56 MHz SRF Cavity Cryostat support system and Shielding C. Pai 1-19-2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Q1 for JLAB’s 12 Gev/c Super High Momentum Spectrometer S.R. Lassiter, P.B. Brindza, M. J. Fowler, S.R. Milward, P. Penfold, R. Locke Q1 SHMS HMS Q2 Q3.
Advertisements

N. Dhanaraj, Y. Orlov, R. Wands Thermal-Stress Analysis of CC1 Space Frame.
Vacuum Vessel Production Readiness Review
Status of the SPL cavities at CERN I.Aviles & N. Valverde on behalf of SPL team 1I. Aviles & N. ValverdeLund, 11 December 2013.
Progress on the MICE Cooling Channel Solenoid Magnet System
Figure 1 – NSTX Upper Umbrella Assembly Upgrade Design: Version 3.
9/26/2003E.L.B. MICE Meeting 9/26/2003 Absorber design update Edgar L. Black IIT.
1 Update on Focus Coil Design and Configuration M. A. Green, G. Barr, W. Lau, R. S. Senanayake, and S. Q. Yang University of Oxford Department of Physics.
Tracker Solenoid Module Design Update Steve VirostekStephanie Yang Mike GreenWing Lau Lawrence Berkeley National LabOxford Physics MICE Collaboration Meeting.
Status of the Coil Structure Design and Magnetic-Structural Analysis Presented by X.R. Wang Contributors: UCSD: S. Malang, A.R. Raffray PPPL: H.M. Fan.
-1- ICST/HIT The 23 rd MICE Collaboration Meeting Jan.13 to 17, Harbin/China MICE/MuCool Coupling Magnets Vacuum Vessel Design Guo, Xinglong.
Twin Solenoid Twin Solenoid - conceptual design for FCC-hh detector magnet - Matthias GT Mentink Alexey Dudarev Helder Pais Da Silva Leonardo Erik Gerritse.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,
DQW Cryogenic Magnetic Shield Internal Review Niklas Templeton 06/05/15.
Cryomodule Concept for the ODU RF Dipole Crab Cavity Tom Nicol* - Fermilab December 10, 2013 * With lots of help from HyeKyoung, Tom J, Shrikant, Ofelia,
Allan DeMello Lawrence Berkeley National Lab RFCC Module Design Review October 21, 2008 RFCC Module and Subcomponents Mechanical Design.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,
Progress on the MuCool and MICE Coupling Coils * L. Wang a, X. K Liu a, F. Y. Xu a, A. B. Chen a, H. Pan a, H. Wu a, X. L. Guo a, S. X Zheng a, D. Summers.
R&D Status and Plan on The Cryostat N. Ohuchi, K. Tsuchiya, A. Terashima, H. Hisamatsu, M. Masuzawa, T. Okamura, H. Hayano 1.STF-Cryostat Design 2.Construction.
Joint Institute for Nuclear Research Further optimization of the solenoid design A.Efremov, E.Koshurnikov, Yu.Lobanov, A.Makarov, A.Vodopianov GSI, Darmstadt,
Page 1 Jean Delayen HyeKyoung Park Center for Accelerator Science Department of Physics, Old Dominion University and Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator.
Electrostatic Septum For AGS C. Pai Brookhaven National Laboratory Collider-Accelerator Department
RFCC Module Design Update  automatic tuners  cavity suspension  cavity installation Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Collaboration.
Stress and cool-down analysis of the cryomodule Yun He MLC external review October 03, 2012.
The ratio of stress and strain, called modulus of elasticity. Mechanical Properties of Solids Modulus of Elasticity.
1 MME3360b Assignment 04 10% of final mark 6 problems, each worth 16.7% of assignment mark Due April 9 th, 2012.
Work toward Stainless Steel SRF Helium Vessels at Fermilab Tom Peterson (presenter), Information from Jeff Brandt, Serena Barbanotti, Harry Carter, Sergei.
Cavity support scheme options Thomas Jones 25/06/15 to 06/07/15 1.
Zian Zhu Magnet parameters Coil/Cryostat/Support design Magnetic field analysis Cryogenics Iron yoke structure Mechanical Integration Superconducting Magnet.
Preliminary Design for the Coupling Coil Cryostat in MICE
Magnets and Supports Bob Wands October 20, 2006 PPD/MD/Engineering Analysis Group Fermilab 4 th Concept Detector at Fermilab October, 2006.
Brookhaven - fermilab - berkeley US LHC ACCELERATOR PROJECT LHC IRQ Inner Triplet Review Q1, Q2, and Q3 Mechanics T. Nicol April 24-25, 2007.
5 K Shield Study of STF Cryomodule Norihito Ohuchi, Norio Higashi KEK Xu QingJin IHEP 2008/3/3-61Sendai-GDE-Meeting.
56 MHz SRF Cavity Thermal Analysis and Vacuum Chamber Strength C. Pai
SCH Controls Readiness Review- Cryostat Nov 4-5, 2015 Kurt Cantrell.
56 MHz SRF Cavity and Helium vessel Design
22 October 2005MICE Meeting at RAL1 Tracker Solenoid Overview Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory MICE Collaboration Meeting 22 October 2005.
Engineering Analysis October 23, 2006 Team Moondogs Chris Culver Rahul Kirtikar Elias Krauklis Christopher Sampson Michael Widerquist.
Cavity support scheme options Thomas Jones 25/06/15 1.
Alignment and assembling of the cryomodule Yun He, James Sears, Matthias Liepe.
HiLumi-LHC/LARP Crab Cavity System External Review – May Work partly supported by the EU FP7 HiLumi LHC grant agreement No and by the.
MICE RFCC Module Update Steve Virostek Allan DeMello Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE CM27 at RAL, UK July 8, 2010.
Date 2007/Sept./12-14 EDR kick-off-meeting Global Design Effort 1 Cryomodule Interface definition N. Ohuchi.
Adam Carreon July 19, 2012 Technical Division SRF Department Dressed SSR1 Cavities.
MICE CC Magnet Cryostat Design Overview Derun Li Center for Beam Physics Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE CC Cryostat Design Review LBNL, February.
Ralf Eichhorn CLASSE, Cornell University. I will not talk about: Cavities (Nick and Sam did this) HOM absorbers (did that yesterday) Power couplers (see.
Comments from the SNS Cryostat Design Review February 2010 Tom Peterson, Fermilab 15 February 2010.
7th SRF Materials Workshop FRIB SRF Cavities 7/16/12 Chris Compton.
14-Jun-161 Status of Horizontal Test Stand (HTS-2) Development Efforts Pradeep Kush, Prashant Khare, RRCAT, India Team Members: S.Gilankar, Rupul Ghosh,
Thermal screen of the cryostat Presented by Evgeny Koshurnikov, GSI, Darmstadt September 8, 2015 Joint Institute for Nuclear Research (Dubna)
11/12/2013P. Bosland - AD-retreat - Lund Designs of the Spoke and Elliptical Cavity Cryomodules P. Bosland CEA/Saclay IRFU On behalf of the cryomodule.
Cavity Supporting Scheme Paulo Azevedo, CERN – TE/MSC SPL Conceptual Review, 04/11/2010.
704 MHz cavity design based on 704MHZ_v7.stp C. Pai
EURISOL CB MEETING – PSI – 15 JUNE 2006 Sébastien Bousson IPN Orsay – Accelerator Division TASK 8 STATUS REPORT INFN – Legnaro IPN Orsay.
F LESEIGNEUR / G OLIVIER LUND January 9th, ESS HIGH BETA CRYOMODULE ESS CRYOMODULE STATUS MEETING HIGH BETA CRYOMODULE LUND JANUARY 9TH, 2013 Unité.
2K Cold Box Structural Analysis
CERN – Zanon discussions
Stress and cool-down analysis of the cryomodule
Ti/SS transitions A.Basti INFN-PISA*
2K Cold Box Structure Analysis
HFM Test Station Main Cryostat
SiD Solenoid Status and Plans
FRESCA2 Update on the dipole design and new calculations
BESIII Collaboration Meeting, June 5~6, 2002, Zian Zhu
Cryomodule Assembly Plan
SNS PPU Cryomodule Space Frame
8-T Solenoid Package and Local Magnetic Shielding in FRIB Cryomodules
Magnetic shielding and thermal shielding
IR Beam Transport Status
SNS PPU Cryomodule Space Frame
Presentation transcript:

56 MHz SRF Cavity Cryostat support system and Shielding C. Pai

Configuration of 56 MHz Cryostat

Total Weight estimate of 56 RF cavity cryostat Niobium + Titanium Vessel: 760 lb Tuner Linkage: 100 lb Space Frame: 400 lb Heat Shield: 150 lb Inner Magnetic Shield: 200 lb Outer Magnetic Shield: 250 lb Mis. : 240 lb Total Inside cryostat: 2100 lb Vacuum Chamber: 1500 lb Tuner, 2 nd stage 200 lb Thermal transition+ 500 lb Piping and Mis. 200 lb Total in Cryomodule: 4500 lb

Space Frame and Nitronic Rod (Cavity not shown)

Load Path in the 56 MHz Cryostat

Cryostat support Isolator Actuator

Nitronic Rod Stretch and spring Load

Radial Nitronic rod configuration 1. Length of Rod: Warm: ” Cold shrink: a. Due to Helium tank shrink: ” too long ( ”) b. Due to Rod shrink: ” Net shrink of rod: = ” (D) 2. Force induced in the rod with out spring: F=K*D=962 lb

Parts No. AM Quantity: 2 in parallel Material: Stainless steel Load at 3/4 deflection: =540 lb x2=1080 lb K of spring =42,477 lb/in (2 in Parallel) Stiffness of Rod: 37,909 lb/in (K) Combined stiffness of system: K=20,031 lb/in Force induced in the rod: F= lb Add two Disk Springs for Radial support

Axial Nitronic Rod Configuration 1. Length of Rod: Warm: ” Cold shrink: a. Due to Helium tank shrink: ” ( ”) b. Due Rod shrink: ” Net shrink of rod: = ” (D) 2 Force induced in the rod without spring: F=K*D= 1,430 lb

Torsion spring for Nitronic Rod (No Friction Loss for Tuning operation) Material: Ti-6Al-4V Yield strength: 128,000 psi K=840/.02=42,000 lb/in Stiffness of Rod: 31,593 lb/in (K) Combined stiffness of System: K=18,117 lb/in Force induced in the rod: F=K*D= 815 lb 3/5 load) S=70,123 psi

56 MHz SRF Cavity Nitronic Rod Support System Stiffness Analysis C. Pai

SRF cavity Support, Space Frame with Nitronic Rods Space Frame Axial Nitronic Rods Radial Nitronic Rods

Model, Helium vessel support by Nitronic rods, with disk spring Loading in Nitronic Rods Case 1. Cold Shrink force Case 2. Tuning Force Case 3. Combined Shrink + tuning Springs are simulated by Combined elastic modulus E radial: 14.7E6 psi E axial: 16.1E6 psi

Loading in the Nitronic rods Loading in Nitronic Rods Case 1. Tuning Force, 300 lb Case 2. Shrink to 4.5 K Case 3. Combined Shrink + tuning force

Stress plot, loading: Under tuning force only Tuning Force F=300 lbf Stress in Nitronic rod Max. S: 1313 psi Yield Strength: 55,000 psi Annealed

Under tuning force only, deflection plot Max. deflection at Bracket:.00181” Ratio of stiffness: tuning plate to support system Ratio=.060/.00181=33.1

Under Tuning Force only, Animation

Temperature distribution in the support system 4.5 K 300K Unit: F

Thermal load only, Stress plot Stress in Nitronic rod Max S: 34,242 psi, Axial S: 15,638 psi, Radial Yield Strength: 55,000 psi Annealed

Thermal load only, Deflection plot Max. deflection: Far end: ” Near End:.0194” Fixed bracket: about.001”

Thermal load only, Animation

Both Thermal and force load, Stress plot Stress in Nitronic rod Max S: 32,939 psi, Axial S: 14,890 psi, Radial Yield Strength: 55,000 psi Annealed

Both Thermal and force load, Deflection plot Max. deflection: Far end: ” Near End:.0175” Fixed bracket: DY=.0033”

Animation, Both thermal and force load

Space Frame strength Calculation

Model and Loading Material: SS304 Yield strength: 30,000 psi Gusset

Deflection Max. ∆ Y=.040” Max. ∆ Y=.023”

Max stress, S=15,454 psi Von Mises Stress

Max stress, S=15,454 psi Yield strength: 30,000 psi Eqv Stress

Stress at end plate Typical bending stress, S=3867 psi

Heat shield, Inner and Outer Magnetic shields

Cross section view of 3 shields Thermal heat shield Supported by Vacuum chamber Inner magnetic shield Inside of Space Frame Outer magnetic shield Outside of spaced frame Space Frame

Thermal Heat Shield (aluminum,.080”) Cooling Tube ID: 0.5” (aluminum extrusion) Thickness for welding, t=.19” Supported by Vacuum chamber

Inner Magnetic shield, Supported at inside of space frame Amumetal,.062”, Room Temperature

Outer Magnetic Shield, Supported at outside of space frame Amumetal,.062”, room temperature

Magnetic shielding effect: (Attenuation) Properties of Amumetal: Mu=60,000, t=.0625” Inner Radius: in, Outer Radius: in Attenuation of outer shield = 88.8 Attenuation of inner shield=103.8 Total combined Attenuation: Effect: if stray magnetic field from DX magnet is 10 gauss, the penetrated field to RF cavity is about gauss. Magnetic shielding effect: (Attenuation)

Assembled Cryostat