Research Project Methylation of ARTS promoter is responsible for its silencing in several types of cancer Dana Mamriev Supervisor: Prof. Sarit Larisch,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Apoptosis By Douglas R. Green
Advertisements

Methylation, Acetylation and Epigenetics
ApoptosisNecrosis Apoptosis is a form of programmed cell death Apoptosis is responsible for the formation of digits in the developing mouse paw. Apoptotic.
1. What is the Central Dogma? 2. How does prokaryotic DNA compare to eukaryotic DNA? 3. How is DNA organized in eukaryotic cells?
DNA and Gene Expression. DNA Deoxyribonucleic Acid Deoxyribonucleic Acid Double helix Double helix Carries genetic information Carries genetic information.
1. What is the Central Dogma? 2. How does prokaryotic DNA compare to eukaryotic DNA? 3. How is DNA organized in eukaryotic cells?
Estrogen and its receptors play an important role in breast carcinogenesis. In humans, there are two subtypes of estrogen receptors (ER), ER  and ER ,
The Organization and Control of Eukaryotic Genomes Ch. 19 AP Biology Ms. Haut.
NOTES: CH 18 part 2 - The Molecular Biology of Cancer
REGULATION OF GENE EXPRESSION Chapter 18. Gene expression A gene that is expressed is “turned on”. It is actively making a product (protein or RNA). Gene.
-The methods section of the course covers chapters 21 and 22, not chapters 20 and 21 -Paper discussion on Tuesday - assignment due at the start of class.
Apoptosis (Programmed Cell Death). Apoptosis vs Necrosis Level of stress, change in environment stress apoptosisnecrosis.
Regulation of Gene Expression
Regulation of Gene Expression
Eukaryotic Gene Regulation
Regulation of Gene Expression Eukaryotes
Chapter 11 Regulation of Gene Expression. Regulation of Gene Expression u Important for cellular control and differentiation. u Understanding “expression”
Eukaryotic Genome & Gene Regulation The entire genome of the eukaryotic organism is present in every cell of the organism. Although all genes are present,
P53 Missense Mutation Cancer. Outline Disease related to p53 Role and regulation pathway Structure of p53 Missense mutation and consequences Experiment’s.
Regulation of Gene Activity. Conservation Remember, our bodies are conservative, they only make what we need, when we need it. How do they know this???
Gene Expression. Cell Differentiation Cell types are different because genes are expressed differently in them. Causes:  Changes in chromatin structure.
Essentials of Biology Sylvia S. Mader
Chapter 18. Transcription Operon Operon: cluster of related genes with on/off switch Three Parts: 1.Promoter – where RNA polymerase attaches 2.Operator.
Melanie Tavone. Curriculum Expectations D3.3 explain the steps involved in the process of protein synthesis and how genetic expression is controlled in.
Apoptosis Yasir Waheed. The cells of a multicellular organism are members of a highly organized community. The number of cells in this community is tightly.
Benign Versus Malignant Tumors
CHAPTER 19 THE ORGANIZATION AND CONTROL OF EUKARYOTIC GENOMES Copyright © 2002 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Benjamin Cummings Section D: The.
Eukaryotic Gene Control. Gene Organization: Chromatin: Complex of DNA and Proteins Structure base on DNA packing.
Chromatin Structure:  Tightly bound DNA less accessible for transcription  DNA methylation: methyl groups added to DNA; tightly packed;  transcription.
Chapter 19 The Organization & Control of Eukaryotic Genomes.
Gene Expression (Epigenetics) Chapter 19. What you need to know The functions of the three parts of an operon. The role of repressor genes in operons.
1. What is the Central Dogma? 2. How does prokaryotic DNA compare to eukaryotic DNA? 3. How is DNA organized in eukaryotic cells?
The Organization and Control of Eukaryotic Genomes Ch. 19 AP Biology Ms. Haut.
Eukaryotic Gene Regulation
REGULATION OF GENE EXPRESSION
Molecular Genetics: Part 2B Regulation of metabolic pathways:
GENETIC BIOMARKERS.
Figure 1. miRNA in NETs PNET SB-NET miR-7-5p miR-19a miR-96 miR-182
EPIGENETICS Textbook Fall 2013.
Regulation of Gene Expression
EXPRESSION AND EPIGENETIC REGULATION OF KALLIKREINS AND KININ RECEPTORS IN LUNG CARCINOMA CELLS Kanti Bhoola, Yee Yen Sia, Odette Shaw, Neil Misso &
Regulation of Gene Expression
Regulation of Gene Expression
Gene Expression.
Cell Cycle and Apoptosis
Patient VB Li-Fraumeni Syndrome.
Chapter 15 Controls over Genes.
Companion PowerPoint slide set DNA Methylation & Cadmium Exposure in utero An Epigenetic Analysis Activity for Students This teacher slide set was created.
Companion PowerPoint slide set DNA Methylation & Cadmium Exposure in utero An Epigenetic Analysis Activity for Students This teacher slide set was created.
Gene Regulation Ability of an organisms to control which genes are present in response to the environment.
Concept 18.5: Cancer results from genetic changes that affect cell cycle control The gene regulation systems that go wrong during cancer are the very same.
Companion PowerPoint slide set DNA Methylation & Cadmium Exposure in utero An Epigenetic Analysis Activity for Students This teacher slide set was created.
Concept 18.2: Eukaryotic gene expression can be regulated at any stage
Chapter 18: Regulation of Gene Expression
Regulation of Gene Expression
Epigenetics Study of the modifications to genes which do not involve changing the underlying DNA
Control of Eukaryotic Genes
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (June 2008)
Review Warm-Up What is the Central Dogma?
Epigenetics Heritable alteration of gene expression without a change in nucleotide sequence.
Inhibition of DNA Methylation in the COL1A2 Promoter by Anacardic Acid Prevents UV- Induced Decrease of Type I Procollagen Expression  Min-Kyoung Kim,
Volume 42, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Epigenetics modification
Bo-Kuan Wu, Charles Brenner  Cell Reports 
The human GPR109A promoter is methylated and GPR109A expression is silenced in human colon carcinoma cells. The human GPR109A promoter is methylated and.
Eukaryotic Gene Regulation
by Xuefang Cao, Xingming Deng, and W. Stratford May
DNA demethylation reactivates GSN expression in gastric cancer cells.
Epigenetics.
Presentation transcript:

Research Project Methylation of ARTS promoter is responsible for its silencing in several types of cancer Dana Mamriev Supervisor: Prof. Sarit Larisch, University of Haifa

Programmed cell death- Apoptosis Essential process occurring in all multi-cellular organisms which leads to "cell suicide" Keeps a steady state cell numbers in tissues Serves as a major defense mechanism that protects the organism from mutations that can cause uncontrolled division leading to cancer

The major executioners of apoptosis are caspases- a family of enzymes that function as proteases.

Two major signaling pathways are responsible for induction of apoptosis in cells: The External and the Mitochondrial pathway Ow Y-L.P. et al. Nature 2008.

The Mitochondrial pathway Responsible for most processes of apoptosis in most cells. The apoptotic process is controlled through the action of both activators and inhibitors of caspases(Inhibitors of apoptosis- IAP) proteins. IAP-antagonists are mitochondrial proteins which bind and antagonize IAPs leading to the release of active caspases bound by IAPs Release of pro-apoptotic factors, including Cytochrome C and Smac/Diablo (SMAC), from the mitochondrial intermembrane space to the cytosol promotes caspases activation

Apoptosis trigger Cytochrome C IAP -Antagonists

ARTS- a mitochondrial pro-apoptotic protein-initiates caspase activation upstream of MOMP ARTS is a mitochondrial protein which is derived by differential splicing of the human Septin 4 (Sept4) gene ARTS acts as an XIAP-antagonist to initiate caspase activation and apoptosis. ARTS uses unique sequences to bind XIAP and promote its degradation leading to apoptosis High levels of ARTS alone are sufficient to promote apoptosis in many cancer cell lines

*By Edison et al.2012

ARTS functions as a Tumor suppressor protein, which is silenced in many types of cancers ARTS expression is frequently lost in acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients Leukemic cells lacking ARTS were resistant to apoptotic induction Deletion of the mouse Sept4 gene, which encodes ARTS, promotes tumor development

ARTS protein is lost in 75% of ALL patients Healthy donor Pre-B ALL T-ALL Elhasid et al, Oncogene, 2004

ARTS mRNA is frequently silenced in human lymphoma patients Garcia-Fernandez et al., Genes & Dev, 2010 11

Methylation A Genetic process that inhibits expression of proteins Methyl group is added to a cytosine or adenine DNA nucleotides In mammals the methyl group is usually added to the cytosine in a CG dinucleotide, in regions called “CpG islands” The enzyme which is adding methyl groups to the carbon-5 position of a specific cytosine residue is DNA Methyltransferase DNA methylation has an important role in the regulation of gene expression and chromatin organization within normal eukaryotic cells (the methylation control DNA accessibility for transcription) When the regulation of the methylation disrupts the gene expression is changing and tumor suppressor gens may be silenced. DNA methylation is one of the known mechanisms for inactivating tumor suppressor genes Methylation found to be the main mechanism responsible for the loss of ARTS expression in leukemia and lymphoma patients

Schematic representation of DNA methylation, which converts cytosine to 5’methyl-cytosine via the actions of DNA methyltransferase (DNMT). DNA methylation typically occurs at cytosines that are followed by a guanine *By Samir Zakhari Ph.D. from the review “Alcohol Metabolism and Epigenetics Changes”

Hypothesis: A common feature of most cancers is the loss of their ability to undergo apoptosis. One mechanism leading to that is by silencing tumor suppressor proteins which promote apoptosis. We assumed that if we will restore expression of ARTS by demethylation in these cells it will lead to specific apoptosis of these cancer cells.  

Work aims: To identify certain cancer cell lines in which ARTS expression is not detectable. To show that methylation of ARTS promoter is responsible for silencing ARTS expression. And that demethylation of ARTS promoter restores the expression of ARTS in these cancer cells.

5-Azacytidine (5-Aza) C8H12N4O5 Is a chemical analogue of the cytosine nucleoside Inhibited DNA methylation- demethylation agent Use to demonstrate the correlation between loss of methylation in specific gene regions and activation of the associated genes Incorporated into DNA, inhibits DNMT activity to induce DNA hypomethylation

Testing the effect of 5-AZA on ARTS RNA expression: Experimental procedure Cells were seeded and treated with 10 μM of 5-Aza for 72 hours. Cells that were not treated with 5-AZA were served as negative control RNA was isolated from the treated and untreated cells RT-PCR method were used to determine the mRNA levels of ARTS cDNA were amplified with specific primers for ARTS by PCR reaction PCR products were analyzed using gel electrophoresis to determine if ARTS expression can be rescued using demethylation Densitometry analyzes comparing values of ARTS to Actin quantified the expression levels of ARTS in response to treatment of 5-Aza Specific primers for Actin were served as positive control for cDNA synthesis and negative control for demethylation

The cells that were examined A375- human epithelial malignant melanoma cell line UACC- human breast epithelial primary ductal carcinoma HepG2- human hepatocellular carcinoma

Results: ARTS promoter is methylated in A375, UACC and HepG2 cell lines

ARTS expression is increased with the exposure to 5-Aza at the RNA levels in A375 cell line 192 bp 610 bp P.C- for positive control we used plasmid with ARTS gens. N.C- for negative control the sample contained primer for ARTS without cDNA N.T- Untreated cells with 5-aza 18 times increase in A375 treated cells A375 is a human epithelial malignant melanoma cell line

5-Aza treatment caused demethylation of ARTS promoter in a dose depended manner in A375 cell line Actin 1 1- Exp1 10 µM of 5-Aza 2- Exp2 1 µM of 5-Aza 3-Exp3 0.1 µM of 5-Aza 2 3 192 bp 1 2

5-Aza treatment caused demethylation of ARTS promoter in a dose depended manner in A375 cell line

ARTS expression increases with the exposure to 5-Aza at the RNA levels in UACC cell line Actin 192 bp 8 times increase in UACC cells UACC is a human breast epithelial primary ductal carcinoma

ARTS expression increases with the exposure to 5-Aza at the RNA levels in HepG2 cell line 192 bp 610 bp P.C- for positive control we used plasmid with ARTS gens. N.C- for negative control the sample contained primer for ARTS without cDNA N.T- Untreated cells with 5-aza 23 times increase in HepG2 cells HepG2 is a human hepatocellular carcinoma

5-Aza treatment causes demethylation of ARTS in dose depended manner in HepG2 cell line Actin 1 2 3 1- Exp1 10 µM of 5-Aza 2- Exp2 1 µM of 5-Aza 3-Exp3 0.1 µM of 5-Aza 192 bp 1 2

5-Aza treatment causes demethylation of ARTS in dose depended manner in HepG2 cell line

ARTS RNA Analysis-summary results A major increase in ARTS RNA expression levels was seen in HepG2, A375 and UACC cells.

To test the effect of 5-Aza on protein levels of ARTS we used the following methods: The treated and untreated cells were lysed and run on SDS-PAGE A375, UACC, HCT and Sk-mel Cell lines were seeded and treated with 10 μM of 5-AZA for 72 hours Results were analyzed using Western-bloot with specific monoclonal anti-ARTS antibodies (SIGMA) Actin served as loading control Densitometry analyzes comparing values of ARTS to Actin quantified the expression levels of ARTS in response to treatment of 5-AZA

The effect of 5-Aza on ARTS Protein expression levels in A375 an HCT cells + HCT + - Cell line 5-AZA Protein Actin 10 µM5-aza 1.7 times increase 2.7 times increase

The effect of 5-Aza on ARTS Protein expression levels in Sk-Mel and UACC cells + Actin Cell line - + UACC 3.6 times increase 1.4 times increase

Comparing our results at the RNA level of ARTS expression with its protein expression shows that in A375, UACC cell lines a strong up stream regulation of ARTS at RNA and protein levels

ARTS protein Analysis-summary We saw an increase in ARTS protein expression in the treated cells 3.6 times for sK-Mel 2.7 times for HCT And 1.4 times for UACC The effect of 5-AZA at the protein level was much smaller than the effect at the RNA levels These findings suggest that additional regulation mechanisms control the levels of ARTS in these cell lines at the protein levels

Post translational modifications such as degradation could explain the smaller effect seen in the 5-AZA treated cells at the protein levels as compared to the more significant effect seen at the RNA level

Conclusions: 1. Silencing of ARTS occurs through methylation in several solid tumor cell lines: A375 (melanoma), UACC (ductal carcinoma),HepG2 (hepatocellular carcinoma), HCT (colorectal carcinoma), and Sk-Mel (melanoma) 2. Post translational modifications such as Ubiquitin-Proteasome degradation of ARTS (published) could explain the smaller effect seen in the 5-AZA treated cells at the protein levels as compared to the more significant effect seen at the RNA level