Remainder Subject to Divestment (2) (1) To A for life, then to B & heirs if she turns 21, but if B dies before 21, then to C & heirs. Reversion in O. (2) To A for life, then to B & her heirs, but if B dies before 21, then to C & his heirs. If A alive & B dies at 14 If A alive & B dies at 14: (both 1+2) B gets 0; C gets fee simple at A’s death

Contingent Remainder (1) v. Vested Remainder Subject to Divestment (2) (1) To A for life, then to B & heirs if she turns 21, but if B dies before 21, then to C & heirs. Reversion in O. (2) To A for life, then to B & her heirs, but if B dies before 21, then to C & his heirs. If A alive & B turns 21 If A alive & B turns 21: (both 1+2) B has vested remainder C’s interest fails

Contingent Remainder (1) v. Vested Remainder Subject to Divestment (2) (1) To A for life, then to B & her heirs if she turns 21, but if B dies before 21, then to C and his heirs. Reversion in O. (2) To A for life, then to B & her heirs, but if B dies before 21, then to C & his heirs. If A dies & B not yet 21(1) If A dies & B not yet 21 (1) Conditions not met for either B or C. Remainders either destroyed or become Executory Interests O takes Fee Simple [on Executory Limitation in Modern View (exc. FL)]

Contingent Remainder (1) v. Vested Remainder Subject to Divestment (2) (1) To A for life, then to B & her heirs if she turns 21, but if B dies before 21, then to C and his heirs. Reversion in O. (2) To A for life, then to B & her heirs, but if B dies before 21, then to C & his heirs. If A dies & B not yet 21(2) If A dies & B not yet 21 (2) No requirement that B turn 21 to take possession, so B has Fee Simple on Executory Limitation. C still has Shifting Executory Interest that will become possessory if B dies before turning 21. C still has Shifting Executory Interest that will become possessory if B dies before turning 21.

Vested Remainder Subject to Divestment (1) v. Vested Remainder in F.S. subj. to Exec. Lim. (2) (1) To A for life, then to B & her heirs, but if B dies before turning 21, then to C & his heirs. Condition might occur before B obtains possession.

Vested Remainder Subject to Divestment (1) v. Vested Remainder in F.S. subj. to Exec. Lim. (2) but if B dies before turning 21, then to C & his heirs. (1) To A for life, then to B & her heirs, but if B dies before turning 21, then to C & his heirs. Condition might occur before B takes possession. but if B ever uses the land for commercial purposes, to C & his heirs. (2) To A for life, then to B & her heirs, but if B ever uses the land for commercial purposes, to C & his heirs. Condition cannot occur before B takes possession.

EXAM TIP: COMMON MISTAKES Contingent Remainder Subject to Open Contingent Remainder Subject to Divestment Executory Interest Subject to Divestment

EXAM TIP: COMMON MISTAKES Contingent Remainder Subject to Open Contingent Remainder Subject to Divestment Executory Interest Subject to Divestment These Phrases Only Used for Vested Remainders

DENALI (4K): “To George for life, then to Kramer and his heirs; but if Kramer does not attain the age of 21, then to Elaine and her heirs." Kramer is 15 years old. George ?

DENALI (4K): “To George for life, then to Kramer and his heirs; but if Kramer does not attain the age of 21, then to Elaine and her heirs." Kramer is 15 years old. George: Life Estate Kramer?

DENALI (4K): “To George for life, then to Kramer and his heirs; but if Kramer does not attain the age of 21, then to Elaine and her heirs." Kramer is 15 years old. George: Life Estate Kramer: Vested Rem. (in f.s.) Subj. to Divestment – Vested b/c K not reaching 21 is condition on Elaine’s interest; K doesn’t have to reach 21 to get possession – Subject to Divestment b/c K can lose interest before it becomes possessory if he dies before 21 while G alive Elaine?

but if Kramer does not attain the age of 21, then to Elaine and her heirs." DENALI (4K): “To George for life, then to Kramer and his heirs; but if Kramer does not attain the age of 21, then to Elaine and her heirs." Kramer is 15 years old. George: Life Estate Kramer: Vested Rem. (in f.s.) Subj. to Divestment Elaine: Shifting Executory Interest (in f.s.) Elaine: Shifting Executory Interest (in f.s.) – Executory Interest b/c would cut off K’s Vested Rem. (or Fee if K gets possession before turning 21) – Shifting b/c cutting off grantee’sinterest – Note: If there’s a vested remainder, can’t have a second remainder following same finite interest.

DENALI (4L): Daffy "to Tweety for life, then to such of Tweety's children as survive him, but if none of Tweety's children survives him, then to Peggy and her heirs." Tweety has 2 children, Heckle and Jeckle. Tweety: ?

DENALI (4L): Daffy "to Tweety for life, then to such of Tweety's children as survive him, but if none of Tweety's children survives him, then to Peggy and her heirs." Tweety has 2 children, Heckle and Jeckle. Tweety: Life Estate Tweety’s Children?

DENALI (4L): Daffy "to Tweety for life, then to such of Tweety's children as survive him, but if none of Tweety's children survives him, then to Peggy and her heirs." Tweety has 2 children, Heckle and Jeckle. Tweety: Life Estate Tweety’s Children: Contingent Remainder (in f.s.) (Must Survive Tweety) Peggy?

DENALI (4L): Daffy "to Tweety for life, then to such of Tweety's children as survive him, but if none of Tweety's children survives him, then to Peggy and her heirs." Tweety has 2 children, Heckle and Jeckle. Tweety: Life Estate Tweety’s Children: Contingent Remainder (in f.s.) Peggy: Alternative Contingent Remainder (in f.s.) Only 2 Possibilities: – Tweety survived by children (who take) – Tweety not survived by children (Peggy takes)

DENALI (4L): Daffy "to Tweety for life, then to such of Tweety's children as survive him, but if none of Tweety's children survives him, then to Peggy and her heirs." Tweety has 2 children, Heckle and Jeckle. Tweety: Life Estate Tweety’s Children: Contingent Remainder (in f.s.) Peggy: Alternative Contingent Remainder (in f.s.) Anything Else?

DENALI (4L): Daffy "to Tweety for life, then to such of Tweety's children as survive him, but if none of Tweety's children survives him, then to Peggy and her heirs." Tweety has 2 children, Heckle and Jeckle. Tweety: Life Estate Tweety’s Children: Contingent Remainder (in f.s.) Peggy: Alternative Contingent Remainder (in f.s.) Daffy: Reversion (even when alternate contingent remainders)

DENALI (4L): Daffy "to Tweety for life, then to such of Tweety's children as survive him, but if none of Tweety's children survives him, then to Peggy and her heirs." Tweety: Life Estate Tweety’s Children: Contingent Remainder (in f.s.) Peggy: Alternative Contingent Remainder (in f.s.) Daffy: Reversion (even when alternate contingent remainders)

DENALI (4M): Amanda "to Billy for life, then to Billy's children and their heirs, but if at Billy's death he is not survived by any children, then to Jo and her heirs." Billy has no children. Billy: ?

DENALI (4M): Amanda "to Billy for life, then to Billy's children and their heirs, but if at Billy's death he is not survived by any children, then to Jo and her heirs." Billy has no children. Billy: Life Estate Billy’s children: ?

DENALI (4M): Amanda "to Billy for life, then to Billy's children and their heirs, but if at Billy's death he is not survived by any children, then to Jo and her heirs." Billy has no children. Billy: Life Estate Billy’s children: Contingent Remainder (in f.s.) (Unborn) Jo: ?

Alternative Contingent Remainders Two contingent remainders for which the event that causes one to vest will destroy the other.

DENALI (4M): Amanda "to Billy for life, then to Billy's children and their heirs, but if at Billy's death he is not survived by any children, then to Jo and her heirs." Billy has no children. When does contingent remainder in B’s children vest?

DENALI (4M): Amanda "to Billy for life, then to Billy's children and their heirs, but if at Billy's death he is not survived by any children, then to Jo and her heirs." Billy has no children. Contingent remainder in B’s children vests when a child of B’s is born. When does contingent remainder in Jo vest?

DENALI (4M): Amanda "to Billy for life, then to Billy's children and their heirs, but if at Billy's death he is not survived by any children, then to Jo and her heirs." Billy has no children. Contingent remainder in B’s children vests when a child of B’s is born. Contingent remainder in Jo vests when Billy dies survived by no children. Is the interest in Jo destroyed when the interest in the children vests?

DENALI (4M): Amanda "to Billy for life, then to Billy's children and their heirs, but if at Billy's death he is not survived by any children, then to Jo and her heirs." Billy has no children. Billy: Life Estate Billy’s children: Contingent Remainder (in f.s.) Jo: Contingent Remainder (in f.s.) (Not alternate) Anything Else?

DENALI (4M): Amanda "to Billy for life, then to Billy's children and their heirs, but if at Billy's death he is not survived by any children, then to Jo and her heirs." Billy has no children. Billy: Life Estate Billy’s children: Contingent Remainder (in f.s.) Jo: Contingent rem. (in f.s.) (Not alternate) Amanda: Reversion