Agenda Introduction Study Objectives Study Design Delegation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 US Investigator Meeting DIAS-4, Chicago, July 2011 Good Clinical Practice (GCP) for Investigators and the Research Team.
Advertisements

Essential Documentation GCP Training Seminar 12th October 2011
CROMS NIDCR Clinical Monitoring
Tips to a Successful Monitoring Visit
The Principal Investigator’s Roles and Responsibilities Chicken Soup for the Busy Coordinator (May 2010)
Safety Reporting IN Clinical Trials
HOT TOPICS ARCHIVING OR HOW NOT TO DUMP YOUR RUBBISH!
GCP for Investigators Tina Lidén Mascher, Kvalitetsregister, forskning och industrisamarbeten.
Verifying Source Documents. 2 Source Documentation First place the data are captured Original documents, data, and records Certified Copies Should contain.
Pharmacovigilance Dr. Muiris Dowling,
UTHSC IRB Donna Hollaway, RN, CCRC 11/30/2011 Authority to Audit 45 CFR (e) An IRB shall conduct continuing review of research covered by this.
Reporting Unanticipated Problems Involving Risk to Subjects or Others and Adverse Events WFUHS Policy/Procedure Effective Date 6/1/07 Wendy Murray Monitoring.
Practical Effective Steps to Improve Trial QUALITY from Audit/Inspections findings Cancer Clinical Trials Unit Scotland A NCRI Accredited Cancer Trials.
Elements of a clinical trial research protocol
GCP compliance for GenISIS  This presentation is intended for clinical staff involved in recruiting patients to the GenISIS (Genetics of Influenza Susceptibility.
Capturing and Reporting Adverse Events in Clinical Research
ROLE OF NURSES IN CLINICAL RESEARCH IN MALAWI OWEN DAIRE BSCN MPH RNM.
Developed by Klinikos; Roy Fraser (2012) Investigator Study File
Jennifer McCormick MA, CRC Karla Lichter RN CCRC.
M ODULE H I NTERIM M ONITORING V ISIT Denise Thwing 21 Apr Version: Final 21-Apr-2010.
Adverse Events, Unanticipated Problems, Protocol Deviations & other Safety Information Which Form 4 to Use?
Recapture of Day 1 Suchart Chongprasert, Ph.D. Food and Drug Administration “Practical Aspects in Performing Clinical and Bioanalytical Parts in BA/BE.
SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENTS REPORTING Elizabeth Dayag IRB Administrator Naval Medical Center Portsmouth.
Template for study specific training for Intrapartum Research Studies [ Please see guide before using this]
Adverse Events and Unanticipated Problems Presented by: Karen Jeans, PhD, CCRN, CIP COACH Program Analyst.
Janet Ellen Holwell, CCRC, CCRA President, NY Metropolitan Chapter of ACRP.
Elements of Clinical Trial Quality Assurance Regulatory Coordinator –SCTR SUCCESS Center QA Monitor – NIDA Clinical Trials Network Stephanie Gentilin,
RESPONSIBILITIES OF INVESTIGATOR
1 Nuts and Bolts of Safety Reporting The Role of the CRO Dr. Noa Lowenton Spier Pharma-Clinical S.A.G.
New Adverse Event Reporting Policy Effective September 1, 2007.
H. Lundbeck A/S21-Sep-151 Pharmacovigilance during clinical development SAE reporting, ASUR and PSUR IFF Seminar, 21. February 2007.
Common Audit Findings UTHSC Institutional Review Board (IRB)
RESCUE: ACRIN 4701 Protocol Development & Regulatory Compliance (PDRC) Josephine Schloesser, ACRIN Monitor Chris Steward, ACRIN QC Auditor.
Joint Research & Enterprise Office Training The team, the procedures, the monitor and the Sponsor Lucy H H Parker Clinical Research Governance Manager.
University of Miami Office of Research Compliance Assessment Lynn E. Smith, JD, CIM, CIP Johanna Stamates, RN, BA, CCRC With assistance from Elizabeth.
Role of the Oncology Research Team Carmen B. Jacobs, BS, RN,OCN, CCRP U.T.M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Houston, Texas U.S.A.
Monitoring IRB Monitoring of Clinical Trials. Types of Monitoring Internally Internally Externally Externally.
UC DAVIS OFFICE OF RESEARCH Overview of Good Clinical Practices (GCP) Investigator and Study Team Responsibilities Miles McFann IRB Administration Training.
AUDIT REQUIREMENTS, FINDINGS & BASICS RESEARCH COMPLIANCE.
EAE Training EAE Reporting and Assessment Overview DAIDS Regional Training Event, Regulatory Compliance Center Kampala, Uganda, September 2009 DAIDS Regional.
RIHES-II: H ANDLING A UDITS AND I NSPECTIONS E FFECTIVE D ATE 25 D ECEMBER 2006 V ERSION : 3.0 บุญเหลือ พรึงลำภู 15 มกราคม 2557.
Serious Adverse Event Reporting Start-up Meeting March 25, 2010 Kingston, ON.
Sponsor Visits and Monitoring
Role of Site Investigator Ensure subject safety is protected & well-managed Full compliance with requirements of Good Clinical Practice (GCP) Conduct the.
CONDUCTING COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENTS Allen Ditch Director Corporate Quality Bristol Myers Squibb Medical Research Summit March 6, 2003.
GCP for Emergency Medicine.  This presentation is intended for emergency physicians involved in recruiting patients to clinical trials and/or caring.
Surviving CTIMPs and MHRA inspections Kim Gooding Diabetes and Vascular Medicine UEMS and Exeter CRF Exeter Clinical Research Facility.
D3 ) Not Recovered d5) Fatal Was a post-mortem undertaken?YesNo Was the SAE ongoing at time of death from other cause? Yes No d d m m y y y y d1) Recovered.
Session 2 IRB Training  What is the Principal Investigator’s role in Human Subject Research?  What is the role of the Investigator’s staff in Human Subject.
Slide 1 Standard Operating Procedures. Slide 2 Goal To review the standard operating procedures Creating the informed consent document Obtaining informed.
Responsibilities of Sponsor, Investigator and Monitor
Sponsor Visits and Monitoring Barbara Gallagher, RN Clinical Research Nurse Jefferson Clinical Research Institute.
REPORTING ADVERSE EVENTS AND COMPLETING THE REPORT FORM
Safety of the Subject Cena Jones-Bitterman, MPP, CIP, CCRP
The Role and Responsibilities of the Clinical Research Coordinator
Responsibilities of Sponsor, Investigator and Monitor
Safety Reporting V6.0 17/01/17.
MAINTAINING THE INVESTIGATOR’S SITE FILE
Assessing expectedness of an adverse event
Administering Informed Consent Issues for Discussion
Pharmacovigilance in clinical trials
Safety of the Subject Cena Jones-Bitterman, MPP, CIP, CCRP
UK Legal Requirement for Notification of Serious Breaches of Good Clinical Practice or The Trial Protocol John Poland, PhD Senior Director, Regulatory.
*Continue on SAE supplemental page CTT21 A if more space is required
SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENTS REPORTING
CONDUCTING THE TRIAL AT
MAINTAINING THE INVESTIGATOR’S STUDY FILE
WHAT TO DO IF A PATIENT DEVELOPS AN UNEXPECTED PROBLEM?
Good clinical practice
Serious Adverse Event Reconciliation
Presentation transcript:

INSERT STUDY TITLE Site Initiation Visit Insert Site Name Insert SIV Date

Agenda Introduction Study Objectives Study Design Delegation Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria Study procedures Withdrawal of Patients Concomitant therapies Delegation Safety reporting Confidentially Site Files CRFs Archiving Monitoring, Audits and Compliance Contacts

Funders: Sponsor: Coordinating Centre: IMP supplier:

Current study status Include details of no. sites (open & planned), no. patients enrolled, details of any SAEs to date, any amendments in the pipeline, date opened to recruitment, proposed close to recruitment date etc

Background Disease Current standard of care

INSERT IMP NAME INSERT DETAILS OF IMP – type of drug, why promising in this cancer, previous studies, safety profile etc

Study Objectives Primary Objective Secondary Objectives Exploratory / Translational Objectives

Study Design

Inclusion Criteria

Exclusion Criteria

Consent process must be documented in the medical notes! Informed Consent Consent should only be taken when it is given freely after that person is informed of nature, significance, implications and risks of trial. Patients are free to refuse consent or withdraw from study at any time without giving reasons Written, informed consent must be obtained from all patients: By the PI or suitably trained delegated sub-investigator as listed on delegation the log prior to any study-specific procedure being performed Full verbal explanation of the trial and patient information sheet will be provided If necessary translators should be provided for patients unable to understand English Patient given at least 24 hours to consider their participation Patient given the opportunity to ask questions If new information becomes available and results in significant changes to study procedures or patient risk benefit, the patient information sheet will be amended and the patient must be re-consented. Consent process must be documented in the medical notes!

Informed Consent II Where will potential patients be identified? Where do you get referrals from? Who will first approach patients? Who will take consent? How many patients do you plan to enrol per year?

Registration

Screening

Randomisation Referto randomisation SOP or section X of protocol

Treatment

Follow-Up

Assessment Schedule

Laboratory Procedures

Imaging Procedures List here the imaging procedures, Include details of test scans before enrollment to test for quality and/ calibration of equipment (If study specific software/equipment that i.e. that is not standardly use, is part of the trial How data protection will be ensured if the images are transferred out of the (NHS) site

Study specific equipment, software and devices List what is being supplied to the site How it is calibrated before and during and how it is maintained (consider back-up, disaster recovery, storage, expiry – how this is documented and who is responsible) Give specific training details on the equipment / devices / software

Patient Withdrawal

Concomitant Therapies

Safety Reporting I An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a subject to whom a medicinal product has been administered or who has participated in research procedures, including occurrences which are not necessarily caused by or related to that product or procedure. An AE can therefore be any unfavourable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom or disease temporarily associated with the use of a research procedure, whether or not considered related to the trial treatment. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that fulfils at least one of the following criteria: Is fatal – results in death (NOTE: death is an outcome, not an event) Is life-threatening Requires inpatient hospitalisation or prolongation of existing hospitalization Results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity Is a congenital anomaly/birth defect

Safety Reporting II All adverse events that occur between informed consent and the end of follow up must be recorded in the CRF and patient notes. They must be assigned a severity and a causality Severity: Mild: Awareness of sign or symptom, but easily tolerated. Moderate: Discomfort enough to cause interference with normal daily activities. Severe: Inability to perform normal daily activities. Life Threatening: Immediate risk of death from the reaction as it occurred. Causality: None: No relationship between the experience and the administration of study drug; related to other aetiologies such as concomitant medications or patient’s clinical state. Unlikely: The current state of knowledge indicates that a relationship is unlikely. Possible: A reaction that follows a plausible temporal sequence from administration of the study drug and follows a known response pattern to the suspected study drug. The reaction might have been produced by the patient’s clinical state or other modes of therapy administered to the patient. Probable: A reaction that follows a plausible temporal sequence from administration of the study drug and follows a known response pattern to the suspected study drug. The reaction cannot be reasonably explained by the known characteristics of the patient’s clinical state or other modes of therapy administered to the patient. For all SAEs the Principal Investigator must assign the event as: Related : It resulted from administration of any of the research procedures Unexpected : The type of event is not listed in the protocol as an expected occurrence. A trial specific SAE form needs to be completed and submitted to the Study Coordinator on 0207 882 8409, within 24 hours of becoming aware of the event.

Safety Reporting III Expected adverse events that do not need recording as SAEs: Refer to section X of the protocol

Unblinding The unblinding process is : Refer to section X of the protocol / Unblinding SOP

Pregnancy If the patient becomes pregnant at any point during the trial, a pregnancy reporting form must be completed and submitted to Study coordinator within 24 hours of the PI becoming aware. All pregnancies must be followed-up until the outcome has been determined and a pregnancy follow-up report is to be completed within 7 calendar days of the outcome being determined. All pregnancy outcomes will be reported to the MREC within 15 calendar days.

Delegation of responsibilities A delegation log is provided in the site file and pharmacy file Staff must sign the delegation log prior to performing any study activities Copies of the delegation log should be faxed to the Coordinating Centre on a regular basis CVs and evidence of GCP training for all staff on delegation log must be present in the site/pharmacy files and provided to the Coordinating Centre. These should be updated every two years. Ensure that all staff members who prescribe IMP are on the delegation log (this is a common finding)

Training All new staff working on the study must be trained in the protocol and study procedures before being added to the delegation log. Evidence of training must be in the site/pharmacy files A template training log is provided in the site file (it is acceptable to use your own) Training of registrars can be documented by meeting minutes

Confidentiality All information collected during course of trial will be kept strictly confidential Study numbers will be allocated and all data received by co-ordinating site will be pseudo-anonymised Centres will comply with all aspects of 1998 Data Protection Act and operationally this will include: Consent from patients to record personal details including name, date of birth, address, telephone number, NHS ID and hospital ID Appropriate storage, restricted access and disposal arrangements for patients personal and clinical details Consent from patients for access to their medical records by responsible individuals from research staff or from regulatory authorities, where it is relevant to trial participation Consent from patients for data collected for trial to be used to evaluate safety and develop new research

Site Files All centres will be provided with a site file Sites are expected to keep them up to date This file will be monitored by site staff and by a representative of Sponsor Records should be handled in accordance with instructions from Sponsor

Source data List here what constitutes sources data (e.g. scans, photographs, blood test results, medical notes, questionnaires, and interview transcripts) and instructions on how it will be reported and recorded. Medical notes to be completed contemporaneously with the consultation with the subject All entries to be signed and dated by the person making the entry, where decision made someone other than the staff making the entry e.g. nurse making the entry but the dosing decision is made by the physician. Key events to be recorded include: date provision of the subject with the PIS, date of consent, eligibility decision, randomisation, trial visits or follow-up calls, treatment and dosing decisions relating to clinical care, adverse events, withdrawal, termination and end of trail involvement. Include who is responsible for completing the source data i.e. the research team or the participant (for example in the use of questionnaires) Each Site File (ISF) will be provided with a list of source data for this trial.

CRFs Ensure completeness, accuracy and legibility May only be completed by delegated staff members recorded on Delegation Log Required for each included trial patient Should be up-to-date for all monitoring visits Source Data: Ensure completeness, accuracy and legibility Ensure consistency with all data entered on to CRFs (all discrepancies will need to be explained) Must be completed legibly in ink Subjects are to be identified on every page by initials and DEPICT trial number only All requested information must be entered in spaces provided If an item is not applicable, it should be documented as such No blank spaces should be left on form

CRFs Corrections should made by: Striking through incorrect entry with a single line (not obscuring original entry) Entering correct information adjacent to incorrect entry Including initials and date Investigator or delegated sub-investigator must: Promptly review CRF Sign and date Consent, Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria and End of Trial Certification Fax/scan CRFs in sections as described in CRF Guidance Notes Originals will stay on site and be stored with archive files Help with completion can be obtained fromXXXXXXXXXXX

Record Retention and Archiving At end of trial: Following written authorisation from Sponsor, arrangements for confidential destruction will then be made If an Investigator leaves after the end of the study, all responsibility for archiving should be transferred to a designated person acceptable to the Sponsor Where do you archive? The Sponsor archiving policy is 20 years after the end of trial.

Monitoring Quarterly/Yearly/Bi-annual site visits by Trial Coordinator Review of site file Consents Fully regulatory documentation Current protocol, PIS, CF present SAEs Enrolment and screening logs Delegation Logs; CVs and GCP training Review of pharmacy - Accountability logs, Temperature logs, Destruction logs, Pharmacy file Source data verification - will involve direct access to patient notes; missing data will be sought, unless confirmed as not available Who should be contacted to arrange monitoring visits? Where will monitoring visits occur? Is there a restriction on the number of patient notes allowed at any one visit?

Audit This study may be audited by the Sponsor or competent authority Investigators are obliged to cooperate in any inspection Investigators must tell the Trial Coordinator immediately if they are being audited by a competent authority When were you last inspected by the MHRA? Were there any critical findings?

Deviations and Breaches Protocol deviations (including missed or delayed tests) must be reported to the coordinating centre as soon as possible. Serious breaches in GCP or trial protocol A serious breach is a breach which is likely to effect to a significant degree: Safety or physical or mental integrity of trial subjects Scientific value of trial All trial investigators must promptly notify CI or Sponsor of a serious breach

Protocol Compliance Each Principal Investigator must: Read approved protocol and sign protocol signature page Adhere to the approved protocol Be responsible for enrolling only those patients who meet eligibility criteria

Current Documents DOCUMENT VERSION DATE Protocol PIS ICF GP Letter CRFs IB SmPC Lab Manual Registration Procedure Hard copies provided in the site file Electronic copies of all documents will be provided after this visit

Study Contacts Chief Investigator Trial Coordinator SAEs and CRFs X SAEs and CRFs Faxed toXXXXXXX

Questions?