© 2005 MCI, Inc. All Rights Reserved. PT10400. 06/08/05 Proposal for Discrete Networks and National Peering Prop-029-v001 APNIC 20 Hanoi Presented at APNIC.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Policy SIG report 29 February 2008 APNIC 25, Taipei Toshiyuki Hosaka Randy Bush Jian Zhang.
Advertisements

Operational Policies for NIRs in the APNIC Region NIR Meeting APNIC14, Kitakyushu, Japan 4 Sept 2002.
ARIN IP Address Stewardship 3 February About ARIN Regional Internet Registry (RIR) – Established December 1997 by Internet community 100% community.
A S I A P A C I F I C N E T W O R K I N F O R M A T I O N C E N T R E APNIC Open Policy Meeting Address Policy (Procedures) SIG 1 March 2001.
© 2008 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco ConfidentialPresentation_ID 1 Introduction to IPv4 Introduction to Networks.
1 Overview of policy proposals Policy SIG Wednesday 26 August 2009 Beijing, China.
1 Change in the Minimum Allocation Criteria Policy Proposal Proposed by Rajesh Chharia, President – ISPAI Presented by Kusumba S Vice President - ISPAI.
IPv6: The Future of the Internet? July 27th, 1999 Auug.
IPv6 Addressing – Status and Policy Report Paul Wilson Director General, APNIC.
RIPE Network Coordination Centre ISOC 2007/IPv6 Forum, Tel Aviv, Feb Arno Meulenkamp IP Resource Statistics & IPv6 Policy Update.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco Public 1 Addressing Fundamentals Internetworking Fundamentals Instructor: Abdirahman I. Abdi.
Update on RIPE NCC Inter- RIR Transfer proposal Adam Gosling APNIC 38 Policy SIG Meeting 18 September 2014.
APNIC 33 AMM Policy SIG Report Andy Linton, Policy SIG Chair Thursday 2 March 2012.
Final Stages of IPv4 Distribution Guangliang Pan Resource Services Manager, APNIC.
Policy Implementation and Experience Report Leslie Nobile.
Overview of policy proposals Policy SIG 27 February 2008 APNIC 25, Taipei.
ARIN Policies and Guidelines An Introduction Presented by Richard Jimmerson Director of Operations NANOG 22Scottsdale, AZ.
Policy Implementation & Experience Report Leslie Nobile Director, Registration Services.
APNIC Policy Update 1 st TWNIC IP Open Policy Meeting 3 December, 2003 Taipei, Taiwan.
Open Policy Hour Einar Bohlin, Policy Analyst. OPH Overview Draft Policy Preview Policy Experience Report Policy BoF.
POLICY EXPERIENCE REPORT Leslie Nobile. Review existing policies – Ambiguous text/Inconsistencies/Gaps/Effectiveness Identify areas where new or modified.
Introduction to The Internet ISP Workshops 1 Last updated 24 April 2013.
Skeeve Stevens APNIC 29, Kuala Lumpur Alternative criteria for subsequent IPv6 allocations Prop-083v002.
APNIC Policy Update 1 st TWNIC Open Policy Meeting 3 December, 2003 Taipei, Taiwan.
CONFIDENTIAL IPv4 Current Market Conditions and Information Matt Talarico October,
Address Policy SIG, APNIC Policy meeting, February 27th, 2003 (1) IPv6 Policy in action Feedback from other RIR communities David Kessens Chairperson RIPE.
1 APNIC allocation and policy update JPNIC OPM July 17, Tokyo, Japan Guangliang Pan.
Copyright © 2007 Japan Network Information Center Global Policy for the Allocation of the remaining IPv4 Address Space  Japan Network Information Center.
A proposal to lower the IPv4 minimum allocation size and initial criteria in the AP region prop-014-v001 Policy SIG APNIC17/APRICOT 2004 Feb
Draft Policy Transfers & Multi-National Networks Kevin Blumberg.
1 IPv6 Allocation Policy and Procedure Global IPv6 Summit in China 2007 April 13, 2007 Gerard Ross and Guangliang Pan.
Draft Policy IPv6 Subsequent Allocations Utilization Requirement.
IP Addressing and ICT Development in the Pacific Islands Anne Lord and Save Vocea, APNIC ICT Workshop, Fiji, November, 2002.
Skeeve Stevens APNIC 31, Hong Kong Alternative criteria for subsequent IPv6 allocations Prop-083v003.
IPv6. Why IPv6? Running out of IPv4 addresses Internet Assigned Numbers Authority allocated the last 5 /8 blocks on 3 Feb 2011 Internet Assigned Numbers.
Policies for ASN Management in the Asia Pacific Region – Revised Draft Address Policy SIG APNIC14, Kitakyushu, Japan 4 Sept 2002.
1 Application of the HD ratio to IPv4 [prop-020-v001] Policy SIG 1 Sept 2004 APNIC18, Nadi, Fiji.
A S I A P A C I F I C N E T W O R K I N F O R M A T I O N C E N T R E Emerging Registry Criteria ASO General Assembly Budapest, 19 May 2000.
Policy Experience Report Leslie Nobile. Review existing policies – Ambiguous text/Inconsistencies/Gaps/Effectiveness Identify areas where new or modified.
APNIC 32 AMM Policy SIG Report Andy Linton Thursday 1 September 2011.
Rework of IPv6 Assignment Criteria Draft Policy
Draft Policy IPv6 Subsequent Allocations Utilization Requirement.
1 The Internet Registry System Mirjam Kühne RIPE NCC EC-POP Brussels 5 July 1999.
IPv4 IXP Address Policy APNIC Policy SIG Meeting Taipei, August 2001 Philip Smith.
Draft Policy Merge IPv4 ISP and End-User Requirements 59.
Prop-073 Automatic allocation/assignment of IPv6 Terry Manderson Andy Linton.
1 IANA global IPv6 allocation policy [prop-005-v002] Policy SIG 1 Sept 2004 APNIC18, Nadi, Fiji.
1 Transition to IPv6: Should ISPs consider it now? PITA 11th AGM Meeting 2007 Tahiti, French Polynesia 24 April 2007.
1 IPv6 Allocation and Policy Update Global IPv6 Summit in China 2007 April 12, 2007 Guangliang Pan.
60 Draft Policy ARIN NRPM 4 (IPv4) Policy Cleanup.
Copyright (c) 2002 Japan Network Information Center Proposal for IPv6 Policy for Essential Infrastructure in the AP region Izumi Okutani IP Address Section.
Regional PDP Report Einar Bohlin, Policy Analyst.
Whois & Data Accuracy Across the RIRs. Terms ISP – An Internet Service Provider is allocated address space by an RIR for the purpose of providing connectivity.
ARIN Update John Curran President and CEO, ARIN Focus IPv4 to IPv6 Transition Awareness – Targeting ISPs and Content Providers Continued enhancements.
1 APNIC Open Address Policy Meeting Special Interest Group Session March 2nd, Korea, Seoul.
8 th Address Policy SIG Report Takashi Arano Yong Wan Ju Kenny Huang Chair/co-Chairs of APNIC Address Policy SIG.
September, 2003 Bill Woodcock Packet Clearing House
Regional Internet Registries An Overview
KRNIC Member Workshop November 2001 Seoul, Korea
Draft Policy Shared Transition Space for IPv4 Address Extension
RIPE Policy Landscape Filiz Yilmaz ESNOG, February 2008.
Requiring aggregation for IPv6 subsequent allocations
Policy SIG Wednesday 3 March 2010
IPv6 Policy and Allocation Update
Jane Zhang & Wendy Zhao Wei
Permitted Uses of space reserved under NRPM 4.10
The Current Issues in IPv6 Policy
IPv6 Policy Update ~ APNIC community ~
Removing aggregation criteria for IPv6 initial allocations
prop-081-v001: Eligibility for assignments from the final /8
Presentation transcript:

© 2005 MCI, Inc. All Rights Reserved. PT /08/05 Proposal for Discrete Networks and National Peering Prop-029-v001 APNIC 20 Hanoi Presented at APNIC 20 Presented by Uchenna N Ibekwe September 2005

© 2005 MCI, Inc. All Rights Reserved. PT /08/05 Synopsis This is a proposal to permit large ISPs to manage multiple country accounts under a single APNIC membership using the concept of discrete networks.

© 2005 MCI, Inc. All Rights Reserved. PT /08/05 - Highlights - Benefits - Criteria For Qualification - Prop-029-v001 - Fees - References - Questions Proposal for Discrete Networks and National Peering

© 2005 MCI, Inc. All Rights Reserved. PT /08/05 Highlights Based on exiting policies, APNIC accounts are defined on geographic terms (per country). Per proposal each organization, ISP or LIR would have one APNIC account with multiple discrete networks. The discrete network categories would be: 1.Country-based discrete networks; same format as the current APNIC accounts. 2.Service-based discrete networks; to include network management and other autonomous networks like remote access and MPLS-based (Private IP) networks. This category will require special approval from APNIC.

5 APNIC account structure Organizational Account Discrete Network 1 Australia Customer Network IP allocations used for assignments to small ISPs and customer accounts. Country-based allocations Discrete Network 2 Japan Customer Network IP allocations used for assignments to small ISPs and customer accounts. Country-based allocations Discrete Network 3 Management Network/Backbone Network IP allocations destined for autonomous networks Internal company use Specialized services Service-based networks The country-based accounts will retain their current names while the organizational account would have the format “Company-AP” example MCI-AP.

© 2005 MCI, Inc. All Rights Reserved. PT /08/05 Existing HD ratios and allocation policies will be enacted at the discrete network level with billing at the organizational level. The second point on this proposal recommends that APNIC allocate routable aggregate blocks of IPv6 to enable Global/Continental-regional/National peering for Large ISPs with global facilities. This policy will only apply to ISPs who qualify and will be implemented upon request. Highlights

7 Global/Continental-regional/National peering North America Latin America Africa Asia Pacific Europe/Middle- East

© 2005 MCI, Inc. All Rights Reserved. PT /08/05 - Highlights - Benefits - Criteria For Qualification - Prop-029-v001 - Fees - References - Questions Proposal for Discrete Networks and National Peering

© 2005 MCI, Inc. All Rights Reserved. PT /08/05. Management Simplification of multiple country accounts Currently large ISPs such as MCI with multiple APNIC accounts (one per country) using the concept of discrete network can simplify their procedures by combining their membership accounts under a single account, while managing each country IP allocation as separate discrete networks.

© 2005 MCI, Inc. All Rights Reserved. PT /08/05 Simplify Billing This concept will simplify the billing requirement for APNIC, hereby reducing the number of member accounts per ISP and unify the billing cycles.

© 2005 MCI, Inc. All Rights Reserved. PT /08/05 Peering Most large ISPs with International networks spanning multiple continent and regions have peering policies implemented on their network. In order to make regional peering work in IPv6, we will need to advertise a single aggregate address block per region. These Single aggregates are then announced to continental- regional peers.

© 2005 MCI, Inc. All Rights Reserved. PT /08/05 Peering (cont.) In some countries, it is required by law that we peer with other ISPs or interconnect at NAP (Network Access Point). In this case, the issue of peering is required and this can only be done using aggregated IPv6 addresses which will be based on the level of peering (It can be Global/Continental- regional/National peering).

© 2005 MCI, Inc. All Rights Reserved. PT /08/05 Realignment of Policies This proposal is realignment of APNIC policies to include the discrete networks; it only seeks to simplify current APNIC operational requirements, frameworks for management and allocation of IPv6/IPv4 addresses. This policy will be vital to integration of IPv6 into the Asia Pacific region.

© 2005 MCI, Inc. All Rights Reserved. PT /08/05 Others Legal and Regulatory Considerations (National and Regional). Will IPv6 solve all our Internet problems? Do we need support structures? Security and Routing Benefits – example RIR identifiers. Specialized Networks – example Gaming Networks. IPv6 Vs Globalization. Transition from IPv4 to IPv6. Market segments differentiations.

© 2005 MCI, Inc. All Rights Reserved. PT /08/05 - Highlights - Benefits - Criteria For Qualification - Prop-029-v001 - Fees - References - Questions Proposal for Discrete Networks and National Peering

© 2005 MCI, Inc. All Rights Reserved. PT /08/05 Criteria For Qualification The organization should be a single entity, and not a consortium of smaller independent entities. This policy applies only to organizations that have been previously granted address space by an RIR. This policy does not apply to organizations with only legacy address space. The organization must have multiple (at least two) discrete multi-homed networks.

© 2005 MCI, Inc. All Rights Reserved. PT /08/05 Criteria For Qualification The organization must have compelling criteria for creating discrete networks. Examples: 1.Regulatory restrictions for data transmission 2.Geographic distance and diversity between networks 3.Autonomous multi-homed discrete networks The organization must apply for this policy to be applied to their account. Other APNIC IP allocation policies for IPv6/IPv4 would apply to this proposal (including HD ratios).

© 2005 MCI, Inc. All Rights Reserved. PT /08/05 - Highlights - Benefits - Criteria For Qualification - Prop-029-v001 - Fees - References - Questions Proposal for Discrete Networks and National Peering

© 2005 MCI, Inc. All Rights Reserved. PT /08/05 Refer to posted Proposal, which is based on a similar policy approved ARIN. Prop-029-v001

© 2005 MCI, Inc. All Rights Reserved. PT /08/05 - Highlights - Benefits - Criteria For Qualification - Prop-029-v001 - Fees - References - Questions Proposal for Discrete Networks and National Peering

© 2005 MCI, Inc. All Rights Reserved. PT /08/05 Fees The IP addresses from all combined resources would be taken into account when assessing the membership tier for the organization upon the renewal of their membership.

© 2005 MCI, Inc. All Rights Reserved. PT /08/05 - Highlights - Benefits - Criteria For Qualification - Prop-029-v001 - Fees - References - Questions Proposal for Discrete Networks and National Peering

© 2005 MCI, Inc. All Rights Reserved. PT /08/05 References APNIC References Similar proposal withdrawn by MCI HD ratio Policy ARIN References Policy Proposal : Address Space for Multiple Discrete Networks Policy : Multiple Discrete Networks - Single Maintainer ID

© 2005 MCI, Inc. All Rights Reserved. PT /08/05 - Highlights - Benefits - Criteria For Qualification - Prop-029-v001 - Fees - References - Questions Proposal for Discrete Networks and National Peering

25 Questions ?