OSTST Meeting, Hobart, Australia, March 12-15, 2007 EIGEN-5 activities in GFZ and GRGS R. Biancale, J.-M. Lemoine, S. Bruinsma, S. Loyer* CNES/GRGS Toulouse,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Time Variable Gravity Implementation issues for Jason L. Cerri, S. Houry, J.P. Berthias Ocean Topography Science Team Meeting - Hobart, Australia – March.
Advertisements

A Comparison of topographic effect by Newton’s integral and high degree spherical harmonic expansion – Preliminary Results YM Wang, S. Holmes, J Saleh,
Ocean circulation estimations using GOCE gravity field models M.H. Rio 1, S. Mulet 1, P. Knudsen 2, O.B. Andersen 2, S.L. Bruinsma 3, J.C. Marty 3, Ch.
An estimate of post-seismic gravity change caused by the 1960 Chile earthquake and comparison with GRACE gravity fields Y. Tanaka 1, 2, V. Klemann 2, K.
POD/Geoid splinter March 14, 2007 J.P. Berthias Ocean Topography Science Team Meeting - Hobart, Australia – March 2007.
From TOPEX-POSEIDON to JASON Science Working Team Meeting GRACE Mission Status Arles, France November 18-21, 2003 Byron D. Tapley (Principal Investigator)
Continental mass variations from Independent Component Analysis (ICA) of Level-2 monthly GRACE data Frédéric Frappart 1, Guillaume Ramillien 1, Inga Bergmann.
Determination of Gravity Variations in Northern Europe from GRACE Jürgen Müller, Matthias Neumann-Redlin Institut für Erdmessung, University of Hannover,
Effect of Surface Loading on Regional Reference Frame Realization Hans-Peter Plag Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology and Seismological Laboratory University.
GRACE GRAVITY FIELD SOLUTIONS USING THE DIFFERENTIAL GRAVIMETRY APPROACH M. Weigelt, W. Keller.
POD/Geoid Splinter Summary OSTS Meeting, Hobart 2007.
International Terrestrial Reference Frame - Latest Developments Horst Müller 16th International Workshop on Laser Ranging, Poznan, Poland, October
This study is a part of the activity in the frameworks of ISTC 2975 project “New methods of interpretation of new satellite data on the Earth gravity field.
COMBINED MODELING OF THE EARTH’S GRAVITY FIELD FROM GOCE AND GRACE SATELLITE OBSERVATIONS Robert Tenzer 1, Pavel Ditmar 2, Xianglin Liu 2, Philip Moore.
Time-depending validation of ocean mass anomalies from GRACE by means of satellite altimetry and numerical models Henryk Dobslaw and Maik Thomas GeoForschungsZentrum.
Dynamic Planet 2005 Cairns, Australia August 2005
Monitoring the Global Sea Level Rise Budget with Jason, Argo and GRACE Observations Eric Leuliette and Laury Miller NOAA/Laboratory for Satellite Altimetry.
Use of G99SSS to evaluate the static gravity geopotential derived from the GRACE, CHAMP, and GOCE missions Daniel R. Roman and Dru A. Smith Session: GP52A-02Decade.
Don P. Chambers Center for Space Research The University of Texas at Austin Understanding Sea-Level Rise and Variability 6-9 June, 2006 Paris, France The.
Assessment of Basin-scale Terrestrial Water Storage Variations from Reprocessed GRACE Gravity Fields for Climate Model Validation L. Zhang, H. Dobslaw,
1 Assessment of Geoid Models off Western Australia Using In-Situ Measurements X. Deng School of Engineering, The University of Newcastle, Australia R.
ESA Living Planet Symposium, Bergen, T. Gruber, C. Ackermann, T. Fecher, M. Heinze Institut für Astronomische und Physikalische Geodäsie (IAPG)
M-H Rio 1, F.Hernandez 2, J-M Lemoine 3, R. Schmidt 4, Ch. Reigber 4 AN IMPROVED MEAN DYNAMIC TOPOGRAPHY COMPUTED GLOBALLY COMBINING GRACE DATA, ALTIMETRY.
1 Approximate decorrelation and non-isotropic smoothing of time-variable GRACE gravity field models Jürgen Kusche, Roland Schmidt with input from Susanna.
NKG Working Group for Geodynamics Copenhagen, 23 –24 April, Tasks of a new Working Group on Absolute Gravimetry Herbert Wilmes Federal Agency for.
GOCE ITALY scientific tasks and first results Fernando Sansò and the GOCE Italy group.
The IGS contribution to ITRF2013 – Preliminary results from the IGS repro2 SINEX combinations Paul Rebischung, Bruno Garayt, Xavier Collilieux, Zuheir.
Last Time: Ground Penetrating Radar Radar reflections image variations in Dielectric constant  r ( = relative permittivity )  3-40 for most Earth materials;
Towards improved GRACE de-aliasing - first results from dynamical and residual ocean tide analysis Wolfgang Bosch 1), Detlef Stammer 2), Frank Flechtner.
1 Average time-variable gravity from GPS orbits of recent geodetic satellites VIII Hotine-Marussi Symposium, Rome, Italy, 17–21 June 2013 Aleš Bezděk 1.
Water storage variations from time-variable gravity data Andreas Güntner Helmholtz Centre Potsdam - GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences Section.
1 GRACE Science Team Meeting Potsdam October 2007 GRACE Science Data System Status Michael Watkins, Gerard Kruizinga, Da Kuang, Willy Bertiger, Dah-Ning.
Geocenter Variations Derived from GRACE Data Z. Kang, B. Tapley, J. Chen, J. Ries, S. Bettadpur Joint International GSTM and SPP Symposium GFZ Potsdam,
The Road to RL05 Srinivas Bettadpur for the UTCSR GRACE Team.
EGU General Assembly 2011, 3 rd – 8 th April 2011, Vienna, Austria EGU EIGEN-6 A new combined global gravity field model including GOCE data from.
GRACE Mascons and Hydrological Data for the Continents: GRACE ACCESS D. Rowlands (1), F. Lemoine (1), S. Luthcke (1), S. Klosko (2), D. Chinn (2), K. Akoumany.
OSTST March, Hobart, Tasmania Ocean Mean Dynamic Topography from altimetry and GRACE: Toward a realistic estimation of the error field Marie-Helene.
Lecture 21 – The Geoid 2 April 2009 GISC-3325.
Progress in Geoid Modeling from Satellite Missions
POD/Geoid splinter Wednesday March 14, 2007 Morning and Afternoon J.P. Berthias – J. Ries Ocean Topography Science Team Meeting - Hobart, Australia – March.
Hobart Australia March 2007Willy Bertiger Ocean Surface Topography Science Team Meeting GPS-Based Precise Orbit Determination: Jason-1 Status Willy Bertiger,
E. Schrama TU Delft, DEOS Error characteristics estimated from CHAMP, GRACE and GOCE derived geoids and from altimetry derived.
GRACE Science Team Meeting October 15-17, 2007 Potsdam Germany Alternative Gravity Field Representations: Solutions, Characteristics, and Issues Michael.
EUM/OPS/VWG/11 Issue /06/2011 Yoke Yoon Yago Andres Christian Marquardt COSMIC GPS Data Processing Slide: 1.
L. Zenner 1, E. Fagiolini 2, F. Flechtner 3, T. Gruber 1, G. Schwarz 2, T. Trautmann 2, J. Wickert 3 1 Institut für Astronomische u. Physikalische Geodäsie,
International Symposium on Gravity, Geoid and Height Systems GGHS 2012, Venice, Italy 1 GOCE data for local geoid enhancement Matija Herceg Per Knudsen.
C.C.Tscherning, Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen. Improvement of Least-Squares Collocation error estimates using local GOCE Tzz signal standard.
IERS Workshop on Conventions: September 2007 Ocean and atmospheric tides standards (used for EIGEN gravity field modeling) Richard Biancale (CNES/GRGS)
C H A M P International Laser Ranging Service - General Assembly, October 2005 Eastbourne, UK L. Grunwaldt, R. Schmidt, D. König, R. König, F.-H. Massmann.
Assessing the GIA Contribution to SNARF Mark Tamisiea and Jim Davis Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.
A comparison of different geoid computation procedures in the US Rocky Mountains YM Wang 1, H Denker 2, J Saleh 3, XP Li 3, DR Roman 1, D Smith 1 1 National.
A proposal for a consistent model of air pressure loading as part of the International Terrestrial Reference System (ITRS) Conventions Plag, H.-P. (1),
Vermelding onderdeel organisatie A 3-year series of Earth’s gravity field derived from GRACE range measurements Xianglin Liu, Pavel Ditmar, Qile Zhao,
ESA living planet symposium Bergen Combination of GRACE and GOCE in situ data for high resolution regional gravity field modeling M. Schmeer 1,
Ingo Sasgen 1, Henryk Dobslaw 1, Zdenek Martinec 2, and Maik Thomas 1 (1) GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam, Department 1: Geodesy and Remote Sensing Section.
Mayer-Gürr et al.ESA Living Planet, Bergen Torsten Mayer-Gürr, Annette Eicker, Judith Schall Institute of Geodesy and Geoinformation University.
OSTST Meeting, Hobart, Australia, March 12-15, 2007 On the use of temporal gravity field models derived from GRACE for altimeter satellite orbit determination.
ESA Living Planet Symposium 28 June - 2 July 2010, Bergen, Norway A. Albertella, R. Rummel, R. Savcenko, W. Bosch, T. Janjic, J.Schroeter, T. Gruber, J.
Jason-1 POD reprocessing at CNES Current status and further developments L. Cerri, S. Houry, P. Perrachon, F. Mercier. J.P. Berthias with entries from.
The OC in GOCE: A review The Gravity field and Steady-state Ocean Circulation Experiment Marie-Hélène RIO.
An oceanographic assessment of the GOCE geoid models accuracy S. Mulet 1, M-H. Rio 1, P. Knudsen 2, F. Siegesmund 3, R. Bingham 4, O. Andersen 2, D. Stammer.
Last Time: Introduction to Gravity Governed by LaPlace’s equation: with solution of the form: If we have a spherical body with mass M and constant (or.
GOCE Gravity Field Models – Overview and Performance Analysis Th. Gruber*, R. Rummel* & High Level Processing Facility (HPF) Team *Institute of Astronomical.
How Do we Estimate Gravity Field? Terrestrial data –Measurements of surface gravity –Fit spherical harmonic coefficients Satellite data –Integrate equations.
ESA Living Planet Symposium, 29 June 2010, Bergen (Norway) GOCE data analysis: the space-wise approach and the space-wise approach and the first space-wise.
Astronomical Institute University of Bern 1 Astronomical Institute, University of Bern, Switzerland * now at PosiTim, Germany 5th International GOCE User.
ESA Climate Change Initiative Sea-level-CCI project A.Cazenave (Science Leader), G.Larnicol /Y.Faugere(Project Leader), M.Ablain (EO) MARCDAT-III meeting.
Dynamic Planet 2005 Cairns, Australia August 2005
X SERBIAN-BULGARIAN ASTRONOMICAL CONFERENCE 30 MAY - 3 JUNE, 2016, BELGRADE, SERBIA EARTH ORIENTATION PARAMETERS AND GRAVITY VARIATIONS DETERMINED FROM.
Daniel Rieser, Christian Pock, Torsten Mayer-Guerr
Presentation transcript:

OSTST Meeting, Hobart, Australia, March 12-15, 2007 EIGEN-5 activities in GFZ and GRGS R. Biancale, J.-M. Lemoine, S. Bruinsma, S. Loyer* CNES/GRGS Toulouse, France * Noveltis, Ramonville Saint-Agne, France Ch. Förste, F. Flechtner, R. Schmidt GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam, Germany

OSTST Meeting, Hobart, Australia, March 12-15, 2007 EIGEN statistics MeanTime-variable (monthly solutions) EIGEN-GRACE01S 39 days EIGEN-GRACE02S110 days 9 (04/ /2003) EIGEN-GRACE03S376 days16 (02/ /2004) EIGEN-GRACE04S430 days46 (02/ /2006) EIGEN-GRACE05Snot yet45 (02/ /2006) MeanTime-variable (10-day solutions) EIGEN-GL04Sover 2 full years 86 (07/ /2005) EIGEN-GL05Snot yet146 (07/ /2006) EIGEN-GL04S1/-GL04C (2006) expanded in s.h. up to 150/360 EIGEN-5S/-5C (mid/end 2007) expanded in s.h. up to 150/360

OSTST Meeting, Hobart, Australia, March 12-15, 2007 Gain in spectral accuracy of EIGEN models Further investigations : adjusting tides (S2,...) using KBR data destriping geoid models

OSTST Meeting, Hobart, Australia, March 12-15, 2007 EIGEN Standards Major updates in EIGEN-GRACE05S:  Static background gravity model: EIGEN-GL04C (150x150).  Updated K2 and included M4 tide in FES2004 ocean tides.  Usage of ocean pole tide model (Desai 2002).  Usage of new atmospheric/oceanic de-aliasing product AOD1B-RL04 (mass- conserving baroclinic OMCT ocean model).  Relativity extended by Lense-Thirring & de Sitter effects (IERS Conventions 2003).  IERS 2003 nutation and precession model.  Tidal and nutational corrections to EOP (local spline interpolation).  Az/El dependent phase center corrections for GPS-SST of GRACE-A/B (JPL) Major differences of EIGEN-GL04S wrt. EIGEN-GRACE05S :  MOG2D (LEGOS/CLS) instead of OMCT  Az/El dependent phase center corrections for GPS-SST of GRACE-A/B (GRGS)  KBRR data (GRGS’ derivation of Level-1B KBR data)  KBRR empirical parameterization

OSTST Meeting, Hobart, Australia, March 12-15, 2007 C 20 normalized coefficient series from LAGEOS only (in red), GRACE+LAGEOS (in blue), empirical model (in green) GGM2C EIGEN-GL04C /y

OSTST Meeting, Hobart, Australia, March 12-15, 2007 Adjustment of 6 parameters for all coefficients : Bias Drift COS(annual) SIN(annual) COS(semi-annual) SIN(semi-annual) Proposal : Additional periodic coefficients could be delivered as well with the EIGEN-5 models C 21 /S 21 normalized coefficient series

OSTST Meeting, Hobart, Australia, March 12-15, Adjusting bias + drift + annual + semi-annual terms for all coefficients up to degree 40; keeping the static field for higher degrees. 2.Computing « gravitological months » : averaging each month over 4 years. 3.Assimilating GRACE results into hydrological models (i.e. WGHM). Ways of taking into account time variations

OSTST Meeting, Hobart, Australia, March 12-15, 2007 POD Results for GRACE 19 μm 12 μm 11 μm 12 μm.18 μm/s.14 μm/s 7.4 mm 7.2 mm 7.1 mm 6.4 mm 31 mm 30 mm 29 mm 30 mm

OSTST Meeting, Hobart, Australia, March 12-15, 2007 POD Results for JASON 54.7 mm 54.6 mm 54.3 mm.3219 mm/s.3185 mm/s.3181 mm/s 12.7 mm 12.2 mm 11.9 mm 11.5 mm

OSTST Meeting, Hobart, Australia, March 12-15, 2007 over 10 days using a 10-day model vs. EIGEN-GL04S March 2005 – radial rms = 5 mm Jason radial orbit comparison

OSTST Meeting, Hobart, Australia, March 12-15, 2007 Example of selected GFZ RL04 and WGHM coefficients GFZ RL04 monthly coefficients and fitted periodic signal WGHM (Water GAP Global Hydrology Model, Döll et al., 2003) monthly coefficients and fitted periodic signal

OSTST Meeting, Hobart, Australia, March 12-15, 2007 Until now degree 1 coefficients were not delivered in the 10- day models (i.e. the origin of EIGEN models is the Earth centre of mass). They are adjusted only through Lageos data. Nevertheless they could be delivered for altimetric purposes. Degree 1 coefficients In summary for the next “satellite” EIGEN-5S model we can propose delivering optional annual and semi-annual sine and cosine terms from degree 1 to 40 (and some drifts as well).

OSTST Meeting, Hobart, Australia, March 12-15, 2007 Task Computation of global high-resolution gravity field models in terms of spherical harmonic coefficients from the combination of satellite data and surface gravity data. At GFZ Potsdam and GRGS Toulouse, such global gravity models are routinely produced in the framework of the EIGEN* processing activities. Combined data sets Satellite data: GRACE GPS/SST and K-Band data CHAMP GPS/SST data LAGEOS Satellite Laser Ranging measurements Ground data: Gravity anomaly data over land (based on classical and air-born gravimetry) Ocean geoid height and ocean gravity anomaly data (based on altimetry and ship gravimetry) The ground data presently available for GFZ/GRGS allow a global grid coverage of 0.5° x 0.5° resolution, corresponding to a maximum degree of 360 for the spherical harmonic coefficients of a global gravity field model obtained from it. * EIGEN = European Improved Gravity model of the Earth by New techniques GFZ/GRGS activities on combined gravity field models

OSTST Meeting, Hobart, Australia, March 12-15, 2007 Surface Data Unfiltered data Filtered data for avoiding of truncation errors (n,m >179 filtered) Blockdiagonal normal equ. (n=m=0,359) & Integration ( n=m=360) Complete normal equ. (n=m=1,200) COMBINATION COMPLETE GRAVITY FIELD SOLUTION (n=m=360) Preprocessing Combined Satellite normal equ. GPS ground data GRACE GPS-SST GRACE K-band range rate Strategy for Combination of Satellite and Surface Data Filtering for highest frequ. (n,m >360 filtered) LAGEOS SLR data GPS orbits and clocks GRACE orbits and observation equations LAGEOS orbits & normal equations (n=m=1,30) GRACE normal equations (n=m=1,150) COMBINATION

OSTST Meeting, Hobart, Australia, March 12-15, 2007 Algorithms The combination of the different data sets is made on the basis of normal equations: Up to degree of 200 (presently):  Computation of full normal equation matrices: LAGEOS data, until degree 30 GRACE data, until degree 150 Ground data, until degree 200, one normal equation matrix for each individual data set  Accumulation of the individual normal equation matrices  Solution of the combined normal equation matrix by inversion incl. computation of the full variance/covariance matrix From degree 200 up to 360: Forming and solution of a block-diagonal normal equation matrix from the global gravity anomaly ground data GFZ/GRGS activities on combined gravity field models

OSTST Meeting, Hobart, Australia, March 12-15, 2007 contribution to the solution, full normal matrix: kept separately and bound together with the surface data using constraints**): kept separately (reduced from the full normal matrix): not used: contribution to the solution, block diagonal matrix: contribution to the solution, numerical integration: 70 GRACE degree/order Integration overlapping surface, full 70 GRACE 155 surface, block diagonal degree/order LAGEOS **) constraints (pseudo observations), applied between degree 90 and 150 : Combination scheme of EIGEN-GL05Cp

OSTST Meeting, Hobart, Australia, March 12-15, 2007 GFZ/GRGS combined Gravity field solutions released during the last years Terrestrial data: Grid size for the full normal equations Satellite data: months: 10/ /2003 CHAMP 34 months: 02/ / months: 02/ / months: 02/ / days: 04/ /2003 GRACE Main differences: 30‘ x 30‘ 1° x 1° using constraints Overlapping range [deg] between satellite and terrestrial data: Max. degree of the the full normal matrix GFZ mean sea surface heightsCLS01 sea surface heightsOcean data (direct altimetry) 24 months: 02/ / months: 02/ / LAGEOS 360 x 360 preliminaryMarch 2006March 2005May 2004 released: Resolution: EIGEN-GL05CpEIGEN-GL04CEIGEN-CG03CEIGEN-CG01C

OSTST Meeting, Hobart, Australia, March 12-15, 2007 EIGEN-GL05Cp gravity anomaly Resolution: 0.5° x 0.5° [mgal]

OSTST Meeting, Hobart, Australia, March 12-15, 2007 Δζ, 0.5° x 0.5° Geoid height differences vs. a global ground data only solution EIGEN-CG03C [meter] EIGEN-GL04C [meter] EIGEN-GL05Cp [meter] Improvement of combined EIGEN-models (1) → Reduction of the meridional stripes !

OSTST Meeting, Hobart, Australia, March 12-15, 2007 EIGEN-CG03C EIGEN-GL04C [meter] EIGEN-GL05Cp → Reduction of the meridional stripes ! Improvement of combined EIGEN-models (2) Δζ, 0.5° x 0.5° Geoid height differences vs. a global ground data only solution

OSTST Meeting, Hobart, Australia, March 12-15, 2007 EIGEN-GL05Cp: Geoid Degree Amplitudes (1) yellow: EIGEN-CG01C vs. GGM02C light blue:EIGEN-CG03C vs. GGM02C brown:EIGEN-GL04C vs. GGM02C greenEIGEN-GL05Cp vs. GGM02C EGM 96

OSTST Meeting, Hobart, Australia, March 12-15, 2007 EIGEN-GL05Cp: Geoid Degree Amplitudes EIGEN-GL04C EGM96 EIGEN-GL05Cp EIGEN-CG01C vs. GGM02C EIGEN-CG03C vs. GGM02C EIGEN-GL04C vs. GGM02C EIGEN-GL05Cp vs. GGM02C

OSTST Meeting, Hobart, Australia, March 12-15, 2007 Comparison with independent ocean gravity data Latitude-weighted root mean square of geoid- and gravity anomaly differences between gravity field models and altimetry based data sets, formed on 1° x 1° grids of the compared data sets, after filtering with different filter lengths. Altimetry based data sets for comparison *) NIMA altimetric gravity anomalies over the ocean (Kenyon, Pavlis 1997) **) Geoid undulations over the oceans derived from CLS01 altimetric Sea Surface Heights (Hernandez et al., 2001) and ECCO simulated sea surface topography (Stammer et al., 2002) ° ° °CLS-ECCO **) [m] ° ° °NIMA *) [mgal] EIGEN- GL05Cp EIGEN- GL04C EIGEN- CG03C EIGEN- CG01C GGM02CEGM96 Filter- length gravity field model altimetry based data set

OSTST Meeting, Hobart, Australia, March 12-15, 2007 Status and Future plans: The current published combined model is EIGEN-GL04C. It’s coefficient set is available for download at the ICGEM* data base at GFZ Potsdam: Further improvements of the preliminary EIGEN-GL05Cp model are planned for the upcoming EIGEN-05C gravity field model: - based on EIGEN-GRACE05S (GFZ) and EIGEN-GL05S (GRGS) models -inclusion of CHAMP data - extension of the full ground data based normal equations to higher degrees (n,m=250 or more) -usage of new/updated ground data sets *ICGEM = The International Center of Global Earth Models at GFZ Potsdam is one of the six data centers of the International Gravity Field Service (IGFS) of the IAG GFZ/GRGS activities on combined gravity field models