WLRD Science Seminar Sammamish River Water Quality Model Status Report November 19, 2002.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
National Institute of Environmental Research A consideration of the hydraulic simulation of a dam to reduce algal bloom S.J. Yu, S.R. Ha*, D.I. Jung, J.Y.
Advertisements

Figure 1: Location map of hydrographic and coastal sampling stations.
Geographical Information System & Modelling LIFE02/ENV/P/
The Barton Springs Part of the Edwards Aquifer: Basic physical and hydrologic characteristics pertinent to permitted discharges Raymond Slade, Jr, Certified.
Great Lakes Observing System GLRI Tributary Monitoring Project
The MWRA outfall monitoring program. What we measure and what we have observed so far.
OMSAP Public Meeting September 1999 The Utility of the Bays Eutrophication Model in the Harbor Outfall Monitoring Program James Fitzpatrick HydroQual,
Design of Optimum Selective Withdrawal Operation for Temperature Management at Round Butte Dam, Lake Billy Chinook, Oregon Presentation to WEFTEC 2000.
2014 NETCARE AMUNDSEN CRUISE Ocean-Atmosphere Interactions Michel Gosselin University of Quebec at Rimouski Maurice Levasseur Laval University Highly qualified.
South Puget Sound Dissolved Oxygen Study WQ Partnership Meeting March 15, 2007 Andrew Kolosseus
Water Quality Monitoring of Lake St. Joseph Watershed Principal Investigator: Beatrix Haggard, Ph.D. Co-Principal Investigators: James Hendrix Donnie Miller,
LCFR Water Quality Modeling Project Report Jim Bowen, UNC Charlotte LCFRP Advisory Board/Tech. Comm. Meeting, October 30, 2008 Raleigh, NC.
SENSORS, CYBERINFRASTRUCTURE, AND WATER QUALITY IN THE LITTLE BEAR RIVER Jeffery S. Horsburgh David K. Stevens, Amber Spackman Jones, David G. Tarboton,
Marine Chemistry and Biological Oceanography 海洋化學與生物海洋.
Common Monitoring Parameters. Step 1 Consider purpose/objectives of monitoring Assess use attainment Characterize watershed Identify pollutants and sources.
Rio Blanco Watershed The Rest of the Story. Located Northwest of Guadalajara, Mexico Located Northwest of Guadalajara, Mexico Physical Characteristics.
Jędrasik J., Kowalewski M., Ołdakowski B., University of Gdansk, Institute of Oceanography Impact of the Vistula River waters on the Gulf of Gdańsk during.
Pomme de Terre Lake Water Quality Summary Pomme de Terre Lake Water Quality Summary US Army Corps of Engineers Environmental Resources Section.
Progress in Implementing the EPA WASP Model for Narragansett Bay 1 Lucner Charlestra 1, Edward Dettmann 2 1 Postdoc., USEPA, Atlantic Ecology Div.,
Physical & Chemical Parameters of the Turnbow Pond Cody Clark Dylan Weir Jeffery Johnson.
The Physical Modulation of Seasonal Hypoxia in Chesapeake Bay Malcolm Scully Outline: 1)Background and Motivation 2)Role of Physical Forcing 3)Simplified.
The Orange County Water District Riverbed Filtration Pilot Project Jason Keller 1, Michael Milczarek 1, Greg Woodside 2, Adam Hutchinson 2, Adam MP Canfield.
A T HREE- D IMENSIONAL W ATER Q UALITY M ODEL OF S OUTHERN P UGET S OUND Greg Pelletier, P.E., Mindy Roberts, P.E., Skip Albertson, P.E., and Jan Newton,
Courtney K. Harris Virginia Institute of Marine Sciences In collaboration with Katja Fennel and Robin Wilson (Dalhousie), Rob Hetland (TAMU), Kevin Xu.
Module 10/11 Stream Surveys Stream Surveys – February 2004 Part 1 – Water Quality Assessment.
The Non-tidal Water Quality Monitoring Network: past, present and future opportunities Katie Foreman Water Quality Analyst, UMCES-CBPO MASC Non-tidal Water.
These notes are provided to help you pay attention IN class. If I notice poor attendance, fewer notes will begin to appear on these pages 1.
Temperature Measured with a thermometer Units are ◦C
Momentum Equations in a Fluid (PD) Pressure difference (Co) Coriolis Force (Fr) Friction Total Force acting on a body = mass times its acceleration (W)
Towards a Hydrodynamic and Optical Modeling System with Remote Sensing Feedback Yan Li Dr. Anthony Vodacek Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory.
Sammamish River Diel Dissolved Oxygen and pH Study September 21, 2005.
National Consultation with TNMC 3 May 2005, Bangkok WUP-FIN Phase II – Bank erosion study.
Review of DWSC Modeling- what should we do next? Russ Brown, Jones & Stokes DO-TMDL Technical Work Group May 16,2006.
What is a Watershed? An area of land, from ridge top to ridge top, that collects, stores, and releases water to a common point, such as a river or a lake.
 Instrumentation  CTD  Dissolved Oxygen Sensor  ADCP/ Current Meters  Oxygen Titrations  Nutrient Concentrations Circulation and Chemical Tracer.
Impact of Watershed Characteristics on Surface Water Transport of Terrestrial Matter into Coastal Waters and the Resulting Optical Variability:An example.
US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center Hydrodynamic, Water Quality, and Ecological Modeling to Assess System-wide Impacts.
NWQMC San Jose, CA May 8, 2006 Combining Dynamic Assessment with Traditional Monitoring Approaches to Improve Understanding of NPS Pollution Impacts William.
Modelling 2: Introduction to modelling assignment. A basic physical-biological model. Model equations. Model operation. The assignment.
Development of the Neuse Estuary Eutrophication Model: Background and Calibration By James D. Bowen UNC Charlotte.
Water Quality Modeling D Nagesh Kumar, IISc Water Resources Planning and Management: M8L4 Water Resources System Modeling.
SALT-WEDGE INTRUSION OF SEAWATER AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR PHYTOPLANKTON DYNAMICS IN THE YURA ESTUARY, JAPAN Kasai et al., (2010). Estuarine, Coastal, &
5.2 Detection and Monitoring of Pollution
By Jim Bowen, UNC Charlotte presented at Multi-Media Modeling Workshop
The Orange County Water District Riverbed Filtration Pilot Project Jason Keller 1, Michael Milczarek 1, Greg Woodside 2, Adam Hutchinson 2, Robert Rice.
Abstract Man-made dams influence more than just the flow of water in a river. The build up of sediments and organic matter, increased residence times,
Hydrogroup Meeting Mohid Land & Mohid Drainage Network Frank Braunschweig Rosa Trancoso Pedro Galvão Pedro Chambel Ramiro Neves Etc.
Aquatic Ecosystem Overview: We need to understand the physical (e.g. hydrodynamics) and chemical environment that ultimately control the productivity,
Environmental Monitoring in the Black Sea Meeting Name, Dates, Venue Joint Survey Prepared by: Alexander Mikaelyan with contribution of Jaroslav Slobodnik,
Nitrogen loading from forested catchments Marie Korppoo VEMALA catchment meeting, 25/09/2012 Marie Korppoo, Markus Huttunen 12/02/2015 Open DATA: Nutrient.
Curtis DeGasperi - Foster Wheeler Tarang Khangaonkar – Foster Wheeler
Water Testing APES.
Water Testing APES.
Caddo Lake Nutrient Study Roy Darville - Caddo Lake Institute
Aquatic Ecosystem Overview:
AQUATOX v. 3.1 Host Institution/URL
Elizabeth River PCB TMDL Study: Numerical Modeling Approach
Lake Spokane 2012 Nutrient Monitoring Data
Public Meeting February 19, 2009
James River PCB TMDL Study: Numerical Modeling Approach
URBANIZATION IMPACTS ON STREAM NUTRIENT
Phosphorus and Suspended Solids TMDL For the Lower Fox River/Green Bay Area of Concern – Putting the Pieces Together Bud Harris, P. Sager, D. Scheberle,
Update on the Ecological Model
Eutrophication Processes
The effect of ship Nox deposition on cyanobacteria blooms
Environmental Time Functions & Segment Parameters
Dissolved Oxygen Processes
Eutrophication indicators PSA & EUTRISK
URBANIZATION IMPACTS ON STREAM NUTRIENT
Presentation transcript:

WLRD Science Seminar Sammamish River Water Quality Model Status Report November 19, 2002

Sammamish-Washington Analysis and Modeling Program

Sammamish River Model

Sammamish River Basins

CE-QUAL-W2 Model 2-D model Laterally averaged No zooplankton, macrophytes, sediment diagenesis Epiphyton and riparian shade model added recently

Background Initially developed by Seattle Corps Corps contractor updated model Corps transferred model to King County

Model State Variables Indicator Bacteria Inorganic Suspended Solids Nutrients (N,P,Si) Labile and Refractory Organic Matter Dissolved Oxygen Algae Alkalinity/Inorganic Carbon

Model Derived Variables Total, Particulate, and Dissolved Org. C Analytical nutrient forms (e.g., TP, TKN) Total Suspended Solids Chlorophyll a Dissolved Oxygen Saturation pH

Hydrodynamic Output Temperature Horizontal and Vertical Velocity Density

Model Calibration Steps Water Balance/Hydraulics Temperature Water Quality Conservative constituents Nutrients DO/pH Light penetration Phytoplankton Start

Model Data Needs Bathymetry Meteorology Gaged tributary quantity and quality Ungaged inflow quantity and quality Calibration data (quantity/quality)

Data Sources Bathymetry (HEC model cross sections) Meteorology (Sea-Tac, UW, Sand Point NOAA) Hydrology and stream temperature (WLRD, USGS, Snohomish Co., USACOE) Water quality data (WLRD, Ecology) Water surface elevations (USACOE, Reuse study)

Sammamish River X-Sections

Meteorological Data Sources

Stream Gaging Locations

Lake Washington Water Surface Elevation Kenmore

ACOE 1999 Temperature Study Stations

King County Temperature Stations

Forward-Looking Infrared Study - September 2, March 23, 2000

Forward-Looking Infrared Study September 2, 1999

Model Setup

Model Grid

Model Calibration

Sammamish River Recon August 30, 2001

Ongoing Temperature Monitoring

Ongoing Water Surface Profiling

Shade Inputs

Water Quality Model Development

Water Quality Locators Prior to Year 2000

Ecology Sampling Locations 08B070 08B110

Water Quality Locators >=Year 2000

Water Quality Model Boundary Conditions

Water Quality Model Results

Water Quality Model Diurnal DO and pH Fluctuations

Recommendations Groundwater data collection Ungaged tributary input refinement River water surface elevations/travel time studies Mainstem river temperature data collection Additional mainstem water quality stations including storm sampling and chl a meas. Tributary organic carbon monitoring Continuous DO/pH monitoring

Model Calibration Steps Water Balance/Hydraulics Temperature Water quality –Conservative constituents –Nutrients –DO/pH –Light penetration –Phytoplankton Revisit temperature and repeat water quality

Model State Variables Total dissolved solids Multiple arbitrary constituents –Conservative tracer –Residence time –Indicator bacteria Ammonium Nitrate Dissolved inorganic P Dissolved silica Particulate biogenic silica Multiple inorganic suspended solids Total iron Labile DOM Refractory DOM Labile POM Refractory POM Multiple CBOD groups Multiple algal groups Dissolved oxygen Total inorganic carbon Alkalinity

Model Derived Variables Total, dissolved, and particulate organic carbon Total, dissolved, and particulate organic nitrogen Total Kjedahl nitrogen Total nitrogen Total, dissolved, and particulate organic P Total suspended solids Total inorganic suspended solids Dissolved oxygen saturation Algal production Chlorophyll a Total algal biomass pH Carbon dioxide Bicarbonate Carbonate

Hydrodynamic Output Horizontal and vertical velocity Temperature Density Vertical eddy viscosity Vertical shear stress Advection of vertical momentum Advection of longitudinal momentum Longitudinal momentum Horizontal density gradient Horizontal pressure gradient Shear at top of layer Shear at the bottom of layer Gravity term due to channel slope

Model Data Needs Channel cross sections/bathymetry Meteorology (air temp, dew point, wind, clouds, observed solar radiation) Measured tributary inflow quantity and quality Unmeasured (including gw?) inflow quantity and quality Calibration data (quantity/quality)

Water Quality Boundary Conditions TDS = 0.55 x Spec. Cond. Dissolved silica = 7.2 mg/L Particulate biogenic silica = 2.0 mg/L Ammonium, nitrate, diss. P from observations TIC from pH and alkalinity measurements Inorganic suspended solids = TSS - POM* *POM = Particulate organic matter …but organic carbon concentration not measured

Water Quality Boundary Conditions Assume tributary TOC = 5 mg/L Assume 40 % of organic matter is carbon Assume 90 % of TOC is dissolved Assume 30 % of TOC is labile Therefore: –LDOM = TOC x 2.5 x 0.9 x 0.3 –RDOM = TOC x 2.5 x 0.9 x 0.7 –LPOM = TOC x 2.5 x 0.1 x 0.3 –RPOM = TOC x 2.5 x 0.1 x 0.7

Water Quality Boundary Conditions Assume three algal groups (diatoms, greens, blue-greens) for initial modeling Assume algae contributed only at the upstream boundary with Lake Sammamish Assume conversion of chlorophyll a to algal biomass (mg/L) = chl a (µg/L) x Assume fraction of influent algal biomass that is: Diatoms = 0.5 Greens = 0.3 Blue-greens = 0.2