OWASA – UNC Water Reuse System Project: A Technical and Financial Partnership to Promote More Sustainable Water Management.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Alabama Water Resources Conference 2013
Advertisements

Facilities Management Utilities & Engineering Services Duke CHWP-2 RECLAIM WATER DU-107-PP.
1 An Integrated, Collaborative, Sustainable GREEN RESOURCES COMMUNITY January 2013 Update.
Town of Pittsboro Water & Sewer Analysis Presentation to the Town Board Monday, January 26, 2015 Town of Pittsboro - Board Presentation - January 26, 2015.
City of Farmersville, Texas Water and Wastewater Rate Study February 2011.
Understanding our Water Footprint: De-risking Operations Ed Kirk, Johns Hopkins University Jonathan Lanciani, Sustainable Water.
© 2014 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved. Catawba-Wateree Water Management Group Water Supply Planning.
Colorado Springs’ ASR Program Presented by Cortney Brand Western Water Workshop, Gunnison, CO July 28, 2005.
Efc.sog.unc.edu Financial Revenue Trends and Sustainability Jeff Hughes Director, Environmental Finance Center University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Rainwater Conservation System Town of Cary Senior Center Facility.
Energy Efficiency and Arizona’s Energy Future Jeff Schlegel Southwest Energy Efficiency Project (SWEEP) April
Reclaimed Water and Non-Potable Water at UNC-CH
1 Nassau County NY United Water Partnership The US Conference of Mayors Mayors Water Council April 30 – May 1, 2015 Rob Walker Chief Deputy County Executive,
Municipal and Industrial Conservation and Water Reuse Workgroup Elizabeth Lovsted Sr. Civil Engineer Urban Water Institute Annual Water Policy Conference.
City Of Phoenix Water Rates June 30, 2011 Denise Olson Deputy Finance Director Finance Department.
Citizens’ Academy Kathy Viehe GRU Interim General Manager April 15, 2015.
Working together. Achieving results. CPUC Recycled Water OIR (R ) Workshop 3: Recycled Water Costs/Rates Water IOU Panel General Principles January.
National Investment in Water and Waste Water Infrastructure, Funding & Pricing Mid-West Regional Authority Annual Conference 2009.
City of Savannah Water, the Lifeline of the Community.
Eric Hansen, P.E. Capital Planning Program CPUC Recycled Water Order Instituting Rulemaking (R ) San Francisco January 20, 2012 Workshop 3: Understanding.
Rate and Revenue Considerations When Starting an Energy Efficiency Program APPA’s National Conference June 13 th, 2009 Salt Lake City, Utah Mark Beauchamp,
Rule 62-40, F.A.C. – What is it? The Water Resource Implementation Rule (State Water Policy). Required by Sec , F.S. Goals, objectives and guidance.
Citizens’ Academy Kathy Viehe GRU Interim General Manager November 12, 2014.
Columbia River Water Management Program (CRWMP) Review of Year One Upper Crab Creek Planning Unit Meeting April 17, 2007.
Cottonwood Water & Sanitation DistrictSeptember 2002 Arber Indirect Potable Reuse at Cottonwood Water and Sanitation District Rick Arber, Ben Johnson Richard.
Economic challenges of wastewater treatment and use in agriculture Javier Mateo-Sagasta, FAO Pay Drechsel, IWMI.
Phoenix Convention Center Phoenix, Arizona Federal Water Efficiency Sustainability TrackWater Efficient Operations Kate McMordie Stoughton Pacific Northwest.
Western Water Issues: The Challenges of Growth NARUC Water Committee Summer Meetings July 2008, Portland, Oregon Walton Hill, United Water.
Energy, Utilities, and Telecommunication Summer Study Committee Meeting September 2, 2014 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., BCEE Commissioner IN Department of.
Demand-Side Management Models & Practices in California Innovating for Sustainable Results: Integrated Approaches for Energy, Climate, and the Environment.
City of Renton, WA Water Use Efficiency Margaret Ales PNWS – AWWA CONFERENCE MAY 1, 2008 Copyright © 2008 by R. W. Beck, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Opportunities,
Financial Impact of Drought March 5, 2008 Updated 3/17/08.
Energizing Utilities to Embrace Demand Energizing Utilities to Embrace Demand Management South Florida Water Management District Water Summit December.
Direct Nonpotable Water Reuse Feasibility Study Public Meeting October 2011.
Infrastructure management system Managers and engineers need clear guidelines for life-cycle management of infrastructure systems for water, sewer, and.
SOUTH METRO WATER SUPPLY STUDY DECEMBER 2003 Stretching our Water Supplies South Metro Denver Area Gunnison Water Conference July 28, 2004.
Investment in Water Infrastructure California Water Association.
Economic challenges of wastewater treatment and use in agriculture Javier Mateo-Sagasta, FAO Pay Drechsel, IWMI.
Investing In Our Future. Statement from Mayor Tom Murphy “The Gillette Regional Water Supply Project is essential for quality of life and economic development.
Financial management challenges faced by southeastern U.S. water utilities Shadi Eskaf Senior Project Director Environmental Finance Center.
Texas Innovation Water 2010 Seawater Desalination What is the benefit to the State from implementing the Brownsville Seawater Demonstration Project?
Maximizing Water Supply Sustainability for the Goleta Valley Ryan Drake Water Supply and Conservation Manager 2015 Central Coast Sustainability Summit.
November 17, 2015 Charting the Future of Water Reuse for the City of Raleigh Sheryl D. Smith, P.E. – CDM Smith Eileen M. Navarrete, P.E., PMP – City of.
Road Map to the Future: The Consolidation of Sewer Infrastructure in Rutherford County, NC November 16 th, 2015.
Conservation Cal Water’s Approach with the California Public Utilities Commission Darin Duncan, Bear Gulch District Manager Low-Income Oversight Board.
EXPANSION OF BRUNSWICK COUNTY’S NORTHWEST WATER TREATMENT PLANT Public Utilities.
3 Councillors Greater Taree 3 Councillors Great Lakes MidCoast Water General Manager Design And Construction Strategic Planning OperationsCorporate.
Getting the Price Right: Seven Not-So-Easy Steps to Water Pricing Happiness Jeff Hughes Environmental Finance Center University of.
Water System Master Plan & Rate Study City of DeKalb, Illinois City Council Presentation May 16, 2015.
Hernando County’s Utilities Infrastructure Opportunity through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (the Federal Stimulus Package)
1 Your Utility Services: The Bottom Line Facilities Managers Meeting November 5, 2015.
Broomfield Comprehensive Plan 2016 Update Utility Work Group Report Utility Work Group: − Bob Pearson, Coordinator − Beth Willman, Recorder − Hal Lunka.
Water Utility General Overview Revenues Overall Revenue Increase 2.6% Expenditures. Overall Expenditure decrease of 1.3% Reservoirs Supplies 203.6% Hydrant.
What are they and how are they calculated? May 2015.
Operating Efficiencies Costs to operate and maintain the water and sewer system have not varied significantly during the first 5 years of operation.
Climate Change Threat Drought 1. Potential Impacts from Drought How might our community be impacted by drought? 2.
Emirates Central Cooling Systems Corporation Presented by: Samer khoudeir Chief Sales & Marketing Officer.
Broward County Water Advisory Board Technical Advisory Committee December 19,2014 Barbara Powell, EPCRD, Broward County.
Miami-Dade Water & Sewer Department Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department |  1   Reuse, Every Drop Has Value Seminar FPL JPA.
Current Water Rates $26.66 per month readiness to serve fee (billed on a quarterly basis at $80.00) 5.14 per 1,000 gallons of water used The City of Flushing.
NC AWWA-WEA 97th Annual Conference
Department of Water Management Water Supply Update
Recycled Water Project – Sharon Heights GCC
City of Sisters, OR 2017 Water & Sewer Rate Study
Finance and Governance Infrastructure Challenges in North Carolina
Orange Water and Sewer Authority February 24, 2000
NRCS Agricultural Water Management Activities in the Southeast US
City of Sunrise Wastewater Reuse Program
Water Supply Planning for the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area
EAST MESABI JOINT WATER SYSTEM A JOINT VENTURE BETWEEN THE east range communities REQUEST A $6 million request for State Funding in 2019 to build a comprehensive.
Presentation transcript:

OWASA – UNC Water Reuse System Project: A Technical and Financial Partnership to Promote More Sustainable Water Management

About OWASA…  Serve ~80,000 people, 20,000 accounts  ~ 9 mgd average-day demand (UNC ~ 2.4 mgd) (UNC ~ 2.4 mgd)  3.4 billion gallon reservoir system  ~11.5 mgd safe yield  20 mgd WTP  14.5 mgd WWTP

Mason Farm WWTP Jones Ferry Road WTP

 OWASA was created in 1977  Water and sewer utilities were previously owned & operated by Carrboro, Chapel Hill and UNC  Contractually obligated to meet the water/sewer needs of the Towns and University as determined by the Towns and University

2002 Drought Was Call for Action  Board-adopted goals for sustain- ability, environmental responsibility, and water conservation and reuse  OWASA’s water conservation program is part of our long-term supply plan – not simply short-term drought response management  Water reuse a very key strategy

Demands Have Been Stable

UNC’s Peak Demand Ratios are Higher Than Our System- wide Peaking Ratios

Is Water Reuse Feasible? Initially Evaluated in 1995 – Not Pursued Initially Evaluated in 1995 – Not Pursued 2002 Drought Led to Joint Re-evaluation 2002 Drought Led to Joint Re-evaluation Study Study Technical, economic, and environmental feasibility analysis Technical, economic, and environmental feasibility analysis Pilot-scale testing Pilot-scale testing Microbiological study Microbiological study Mason Farm WWTP upgrade underway Mason Farm WWTP upgrade underway UNC main campus expansion underway UNC main campus expansion underway

OWASA-UNC Reuse Project Feasible for use in cooling towers Feasible for use in cooling towers Feasible for irrigation use, toilet flushing Feasible for irrigation use, toilet flushing Other uses may also be possible Other uses may also be possible South Chiller Cooling Tower Cogeneration Plant Cooling Tower

Potential Reuse Demands* vs. Projected Potable Water Demands *Demands shown are for cooling tower make-up water and irrigation uses, only. Potential demands may be higher if other uses are met through reuse. Water reuse may also be a strategy for meeting Carolina North water needs, but that potential is not reflected in the above table. ReclaimedPotableTotalReclaimed Water Demandas % of (mgd) Total % %

General Layout of the Planned Water Reuse System

Peak Day Demands – No Reuse

Reuse Defers WTP Expansion

Reduction in Water Revenue Year 1 Year 1 660,000 gpd loss in potable sales 660,000 gpd loss in potable sales > $1,000,000 revenue reduction in Year 1 > $1,000,000 revenue reduction in Year 1 Direct costs only reduced by $380,000 Direct costs only reduced by $380,000 (Less energy and chemicals for potable water) ~ 3.6% increase in water rate needed to balance water revenues ~ 3.6% increase in water rate needed to balance water revenues Projected RCW rate $2.40/1,000 Projected RCW rate $2.40/1,000 > $466,000 direct/indirect O&M costs > $466,000 direct/indirect O&M costs

Deferred Capital Costs Could defer 5 capital projects for several years through reuse/conservation Could defer 5 capital projects for several years through reuse/conservation Net Present Savings of project deferrals > $3,000,000 in next 9 years Net Present Savings of project deferrals > $3,000,000 in next 9 years Potential deferral/elimination of > $40 million to go to Jordan Lake Potential deferral/elimination of > $40 million to go to Jordan Lake

OWASA-UNC Reuse Project Sustainable management strategy Sustainable management strategy Save drinking water for human use Save drinking water for human use Reduce community’s risk to droughts Reduce community’s risk to droughts Reuse supply less vulnerable to drought Reuse supply less vulnerable to drought Locally controlled source Locally controlled source Reduce discharge of nutrients Reduce discharge of nutrients Reuse is cost-effective, safe and reliable approach for meeting multiple objectives

UNC > $10,000,000 for Phase I > $10,000,000 for Phase I $1.866 million CWMTF grant $1.866 million CWMTF grant $0.625 million EPA grant $0.625 million EPA grant Payback < 10 years Payback < 10 years UNC pays $5.85/1,000 gallons for all potable water use during May-Sept. and $3.08/1,000 gallons in all other months UNC pays $5.85/1,000 gallons for all potable water use during May-Sept. and $3.08/1,000 gallons in all other months

OWASA Positions… Water customers cover revenue loss Water customers cover revenue loss No subsidy of RCW capital or O&M by customers No subsidy of RCW capital or O&M by customers No reimbursement to UNC No reimbursement to UNC OWASA owns and operates system OWASA owns and operates system If RCW is down, UNC to pay for potable water at then-current water rate If RCW is down, UNC to pay for potable water at then-current water rate

OWASA-UNC Reuse Project OWASA-UNC reuse contract: April, 2006 OWASA-UNC reuse contract: April, 2006 UNC to pay full cost (less grants) UNC to pay full cost (less grants) Construction now underway Construction now underway Pump station/storage tank at WWTP Pump station/storage tank at WWTP 8,000 ft. of 24-inch main to south campus 8,000 ft. of 24-inch main to south campus Phase I: 7,000 ft. of pipe on main campus Phase I: 7,000 ft. of pipe on main campus Projected Start-up: March 2009 Projected Start-up: March 2009

Is Reuse in Your Future? Rates Rates Non-potable demands (current/future) Non-potable demands (current/future) Proximity of demands Proximity of demands WWTP capability WWTP capability Supplemental funding Supplemental funding Full cost recovery may not be possible Full cost recovery may not be possible Incentives for reuse may be needed Incentives for reuse may be needed

Thank You If you would like more information about the OWASA-UNC reuse project or OWASA’s conservation efforts, please contact: Patrick (Pat) Davis Utility Manager OWASA P.O. Box 366 Carrboro, NC Telephone: (Direct) OWASA Website:

Increasing Block Rates for Residential Customers

Financial Goals Full-Cost Recovery Full-Cost Recovery National survey (1) National survey (1) 34% of systems have performed a cost of service analysis 34% of systems have performed a cost of service analysis Only about 14% of reclaimed water systems in US are fully recovering their RW system costs Only about 14% of reclaimed water systems in US are fully recovering their RW system costs (1) AWWA/WEF Water Reuse Rate Survey presented by Ken Thompson at 2004 Water Sources Conference, January 2004

Monthly Water Use by Residential Customers