Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Hall C Commissioning: The Past (1996) First Exp: “by consensus” What Hampton Univ. wanted What ANL wanted.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Dept. Of Energy 1 Spin Dance.
Advertisements

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Dept. Of Energy 1 Spin Dance.
Hall A Status Hall A Collaboration Meeting June 9, 2011 Robert Michaels Acting Hall A Leader Recent Activity Publications (please write archival papers.
Copyright © AEA — Association of Enterprise Architects 2013 AEA Workgroup Procedures Version of 31 October 2013.
Fermilab E906 Schedule Paul E. Reimer 20 June 2008.
DVCS collaboration meeting, December 15-16, 2008, 1 Operated by the Jefferson Science Associates for the U.S. Department Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National.
EPAC June 2003 The EPAC June 2003 Questions 1. Clarify the Motivation for the Proposal. 2. How to ensure the e+ polarimeter works right away? 3. What is.
1 CS 425 / CS 625 Software Engineering Fall 2007 Course Syllabus August 27, 2007.
IS 421 Information Systems Management James Nowotarski 16 September 2002.
1 Hall A Update Thia Keppel APEX Collaboration Meeting April 2015.
SHMS Detector Commissioning and Installation Howard Fenker Hall-C Users Meeting Jan-2015.
Tevatron BPM Upgrade Project Manager Overview Stephen Wolbers Tev BPM Technology Choice Review December 16, 2003.
Jefferson Lab Programs Joint and bridge Faculty appointments Summer programs K-12 programs Impact.
Jefferson Lab Status Hall A collaboration Dec. 16, 2013 R. D. McKeown Deputy Director For Science.
SLO Workshop #2. Overview Objectives for today: You will be able to..  Recognize well written components of an SLO  Practice the process of analyzing.
GlueX Collaboration Meeting February 2011 Jefferson Lab Our 30’th Collaboration Meeting.
Status of Hall C 6 GeV Analysis Software Robust Fortran/CERNLIB code, “ENGINE”, for analysis of HMS/SOS coincidence and single arm experiments that has.
Research at Jefferson Lab – K. A. Aniol, M.B. Epstein, D.J. Margaziotis What ? 1)Investigate the structure of nucleons and nuclei. 2)Determine at what.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Secretary of Technology Page 1 Jefferson Lab Overview Deb Magaldi Public Affairs
Proton Recoil Polarization in the 4 He(e,e’p) 3 H, 2 H(e,e’p)n, and 1 H(e,e’p) Reactions SHMS Commissioning Session, Hall C Workshop. August 20, 2011.
Research at Jefferson Lab – K. A. Aniol, M.B. Epstein, D.J. Margaziotis What ? 1)Investigate the structure of nucleons and nuclei. 2)Determine at what.
SHMS-HMS User’s Group Progress Report at Hall C User’s Winter Workshop January 30, 2009.
Status of Hall C 6 GeV Analysis Software Robust Fortran/CERNLIB code, “ENGINE”, for analysis of HMS/SOS coincidence and single arm experiments that has.
Your Final Project Write an application: Language of your choosing Occupies rest of semester Individual project May NOT be: a work-for-hire for another.
AM Software Review. Hall C after 12 GeV Upgrade Beam Energy: 2 – 11 GeV/c Super High Momentum Spectrometer (SHMS) –Horizontal Bender, 3 Quads, Dipole.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 IPR October 18-20, 2011 John J. LeRose Independent Project Review of 12 GeV Upgrade Jefferson Lab.
Hall A Collaboration, June 10, 2010, 1 Operated by the Jefferson Science Associates for the U.S. Department Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator.
Thia Keppel 9/24/12. Accelerator schedule excerpts (Arne Freyberger) Accelerator Run II: Beam in hall 3/2014, or maybe as early as 1/2014 (?) > 1.1 GeV/pass,
Jefferson Lab Update R. D. McKeown Jefferson Lab HPS Meeting June 16, 2014.
Fall 2011 Course Syllabus Instructor: Sergiu Dascalu Department of Computer Science and Engineering August 30,
ECE445: The Design Review Sept 2, Documentation Roadmap Request for Approval Proposal Design Review Final Paper &Presentation Sept 10Sept 16Sept.
LIGO-G M Organization and Budget Gary Sanders NSF Operations Review Caltech, February 26, 2001.
10/25/2007GlueX Collaboration Meeting1 October 25-27, 2007 Jefferson Lab This is approximately our 20’th such meeting.
Vina Punjabi Norfolk State University Hall A Collaboration Meeting June 10-11, 2010 GEp-V Experiment to Measure G Ep /G Mp.
MOLLER Collaboration Meeting May 2014 Hall A Update Thia Keppel 1.
SOLID: View from Hall A Robert Michaels, Acting Hall A Leader Issues to Discuss Schedule of Experiments Procedures to Decide Schedules Budget and Manpower.
Transverse Momentum Dependence of Semi-Inclusive Pion and Kaon Production E : Spokespersons Peter Bosted, Rolf Ent, Hamlet Mkrtchyan 25.5 days.
Jefferson Lab Overview Bob McKeown April 20, 2015.
Interviewing for Information by Dr. Steven Del Chiaro Presented to San Jose State University Opportunities in Psychology Spring, 2008.
Tips on Project Management Fall 2009 Updated Spring 2012 Presented by: Dr. Bun Yue Chair, Division of Computing and Mathematics Spring 2012 University.
Hall A Installation Review John J. LeRose 2/25/2009.
HPS Experiment Overview John Jaros HPS Collaboration Meeting at JLAB October 26, 2015.
Experiment Readiness Review P. Rossi – Hall C Coll. Meeting Jan 21, 2016.
1 Melynda Brooks, “Understanding the Origin of the Nucleon Spin” Understanding the Origin of the Nucleon Spin Andi Klein, P-23, Melynda Brooks P-25, Pat.
Status of Hall C 6 GeV Analysis Software Robust Fortran/CERNLIB code, “ENGINE”, for analysis of HMS/SOS coincidence and single arm experiments that has.
SHMS User Group Issues General Discussion at Hall C User’s Summer Workshop August 5, 2008.
Fiducial Cuts for the CLAS E5 Data Set K. Greenholt (G.P. Gilfoyle) Department of Physics University of Richmond, Virginia INTRODUCTION The purpose of.
Workshop summary Outline  Workshop’s aims  Highlights from the presentations (my selection!)  Costing Exercise – What we learnt  Summary - Roadmap.
1. Baseline – from LMC  Presentation by F. Bordry at LHC Machine Committee 5.10 on LS1 Organisation: 1. Linac4 is not going to be connected.
Communication Tools Used For Commissioning the 12 GeV CEBAF Accelerator Brian Freeman WAO (Mainz, Germany) October 2014.
Status of Polarimeters and Polarized Targets: what are the plans for development of polarized targets to meet the needs of the Day 1 and future experimental.
Electronics for GEM R&D at the University of Virginia
GlueX Collaboration Meeting
Jefferson Lab Overview
TDAQ Phase-II kick-off CERN background information
Tips on Project Management Fall 2009
Preparations for a Lehman Review
G0 Accelerator Planning Meeting (11/1/05)
Operations Department
Operations Department
View from Lab Management HPS Collaboration Meeting
Schedule Rolf Ent HPS Meeting, May 22, 2018.
S. Stepanyan (JLAB) HPS collaboration meeting May 3 – 5, 2017 JLAB
Gep/SANE this week – quick overview
NSS Instrument Project Tollgate Coordinator
Early running planning process
StayTreat Wrap Up OPS 2015 StayTreat.
SOLID Collaboration Meeting
PAC47 Charge Robert McKeown PAC47 July 29, 2019.
SWE 632 User Interface Design and Development
Presentation transcript:

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Hall C Commissioning: The Past (1996) First Exp: “by consensus” What Hampton Univ. wanted What ANL wanted

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Hall C 12 GeV Commissioning: Future Lab management will be increasingly discussing 12 GeV startup plans over the next year. The PAC will likely be asked to review startup/commissioning plans at the next summer PAC. (August 2012). Hall C needs to develop a tentative / working plan for the first two years of operations. It would be good to select as early experiments those that can be analyzed relatively quickly so that a "payoff" of the upgrade can be seen. The purpose of today's discussion is information gathering and to share and hear opinions about what should run early. See if some kind of “consensus” or broad support for any particular experiment ordering. There are already at least 5-6 years of experiments approved. Users should be realistic and understand that some experiments will run towards the end of the decade. Steve has asked Arne for a rough estimate of how much beam Hall C could get in the first couple of years. Will show this draft next.

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility “12 GeV” Schedule: “Speculative and Conservative” Disclaimer: “T his is all still very speculative and conservative, but the first beam to Hall C will be in the Fall of 2014 for beam transport and detector test. (Oct 2014 to Dec 2014). This will be followed by an engineering run in B & C the Fall of 2015, Oct to Dec. I haven't had a chance to work on this schedule, the one thing I need to increase the multiplicity earlier, this might allow for more beam to C or B, right now I more or toggle between A&D (which come on line first, and run during the spring) and B&C (which run in the Fall).” Arne Freyberger 8/17/11

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility 12 GeV Hall C Experiments All experiments listed shown are approved, but four have not been graded, so they have not actually been awarded time. But the times they had requested are included and what the PAC awards next week are likely to be similar. The yellow rows are those experiments that require something non-standard. (Polarized He3, Polarimeter, GeN.)

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Hall C 12 GeV Commissioning Please limit your presentations to ~10 minutes (including questions) so that there is time for discussion after the presentations. We hope people will follow the format suggested in the earlier . To Review: 1.Present an overview of the experiment. As we have a PAC that assigns grades, don't try to sell the importance of the physics. But do point out if the physics result is a prerequisite to other Jlab experiments that may run early in the 12 GeV era. Clearly indicate if the experiment should be considered as a possible: "commissioning” experiment (first two), or "early" experiment (roughly first five, including the two commissioning). 2.Note the contributions that your experiment's collaboration is making toward the construction/commissioning of the SHMS and the restart of Hall C.

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Hall C 12 GeV Commissioning 3. Because of the additional manpower and expertise likely needed for for commissioning experiments, discuss your collaboration's openness to inviting additional hall users and staff to participate in the experiment. 4.Discuss the collaboration's readiness (manpower, hardware, software, commitment to a tight schedule, past experience/track record,...) to run the experiment early. 5. Discuss the features of your experiment that make it conducive to running with a new not yet well understood spectrometer and new accelerator. Conversely, list special unusual/difficult requirements, such as unusual target demands, tight resolution and efficiency requirements, tight tolerances on absolute quantities such as beam energy, angles, momenta, etc. 6.Describe the benefits to Hall C and subsequent experiments from running your experiment early. 7. Summarize, discussing the pros and cons of running your experiment early.