Gravity Lidar Study for 2006: A First Look D.R. Roman, V.A. Childers, D.L. Rabine, S.A. Martinka, Y.M. Wang, J.M. Brozena, S.B. Luthcke, and J.B. Blair.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Jeffrey Walker Factors Affecting the Detection of a Soil Moisture Signal in Field Relative Gravity Measurements 1 Adam Smith, 1 Jeffrey Walker, 1 Andrew.
Advertisements

Instruments used in gravity prospecting
Sky Hunter Exploration. Sky Hunter Exploration is a Calgary, Canada-based company that provides a valuable exploration tool to oil and.
Calibration Scenarios for PICASSO-CENA J. A. REAGAN, X. WANG, H. FANG University of Arizona, ECE Dept., Bldg. 104, Tucson, AZ MARY T. OSBORN SAIC,
CHAPTER 5: PREDICTING STORM SURGE LESSONS FROM HURRICANE IKE.
2015 Height Modernization Partner Meeting April 14, 2015.
Principles of Sea Level Measurement Long-term tide gauge records  What is a tide station?  How is sea level measured relative to the land?  What types.
Section 7: Conducting Surveys along the Texas Coast.
45 th Annual Alaska Surveying & Mapping Conference February 21-25, 2011 Hilton Anchorage Hotel Impact of Airborne Gravity Surveys on Geoid Modeling in.
NOAA’s National Geodetic Survey USGG2009 & GEOID09: New geoid height models for surveying/GIS ACSM-MARLS-UCLS-WFPS Conference FEB 2009 Salt Lake.
Airborne Gravity Processing 101 Sandra Preaux
How Global Positioning Devices (GPS) work
Using Aerogravity to Produce a Refined Vertical Datum D.R. Roman and X. Li XXV FIG Congress June 2014 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Session TS01A, Paper.
Geoid Surfaces and Theory Session B of Datums, Heights and Geodesy Presented by Daniel R. Roman, Ph.D. Of the National Geodetic Survey.
Planning for airborne LIDAR survey Dr.Lamyaa Gamal El-deen.
G13A Towards a New Vertical Datum Daniel R. Roman 1, Xiaopeng Li 2, Simon A. Holmes 3, Vicki A. Childers 4, and Yan M. Wang 1 1. Geosciences Research.
Use of G99SSS to evaluate the static gravity geopotential derived from the GRACE, CHAMP, and GOCE missions Daniel R. Roman and Dru A. Smith Session: GP52A-02Decade.
Vicki Childers, Daniel Winester, Mark Eckl, Dru Smith, Daniel Roman
Advances and Best Practices in Airborne Gravimetry from the U.S. GRAV-D Project Theresa M. Damiani 1, Vicki Childers 1, Sandra Preaux 2, Simon Holmes 3,
GRAV-D Project Update Vicki Childers, Ph.D. GRAV-D Project Manager.
1 Assessment of Geoid Models off Western Australia Using In-Situ Measurements X. Deng School of Engineering, The University of Newcastle, Australia R.
OC3522Summer 2001 OC Remote Sensing of the Atmosphere and Ocean - Summer 2001 Active Microwave Radar.
Innovative Solutions for tomorrow’s transportation needs Florida Permanent Reference Network Where are we headed now?
Leading Cadet Training
April nd IBTrACS Workshop 1 Operational Procedures How can we build consistent, homogeneous, well- documented climate quality data?
Geoid Height Models at NGS Dan Roman Research Geodesist.
Towards the unification of the vertical datums over the North American continent D Smith 1, M Véronneau 2, D Roman 1, J L Huang 2, YM Wang 1, M Sideris.
Gravity-Lidar Study for 2006: Refined Gravity Field For the North-Central Gulf of Mexico Dan Roman National Geodetic Survey Jarir Saleh National Geodetic.
Lecture 7 – More Gravity and GPS Processing GISC February 2009.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Altimetric Bathymetry Model Excels Global bathymetry model combines depths.
Tide corrections from KGPS and a precise geoid John Brozena, Randy Herr, Vicki Childers.
B ≥ 4 H & V, KNOWN & TRUSTED POINTS? B LOCALIZATION RESIDUALS-OUTLIERS? B DO ANY PASSIVE MARKS NEED TO BE HELD? RT BASE WITHIN CALIBRATION (QUALITY TIE.
1 Geoid and Geoid Change: Discussion Topics Roger Haagmans, Boulder, 21October 2009.
SWOT Near Nadir Ka-band SAR Interferometry: SWOT Airborne Experiment Xiaoqing Wu, JPL, California Institute of Technology, USA Scott Hensley, JPL, California.
Integrating Airborne DWL and PBL Models in Real Time G.D. Emmitt, C. O’Handley, S. A. Wood and S. Greco Simpson Weather Associates WGSBLW Miami 2007.
The National Geodetic Survey Gravity Program Benefits and Opportunities Juliana Blackwell, Director National Geodetic Survey (NGS)
Evaluating Aircraft Positioning Methods for Airborne Gravimetry: Results from GRAV-D’s “Kinematic GPS Processing Challenge” Theresa M. Damiani, Andria.
Status and Plans of the National Geodetic Survey’s Gravity Database Update Daniel R. Roman and Yan Ming Wang October 13-14, 2005 Austin, Texas.
Evaluating Aircraft Positioning Methods for Airborne Gravimetry: Results from GRAV-D’s “Kinematic GPS Processing Challenge” Theresa M. Damiani, Andria.
Introduction to GPS/GNSS Introduction to Tidal and Geodetic Vertical Datums Corbin Training Center January 7, 2009 Jeff Little Guest Speaker ,
GRAV-D Part II : Examining airborne gravity processing assumptions with an aim towards producing a better gravimetric geoid Theresa Diehl*, Sandra Preaux,
Establishing A Gravity Plan Ohio Department of Transportation October 14, 2011.
Vicki Childers National Geodetic Survey GRAV-D: The Gravity for the Re- definition of the American Vertical Datum ACSM 2009 Workshop.
S.A.T.E.L.L.I.T.E.S. Project Students And Teachers Evaluating Local Landscapes to Interpret The Earth from Space Cloud Frog picture, research project name,
GPS Services Group C&C Technologies, Inc., C-Nav GcGPS System Background and Accuracy.
Initial Results of the Geoid Slope Validation Survey of 2011 Dru Smith 1, Simon Holmes 1, Xiaopeng Li 1, Yan Wang 1, Malcolm Archer-Shee 1, Ajit Singh.
Lecture 21 – The Geoid 2 April 2009 GISC-3325.
A Brief Introduction to Gravity UT Intro to Geophysics Class March 10, 2009 Austin-Bergstrom Airport Theresa Diehl, Ph.D. Research Geodesist NOAA National.
Progress in Geoid Modeling from Satellite Missions
Earth Surface and Interior Focus Area Space Geodetic Networks for Maintaining the Reference Frame Geodesy's Critical Contributions to NASA (Earth Science)
Evapotranspiration Estimates over Canada based on Observed, GR2 and NARR forcings Korolevich, V., Fernandes, R., Wang, S., Simic, A., Gong, F. Natural.
March 8, 2005 Calibration and Operation of the Stepped Frequency Microwave Radiometer during the 2005 Hurricane Season Ivan PopStefanija
Tide corrections from KGPS and a precise geoid
Section 6: Conducting the Lidar Survey. Outline QGPS base station operation QAircraft operations mapping survey area calibration QPreliminary processing.
Mapping Greenland Using NASA’s Full- Waveform, Medium/High-Altitude, LVIS Lidar System: Potential 2009 Coverage and Expected Performance Michelle Hofton.
Jetstream 31 (J31) in INTEX-B/MILAGRO. Campaign Context: In March 2006, INTEX-B/MILAGRO studied pollution from Mexico City and regional biomass burning,
GEOID03 in Louisiana and Alaska Dr. Yan M Wang and Dr. Daniel R Roman Geodesist, NGS/NOAA ACSM Annual Conference and Technology Exhibition Orlando, FL.
Investigation of the use of deflections of vertical measured by DIADEM camera in the GSVS11 Survey YM Wang 1, X Li 2, S Holmes 3, DR Roman 1, DA Smith.
SATELLITE ORBITS The monitoring capabilities of the sensor are, to a large extent, governed by the parameters of the satellite orbit. Different types of.
Improving Regional Geoid by optimal Combination of GRACE Gravity Model and Surface Gravity Data YM Wang, DR Roman and J Saleh National Geodetic Survey.
GRAV-D: NGS Gravity for the Re- definition of the American Vertical Datum Project V. A. Childers, D. R. Roman, D. A. Smith, and T. M. Diehl* U.S. National.
Preliminary Results of Shoreline Delineation using Thermal Imagery Maryellen Sault, Jason Woolard, Stephen White and Jon Sellars NOAA’s National Geodetic.
SCM x330 Ocean Discovery through Technology Area F GE.
WP120 External Calibration of Spaceborne Microwave Remote Sensing System Sensors Objective:Evaluation of external calibration needs for a variety of microwave.
Last Time: Introduction to Gravity Governed by LaPlace’s equation: with solution of the form: If we have a spherical body with mass M and constant (or.
NASA, CGMS-44, 7 June 2016 Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS SURFACE PRESSURE MEASUREMENTS FROM THE ORBITING CARBON OBSERVATORY-2.
Integration of Gravity Data Into a Seamless Transnational Height Model for North America Daniel Roman, Marc Véronneau, David Avalos, Xiaopeng Li, Simon.
Initial Results of the Geoid Slope Validation Survey of 2011 Dru Smith 1, Simon Holmes 1, Xiaopeng Li 1, Yan Wang 1, Malcolm Archer-Shee 1, Ajit Singh.
5th Workshop on "SMART Cable Systems: Latest Developments and Designing the Wet Demonstrator Project" (Dubai, UAE, April 2016) Contribution of.
Advances and Best Practices in Airborne Gravimetry from the U. S
Presentation transcript:

Gravity Lidar Study for 2006: A First Look D.R. Roman, V.A. Childers, D.L. Rabine, S.A. Martinka, Y.M. Wang, J.M. Brozena, S.B. Luthcke, and J.B. Blair Canadian Geophysical Union 2006 Annual Meeting Banff, Alberta, Canada Geodesy and Geodynamics Session 15 May 2006

Abstract Aerogravity and lidar data were collected in the littoral and onshore regions of the Florida panhandle, Alabama, Mississippi, and Louisiana as the second part of a three year study. These data were collected principally in 41 lines oriented north-south spaced at 10 km and collected at ft (greater than 10 km to mitigate aliasing). Individual lines were 500 km long, hence the full extent of the region is 400 km by 500 km. Weather conditions were fair throughout the survey, consequently most of the signal was retained along the profiles. These data will be used to test for long wavelength trends and biases in Earth Gravity Models derived from the GRACE gravity mission. These data provide sufficient coverage to analyze the gravity field to degree and order 100, which should be sufficient for analyzing the GRACE contribution. Additionally, they will be used to detect local systematic problems of existing surface gravity data both onshore and offshore. In last year’s study, inaccurate shipborne gravity data were determined to have had decimeter impact on the coastal geoid accuracy. The lidar data are not expected to be ready by the time of the conference, however, they are intended to be combined with available high-accuracy tidal models to validate the absolute accuracy of the derived gravimetric geoid for this region.

Background Second year of three year study of Gulf of Mexico Funded & flown by NOAA using NRL’s gravity meter and NASA’s LVIS lidar Collects aerogravity starting above stable onshore areas to deep offshore areas established by altimetry Detects systematic errors in ship and terrestrial data For southern Louisiana subsidence region, may be used to estimate effects of listric faulting (slumping) Lidar will be used in conjunction with hyper-accurate regional tide models to check geoid and MDT models

Equipment Aircraft: Cessna Citation II –NOAA AOC provided flight hours/crew –Dual GPS antennas and receivers –Independent antenna/receiver for each meter Lacoste-Romberg Air-Sea Gravimeter II –Naval Research Lab equipment/personnel –First Applanix POSAV mounted to collect INS Laser-Vegetation Imaging Sensor (LVIS) –NASA Remote Sensing Lab equipment/personnel –Second Applanix POSAV mounted to collect INS

Data Collection Parameters Tracks should resolve gravity/geoid field to 20 km –Flights are at ft (10+ km) elevation –Track spacing is 10 km perpendicular to shoreline Provides most of the signal Avoids spectral aliasing –Cross-tracks at ~50 km parallel to shoreline Speed over Ground is around 280 kts (500 kmh) –Along track filtering is expected to yield 20 km –Flight legs expected to be between 1-2 hours

Data Collection Process Flight departures based on predicted PDOP spikes in GPS satellites and availability of restricted airspace One hour prior to take off –prep ground GPS stations (replace batteries, etc.) –Spin up gravity meter/calibrate –Predetermine Eotvos correction for inflight –Load memory cards During flight: –Calibrate LVIS in clear skies over open ocean –Minimize bank in turns for both meters

Data Collection Process (cont.) Principal flight legs are 500 km long at 500 kmh –Take-off, line up for first run, fly one hour –Easy turn (Williamson) to minimize banking –One hour back up return leg then land –Most flights in around the three hour mark While on ground for about an hour –Swap out batteries/memory cards –Keep GPS on! Both onboard and ground stations –Helps to calibrate the antennas later If time, weather, and airspace access permit – do it again

QUESTIONS?