Observation of high kinetic energy density jets in the Earth’s magnetosheath E. Amata 1, S. P. Savin 2, R. Treuman 3, G. Consolini 1, D. Ambrosino, M.F.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
On the nature of magnetosheath FTEs A.Roux, P.Robert, O.Le Contel, D.Fontaine, P.Canu (LPP) J.M. Bosqued, P. Louarn (IRAP) 1 Roux-Robert, IAGA 2013, Merida.
Advertisements

Session A Wrap Up. He Abundance J. Kasper Helium abundance variation over the solar cycle, latitude and with solar wind speed Slow solar wind appears.
Electron Acceleration in the Van Allen Radiation Belts by Fast Magnetosonic Waves Richard B. Horne 1 R. M. Thorne 2, S. A. Glauert 1, N. P. Meredith 1.
Statistical study of non-reconnection plasma jets as observed by the DOUBLE STAR spacecraft E. Amata 1, S. Savin 2, D. Ambrosino 1, L. Trenchi 1, M.F.
Grad-Shafranov reconstruction of a bipolar Bz signature in an earthward jet in the tail Hiroshi Hasegawa (2007/02/14)
Formation of the Magnetosphere 1 Solar Wind. Formation of the Magnetosphere 2 Solar Wind Bow Shock Magnetosheath.
Near-Earth Magnetotail Reconnection and Plasmoid Formation in Connection With a Substorm Onset on 27 August 2001 S. Eriksson 1, M. Oieroset 2, D. N. Baker.
Anti-parallel versus Component Reconnection at the Magnetopause K.J. Trattner Lockheed Martin Advanced Technology Center Palo Alto, CA, USA and the Polar/TIMAS,
Five Spacecraft Observations of Oppositely Directed Exhaust Jets from a Magnetic Reconnection X-line Extending > 4.3 x 10 6 km in the Solar Wind Gosling.
MP from [Maynard, 2003] -last closed field lines for the northern axis of dipole, deflected by 23 degrees anti-sunward (colored by - |B|) |B||B| B in B.
Plasma entry in the Mercury’s magnetosphere S. Massetti S. Massetti INAF-IFSI Interplanetary Space Physics Institute, Roma - Italy.
Solar wind interaction with the comet Halley and Venus
OpenGGCM Simulation vs THEMIS Observations in an Dayside Event Wenhui Li and Joachim Raeder University of New Hampshire Marit Øieroset University of California,
State Key Laboratory of Space Weather An inter-hemisphere asymmetry of the cusp region against the geomagnetic dipole tilt Jiankui Shi Center for Space.
Structure of the magnetopause at the ion gyroscale: mass and momentum transfer S. Savin (1), E. Amata (2), M. Andre (3), M. Dunlop (4), Y. Khotyaintsev.
Reinisch_ Solar Terrestrial Relations (Cravens, Physics of Solar Systems Plasmas, Cambridge U.P.) Lecture 1- Space Environment –Matter in.
In-situ Observations of Collisionless Reconnection in the Magnetosphere Tai Phan (UC Berkeley) 1.Basic signatures of reconnection 2.Topics: a.Bursty (explosive)
Location of the High-Latitude Reconnection Site on 14 February 2003 S. Eriksson 1, M. M. Kuznetsova 2, M. W. Dunlop 3, and H. Reme 4 1 LASP, University.
Solar system science using X-Rays Magnetosheath dynamics Shock – shock interactions Auroral X-ray emissions Solar X-rays Comets Other planets Not discussed.
Swedish National Graduate School of Space Technology Cluster multi-spacecraft measurements: applications on transition layer development and location of.
Plasma in the Heliosheath John Richardson M.I.T. Collaborators: J. Belcher, J. Kasper, E. Stone, C. Wang.
1 Dynamic Motion of Bow Shock and Magnetopause Observed by THEMIS Hui Zhang (BU) Q.-G. Zong (Umass Lowell) D. G. Sibeck (GSFC) T. A. Fritz (BU)
Hamrin, M., Norqvist, P., Marghitu, O., et al. Department of Physics, Umeå University, Sweden Nordic Cluster.
What DMSP Data Tell us About the Thermosphere Response to Solar Wind Forcing Delores Knipp CU Aerospace Engineering Sciences and NCAR HAO With Assistance.
MAGNETOTAIL LOBE POPULATION AS MEASURED BY INTERBALL-1 SATELLITE Koleva R. 1, Grigorenko E. 2, Sauvaud J.-A. 3 (1) Solar-Terrestrial Influences Laboratory,
Benoit Lavraud CESR/CNRS, Toulouse, France Uppsala, May 2008 The altered solar wind – magnetosphere interaction at low Mach numbers: Magnetosheath and.
The Sun and the Heliosphere: some basic concepts…
Structure and Detection of Rolled-up Kelvin-Helmholtz Vortices in the Tail Flank of the Magnetosphere H. Hasegawa, M. Fujimoto, T. K. M. Nakamura, K. Takagi.
1 Cambridge 2004 Wolfgang Baumjohann IWF/ÖAW Graz, Austria With help from: R. Nakamura, A. Runov, Y. Asano & V.A. Sergeev Magnetotail Transport and Substorms.
Space Research Institute Graz Austrian Academy of Sciences CERN, Geneve, June 2006 Helmut O. Rucker Exploring the Planets and Moons in our Solar System.
The Magnetopause Back in 1930 Chapman and Ferraro foresaw that a planetary magnetic field could provide an effective obstacle to the solar-wind plasma.
14 May JIM M. RAINES University of Michigan DANIEL J. GERSHMAN, THOMAS H. ZURBUCHEN, JAMES A. SLAVIN, HAJE KORTH, and BRIAN J. ANDERSON Magnetospheric.
Foreshock studies by MEX and VEX FAB: field-aligned beam FAB + FS: foreshock M. Yamauchi et al.
Observation of Prompt Energization to ultra relativistic energies by the March 2015 interplanetary shock Shri Kanekal, Dan Baker, Bern Blake, Sam Califf,
9 May MESSENGER First Flyby Magnetospheric Results J. A. Slavin and the MESSENGER Team BepiColombo SERENA Team Meeting Santa Fe, New Mexico 11 May.
Large-Amplitude Electric Fields Associated with Bursty Bulk Flow Braking in the Earth’s Plasma Sheet R. E. Ergun et al., JGR (2014) Speaker: Zhao Duo.
The Solar Wind.
Cold plasma: a previously hidden solar system particle population Mats André and Chris Cully Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Uppsala.
Response of the Magnetosphere and Ionosphere to Solar Wind Dynamic Pressure Pulse KYUNG SUN PARK 1, TATSUKI OGINO 2, and DAE-YOUNG LEE 3 1 School of Space.
Reconstruction of Reconnection Configurations From Spacecraft Data Bengt Sonnerup and Wai-Leong Teh Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA Hiroshi Hasegawa.
5. Walen Test analysis The Walen Test results for Cluster 3 are as expected for a reconnection event. The test over the leading edge shows a positive correlation.
Earth’s Magnetosphere NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
Cluster observations of a reconnection site at high- latitude magnetopause Y. Khotyaintsev (1), A. Vaivads (1), Y. Ogawa (1,2), M. André(1), S. Buchert(1),
1 Interplanetary Magnetic Flux Enhancements as seen by STEREO C.T. Russell, L.K. Jian and J.G. Luhmann 18 th STEREO Science Working Group April Meudon,
1 Hybrid Simulations of the Callisto - Magnetosphere Interaction Stas Barabash and Mats Holmström Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Kiruna, Sweden.
E.E. Antonova1,2, I.P. Kirpichev2,1, Yu.I. Yermolaev2
Simultaneous in-situ observations of the feature of a typical FTE by Cluster and TC1 Zhang Qinghe Liu Ruiyuan Polar Research Institute of China
Cluster and SuperDARN observations during a positive B y period D. Ambrosino, E. Amata, M.F. Marcucci, I. Coco Istituto di Fisica dello Spazio Interplanetario,
Intermittency Analysis and Spatial Dependence of Magnetic Field Disturbances in the Fast Solar Wind Sunny W. Y. Tam 1 and Ya-Hui Yang 2 1 Institute of.
Analysis of Suprathermal Events Observed by STEREO/PLASTIC with a Focus on Upstream Events STEREO SWG - 20 Meredith, NH October 27-29, 2009 Josh Barry,
17th Cluster workshop Uppsala, Sweden , May 12-15, 2009
Compressibility and scaling in the solar wind as measured by ACE spacecraft Bogdan A. Hnat Collaborators: Sandra C. Chapman and George Rowlands; University.
A shock is a discontinuity separating two different regimes in a continuous media. –Shocks form when velocities exceed the signal speed in the medium.
Magnetic reconnection in the magnetotail: Geotail observations T. Nagai Tokyo Institute of Technology World Space Environment Forum 2005 May 4, 2005 Wednesday.
SEP Event Onsets: Far Backside Solar Sources and the East-West Hemispheric Asymmetry S. W. Kahler AFRL Space Vehicles Directorate, Kirtland AFB, New Mexico,
Radio and Space Plasma Physics Group Tracking solar wind structures from the Sun through to the orbit of Mars A.O. Williams 1, N.J.T. Edberg 1,2, S.E.
MULTI-INSTRUMENT STUDY OF THE ENERGY STEP STRUCTURES OF O + AND H + IONS IN THE CUSP AND POLAR CAP REGIONS Yulia V. Bogdanova, Berndt Klecker and CIS TEAM.
SEPT/STEREO Observations of Upstream Particle Events: Almost Monoenergetic Ion Beams A. Klassen, R. Gomez-Herrero, R. Mueller-Mellin and SEPT Team, G.
R. Maggiolo 1, M. Echim 1,2, D. Fontaine 3, A. Teste 4, C. Jacquey 5 1 Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy (IASB-BIRA); 2 Institute.
Earth’s Magnetosphere Space Weather Training Kennedy Space Center Space Weather Research Center.
Observations of reflected ions downstream of shocks in the heliosphere John Richardson M.I.T. (Voyager plasma experiment) 10 – 5950 eV/q.
1. What controls the occurrence of reconnection. 2
Figure 3. The hybrid simulations results
Lecture 12 The Importance of Accurate Solar Wind Measurements
ARTEMIS – solar wind/ shocks
Cluster science at IRFU
THEMIS multi-spacecraft observations of a 3D magnetic
Effects of Dipole Tilt Angle on Geomagnetic Activities
The Bow Shock and Magnetosheath
Mars, Venus, The Moon, and Jovian/Saturnian satellites
Presentation transcript:

Observation of high kinetic energy density jets in the Earth’s magnetosheath E. Amata 1, S. P. Savin 2, R. Treuman 3, G. Consolini 1, D. Ambrosino, M.F. Marcucci 1, L. Trenchi IFSI - INAF, Rome, Italy 2. IKI, Moscow, Russia 3. ISSI, Bern, Switzerland

OUTLINE MSH flow: basic properties. The 21 March 2002 event. The 17 March 2001 event. The 26 March 2005 event. Summary.

Bow shock: - conversion of kinetic energy into thermal energy; - slowing down to sub-alfvénic and sub- magnetosonic flow. Magnetopause: keeps MSH flow away from magnetosphere. Magnetic reconnection at the magnetopause: - plasma jets, - penetration of plasma in the magnetosphere, - D-shaped distributions, - reflected distributions in the MSH. We describe here several examples of jets which are not due to magnetic reconnection at the magnetopause. W k_MSH = 0.7 W k_SW

OUTLINE MSH flow: basic properties. The 21 March 2002 event. The 17 March 2001 event. The 26 March 2005 event. Summary.

We show two periods during which jets were observed in the northern and southern MSH 17 March Cluster outbound crossing. V SW ~ 330 km/s 21 March Cluster inbound crossing. (Retinò et al., 2006) V SW ~ 470 km/s, n ~ 4 cm -3. Vectors show SW and MSH velocities. 100 km/s

We use ACE, WIND and IMP 8 as solar wind monitors. Y (R E ) X (R E ) WIND (27 March 2002) WIND (17 March 2001) IMP8 (17 March 2001) 17 March WIND: -22, -195, 7 R E IMP8: 13, 20, 13 R E 27 March WIND: 79, -15, 6 R E ACE

We use WIND as solar wind monitor. W k far exceeds the solar wind W kSW. March 27, Period already studied by Retinò et al. (2006): reconnection in the MSH at scales of 100 km. We look at larger scales. Many peaks are seen in N and V. We consider two periods: (presence of N and V peaks) (no N and V peaks)

High Kinetic energy density Plasma Jets HKPJ W k > 6.7 keV/cm -3 W k > 1.5 KeV

Between 11:00 and 11:20 UT  M ms  ~ 1. Between 09:42 and UT,  M ms  ~1.34 and  M A  ~3.8. This suggests that a super-magnetosonic population adds to that with low M ms. For W k > 6.7 keV/cm 3,  M ms  ~ 1.62 For W k > 10 keV/cm 3,  M ms  ~ HKPJ are found between and UT. ~ 28 s, i.e. ~ 6000 km. The characteristic HKPJ angular spread is ~20°-30°. The strongest HKPJ’s have W k ~ 16 keV/cm 3 and a characteristic scale ~6 s, i.e km, i.e. several proton gyroradii.

OUTLINE MSH flow: basic properties. The 21 March 2002 event. The 17 March 2001 event. The 26 March 2005 event. Summary.

ACE GSM mag. field IMP8 c c X (R E ) WIND Y (R E )

Red jet. Mainly due to high speed (dV ~ 63%, dN ~ 4 %) Direction close to MSH flow. M.sphere Green jet. Mainly due to high speed Direction closer to X axis. i.e. towards MP. B z > 0 in the MSH and in the SW. MSH and internal field locally roughly parallel. No D-shaped distributions in the m.sphere. No reflected populations in the MSH. We exclude both local and low-latitude reconnection for the blue and cyan jets. The distance between the Cluster spacecraft was ~ 600 km. Gradients are of the order of 100 km. X dimensions (cyan shadowing) are ~ km.

OUTLINE MSH flow: basic properties. The 21 March 2002 event. The 17 March 2001 event. The 26 March 2005 event. Summary.

XZ GSE XY GSE X Z Y X Cluster DS Bow Shock Cluster & DS orbital tracks between 02 and 04 UT on March 26, 2005.

ACE V z ~ -30 km/s ACE V x ~ -690 km/s DS Cluster 3

DS Cluster 3

(km/s) DS VxDS VyDS VzCl VxCl VyCl Vz Jet MSH XZ GSEXY GSE MSH/Jet flow Angle Double Star Cluster 10° 14° W k_jet ~ 3. W k_MSH ~ 1.5 W k_SW β MSH β jet M ms_MSH M ms_jet D.Star Cluster X Z X Y

OUTLINE MSH flow: basic properties. The 21 March 2002 event. The 17 March 2001 event. The 26 March 2005 event. Summary.

We identified many cases of high kinetic energy density plasma jets (HKPJ) in the MSH. To define such a jet we use the condition: W k_jet > 1.5 W k_SW Summary HKPJ’s are due to N and V increases. They are found in Interball (not shown here), Cluster and Double Star, at any distance from the BS and from the MP. The flow in HKPJ’s is on average directed between the ambient MSH flow direction and the SW flow direction. The temperature in HKPJ’s is lower than in the surrounding MSH, while W T is higher (due to N). The strongest HKPJ’s have W k ~ keV/cm 3 and scales of km, i.e. several proton gyroradii, while their peaks and gradients have scales of the order of the proton gyroradius. We always find that M ms > 1.3 and that β jet > β MSH None of the examined jets seems to be due to reconnection at the MP. Often the jets head towards the MP (in one case with a 20° angle relative to the MP normal).

Are they generated at the BS itself or in the MSH? Questions We do not know the origin of HKPJ’s. The magnetic field in the MSH is too low to account for their extra energy density. Nevertheless, what is the relation between the reconnecting thin current sheets studied by Retinò et al. (2006) and the larger scale HKPJ’s? Increase the statistics. Answer the questions. Future work

Thank you